obdc-20251231

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

________________________________________________________________________________________________

FORM 10-K

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from_______to

Commission File Number: 814-01219

________________________________________________________________________________________________

BLUE OWL CAPITAL CORPORATION II

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

________________________________________________________________________________________________


Maryland			47-5416332
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

399 Park Avenue New York, New York			10022
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 419-3000

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share.

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

☐

Accelerated filer

☐

Non-accelerated filer

☒

Smaller reporting company

☐

Emerging growth company

☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO ☒

The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2025, has not been provided because there is no established market for the registrant’s shares of common stock.

As of February 26, 2026, the registrant had 115,645,934 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.

Table of Contents


		Page
PART I.
Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	30
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	69
Item 1C.	Cybersecurity	69
Item 2.	Properties	70
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	70
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	70

PART II.
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	71
Item 6.	Reserved	75
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	75
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	104
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	F-1
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	123
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	123
Item 9B.	Other Information	123
Item 9C.	Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections	123

PART III.
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	124
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	137
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters	138
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	139
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	141

PART IV.
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	143
Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	144
Signatures		145

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors and undue reliance should not be placed thereon. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about Blue Owl Capital Corporation II (the “Company,” “we” or “our”), our current and prospective portfolio investments, our industry, our beliefs and opinions, and our assumptions. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “may,” “continue,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “targets,” “projects,” “outlook,” “potential,” “predicts” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements, including without limitation:

•an economic downturn could impair our portfolio companies’ ability to continue to operate, which could lead to the loss of some or all of our investments in such portfolio companies;

•an economic downturn could disproportionately impact the companies that we intend to target for investment, potentially causing us to experience a decrease in investment opportunities and diminished demand for capital from these companies;

•the impact of elevated inflation rates, fluctuating interest rates, ongoing supply chain and labor market disruptions, including those as a result of strikes, work stoppages or accidents, instability in the U.S. and international banking systems, changes in law or regulation, including the impact of tariff enactment and tax reductions, trade disputes with other countries, and the risk of recession or future government shutdowns could impact our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies;

•an economic downturn could also impact availability and pricing of our financing and our ability to access the debt and equity capital markets;

•a contraction of available credit and/or an inability to access the equity markets could impair our lending and investment activities;

•changes in base interest rates and significant market volatility on our business and our portfolio companies (including our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies including the ability to achieve our and their business objectives), our industry and the global economy including as a result of ongoing supply chain disruptions;

•interest rate volatility could adversely affect our results, particularly because we use leverage as part of our investment strategy;

•currency fluctuations could adversely affect the results of our investments in foreign companies, particularly to the extent that we receive payments denominated in foreign currency rather than U.S. dollars;

•our future operating results;

•our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;

•the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;

•competition with other entities and our affiliates for investment opportunities;

•risks related to the uncertainty of the value of our portfolio investments, particularly those having no liquid trading market;

•the use of borrowed money to finance a portion of our investments as well as any estimates regarding potential use of leverage;

•the adequacy of our financing sources and working capital;

•the loss of key personnel;

•the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies;

•the ability of Blue Owl Credit Advisors LLC (“the Adviser” or “our Adviser”) to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and administer our investments;

•the ability of the Adviser to attract and retain highly talented professionals;

•our ability to qualify for and maintain our tax treatment as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”);

•the impact that environmental, social and governance matters could have on our brand and reputation and our portfolio companies;

•the effect of legal, tax and regulatory changes on our business and our portfolio companies;

•the impact of information technology system failures, data security breaches, data privacy compliance, network disruptions, and cybersecurity attacks, and the increasing use of artificial intelligence and machine learning technology;

•the impact of geo-political conditions, including revolution, insurgency, terrorism or war, including those arising out of the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, continued political unrest in various countries such as Venezuela, as well as political and social unrest in the Middle East and North Africa regions, uncertainty with respect to immigration, and general uncertainty surrounding the financial and political stability of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and China, on financial market volatility, global economic markets, and various markets for commodities globally such as oil and natural gas; and

•other risks, uncertainties and other factors previously identified in the reports and other documents we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this report should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These forward-looking statements apply only as of the date of this report. Moreover, we assume no duty and do not undertake to update the forward-looking statements. Because we are an investment company, the forward-looking statements and projections contained in this report are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Our Company

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II was formed on October 15, 2015, as a corporation under the laws of the State of Maryland. Our investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns. Our investment strategy focuses on primarily originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle-market companies. Within this space, we predominantly focus on investing in institutionally-backed, upper middle-market businesses, which we categorize as those generating greater than $50 million of EBITDA annually. We invest in senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, equity and equity-related securities including warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity, which may or may not be convertible into a portfolio company’s common equity. We may hold our investments directly or through special purpose vehicles.

Since our Adviser and its affiliates began investment activities in April 2016 through December 31, 2025, our Adviser and its affiliates have originated $187.0 billion aggregate principal amount of investments, of which $182.9 billion of aggregate principal amount of investments prior to any subsequent exits or repayments, was retained by either us or a corporation or fund advised by our Adviser or its affiliates. We seek to participate in transactions sponsored by what we believe to be high-quality private equity and venture capital firms capable of providing both operational and financial resources. We seek to generate current income primarily in U.S. middle-market companies, both sponsored and non-sponsored, through direct originations of senior secured loans or originations of unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, investments in equity and equity-related securities including warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity. We may hold our investments directly or through specialty financing portfolio companies and joint ventures. Except for our specialty financing company investments, our equity investments are typically not control-oriented investments and we may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder.

In general, we define “middle-market companies” to mean companies with earnings before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) between $25 million and $500 million annually, and/or annual revenue of $125 million to $5 billion. We may on occasion invest in smaller or larger companies if an attractive opportunity presents itself, especially when there are dislocations in the capital markets, including the high yield and large syndicated loan markets. Our target credit investments will typically have maturities between three and ten years and generally range in size between $20 million and $500 million. The investment size will vary with the size of our capital base. As of December 31, 2025, excluding certain investments that fall outside of our typical borrower profile, our portfolio companies representing 95.0% of our total debt portfolio based on fair value, had weighted average annual revenue of $921 million and weighted average annual EBITDA of $201 million.

While we believe that current market conditions favor extending credit to middle-market companies in the United States, our investment strategy is intended to generate favorable returns across credit cycles with an emphasis on preserving capital. As of December 31, 2025, based on fair value, our portfolio consisted of 77.4% first lien senior secured debt investments (of which 48.0% we consider to be unitranche debt investments (including “last-out” portions of such loans)), 8.3% second-lien senior secured debt investments, 2.5% unsecured investments, 0.5% specialty finance debt investments, 4.3% preferred equity investments, 5.1% common equity investments, 1.9% specialty finance equity investments and less than 1% joint venture investments. As of December 31, 2025, 97.0% of our debt investments based on fair value are floating rate in nature and subject to interest rate floors. As of December 31, 2025, we had investments in 183 portfolio companies, with an average investment size in each of our portfolio companies of approximately $8.6 million based on fair value.

As of December 31, 2025, our portfolio was invested across 30 different industries. The largest industry in our portfolio as of December 31, 2025, was internet software and services, which represented 10.9% of our total portfolio, based on fair value.

Subsequent to year-end, on February 18, 2026, we entered into loan sale agreements with four institutional investors to sell a portion of our portfolio company investments having aggregate total debt commitments of $600.0 million at a price of 99.8% of par value as part of a $1.4 billion transaction. See “Recent Developments — Asset Sale.” Using the proceeds from these asset sales, on March 5, 2026, our Board declared a special cash return of capital distribution to all of our shareholders of $2.50 per share, representing 30% of our NAV as of December 31, 2025, payable on or before March 31, 2026 to shareholders of record as of March 24, 2026. Subject to the approval of our Board, we also intend to prioritize additional return of capital distributions to our shareholders on a quarterly basis and expect to fund these quarterly returns of capital with repayments, earnings, proceeds from the sale of assets or strategic transactions. Based on our visibility of repayments in the short-term and long term repayment expectations (generally 6-8% historically), we anticipate that we may return 5% or more of our capital to shareholders each quarter which, inclusive of the return of capital from the asset sale, is expected to result in the return of 50% or more of our capital to shareholders in 2026. We also expect, subject to the approval of our Board, to continue to make monthly cash dividends to our shareholders from the Company’s net investment income.

contain the same number of portfolio companies at 183 across 30 industries with over 80% in senior secured loans, an average position size of 0.5% and 2.2% of the portfolio on non-accrual at fair value. Other key metrics will remain largely unchanged including: weighted average EBITDA of approximately $200mm, interest coverage at 1.9x, as well as weighted average spread and maturities. We believe this consistency reflects our disciplined portfolio construction, which has underpinned our strong net annualized total return since inception. We also maintain a strong liquidity position, with approximately $447.0 million in cash and undrawn debt capacity, and a conservative leverage profile, with net debt-to-equity of 0.52x pro forma for these asset sales.

We are an externally managed, closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. We have elected to be treated, and intend to qualify annually, as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a BDC and a RIC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. As a BDC, at least 70% of our assets must be assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, as described herein. We will not invest more than 30% of our total assets in companies whose principal place of business is outside the United States. See “— Regulation as a Business Development Company” and “— Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

We previously offered up to 424,000,000 shares of our common stock in a continuous public offering and a follow-on continuous public offering which was terminated on April 30, 2021. Through the termination of our continuous public offering, we issued 151,364,239 shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $1.39 billion, including seed capital contributed by our Adviser in September 2016 and approximately $10.0 million in gross proceeds raised in the private placement from certain individuals and entities affiliated with our Adviser.

We generally intend to distribute, out of assets legally available for distribution, substantially all of our available earnings, on a monthly basis, as determined by our board of directors (the “Board”) in its sole discretion.

Certain consolidated subsidiaries of ours are subject to U.S. federal and state corporate-level income taxes.

We are advised by the Adviser pursuant to an investment advisory agreement. The Adviser is an indirect affiliate of Blue Owl Capital Inc. (“Blue Owl”) (NYSE: OWL) and part of Blue Owl’s Credit platform, which includes several strategies including direct lending, alternative credit, investment grade credit, liquid credit and other adjacent investment strategies. To achieve our investment objective, we leverage Blue Owl’s relationships with other sophisticated institutions to source, evaluate and, as appropriate, partner with on transactions. There are no assurances that we will achieve our investment objective. The Adviser is responsible for sourcing potential investments, conducting due diligence on prospective investments, analyzing investment opportunities, structuring investments and monitoring our portfolio on an ongoing basis.

We may borrow money from time to time if immediately after such borrowing, the ratio of our total assets (less total liabilities other than indebtedness represented by senior securities) to our total indebtedness represented by senior securities plus preferred stock, if any, is at least 200% (or 150% if certain conditions are met). This means that generally, we can borrow up to $1 for every $1 of investor equity (or, if certain conditions are met, we can borrow up to $2 for every $1 of investor equity). We currently have in place a senior secured revolving credit facility and one special purpose vehicle asset credit facility, and in the future may enter into additional credit facilities. In addition, we have issued unsecured notes and in the future may issue additional unsecured notes. In addition from time to time, we may enter into term debt securitization transactions, also known as collateralized loan obligation transactions. We expect to use our credit facilities and other borrowings, along with proceeds from the rotation of our portfolio, to finance our investment objectives. See “— Regulation as a Business Development Company” for discussion of BDC regulation and other regulatory considerations. See “ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Debt.”

The Adviser and Administrator – Blue Owl Credit Advisors LLC

Blue Owl Credit Advisors LLC serves as our investment adviser pursuant to an amended and restated investment advisory agreement between us and the Adviser (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) . See “Investment Advisory Agreement” below. The Adviser also serves as our Administrator pursuant to an amended and restated administration agreement between us and the Adviser (the “Administration Agreement”). See “Administration Agreement” below.

The Adviser is a Delaware limited liability company that is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). The Adviser is an indirect affiliate of Blue Owl which consists of three investment platforms: (1) Credit, which includes several strategies, including direct lending, alternative credit, investment grade credit, liquid credit and other adjacent investment strategies, (2) GP Strategic Capital, which primarily focuses on acquiring equity stakes in or providing debt financing to large, multi-product private equity and private credit firms, and (3) Real Assets, which primarily focuses on the strategies of net lease real estate, real estate credit and digital infrastructure which focuses on acquiring, financing, developing and operating data centers and related digital infrastructure assets. The Adviser is part of the direct lending strategy of Blue Owl’s Credit platform which focuses on lending to primarily upper-middle-market companies, both private equity-sponsored and non-sponsored and provides a range of customized financing solutions across debt and equity-related instruments. In addition to the Adviser, Blue Owl’s Credit platform’s direct lending strategy is comprised of Blue Owl Diversified Credit Advisors LLC (“ODCA”), Blue Owl Technology Credit Advisors LLC (“OTCA”), Blue Owl Technology Credit Advisors II LLC (“OTCA II”), and Blue Owl

Credit Private Fund Advisors LLC (“OPFA” and together with the Adviser, ODCA, OTCA, and OTCA II, the “Blue Owl Credit Advisers”), which are also registered investment advisers.

Blue Owl’s Credit platform is led by its three co-founders, Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz and Craig W. Packer. The Adviser’s investment team (the “Investment Team”) is also led by Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz and Craig W. Packer and is supported by certain members of the Adviser’s senior executive team and Blue Owl’s Credit platform’s direct lending investment committees. Blue Owl’s four direct lending investment committees focus on a specific investment strategy (Diversified Lending, Technology Lending, First Lien Lending and Opportunistic Lending). Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz, Craig W. Packer and Alexis Maged sit on each of Blue Owl’s direct lending investment committees. In addition to Messrs. Ostrover, Lipschultz, Packer and Maged, the Diversified Lending Investment Committee is comprised of Matthias Ederer, Patrick Linnemann, Meenal Mehta and Logan Nicholson. We consider the individuals on the Diversified Lending Investment Committee to be our portfolio managers. The Investment Team, under the Diversified Lending Investment Committee’s supervision, sources investment opportunities, conducts research, performs due diligence on potential investments, structures the Company’s investments and monitors the Company’s portfolio companies on an ongoing basis. Subject to the overall supervision of the Board, the Adviser manages our day-to-day operations, and provides investment advisory and management services to us.

As of December 31, 2025, the Blue Owl Credit Advisers managed $157.8 billion in assets under management (“AUM”) of which $115.0 billion was attributable to strategies within the direct lending strategy which includes the following:

•Diversified Lending — The diversified lending strategy seeks to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns across credit cycles with an emphasis on preserving capital primarily through originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle market companies.

•Technology Lending — The technology lending strategy seeks to maximize total return by generating current income from our debt investments and other income producing securities, and capital appreciation from our equity and equity-linked investments primarily through originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, technology-related companies based primarily in the United States.

•First Lien Lending — The first lien lending strategy seeks to realize current income with an emphasis on preservation of capital primarily through originating primary transactions in and, to a lesser extent, secondary transactions of first lien senior secured loans in or related to private equity sponsored, middle market businesses based primarily in the United States.

•Opportunistic Lending — The opportunistic lending strategy seeks to generate attractive, risk-adjusted returns by taking advantage of credit opportunities in U.S. middle market companies with liquidity needs and market leaders seeking to improve their balance sheets.

We refer to the Blue Owl BDCs and the private funds, interval fund and separately managed accounts managed by the Blue Owl Credit Advisers in the direct lending strategy, as the “Blue Owl Credit Clients.” In addition to the Blue Owl Credit Clients, Blue Owl's Credit platform includes (1) alternative credit, which targets credit-oriented investments in markets underserved by traditional lenders or the broader capital markets, with deep expertise investing across specialty finance, private corporate credit and equipment leasing; (2) investment grade credit, which focuses on generating capital-efficient investment income through asset-backed finance, private corporate credit, and structured products; and (3) liquid credit, which focuses on the management of collateralized loan obligation vehicles (“CLOs”). Blue Owl’s Credit platform also includes other adjacent investment strategies (e.g., strategic equity assets and healthcare companies).

Blue Owl Credit Clients and other Blue Owl clients may have overlapping objectives with us. The Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts in the allocation of investment opportunities to us and others. In addition, the Adviser and its affiliates are permitted to allocate an investment to a number of products across platforms that it views as appropriate for the particular investment objectives, strategies and characteristics of such products. In order to address these conflicts, the Blue Owl Credit Advisers have put in place investment allocation policies that address the allocation of investment opportunities as well as co-investment restrictions under the 1940 Act. See, “ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.”

In addition, we rely on an order for exemptive relief (the “Order”) to co-invest with other funds managed by the Adviser or certain affiliates, in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. Pursuant to such Order, we are generally permitted to co-invest with certain of our affiliates if such co-investments are done on the same terms and at the same time, as further detailed in the Order. The Order requires that a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of the Board make certain findings (1) in most instances when we co-invest with our affiliates in an issuer where our affiliate has an existing investment in the issuer, and (2) if we dispose of an asset acquired in a transaction under the Order unless the disposition is done on a pro rata basis. Pursuant to the Order, the Board will oversee our participation in the co-investment program. As required by the Order, we have adopted, and the Board has approved, policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the Order, and the Adviser and our Chief Compliance Officer will provide reporting to the Board.

As a result of the Order, there could be significant overlap in our investment portfolio and the investment portfolio of the Blue Owl Credit Clients and other Blue Owl clients that avail themselves of the Order. In addition, the Adviser and its affiliates are permitted to allocate an investment to a number of products across platforms that it views as appropriate for the particular investment objectives, strategies and characteristics of such products. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors —Risks Related to our Adviser and its Affiliates — Our Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for their respective other accounts and clients or issuers in which we may invest.”

The Adviser or its affiliates may engage in certain origination activities and receive attendant arrangement, structuring or similar fees from portfolio companies. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors —Risks Related to our Adviser and its Affiliates — Our Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for their respective other accounts and clients or issuers in which we may invest.”

The Adviser’s address is 399 Park Avenue, 37th floor, New York, NY 10022.

Market Trends

We believe the middle-market lending environment provides opportunities for us to meet our goal of making investments that generate attractive risk-adjusted returns.

Limited Availability of Capital for Middle-Market Companies — The middle market is a large addressable market. According to GE Capital’s National Center for the Middle Market Year-End 2025 Middle Market Indicator, there are approximately 200,000 U.S. middle market companies, which have approximately 48 million aggregate employees. Moreover, the U.S. middle-market accounts for one-third of private sector gross domestic product (“GDP”). GE defines U.S. middle-market companies as those between $10 million and $1 billion in annual revenue, which we believe has significant overlap with our definition of U.S. middle-market companies. We believe U.S. middle-market companies will continue to require access to debt capital to refinance existing debt, support growth and finance acquisitions. We believe that regulatory and structural factors, industry consolidation and general risk aversion, limit the amount of traditional financing available to U.S. middle-market companies. We believe that many commercial and investment banks have, in recent years, de-emphasized their service and product offerings to middle-market businesses in favor of lending to large corporate clients and managing capital markets transactions. In addition, these lenders may be constrained in their ability to underwrite and hold bank loans and high yield securities for middle-market issuers as they seek to meet existing and future regulatory capital requirements. We also believe that there is a lack of market participants that are willing to hold meaningful amounts of certain middle-market loans. As a result, we believe our ability to minimize syndication risk for a company seeking financing by being able to hold its loans without having to syndicate them, coupled with reduced capacity of traditional lenders to serve the middle-market, present an attractive opportunity to invest in middle-market companies.

Capital Markets Have Been Unable to Fill the Void in U.S. Middle-Market Finance Left by Banks — Access to underwritten bond and syndicated loan markets is challenging for middle-market companies due to loan size and liquidity. For example, high yield bonds are generally purchased by institutional investors, such as mutual funds and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) who, among other things, are focused on the liquidity characteristics of the bond being issued in order to fund investor redemptions and/or comply with regulatory requirements. Accordingly, the existence of an active secondary market for bonds is an important consideration in these entities’ initial investment decision. Syndicated loans arranged through a bank are done either on a “best efforts” basis or are underwritten with terms plus provisions that permit the underwriters to change certain terms, including pricing, structure, yield and tenor, otherwise known as “flex”, to successfully syndicate the loan, in the event the terms initially marketed are insufficiently attractive to investors. Furthermore, banks are generally reluctant to underwrite middle-market loans because the arrangement fees they may earn on the placement of the debt generally are not sufficient to meet the banks’ return hurdles. Loans provided by companies such as ours provide certainty to issuers in that we have a more stable capital base and have the ability to invest in illiquid assets, and we can commit to a given amount of debt on specific terms, at stated coupons and with agreed upon fees. As we are the ultimate holder of the loans, we do not require market “flex” or other arrangements that banks may require when acting on an agency basis. In addition, our Adviser has teams focused on both liquid credit and private credit and these teams are able to collaborate with respect to syndicated loans.

Secular Trends Supporting Growth for Private Credit — We believe that periods of market volatility, such as the current period of market volatility caused, in part, by uncertainty regarding inflation and interest rates, and current geopolitical conditions, have

accentuated the advantages of private credit. The availability of capital in the liquid credit market is highly sensitive to market conditions whereas we believe private lending has proven to be a stable and reliable source of capital through periods of volatility. We believe the opportunity set for private credit will continue to expand even as the public markets reopen to normal levels. Financial sponsors and companies today are familiar with direct lending and have seen firsthand the strong value proposition that a private solution can offer. Scale, certainty of execution and flexibility all provide borrowers with a compelling alternative to the syndicated and high yield markets. Based on our experience, larger higher quality credits that have traditionally been issuers in the syndicated and high yield markets are increasingly seeking private solutions independent of credit market conditions. In our view, this is supported by financial sponsors wanting to work with collaborative financing partners that have scale and breadth of capabilities. This has driven substantial growth in direct lending portfolio companies over time. Given the dynamics mentioned above, we believe this trend is poised to continue and that the large amount of uninvested capital held by funds of private equity firms broadly, estimated by Preqin Ltd., an alternative assets industry data and research company, to be $2.7 trillion as of December 31, 2025, will continue to serve as a tailwind to the space.

Attractive Investment Dynamics — We believe the directly negotiated nature of middle-market financings also generally provides more favorable terms to the lender, including stronger covenant and reporting packages, better call protection, and lender-protective change of control provisions. Additionally, we believe BDC managers’ expertise in credit selection and ability to manage through credit cycles has generally resulted in BDCs experiencing lower loss rates than U.S. commercial banks through credit cycles. Further, we believe that historical middle-market default rates have been lower, and recovery rates have been higher, as compared to the larger market capitalization, broadly distributed market, leading to lower cumulative losses. Lastly, we believe that in the current environment, lenders with available capital may be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and may be able to achieve improved economic spreads and documentation terms.

Conservative Capital Structures — With more conservative capital structures, U.S. middle-market companies have exhibited higher levels of cash flows available to service their debt. In addition, U.S. middle-market companies often are characterized by simpler capital structures than larger borrowers, which facilitates a streamlined underwriting process and, when necessary, restructuring process.

Attractive Opportunities in Investments in Loans — We invest in senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, equity and equity-related securities. We believe that opportunities in senior secured loans are significant because of the floating rate structure of most senior secured debt issuances and because of the strong defensive characteristics of these types of investments. We believe that debt issues with floating interest rates offer a superior return profile as compared with fixed-rate investments, since floating rate structures are generally less susceptible to declines in value experienced by fixed-rate securities in a rising interest rate environment. Senior secured debt also provides strong defensive characteristics. Senior secured debt has priority in payment among an issuer’s security holders whereby holders are due to receive payment before junior creditors and equity holders. Further, these investments are secured by the issuer’s assets, which may provide protection in the event of a default.

Potential Competitive Advantages

We believe that the Adviser’s disciplined approach to origination, fundamental credit analysis, portfolio construction and risk management should allow us to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns while preserving our capital. We believe that we represent an attractive investment opportunity for the following reasons:

Experienced Team with Expertise Across all Levels of the Corporate Capital Structure — The members of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee have an average of over 25 years of experience in private lending and investing at all levels of a company’s capital structure, particularly in high yield securities, leveraged loans, high yield credit derivatives and distressed securities, as well as experience in operations, corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions and workout restructuring. The members of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee have diverse backgrounds with investing experience through multiple business and credit cycles. Moreover, certain members of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee and other executives and employees of the Adviser and its affiliates have operating and/or investing experience on behalf of business development companies. We believe this experience provides the Adviser with an in-depth understanding of the strategic, financial and operational challenges and opportunities of middle-market companies and will afford it numerous tools to manage risk while preserving the opportunity for attractive risk-adjusted returns on our investments and offering a diverse product set to help meet borrowers’ needs.

Distinctive Origination Platform — To date, a substantial majority of our investments have been sourced directly. We believe that our origination platform provides us the ability to originate investments without the assistance of investment banks or other traditional Wall Street intermediaries.

The Investment Team includes more than 130 investment professionals (over 40 of whom are dedicated to technology investing) and is responsible for originating, underwriting, executing and managing the assets of our direct lending transactions and for sourcing and executing opportunities directly. The Investment Team has significant experience as transaction originators and building and maintaining strong relationships with private equity sponsors and companies. In addition, we believe that the investment team has enhanced sourcing capabilities because of their ability to utilize Blue Owl’s resources and its relationships with the financial sponsor

community and service providers, which we believe may broaden our deal funnel and result in an increased pipeline of deal opportunities.

The Investment Team also maintains direct contact with banks, corporate advisory firms, industry consultants, attorneys, investment banks, “club” investors and other potential sources of lending opportunities. We believe the Adviser’s ability to source through multiple channels allows us to generate investment opportunities that have more attractive risk-adjusted return characteristics than by relying solely on origination flow from investment banks or other intermediaries and to be more selective investors.

Since the inception of the origination platform in April 2016 through December 31, 2025, the Adviser and its affiliates have reviewed over 11,130 opportunities and sourced potential investment opportunities from more than 840 private equity sponsors and venture capital firms. We believe that the Adviser receives “early looks” and “last looks” based on its and Blue Owl’s relationships, allowing it to be highly selective in the transactions it pursues.

Potential Long-Term Investment Horizon — We believe our potential long-term investment horizon gives us flexibility, allowing us to maximize returns on our investments. We invest using a long-term focus, which we believe provides us with the opportunity to increase total returns on invested capital, as compared to other private company investment vehicles or investment vehicles with daily liquidity requirements (e.g., open-ended mutual funds and ETFs).

Defensive, Income-Orientated Investment Philosophy — The Adviser employs a defensive investment approach focused on long-term credit performance and principal protection. This investment approach involves a multi-stage selection process for each investment opportunity as well as ongoing monitoring of each investment made, with particular emphasis on early detection of credit deterioration. This strategy is designed to minimize potential losses and achieve attractive risk adjusted returns.

Active Portfolio Monitoring — The Adviser closely monitors the investments in our portfolio and takes a proactive approach to identifying and addressing sector- or company-specific risks. The Adviser receives and reviews detailed financial information from portfolio companies no less than quarterly and seeks to maintain regular dialogue with portfolio company management teams regarding current and forecasted performance. Although we may invest in “covenant-lite” loans, which generally do not have a complete set of financial maintenance covenants, we anticipate that many of our investments will have financial covenants that we believe will provide an early warning of potential problems facing our borrowers, allowing lenders, including us, to identify and carefully manage risk. Further, we anticipate that many of our equity investments will provide us the opportunity to nominate a member or observer to the board of directors of the portfolio company or otherwise include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder, which we believe will allow us to closely monitor the performance of these portfolio companies. In addition, the Adviser has built out its portfolio management team to include workout experts who closely monitor our portfolio companies and who, on at least a quarterly basis, assess each portfolio company’s operational and liquidity exposure and outlook to understand and mitigate risks; and, on at least a monthly basis, evaluates existing and newly identified situations where operating results are deviating from expectations. As part of its monitoring process, the Adviser focuses on projected liquidity needs and where warranted, re-underwriting credits and evaluating downside and liquidation scenarios.

Increasing Benefits of Scale — We believe the Adviser’s robust, scaled infrastructure and focus on direct lending provides us a competitive advantage which enables us to provide attractive solutions as a trusted partner and therefore continue to capture market share. Blue Owl’s differentiated approach and scaled platform allow us to capitalize on opportunities across the sizing spectrum—from bespoke financing solutions to traditional upper-middle-market loans and, increasingly, loans of $2.0 billion or more. Blue Owl’s Credit platform’s scale has demonstrated the ability to originate larger deals, while also providing diversification. We believe our scale enables Blue Owl to broaden our deal funnel and provides us access to more investment opportunities than many other direct lenders.

Investment Selection

The Adviser has identified the following investment criteria and guidelines that it believes are important in evaluating prospective portfolio companies. However, not all of these criteria and guidelines will be met, or will be equally important, in connection with each of our investments.

Established Companies with Positive Cash Flow — We seek to invest in companies with sound historical financial performance and a history of profitability which we believe tend to be well-positioned to maintain consistent, often contractual, cash flow to service and repay their obligations and maintain growth in their businesses or market share in all market conditions, including in the event of a recession. The Adviser primarily focuses on upper middle-market companies with a history of profitability on an operating cash flow basis, a high percentage of recurring revenue and with limited cyclicality in their end markets. The Adviser does not intend to invest in start-up companies that have not achieved sustainable profitability and cash flow generation or companies with speculative business plans.

Strong Competitive Position in Industry — The Adviser analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of target companies relative to their competitors. The factors the Adviser considers include relative product pricing, product quality, customer loyalty, substitution risk, switching costs, patent protection, brand positioning and capitalization. We seek to invest in companies that have developed leading positions within their respective markets, are well positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities and operate businesses, exhibit the potential to maintain sufficient cash flows and profitability to service their obligations in a range of economic environments or are in industries with significant barriers to entry. We seek companies that demonstrate advantages in scale, scope, customer loyalty, product pricing or product quality versus their competitors that, when compared to their competitors, may help to protect their market position and profitability.

Experienced Management Team — We seek to invest in companies that have experienced management teams. We also seek to invest in companies that have proper incentives in place, including management teams having significant equity interests to motivate management to act in concert with our interests as an investor.

Diversified Customer and Supplier Base — We generally seek to invest in companies that have a diversified customer and supplier base. Companies with a diversified customer and supplier base are generally better able to endure economic downturns, industry consolidation, changing business preferences and other factors that may negatively impact their customers, suppliers and competitors.

Exit Strategy — While certain debt investments may be repaid through operating cash flows of the borrower, we expect that the primary means by which we exit our debt investments will be through methods such as strategic acquisitions by other industry participants, an initial public offering of common stock, a recapitalization, a refinancing or another transaction in the capital markets.

Prior to making an equity investment in a prospective portfolio company, we analyze the potential for that company to increase the liquidity of its equity through a future event that would enable us to realize appreciation in the value of our equity interest. Liquidity events may include an initial public offering, a private sale of our equity interest to a third party, a merger or an acquisition of the company or a purchase of our equity position by the company or one of its stockholders.

In addition, in connection with our investing activities, we may make commitments with respect to an investment in a potential portfolio company substantially in excess of our final investment. In such situations, while we may initially agree to fund up to a certain dollar amount of an investment, we may sell a portion of such amount, such that we are left with a smaller investment than what was reflected in our original commitment.

Financial Sponsorship — We seek to participate in transactions sponsored by what we believe to be high-quality private equity and venture capital firms. We believe that a financial sponsor’s willingness to invest significant sums of equity capital into a company is an explicit endorsement of the quality of their investment. Further, financial sponsors of portfolio companies with significant investments at risk have the ability and a strong incentive to contribute additional capital in difficult economic times should operational issues arise.

Investments in Different Portfolio Companies and Industries — We seek to invest broadly among portfolio companies and industries, thereby potentially reducing the risk of any one company or industry having a disproportionate impact on the value of our portfolio; however, there can be no assurances in this regard. We seek to structure larger transactions and invest in stable, recession-resistant, strategically valuable industries that we are familiar with. We seek to invest not more than 20% of our portfolio in any single industry classification and target portfolio companies that comprise 0.5-1.5% of our portfolio (with no individual portfolio company generally expected to comprise greater than 5% of our portfolio).

Investment Process Overview

Origination and Sourcing — The Investment Team has an extensive network from which to source deal flow and referrals. Specifically, the Adviser sources portfolio investments from a variety of different investment sources, including among others, private equity sponsors, management teams, financial intermediaries and advisers, investment bankers, family offices, accounting firms and law firms. The Adviser focuses on sponsor-led leveraged buyouts, refinancings, recapitalizations and acquisitions and sponsors who value the ability to provide sizable commitments; flexible and creative solutions; and certainty, speed and transparency. To a lesser extent, the Adviser may invest in broadly syndicated loans. The Adviser believes that its experience across different industries and transaction types makes the Adviser particularly qualified to source, analyze and execute investment opportunities with a focus on downside protection and a return of principal.

Due Diligence Process — The process through which an investment decision is made involves extensive research into the company, its industry, its growth prospects and its ability to withstand adverse conditions. If one or more members of the Investment Team responsible for the transaction determines that an investment opportunity should be pursued, the Adviser will engage in an intensive due diligence process focused on fundamental credit analysis and downside protection. Though each transaction may involve a somewhat different approach, the Adviser’s diligence of each opportunity could include:

•understanding the purpose of the loan, the key personnel, the sources and uses of the proceeds;

•meeting the company’s management and key personnel, including top level executives, to get an insider’s view of the business, and to probe for potential weaknesses in business prospects;

•checking management’s backgrounds and references;

•performing a detailed review of historical financial performance, including performance through various economic cycles, and the quality of earnings;

•contacting customers and vendors to assess both business prospects and standard practices;

•conducting a competitive analysis, and comparing the company to its main competitors on an operating, financial, market share and valuation basis;

•researching the industry for historic growth trends and future prospects as well as to identify future exit alternatives;

•assessing asset value and the ability of physical infrastructure and information systems to handle anticipated growth;

•leveraging the Adviser’s internal resources and network with institutional knowledge of the company’s business;

•assessing business valuation and corresponding recovery analysis;

•developing downside financial projections and liquidation analysis;

•reviewing responsible investing and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) considerations including consulting the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s Engagement Guide for ESG considerations; and

•investigating legal and regulatory risks and financial and accounting systems and practices.

Selective Investment Process — After an investment has been identified and preliminary diligence has been completed, a Diversified Lending Investment Committee memorandum is prepared. This report is reviewed by the members of the Investment Team in charge of the potential investment and generally includes information on downside protection, asset coverage and collateral. If these members of the Investment Team are in favor of the potential investment, then a more extensive due diligence process, which may include significant analysis and focus on strategy and potential to recover par in default scenarios, is employed. Additional due diligence with respect to any investment may be conducted on our behalf by attorneys, independent accountants, and other third-party consultants and research firms prior to the closing of the investment, as appropriate on a case-by-case basis.

Structuring and Execution — Approval of an investment requires the approval of a majority of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. Once the Diversified Lending Investment Committee has determined that a prospective portfolio company is suitable for investment, the Adviser works with the management team of that company and its other capital providers, including senior, junior and equity capital providers, if any, to finalize the structure and terms of the investment. Additionally, a majority of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee may approve parameters or guidelines pursuant to which certain investments may be made or sold consistent with our investment objective.

Inclusion of Covenants — Covenants are contractual restrictions that lenders place on companies to limit the corporate actions a company may pursue. Generally, the loans in which we expect to invest will have financial maintenance covenants, which are used to proactively address materially adverse changes in a portfolio company’s financial performance. However, to a lesser extent, we may invest in “covenant-lite” loans. We use the term “covenant-lite” to refer generally to loans that do not have a complete set of financial maintenance covenants. Generally, “covenant-lite” loans provide borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders because their covenants are incurrence-based, which means they are only tested and can only be breached following an affirmative action of the borrower, rather than by a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition. Accordingly, to the extent we invest in “covenant-lite” loans, we may have fewer rights against a borrower and may have a greater risk of loss on such investments as compared to investments in or exposure to loans with financial maintenance covenants.

Portfolio Monitoring — The Adviser monitors our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis. The Adviser monitors the financial trends of each portfolio company to determine if it is meeting its business plans and to assess the appropriate course of action with respect to our investment in each portfolio company. The Adviser has a number of methods of evaluating and monitoring the performance and fair value of our investments, which may include the following:

•assessment of success of the portfolio company in adhering to its business plan and compliance with covenants;

•periodic and regular contact with portfolio company management and, if appropriate, the financial or strategic sponsor, to discuss financial position, requirements and accomplishments;

•comparisons to other companies in the portfolio company’s industry;

•attendance at, and participation in, board meetings; and

•review of periodic financial statements and financial projections for portfolio companies.

An investment will be placed on the Adviser's credit watch list when select events occur and will only be removed from the watch list with oversight of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee and/or other agents of Blue Owl’s Credit platform. Once an investment is on the credit watch list, the Adviser works with the borrower prior to payment default to resolve financial stress through amendments, waivers or other alternatives. If a borrower defaults on its payment obligations, the Adviser's focus shifts to capital recovery. If an investment needs to be restructured, the Adviser’s workout team partners with the investment team and all material amendments, waivers and restructurings require the approval of a majority of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee.

Structure of Investments

Our investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns.

We expect that generally our portfolio composition will be majority debt or income producing securities, which may include “covenant-lite” loans, with a lesser allocation to equity or equity-linked opportunities. In addition, we may invest a portion of our portfolio in opportunistic investments, which will not be our primary focus, but will be intended to enhance returns to our shareholders and from time to time, we may evaluate and enter into strategic portfolio transactions which may result in additional portfolio companies which we are considered to control. These investments may include high-yield bonds and broadly-syndicated loans, which are typically originated and structured by banks on behalf of large corporate borrowers with employee counts, revenues, EBITDAs and enterprise values larger than the middle-market characteristics described herein, and equity investments in portfolio companies that make senior secured loans or invest in broadly syndicated loans or structured products, such as life settlements and royalty interests. Our portfolio composition may fluctuate from time to time based on market conditions and interest rates.

Covenants are contractual restrictions that lenders place on companies to limit the corporate actions a company may pursue. Generally, the loans in which we expect to invest will have financial maintenance covenants, which are used to proactively address materially adverse changes in a portfolio company’s financial performance. However, to a lesser extent, we may invest in “covenant-lite” loans. See “Investment Process Overview - Inclusion of Covenants.”

Debt Investments — The terms of our debt investments are tailored to the facts and circumstances of each transaction. The Adviser negotiates the structure of each investment to protect our rights and manage our risk. We generally invest in the following types of debt:

•First-lien debt. First-lien debt typically is senior on a lien basis to other liabilities in the issuer’s capital structure and has the benefit of a first-priority security interest in assets of the issuer. The security interest ranks above the security interest of any second-lien lenders in those assets. Our first-lien debt may include stand-alone first-lien loans, “unitranche” loans (including “last out” portions of such loans), and secured corporate bonds with similar features to these categories of first-lien loans. As of December 31, 2025, 48.0% of our first lien debt was comprised of unitranche loans.

◦Stand-alone first lien loans. Stand-alone first-lien loans are traditional first-lien loans. All lenders in the facility have equal rights to the collateral that is subject to the first-priority security interest.

◦Unitranche loans. Unitranche loans (including the “last out” portions of such loans) combine features of first-lien, second-lien and mezzanine debt, generally in a first-lien position. In many cases, we may provide the issuer most, if not all, of the capital structure above their equity. The primary advantages to the issuer are the ability to negotiate the entire debt financing with one lender and the elimination of intercreditor issues. “Last out” first-lien loans have a secondary priority behind super-senior “first out” first-lien loans in the collateral securing the loans in certain circumstances. The arrangements for a “last out” first-lien loan are typically set forth in an “agreement among lenders,” which provides lenders with “first out” and “last out” payment streams based on a single lien on the collateral. Since the “first out” lenders generally have priority over the “last out” lenders for receiving payment under certain specified events of default, or upon the occurrence of other triggering events under intercreditor agreements or agreements among lenders, the “last out” lenders bear a greater risk and, in exchange, receive a higher effective interest rate, through arrangements among the lenders, than the “first out” lenders or lenders in stand-alone first-lien loans. Agreements among lenders also typically provide greater voting rights to the “last out” lenders than the intercreditor agreements to which second-lien lenders often are subject. Among the types of first-lien debt in which we may invest, “last out” first-lien loans generally have higher effective interest rates than other types of first-lien loans, since “last out” first-lien loans rank below standalone first-lien loans.

•Second-lien debt. Our second-lien debt may include secured loans, and, to a lesser extent, secured corporate bonds, with a secondary priority behind first-lien debt. Second-lien debt typically is senior on a lien basis to unsecured liabilities in the issuer’s capital structure and has the benefit of a security interest over assets of the issuer, though ranking junior to first-lien debt secured by those assets. First-lien lenders and second-lien lenders typically have separate liens on the collateral, and an intercreditor agreement provides the first-lien lenders with priority over the second-lien lenders’ liens on the collateral.

•Mezzanine debt (unsecured debt). Structurally, mezzanine debt usually ranks subordinate in priority of payment to first-lien and second-lien debt, is often unsecured, and may not have the benefit of financial covenants common in first-lien and second-lien debt. However, mezzanine debt ranks senior to common and preferred equity in an issuer’s capital structure. Mezzanine debt investments generally offer lenders fixed returns in the form of interest payments, which could be paid-in-kind, and may provide lenders an opportunity to participate in the capital appreciation, if any, of an issuer through an equity interest. This equity interest typically takes the form of an equity co-investment or warrants. Due to its higher risk profile and often less restrictive covenants compared to senior secured loans, mezzanine debt generally bears a higher stated interest rate than first-lien and second-lien debt.

•Broadly syndicated loans. Broadly syndicated loans (whose features are similar to those described under “First-lien debt” and “Second-lien debt” above) are typically originated and structured by banks on behalf of large corporate borrowers with employee counts, revenues, EBITDAs, and enterprise values larger than the middle-market characteristics described above. The proceeds of broadly syndicated loans are often used for leveraged buyout transactions, mergers and acquisitions, recapitalizations, refinancings, and financing capital expenditures. Broadly syndicated loans are typically distributed by the arranging bank to a diverse group of investors primarily consisting of: CLOs; senior secured loan and high yield bond mutual funds; closed-end funds, hedge funds, banks, and insurance companies; and finance companies. A borrower must comply with various covenants contained in a loan agreement or note purchase agreement between the borrower and the holders of the broadly syndicated loan. The broadly syndicated loans in which we invest may include loans that are considered “covenant-lite” loans, because of their lack of a full set of financial maintenance covenants.

Our debt investments are typically structured with the maximum seniority and collateral that we can reasonably obtain while seeking to achieve our total return target. The Adviser seeks to limit the downside potential of our investments by:

•requiring a total return on our investments (including both interest and potential equity appreciation) that compensates us for credit risk;

•negotiating covenants in connection with our investments consistent with preservation of our capital. Such restrictions may include affirmative covenants (including reporting requirements), negative covenants (including financial maintenance covenants), lien protection, limitations on debt incurrence, restrictions on asset sales, downside and liquidation cases, restrictions on dividends and other payments, cash flow sweeps, collateral protection, required debt amortization, change of control provisions and board rights, including either observation rights or rights to a seat on the board under some circumstances; and

•including debt amortization requirements, where appropriate, to require the timely repayment of principal of the loan, as well as appropriate maturity dates.

Within our portfolio, the Adviser aims to maintain the appropriate proportion among the various types of first-lien loans, as well as second-lien debt and mezzanine debt, to allow us to achieve our target returns while maintaining our targeted amount of credit risk.

Our debt investments may be structured as annualized recurring revenue (“ARR”) loans, which are loans made to a company that may not currently be EBITDA positive because they have strategically determined to postpone profitability in favor of acquiring customers that will generate a high lifetime value over time. Generally, our ARR loans are made to high growth technology companies with a stable base of existing customers, providing strong revenue visibility. We believe the recurring revenue market to be underserved and find that ARR loans often have attractive risk adjusted return profiles, in the form of pricing, credit documentation, and /or loan-to-values, relative to the broader market.

Equity Investments — Our investment in a portfolio company could be or may include an equity interest, such as common stock or preferred stock, or equity linked interest, such as a warrant or profit participation right. We may make direct and indirect equity investments with or without a concurrent investment in a more senior part of the capital structure of the issuer. Our equity investments are typically not control-oriented investments and we may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder.

Specialty Financing Portfolio Companies and Joint Ventures

We leverage the expanding role that private lenders are being asked to play in the broader credit markets to evaluate cross-platform opportunities including strategic equity and accretive joint venture investments that have cash flow and credit profiles that provide consistent income.

Specialty Financing Portfolio Companies — We may make equity investments in portfolio companies that make senior secured loans or invest in broadly syndicated loans or structured products, such as life settlements and royalty interests. Our specialty financing companies include the following:

•Amergin, which consists of AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC and AAM Series 2.1 Aviation Feeder, LLC (collectively, “Amergin AssetCo”) and Amergin Asset Management LLC, which has entered into a Servicing Agreement with Amergin AssetCo. Amergin was created to invest in a leasing platform focused on

railcar, aviation and other long-lived transportation assets. Amergin acquires existing on-lease portfolios of new and end-of-life railcars and related equipment and selectively purchases off-lease assets and is building a commercial aircraft portfolio through aircraft financing and engine acquisition on a sale and lease back basis.

•Fifth Season Investments LLC (“Fifth Season”), a portfolio company created to invest in life insurance based assets, including secondary and tertiary life settlement and other life insurance exposures using detailed analytics, internal life expectancy review and sophisticated portfolio management techniques.

•LSI Financing 1 DAC (“LSI Financing DAC”), a portfolio company formed to acquire contractual rights to revenue pursuant to earnout agreements in the life sciences space.

•LSI Financing LLC (“LSI Financing LLC”), a separately managed portfolio company formed to indirectly own royalty purchase agreements and loans in the life sciences space.

•Blue Owl Cross-Strategy Opportunities LLC (“BOCSO”) a portfolio company formed to hold alternative credit assets, including asset-based finance (“ABF”). ABF is a subsector of private credit focused on generating income from pools of financial, physical or other assets.

Joint Ventures — We may make equity investments in joint ventures. Our joint ventures include:

•Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC (“Credit SLF”) is a joint venture whose principal purpose is to make investments in senior secured loans to middle-market companies, broadly syndicated loans and senior and subordinated notes issued by collateralized loan obligations.

•Blue Owl Leasing LLC (“Blue Owl Leasing”), a cross-platform joint venture that invests in equipment leases and loans.

Investments

Our investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns. Our investment strategy focuses primarily on originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle-market companies and is intended to generate favorable returns across credit cycles with an emphasis on preserving capital. We invest in senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, equity and equity-related securities, including common and preferred stock, securities convertible into common stock, and warrants. We define “middle-market companies” to generally mean companies with earnings before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, or “EBITDA” between $25 million and $500 million annually and/or annual revenue of $125 million to $5 billion at the time of investment. We may on occasion invest in smaller or larger companies if an attractive opportunity presents itself, especially when there are dislocations in the capital markets, including the high yield and large syndicated loan markets. Consistent with our goal of capital preservation, we generally intend to invest in companies with loan-to-value ratios (e.g., the amount of outstanding debt as a percentage of the value of the company) of 50% or lower. Our target credit investments will typically have maturities between three and ten years and generally range in size between $20 million and $500 million. We seek to invest not more than 20% of our portfolio in any single industry classification and target portfolio companies that comprise 1-2% of our portfolio (with no individual portfolio company generally expected to comprise greater than 5% of our portfolio). To a lesser extent, we may make investments in syndicated loan opportunities for cash management purposes.

While our investment strategy focuses primarily on middle-market companies in the United States, including senior secured loans, we also may invest up to 30% of our portfolio in investments of non-qualifying portfolio companies. Specifically, as part of this 30% basket, we may consider investments in investment funds that are operating pursuant to certain exceptions to the 1940 Act, as well as in debt and equity of companies located outside of the United States and debt and equity of public companies that do not meet the definition of eligible portfolio companies because their market capitalization of publicly traded equity securities exceeds the levels provided for in the 1940 Act.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had investments in 183 and 182 portfolio companies, respectively, with an aggregate fair value of $1.58 billion and $1.94 billion, respectively. The table below presents our investments for the following periods:


	December 31, 2025						December 31, 2024
($ in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Gain/(Loss)		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Gain/(Loss)

First-lien senior secured debt investments(1)	$	1,251,162	$	1,221,372	$	(29,790)	$	1,532,596	$	1,515,900	$	(16,696)
Second-lien senior secured debt investments	159,446		131,054		(28,392)		229,288		200,284		(29,004)
Unsecured debt investments	37,347		38,673		1,326		33,526		33,594		68
Specialty finance debt investments	7,483		7,491		8		5,016		5,040		24
Preferred equity investments	67,578		67,143		(435)		60,177		59,385		(792)
Common equity investments	55,486		80,120		24,634		62,167		103,225		41,058
Specialty finance equity investments	25,571		30,360		4,789		15,236		17,773		2,537
Joint ventures	334		337		3		190		191		1
Total Investments	$	1,604,407	$	1,576,550	$	(27,857)	$	1,938,196	$	1,935,392	$	(2,804)

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had outstanding commitments to fund unfunded investments totaling $148.5 million and $181.8 million, respectively.

For additional information about our investment portfolio refer to “Note 4 —Investments” to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”).

Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC

On May 6, 2024, Credit SLF, a Delaware limited liability company, was formed as a joint venture. We, Blue Owl Capital Corporation (“OBDC”), Blue Owl Credit Income Corp. (“OCIC”), Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. (“OTF”), Blue Owl Technology Income Corp. (“OTIC”), and State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (“OSTRS”) (each, a “Credit SLF Member” and collectively, the “Credit SLF Members”) co-manage Credit SLF. Credit SLF’s principal purpose is to make investments in senior secured loans to middle-market companies, broadly syndicated loans and senior and subordinated notes issued by collateralized loan obligations. Credit SLF is managed by a board consisting of an equal number of representatives appointed by each Credit SLF Member and which acts unanimously. Investment decisions must be approved by Credit SLF’s board. We do not consolidate our non-controlling interest in Credit SLF.

Refer to Exhibit 99.2 for the Credit SLF Supplemental Financial Information.

Blue Owl Leasing LLC

On June 30, 2025, Blue Owl Leasing, a Delaware limited liability company, was formed as a joint venture between us, OBDC, OCIC, OTF, OTIC, Blue Owl Alternative Credit Fund, and California State Teachers Retirement System (each, a “Blue Owl Leasing Member” and collectively, the “Blue Owl Leasing Members”). The Blue Owl Leasing Members co-manage Blue Owl Leasing. Blue Owl Leasing’s principal purpose is to make investments in leases and loans. Investment decisions must be approved by the Blue Owl Leasing Members. Our investment in Blue Owl Leasing is a co-investment made with our affiliates in accordance with the terms of the exemptive relief that we received from the SEC. We do not consolidate our non-controlling interest in Blue Owl Leasing.

Refer to Exhibit 99.3 for the Blue Owl Leasing Supplemental Financial Information.

Capital Resources and Borrowings

We anticipate generating cash in the future from cash flows from operations, including interest received on our debt investments. We may also issue common stock and debt securities from time to time subject to the approval of our Board.

We may borrow money from time to time if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after such borrowing. Additionally, we are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of shares senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% (or 150% if certain requirements are met) immediately after each such issuance. Our current target leverage ratio is 0.75x. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, our asset coverage was 240% and 231%, respectively. See “Regulation as a Business Development Company – Senior Securities; Coverage Ratio” below.

Furthermore, while any indebtedness and senior securities remain outstanding, we must make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our shareholders on our capital stock (which may cause us to fail to distribute amounts necessary to avoid entity-level taxation under the Code), or the repurchase of such capital stock unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. In addition, we must also comply with positive and negative covenants customary for these types of indebtedness or senior securities.

For additional information about our debt obligations refer to “Note 5 – Debt” in this Annual Report and “ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Debt.”

Distribution Policy

Because we have elected to be treated and intend to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC, we intend to distribute (or be treated as distributing) in each taxable year dividends in an amount equal to at least the sum of 90% of our investment company taxable income (which includes, among other items, dividends, interest, the excess of any net short-term capital gains over net long-term capital losses, as well as other taxable income, excluding any net capital gains reduced by deductible expenses) and 90% of our net tax-exempt income for that taxable year. As a RIC, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our investment company taxable income and net capital gains that we distribute to shareholders. We may be subject to a nondeductible 4% U.S. federal excise tax, if we do not distribute (or are treated as distributing) in each calendar year an amount at least equal to the sum of:

•98% of our net ordinary income, excluding certain ordinary gains and losses, recognized during a calendar year;

•98.2% of our capital gain net income, adjusted for certain ordinary gains and losses, recognized for the twelve-month period ending on October 31 of such calendar year; and

•certain undistributed amounts from previous years on which we paid no U.S. federal income tax.

We can be expected to incur in the future such excise tax on a portion of our income and gains. While we intend to distribute income and capital gains to minimize exposure to the 4% excise tax, we may not be able to, or may not choose to, distribute amounts sufficient to avoid the imposition of the tax entirely. In that event, we will be liable for the tax only on the amount by which we do not meet the foregoing distribution requirement. See “ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS – Risks Related to U.S. Federal Income Tax – We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates if we are unable to qualify and maintain our tax treatment as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code or if we make investments through taxable subsidiaries.”

We may fund our cash distributions to shareholders from any sources of funds available to us, including fee waivers or deferrals by our Adviser that may be subject to repayment, as well as cash otherwise available. We have not established limits on the amount of funds we may use from any available sources to make distributions; however, we will not borrow funds for the purpose of making distributions if the amount of such distributions would exceed our accrued and received revenues (“Net Revenues”), which we define as accrued and received revenues, less paid and accrued operating expenses with respect to such revenues and costs, for the previous four quarters. Distributions may be supported by the deferral or waiver of investment advisory fees and, prior to the termination of the Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement, or the Expense Support Agreement, we entered into with our Adviser, in the form of operating expense support payments pursuant thereto. See “ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS —Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement” for additional information regarding the Expense Support Agreement. We may be obligated to repay our Adviser over several years, and these repayments, if any, will reduce the future distributions that you would otherwise be entitled to receive from us. You should understand that such distributions may not be based on our investment performance. There can be no assurance that we will achieve the performance necessary to sustain our distributions, or that we will be able to pay distributions at a specific rate, or at all. Our Adviser has no obligation to waive or defer its advisory fees or otherwise reimburse expenses in future periods.

Distribution Reinvestment Plan

We have adopted a distribution reinvestment plan, pursuant to which we will reinvest all cash distributions declared by the Board on behalf of our shareholders who elect to participate, or “opt-in.” As a result, if the Board authorizes, and we declare, a cash dividend or other distribution, then our shareholders who have opted in to our distribution reinvestment plan will have their cash distribution automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock as described below, rather than receiving the cash distribution or other distribution. Shareholders who receive distributions in the form of shares of common stock will be subject to the same U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences as if they received cash distributions.

Participation in the distribution reinvestment plan will commence with the next distribution paid after receipt of an investor’s written election to participate in the plan and to all other calendar months thereafter, provided such notification is received by the plan administrator no later than the record date to which such distribution relates.

The number of shares to be issued to a shareholder participating in the distribution reinvestment plan will be determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the distribution payable to each shareholder by a price per share equivalent to the current net public offering price that the shares are sold in our continuous public offering at the closing immediately following the distribution date. In the event that our offering is suspended or terminated, then the reinvestment purchase price will be the net asset value per share. Shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan will have the same voting rights as the shares of our common stock.

On February 17, 2026 our Board determined to terminate our distribution reinvestment plan. As a result, commencing with any distributions payable on or after March 18, 2026, all distributions will be paid in cash. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Developments — Termination of Dividend Reinvestment Plan.”

Competition

Our primary competitors in providing financing to middle-market companies include public and private funds, other BDCs, commercial and investment banks, commercial finance companies and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity and hedge funds and alternative asset managers. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we do. Many of these competitors have similar investment objectives to us, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities. Some of these competitors may have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us, which may create competitive disadvantages for us with respect to our investment opportunities. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Further, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC, or to the distribution and other requirements we must satisfy to qualify for RIC tax treatment. Lastly, institutional and individual investors are allocating increasing amounts of capital to alternative investment strategies. Several large institutional investors have announced a desire to consolidate their investments in a more limited number of managers. We expect that this will cause competition in our industry to intensify and could lead to a reduction in the size and duration of pricing inefficiencies that many of our products seek to exploit. See “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS — Risks Related to Our Business — We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which could delay further deployment of our capital, reduce returns and result in losses.”

Investment Advisory Agreement

The description below of the Investment Advisory Agreement is only a summary and is not necessarily complete. The description set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Investment Advisory Agreement.

Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Adviser is responsible for the following:

•managing our assets in accordance with our investment objective, policies and restrictions;

•determining the composition of our portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing such changes;

•making investment decisions for us, including negotiating the terms of investments in, and dispositions of, portfolio securities and other instruments on our behalf;

•monitoring our investments;

•performing due diligence on prospective portfolio companies;

•exercising voting rights in respect of portfolio securities and other investments for us;

•serving on, and exercising observer rights for, boards of directors and similar committees of our portfolio companies; and

•providing us with such other investment advisory and related services as we may, from time to time, reasonably require for the investment of capital.

The Adviser’s services under the Investment Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and accordingly, the Adviser may provide similar services to other entities.

Term

The Investment Advisory Agreement became effective on May 18, 2021. Unless earlier terminated as described below, the Investment Advisory Agreement will remain in effect for two years from the date it first became effective and from year-to-year thereafter if approved annually by a majority of the Board or by the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities and, in each case, a majority of the independent directors. On May 5, 2025, the Board approved the continuation of the Investment Advisory Agreement.

The Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate within the meaning of the 1940 Act and related SEC guidance and interpretations in the event of its assignment. In accordance with the 1940 Act, without payment of penalty, we may terminate the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser upon 60 days’ written notice. The decision to terminate the agreement may be made by a majority of the Board or the shareholders holding a Majority of the Outstanding Shares of our common stock. “Majority of the Outstanding Shares” means the lesser of (1) 67% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock present at a meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock are present or represented by proxy or (2) a majority of outstanding shares of common stock. In addition, without payment of penalty, the Adviser may terminate the Investment Advisory Agreement upon 120 days’ written notice.

Compensation of the Adviser

Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of our Board and in accordance with the 1940 Act, the Adviser receives an investment advisory fee from us, consisting of two components — a base

management fee and an incentive fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 1.50% based on the average value of our gross assets excluding cash and cash-equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed amounts at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters. Although we do not anticipate making significant investments in derivatives and swaps similar to our direct investment in portfolio companies, the fair value of any such derivatives and swaps, which will not necessarily equal the notional value of such derivatives and swaps, will be included in our calculation of gross assets. The base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. All or any part of the base management fee not taken as to any quarter will be deferred without interest and may be taken in any such quarter prior to the occurrence of a liquidity event. Base management fees for any partial quarter are prorated based on the number of days in the quarter.

The incentive fee consists of two parts: (i) an incentive fee on income and (ii) an incentive fee on capital gains. Each part of the incentive fee is outlined below.

The incentive fee on income will be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and will be based upon our pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. In the case of a liquidation of the Company or if the Investment Advisory Agreement is terminated, the fee will also become payable as of the effective date of the event.

The incentive fee on income for each calendar quarter will be calculated as follows:

•No incentive fee on income will be payable in any calendar quarter in which the pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed a quarterly return to investors of 1.5% per quarter on our adjusted capital. We refer to this as the quarterly preferred return.

•All of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the quarterly preferred return, but is less than or equal to 1.818% , which we refer to as the upper level breakpoint, on our adjusted capital in any quarter, will be payable to our Adviser. We refer to this portion of the incentive fee on income as the catch up. It is intended to provide an incentive fee of 17.5% on all of our pre-incentive fee net investment income when the pre-incentive fee net investment income reaches 1.818% on our adjusted capital in any quarter, measured as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter. The quarterly preferred return of 1.5% and upper level breakpoint of 1.818% are also adjusted for the actual number of days each calendar quarter.

•For any quarter in which our pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds 1.818% on our adjusted capital, the incentive fee on income will equal 17.5% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, because the quarterly preferred return and catch up will have been achieved.

•Pre-incentive fee net investment income is defined as investment income and any other income, accrued during the calendar quarter, minus operating expenses for the quarter, including the base management fee, expenses payable under the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement, any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any expense support payments or any reimbursement by the Company of expense support payments, or any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation.

•For purposes of computing the incentive fee on income, although we do not anticipate making significant investments in derivatives and swaps, the calculation methodology will look through any such derivatives or swaps as if we owned the reference assets directly. Therefore, net interest, if any, associated with a derivative or swap (which is defined as the difference between (i) the interest income and transaction fees received in respect of the reference assets of the derivative or swap and (ii) all interest and other expenses paid by us to the derivative or swap counterparty) will be included in the calculation of quarterly pre-incentive fee net investment income for purposes of the incentive fee on income. The notional value of any such derivatives or swaps is not used for these purposes.

•Adjusted capital is defined as cumulative proceeds generated from sales of our common stock, including proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan, net of sales load (upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees) reduced for (i) distributions paid to our shareholders that represent a return of capital on a tax basis and (ii) amounts paid for share repurchases pursuant to our share repurchase program, if any, measured as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter.

The following is a graphical representation of the calculation of the quarterly incentive fee on income:

Quarterly Incentive Fee on

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(expressed as a percentage of adjusted capital)


0%	1.5%	1.818%


ß 0% à	ß 100% à	ß 17.5% à

Percentage of Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

Allocated to Quarterly Incentive Fee

The incentive fee on capital gains will be determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year during which the Investment Advisory Agreement is in effect. In the case of a liquidation, or if the Investment Advisory Agreement is terminated, the fee will also become payable as of the effective date of such event. The annual fee will equal (i) 17.5% of our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of such calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less (ii) the aggregate amount of any previously paid incentive fees on capital gains as calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).

For purposes of computing the incentive fee on capital gains, the calculation methodology will look through derivatives or swaps as if we owned the reference assets directly. Therefore, realized gains and realized losses on the disposition of any reference assets, as well as unrealized depreciation on reference assets retained in the derivative or swap, will be included on a cumulative basis in the calculation of the incentive fee on capital gains.

Because of the structure of the incentive fee on income and the incentive fee on capital gains, it is possible that we may pay such fees in a quarter where we incur a net loss. For example, if we receive pre-incentive fee net investment income in excess of the 1.5% on adjusted capital for a quarter, we will pay the applicable incentive fee even if we incurred a net loss in the quarter due to a realized or unrealized capital loss. Our Adviser will not be under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the incentive fee they receive that is based on prior period accrued income that we never received as a result of any borrower’s default or a subsequent realized loss of our portfolio.

The fees that are payable under the Investment Advisory Agreement for any partial period will be appropriately prorated. The fees are calculated using detailed policies and procedures approved by our Adviser and our Board, including a majority of the independent directors, and such policies and procedures are consistent with the description of the calculation of the fees set forth above.

Our Adviser may elect to defer or waive all or a portion of the fees that would otherwise be paid to it in its sole discretion. Any portion of a fee not taken as to any month, quarter or year will be deferred without interest and may be taken in any such other month prior to the occurrence of a liquidity event as our Adviser may determine in its sole discretion.

Organization and Offering Costs

Limitations of Liability and Indemnification

The Adviser and its officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with the Adviser, including without limitation its sole member, are not liable to us for any action taken or omitted to be taken by the Adviser in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser (except to the extent specified in Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act, concerning loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty (as the same is finally determined by judicial proceedings) with respect to the receipt of compensation for services).

We will indemnify the Adviser and its officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with the Adviser, including without limitation its general partner or managing member (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) and hold them harmless from and against all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) incurred by the Indemnified Parties in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the right of us or our security holders) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of the Adviser’s duties or obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser. However, the Indemnified Parties shall not be entitled to indemnification in respect of, any liability to us or our shareholders to which the Indemnified Parties would otherwise be subject by reason of criminal conduct, willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of the Adviser’s duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of the Adviser’s duties and obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement.

Board Approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement

On May 5, 2025, the Board held a meeting to consider and approve the continuation of the Investment Advisory Agreement and related matters. The Board was provided information it required to consider the Investment Advisory Agreement, including: (a) the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services to be provided to us by the Adviser; (b) comparative data with respect to advisory fees or similar expenses paid by other BDCs; (c) our projected operating expenses and expense ratio compared to BDCs with similar investment objectives; (d) any existing and potential sources of indirect income to the Adviser from its relationship with us and the profitability of that relationship; (e) information about the services to be performed and the personnel performing such services under the Investment Advisory Agreement; (f) the organizational capability and financial condition of the Adviser and its affiliates; and (g) the possibility of obtaining similar services from other third-party service providers or through an internally managed structure.

On May 5, 2025, based on the information reviewed and the discussion thereof, the Board, including a majority of the non-interested directors, determined that the investment advisory fee rates are reasonable in relation to the services provided and approved the continuation of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as being in the best interests of our shareholders.

Administration Agreement

The description below of the Administration Agreement is only a summary and is not necessarily complete. The description set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Administration Agreement.

Under the terms of the Administration Agreement, the Adviser performs, or oversees the performance of, administrative services for us, which includes, but is not limited to, providing office space, equipment and office services, maintaining financial records, preparing reports to shareholders and reports filed with the SEC, managing the payment of expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered by others, which could include employees of the Adviser or its affiliates. We will reimburse the Adviser for services performed for us pursuant to the terms of the Administration Agreement. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Administration Agreement, the Adviser may delegate its obligations under the Administration Agreement to an affiliate or to a third party and we will reimburse the Adviser for any services performed for us by such affiliate or third party.

The Administration Agreement became effective on May 18, 2021 and the continuation of the Administration Agreement was approved by the Board on May 5, 2025. Unless earlier terminated as described below, the Administration Agreement will remain in effect for two years from the date it first became effective and from year-to-year thereafter if approved annually by a majority of the Board or by the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities and, in each case, a majority of the independent directors. We may terminate the Administration Agreement, without payment of any penalty, upon 60 days’ written notice. The decision to terminate the agreement may be made by a majority of the Board or the shareholders holding a Majority of the Outstanding Shares of our common stock. In addition, the Adviser may terminate the Administration Agreement, without payment of any penalty, upon 60 days’ written notice. To the extent that the Adviser outsources any of its functions we will pay the fees associated with such functions without profit to the Adviser.

We will reimburse Blue Owl Credit Advisors for expenses necessary to perform services related to our administration and operations, including Blue Owl Credit Advisors’ allocable portion of the compensation and related expenses of our Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Financial Officer and their respective staffs. The amount of this reimbursement will be the lesser of (1) Blue Owl Credit Advisors' actual costs incurred in providing such services and (2) the amount that we estimate we would be required to pay alternative service providers for comparable services in the same geographic location. Blue Owl Credit Advisors will be required to allocate the cost of such services to us based on factors such as assets, revenues, time allocations and/or other reasonable metrics. Our board of directors will review the methodology employed in determining how the expenses are allocated to us and the proposed allocation of administrative expenses among us and certain affiliates of Blue Owl Credit Advisors. Our board of directors will assess the reasonableness of such reimbursements for expenses allocated to us based on the breadth, depth and quality of such services as compared to the estimated cost to us of obtaining similar services from third-party service providers known to be available. In addition, our board of directors will consider whether any single third-party service provider would be capable of providing all such services at comparable cost and quality. Finally, our board of directors will, among other things, compare the total amount paid to Blue Owl Credit Advisors for such services as a percentage of our net assets to the same ratio as reported by other comparable business development companies. We will not reimburse Blue Owl Credit Advisors for any services for which it receives a separate

fee, for example rent, depreciation, utilities, capital equipment or other administrative items allocated to a controlling person of Blue Owl Credit Advisors. To the extent that Blue Owl Credit Advisors outsources any of its functions we will pay the fees associated with such functions without profit to Blue Owl Credit Advisors.

The Administration Agreement provides that the Adviser and its affiliates’ respective officers, directors, members, managers, stockholders and employees are entitled to indemnification from us from and against any claims or liabilities, including reasonable legal fees and other expenses reasonably incurred, arising out of or in connection with our business and operations or any action taken or omitted on our behalf pursuant to authority granted by the Administration Agreement, except where attributable to willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of such person’s duties or reckless disregard of such person’s obligations and duties under the Administration Agreement as provided by Section 17(i) of the 1940 Act.

Payment of Our Expenses under the Investment Advisory and Administration Agreements

Except as specifically provided below, all investment professionals and staff of the Adviser, when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory and management services to us, and the base compensation, bonus and benefits, and the routine overhead expenses, of such personnel allocable to such services, will be provided and paid for by the Adviser. We bear our allocable portion of the compensation paid by the Adviser (or its affiliates) to our chief compliance officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs (based on a percentage of time such individuals devote, on an estimated basis, to our business affairs, and as otherwise set forth in the Administration Agreement). We also bear all other costs and expenses of our operations, administration and transactions, including, but not limited to (i) investment advisory fees, including management fees and incentive fees, to the Adviser, pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement; (ii) our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by the Adviser in performing its administrative obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement and Administration Agreement, and (iii) all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions including, without limitation, those relating to:

•expenses deemed to be “organization and offering expenses” for purposes of Conduct Rule 2310(a)(12) of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (exclusive of commissions, the dealer manager fee, any discounts and other similar expenses paid by investors at the time of sale of our stock);

•the cost of corporate and organizational expenses relating to offerings of shares of our common stock;

•the cost of calculating our net asset value, including the cost of any third-party valuation services;

•the cost of effecting any sales and repurchases of the common stock and other securities;

•fees and expenses payable under any dealer manager agreements, if any;

•debt service and other costs of borrowings or other financing arrangements;

•costs of hedging;

•expenses, including travel expense, incurred by the Adviser, or members of the Investment Team, or payable to third parties, performing due diligence on prospective portfolio companies and, if necessary, enforcing our rights;

•escrow agent, transfer agent and custodial fees;

•fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts;

•federal and state registration fees, any stock exchange listing fees and fees payable to rating agencies;

•U.S. federal, state and local taxes;

•independent directors’ fees and expenses including certain travel expenses;

•costs of preparing financial statements and maintaining books and records and filing reports or other documents with the SEC (or other regulatory bodies) and other reporting and compliance costs, including registration and listing fees, and the compensation of professionals responsible for the preparation of the foregoing;

•the costs of any reports, proxy statements or other notices to shareholders (including printing and mailing costs),

•the costs of any shareholder or director meetings and the compensation of investor relations personnel responsible for the preparation of the foregoing and related matters;

•commissions and other compensation payable to brokers or dealers;

•research and market data;

•fidelity bond, directors’ and officers’ errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums;

•direct costs and expenses of administration, including printing, mailing, long distance telephone and staff;

•fees and expenses associated with independent audits, outside legal and consulting costs;

•costs of winding up;

•costs incurred in connection with the formation or maintenance of entities or vehicles to hold our assets for tax or other purposes;

•extraordinary expenses (such as litigation or indemnification); and

•costs associated with reporting and compliance obligations under the 1940 Act and applicable federal and state securities laws.

Affiliated Transactions

We may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without prior approval of the directors who are not interested persons, and in some cases, the prior approval of the SEC. We rely on the Order to co-invest with other funds managed by the Adviser or certain affiliates in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. Pursuant to such Order, we are generally permitted to co-invest with certain of our affiliates if such co-investments are done on the same terms and at the same time, as further detailed in the Order. The Order requires that a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of the Board make certain findings (1) in most instances when we co-invest with our affiliates in an issuer where our affiliate has an existing investment in the issuer, and (2) if we dispose of an asset acquired in a transaction under the Order unless the disposition is done on a pro rata basis. Pursuant to the Order, the Board will oversee our participation in the co-investment program. As required by the Order, we have adopted, and the Board has approved, policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the Order, and the Adviser and our Chief Compliance Officer will provide reporting to the Board.

License Agreement

We have also entered into a license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with an affiliate of Blue Owl, pursuant to which we were granted a non-exclusive license to use the name “Blue Owl.” Under the License Agreement, we have a right to use the Blue Owl name for so long as the Adviser or one of its affiliates remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, we have no legal right to the “Blue Owl” name or logo.

Term

The Board expects to contemplate a liquidity event for our shareholders three to four years after the completion of our continuous public offering. We consider the offering period to be complete as of the termination date of the most recent public equity offering as we have not conducted a public equity offering during the ensuing two year period. A liquidity event could include: (i) a listing of shares on a national securities exchange; (ii) a merger or another transaction approved by the Board in which shareholders will receive cash or shares of a publicly traded company; or (iii) a sale of all or substantially all of its assets either on a complete portfolio basis or individually followed by a liquidation and distribution of cash to its shareholders. A liquidity event may include a sale, merger or rollover transaction with one or more affiliated investment companies managed by the Adviser. A liquidity event involving a merger or sale of all or substantially all of our assets would require the approval of our shareholders in accordance with our charter. Certain types of liquidity events, such as one involving a listing of shares on a national securities exchange, would allow us to retain our investment portfolio intact. If we determine to list securities on a national securities exchange, we expect to, although are not required to, maintain our external management structure. If we have not consummated a liquidity event by the five-year anniversary of the completion of our continuous public offering, the Board will consider (subject to any necessary Shareholder approvals and applicable requirements of the 1940 Act) liquidating us and distributing cash to our shareholders, and dissolving us in an orderly manner. The Board, as part of its ongoing duties, will review and evaluate any potential liquidity events and options as they become available and their favorability given current market conditions; however, there is no assurance that a liquidity event will be completed at any particular time or at all.

Employees

We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees. Services necessary for our business are provided by individuals who are employees of the Adviser or its affiliates, pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement. Each of our executive officers is employed by the Adviser or its affiliates. Our day-to-day investment operations are managed by the Adviser. The services necessary for the origination and administration of our investment portfolio are provided by investment professionals employed by the Adviser or its affiliates. The Investment Team is focused on origination and transaction development and the ongoing monitoring of our investments. In addition, we reimburse the Adviser for the allocable portion of the compensation paid by the Adviser (or its affiliates) to our chief compliance officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs (based on the percentage of time such individuals devote, on an estimated basis, to our business and affairs and as otherwise set forth in the Administration Agreement). See “— Investment Advisory Agreement” and “— Administration Agreement.”

Sustainability

Our and the Adviser’s sustainability efforts seek to enable positive outcomes for our investors and the communities in which we operate. We believe our Adviser’s sustainability efforts reflect strong leadership and oversight by Blue Owl’s senior management and Blue Owl’s Board and Blue Owl’s commitment to its priority areas.

Additionally, to integrate responsible investing practices firmwide, Blue Owl has a Responsible Investing Working Group (the “RI WG”), a cross-functional group across investment platforms, strategies and relevant business units. The RI WG members are senior representatives of their respective teams and are responsible for coordinating responsible investing-related efforts within their business units, as well as providing insights as it relates to their professional roles. The RI WG is chaired by Blue Owl’s Chief Operating Officer and its activities are managed by the Responsible Investing & ESG team.

Investing Responsibly

We and the Adviser recognize the importance of business relevant ESG issues and opportunities and are committed to the consideration of these factors in relation to our business operations and investment activities to manage risk and identify opportunities. Blue Owl adopted an ESG and responsible investing policy, which applies to all asset classes, industries and countries in which Blue Owl does business and the products it manages.

The Adviser believes that incorporating business relevant ESG factors into its corporate and investment activities has the potential to meaningfully contribute to our value. The Adviser strives to continuously strengthen its ability to mitigate, manage, and monitor relevant ESG risks and opportunities within our investment portfolios. When the Adviser considers potential investments on our behalf, it seeks to address the relevant ESG considerations, risks and potential rewards related to prospective investments. Further, the Adviser has processes designed to ensure compliance with applicable regulatory disclosure requirements, including ESG-related disclosure obligations.

The Adviser believes it is important to consider the multiple ways that climate risk may affect it as an asset manager. Blue Owl has designed an approach to identify, assess and prioritize potential climate-related risks across its operations and investment activity. The Adviser has considered recommendations from the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures in the design and implementation of its climate risk management program, including topics related to governance, strategy, risk management and metrics.

Belonging

The Adviser seeks to foster a culture that fuels its ability to deliver results through private markets, attract and retain top talent and build strong partnerships. The Adviser’s values—mutual respect, excellence, constructive dialogue and one team—form the foundation of a culture where its employees are empowered to reach their full potential.

The following initiatives help cultivate connection, opportunity and impact for the Adviser’s employees:

•Employee Resource Groups are open to all employees and aim to create an environment of belonging for all. These groups are employee-initiated and employee-led.

•Blue Owl Celebrates is a series that honors various heritage and affinity months throughout the year by highlighting dynamic guest speakers, small businesses and resources for learning and action.

•Blue Owl partners with industry organizations to offer its employees access to resources, memberships, events, networks and opportunities for professional development, as well as utilizing the organizations’ job boards to recruit candidates.

•Finally, Blue Owl’s suite of benefits includes primary and secondary parental leave, family planning benefits and stipend and flexible work schedules.

Citizenship

Blue Owl takes its role as a corporate citizen seriously and aims to contribute to meaningful causes to support the communities in which it operates and resides. Blue Owl is committed to building a robust citizenship program that is integrated, community-centered, and employee-enriched, including:

•Blue Owl Leads Together, its global employee volunteerism and giving program, allows employees to engage with one another and with the communities in which we live and work; and

•Blue Owl Gives, which advances Blue Owl’s philanthropic mission — unlocking opportunity by powering access to college, to careers, and to capital — through strategic nonprofit partnerships.

Regulation as a Business Development Company

We have elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between BDCs and their affiliates (including any investment advisers or sub-advisers), principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters and requires that a majority of the directors be persons other than “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the 1940 Act.

In addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw our election as, a BDC unless approved by a Majority of the Outstanding Shares of our common stock.

We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, issue and sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the then-current net asset value of our common stock if (1) our board of directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our shareholders, and (2) our shareholders have approved our policy and practice of making such sales within the preceding 12 months. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our board of directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities.

A BDC generally is required to meet an asset coverage ratio of the value of total assets to senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any preferred stock the BDC may issue in the future, of at least 200%. However, certain provisions of the 1940 Act allowed a BDC to increase the maximum amount of leverage it may incur from an asset coverage ratio of 200% to an asset coverage ratio of 150%, if certain requirements are met. This means that generally, a BDC can borrow up to $1 for every $1 of investor equity or, if certain conditions are met and it reduces its asset coverage ratio, it can borrow up to $2 for every $1 of investor equity. The reduced asset coverage requirement permits a BDC to double the amount of leverage it could incur.

We may also be prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our board of directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC.

We may invest up to 100% of our assets in securities acquired directly from issuers in privately negotiated transactions. With respect to such securities, we may, for the purpose of public resale, be deemed an “underwriter” as that term is defined in the Securities Act.

Our intention is to not write (sell) or buy put or call options to manage risks associated with the publicly traded securities of our portfolio companies, except that we may enter into hedging transactions to manage the risks associated with interest rate or currency fluctuations. However, we may purchase or otherwise receive warrants to purchase the common stock of our portfolio companies in connection with acquisition financing or other investments. Similarly, in connection with an acquisition, we may acquire rights to require the issuers of acquired securities or their affiliates to repurchase them under certain circumstances.

We do not intend to acquire securities issued by any investment company that exceed the limits imposed by the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. Under these limits, we generally cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of any registered investment company, invest more than 5% of the value of our total assets in the securities of one investment company, or invest more than 10% of the value of our total assets in the securities of more than one investment company unless certain conditions are met. If we invest in securities issued by investment companies, if any, it should be noted that such investments might subject our shareholders to additional expenses as they will be indirectly responsible for the costs and expenses of such companies.

None of our investment policies are fundamental, and thus may be changed without shareholder approval.

Qualifying Assets. Under the 1940 Act, a BDC may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the company’s total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are any of the following:

(1)Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which:

(a)is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;

(b)is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by the business development company) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and

(c)satisfies any of the following:

(i)does not have any class of securities that is traded on a national securities exchange;

(ii)has a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange, but has an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than $250 million;

(iii)is controlled by a business development company or a group of companies including a business development company and the business development company has an affiliated person who is a director of the eligible portfolio company; or

(iv)is a small and solvent company having total assets of not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not less than $2 million.

(2)Securities of any eligible portfolio company controlled by us.

(3)Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements.

(4)Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.

(5)Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities.

(6)Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.

In addition, a BDC must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2) or (3) above.

Control, as defined by the 1940 Act, is presumed to exist where a BDC beneficially owns more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio company, but may exist in other circumstances based on the facts and circumstances.

The regulations defining qualifying assets may change over time. We may adjust our investment focus as needed to comply with and/or take advantage of any regulatory, legislative, administrative or judicial actions.

Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies. A BDC must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described above. However, in order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, the BDC must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial assistance; except that, where the BDC purchases such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance. Where the BDC purchases such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, the BDC will satisfy this test if one of the other persons in the group makes available such managerial assistance, although this may not be the sole method by which the BDC satisfies the requirement to make available managerial assistance. Making available significant managerial assistance means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the BDC, through its directors, officers or employees, offers to provide and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company through monitoring of portfolio company operations, selective participation in board and management meetings, consulting with and advising a portfolio company’s officers or other organizational or financial guidance.

Temporary Investments. Pending investment in other types of qualifying assets, as described above, our investments can consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, which are referred to herein, collectively, as temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets would be qualifying assets. We may invest in highly rated commercial paper, U.S. government agency notes, U.S. Treasury bills or in repurchase agreements relating to such securities that are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price that is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. Consequently, repurchase agreements are functionally similar to loans. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements. However, the 1940 Act and certain diversification tests in order to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes typically require us to limit the amount we invest with any one counterparty. Accordingly, we do not intend to enter into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in excess of this limit. The Adviser will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties with which we may enter into repurchase agreement transactions.

Warrants and Options. Under the 1940 Act, a BDC is subject to restrictions on the issuance, terms and amount of warrants, options or rights to purchase shares of capital stock that it may have outstanding at any time. Under the 1940 Act, we may generally only offer warrants provided that (i) the warrants expire by their terms within ten years, (ii) the exercise or conversion price is not less than the current market value at the date of issuance, (iii) shareholders authorize the proposal to issue such warrants, and the Board approves such issuance on the basis that the issuance is in our best interests and the shareholders best interests and (iv) if the warrants are accompanied by other securities, the warrants are not separately transferable unless no class of such warrants and the securities accompanying them has been publicly distributed. The 1940 Act also provides that the amount of our voting securities that would

result from the exercise of all outstanding warrants, as well as options and rights, at the time of issuance may not exceed 25% of our outstanding voting securities. In particular, the amount of capital stock that would result from the conversion or exercise of all outstanding warrants, options or rights to purchase capital stock cannot exceed 25% of the BDC’s total outstanding shares of capital stock.

Senior Securities; Coverage Ratio. We are generally permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our common stock if immediately after such borrowing or issuance, the ratio of our total assets (less total liabilities other than indebtedness represented by senior securities) to our total indebtedness represented by senior securities plus preferred stock, if any, is at least 200% (or 150%, if certain requirements are met). This means that generally, a BDC can borrow up to $1 for every $1 of investor equity or, if certain requirements are met and it reduces its asset coverage ratio, it can borrow up to $2 for every $1 of investor equity.

In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we will be required to make provisions to prohibit any dividend distribution to our shareholders on our capital stock or the repurchase of such capital stock unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the dividend distribution or repurchase. We will also be permitted to borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes, which borrowings would not be considered senior securities. For a discussion of the risks associated with leverage, see “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS — Risks Related to Business Development Companies — Regulations governing our operation as a BDC and RIC affect our ability to raise capital and the way in which we raise additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth. As a BDC, the necessity of raising additional capital may expose us to risks, including risks associated with leverage.”

Codes of Ethics. We and the Adviser have each adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act and Rule 204A-1 under the Advisers Act, respectively, that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain personal securities transactions. Personnel subject to the code are permitted to invest in securities for their personal investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such investments are made in accordance with the code’s requirements. Our code of ethics is available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also obtain copies of the code of ethics after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov.

Affiliated Transactions. We may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from conducting certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, the prior approval of the SEC. We rely on the Order to co-invest with other funds managed by the Adviser or certain affiliates in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. Pursuant to the Order, we are generally permitted to co-invest with certain of our affiliates if such co-investments are done on the same terms and at the same time, as further detailed in the Order. The Order requires that a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of the Board makes certain findings (1) in most instances when we co-invest with our affiliates in an issuer where our affiliate has an existing investment in the issuer, and (2) if we dispose of an asset acquired in a transaction under the Order unless the disposition is done on a pro rata basis. Pursuant to the Order, the Board will oversee our participation in the co-investment program. As required by the Order, we have adopted, and the Board has approved, policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the Order, and the Adviser and our Chief Compliance Officer will provide reporting to the Board. The Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ allocation policies seek to ensure equitable allocation of investment opportunities between us and/or other funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates. As a result of the Order, there could be significant overlap in our investment portfolio and the investment portfolio of other Blue Owl Credit Clients and other Blue Owl clients that avail themselves of the Order. In addition, the Adviser and its affiliates are permitted to allocate an investment to a number of products across platforms that it views as appropriate for the particular investment objectives, strategies and characteristics of such products.

Cancellation of the Investment Advisory Agreement. Under the 1940 Act, the Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of its assignment, as defined in the 1940 Act, by the Adviser. See "Investment Advisory Agreement - Term." The Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated at any time, without penalty, by us upon not less than 60 days’ written notice to the Adviser and may be terminated at any time, without penalty, by the Adviser upon 60 days’ written notice to us. The holders of a Majority of our Outstanding Shares may also terminate the Investment Advisory Agreement without penalty upon not less than 60 days’ written notice. Unless terminated earlier as described above, the Investment Advisory Agreement will remain in effect for a period of two years from the date it first became effective and will remain in effect from year-to-year thereafter if approved annually by our Board or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a Majority of our Outstanding Shares, and, in either case, if also approved by a majority of our directors who are not “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act.

Other. We have adopted an investment policy that complies with the requirements applicable to us as a BDC. We expect to be periodically examined by the SEC for compliance with the 1940 Act, and will be subject to the periodic reporting and related requirements of the Exchange Act.

We are also required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect against larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a BDC, we are prohibited from protecting any director or officer against any liability to our shareholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person’s office.

We are also required to designate a chief compliance officer and to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws and to review these policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation.

We are not permitted to change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw our election as, a BDC unless approved by a Majority of the Outstanding Shares of our common stock.

We intend to operate as a non-diversified management investment company; however, we are currently and may, from time to time, in the future, be considered a diversified management investment company pursuant to the definitions set forth in the 1940 Act.

Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act requires BDCs that use derivatives to, among other things, comply with a value-at-risk leverage limit, adopt a derivatives risk management program, and implement certain testing and board reporting procedures. Rule 18f-4 exempts BDCs that qualify as “limited derivatives users” from the aforementioned requirements, provided that these BDCs adopt written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to manage the BDC’s derivatives risks and comply with certain recordkeeping requirements. We currently qualify as a “limited derivatives user” and expect to continue to do so. We have adopted a derivatives policy and comply with the recordkeeping requirements of Rule 18f-4.

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following discussion is a general summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to us and to an investment in our common stock. This discussion does not purport to be a complete description of the income tax considerations applicable to such an investment. For example, this discussion does not describe tax consequences that we have assumed to be generally known by investors or certain considerations that may be relevant to certain types of holders subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws, including persons who hold our common stock as part of a straddle or a hedging, integrated or constructive sale transaction, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, brokers or dealers in securities, pension plans and trusts, persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United States, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, personal holding companies, persons required to accelerate the recognition of gross income as a result of such income being recognized on an applicable financial statement, persons who acquire an interest in the Company in connection with the performance of services, and financial institutions. Such persons should consult with their own tax advisers as to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in our common stock, which may differ substantially from those described herein. This discussion assumes that shareholders hold our common stock as capital assets (within the meaning of the Code).

The discussion is based upon the Code, U.S. Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations, each as of the date of this report and all of which are subject to change at any time, possibly retroactively, which could affect the continuing validity of this discussion and could be applied in a manner that adversely impact shareholders. We have not sought and will not seek any ruling from the IRS regarding any matter discussed herein. Prospective investors should be aware that, although we intend to adopt positions we believe are in accord with current interpretations of the U.S. federal income tax laws, the IRS may not agree with the tax positions taken by us and that, if challenged by the IRS, our tax positions might not be sustained by the courts. This summary does not discuss any aspects of U.S. estate tax, U.S. state or local taxation or non-U.S. taxation. It also does not discuss the special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws that could result if we invested in tax-exempt securities or certain other investment assets.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Shareholder” is a beneficial owner of our common stock that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

•a citizen or individual resident of the United States;

•a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation) organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision thereof;

•a trust that is subject to the supervision of a court within the United States and the control of one or more U.S. persons or that has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person; or

•an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source.

A “Non-U.S. Shareholder” is a beneficial owner of our common stock that is neither a U.S. Shareholder nor a partnership for U.S. tax purposes.

If a partnership (including an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds our common stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Any partner of a partnership holding our common stock should consult his, her or its own tax advisers with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of such shares.

Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to an investor of an investment in our common stock will depend on the facts of his, her or its particular situation. You should consult your own tax adviser regarding the specific tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock to you, including tax reporting requirements, the applicability of U.S. federal, state and local tax laws and non-U.S. tax laws, eligibility for the benefits of any applicable income tax treaty and the effect of any possible changes in the tax laws.

Taxation as a Regulated Investment Company

We have elected to be treated and intend to qualify each year as a RIC under the Code; however, no assurance can be given that we will be able to maintain our RIC tax treatment. As a RIC, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax at corporate rates on any ordinary income or capital gains that we timely distribute to our shareholders as dividends. To qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In addition, in order to obtain RIC tax benefits, we generally must distribute to our shareholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income,” which is generally our net ordinary income plus the excess of realized net short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital losses (the “Annual Distribution Requirement”).

If we qualify as a RIC, and satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, then we will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the portion of our investment company taxable income and net capital gain that we timely distribute (or are deemed to distribute) to our shareholders as dividends. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates on any income or capital gains not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our shareholders.

We will be subject to a nondeductible 4% U.S. federal excise tax on certain undistributed income unless we distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (i) 98% of our net ordinary income for each calendar year, (ii) 98.2% of the amount by which our capital gain exceeds our capital loss (adjusted for certain ordinary losses) for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (iii) certain undistributed amounts from previous years on which we paid no U.S. federal income tax (the “Excise Tax Distribution Requirement”). While we intend to distribute sufficient income and capital gains to our shareholders in each taxable year in order to avoid imposition of this 4% U.S. federal excise tax, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in avoiding entirely the imposition of this tax.

In order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:

•continue to qualify as a BDC under the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year;

•derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to loans of certain securities, gains from the sale or other taxable disposition of stock or other securities or foreign currencies, net income derived from an interest in certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships” (as defined in the Code), or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities (the “90% Income Test”); and

•diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year:

•at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and

•no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the (i) securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of one issuer, (ii) securities, other than securities of other RICs, of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable Code rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or (iii) securities of one or more “qualified publicly traded partnerships” (collectively, the “Diversification Tests”).

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be required to include in our taxable income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with PIK interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or issued with warrants), we must include in our taxable income in each taxable year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. We may also have to include in our taxable income other amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as PIK interest and deferred loan origination fees that are paid after origination of the loan. Because any original issue discount or other amounts accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to our shareholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have received the corresponding cash amount.

Although we do not presently expect to do so, we are authorized to borrow funds, to sell assets and to make taxable distributions of our stock and debt securities in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement. Our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution requirements may be limited by (i) the illiquid nature of our portfolio and/or (ii) other requirements relating to our status as a RIC, including the Diversification Tests. If we dispose of assets in order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or the Excise Tax Distribution Requirement, we may make such dispositions at times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, we may fail to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC and become subject to U.S. federal income tax.

Under the 1940 Act, we are not permitted to make distributions to our shareholders while our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding unless certain “asset coverage” tests are met. If we are prohibited from making distributions, we may fail to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC and become subject to U.S. federal income tax.

Certain of our investment practices may be subject to special and complex U.S. federal income tax provisions that may, among other things: (i) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the allowance of certain losses or deductions; (ii) convert lower taxed long-term capital gain into higher taxed short-term capital gain or ordinary income; (iii) convert an ordinary loss or a deduction into a capital loss (the deductibility of which is more limited); (iv) cause us to recognize income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash; (v) adversely affect the time as to when a purchase or sale of securities is deemed to occur; (vi) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial transactions; and (vii) generate income that will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test described above. We will monitor our transactions and may make certain tax decisions in order to mitigate the potential adverse effect of these provisions.

A RIC is limited in its ability to deduct expenses in excess of its “investment company taxable income” (which is, generally, ordinary income plus the excess of net short-term capital gains over net long-term capital losses). If our expenses in a given year exceed our investment company taxable income, we would experience a net operating loss for that year. However, a RIC is not permitted to carry forward net operating losses to subsequent years. In addition, expenses can be used only to offset investment company taxable income, not net capital gain. A RIC may not use any net capital losses (that is, realized capital losses in excess of realized capital gains) to offset the RIC’s investment company taxable income, but may carry forward such losses indefinitely, and use them to offset capital gains. Due to these limits on the deductibility of expenses, over the course of one or more taxable years we may have, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, aggregate taxable income that we are required to distribute and that is taxable to our shareholders even if such income is greater than the aggregate net income we actually earned during those years. Such required distributions may be made from our cash assets or by liquidation of investments, if necessary. We may realize gains or losses from such liquidations. In the event we realize net capital gains from such transactions, a shareholder may receive a larger capital gain distribution than it would have received in the absence of such transactions.

Investment income received from sources within foreign countries, or capital gains earned by investing in securities of foreign issuers, may be subject to foreign income taxes withheld at the source. In this regard, withholding tax rates in countries with which the United States does not have a tax treaty may be 35% or more. The United States has entered into tax treaties with many foreign countries that may entitle us to a reduced rate of or exemption from withholding tax on investment income and gains. The effective rate of foreign tax cannot be determined at this time since the amount of our assets to be invested within various countries is not now known. We do not anticipate being eligible for the special election that allows a RIC to treat foreign income taxes paid by such RIC as paid by its stockholders.

If we purchase shares in a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, we may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any “excess distribution” received on, or any gain from the disposition of such shares. Additional charges in the nature of interest generally will be imposed on us in respect of deferred taxes arising from any such excess distributions or gains. This additional tax and interest may apply even if we make a distribution as a taxable dividend by us to our shareholders in an amount equal to (1) any excess distribution, or (2) the gain from the dispositions of such shares. If we invest in a PFIC and elect to treat the PFIC as a “qualified electing fund”, or QEF, in lieu of the foregoing requirements, we will be required to include in income each year our proportionate share of the ordinary earnings and net capital gain of the QEF, even if such income is not distributed by the QEF. Alternatively, we may be able to elect to mark-to-market at the end of each taxable year our shares in a PFIC; in this case, we will recognize as ordinary income any increase in the value of such shares and as ordinary loss any decrease in such value to the extent that any such decrease does not exceed prior increases included in our income. Under either election, we may be required to recognize income in excess of distributions from PFICs and our proceeds from dispositions of PFIC stock during that year, and such income will nevertheless be subject to the Annual Distribution Requirement and will be taken into account for purposes of the Excise Tax Distribution Requirement. We intend to limit and/or manage our holdings in PFICs to minimize our liability for any taxes and related interest charges.

If we hold more than 10% of the shares in a foreign corporation that is treated as a controlled foreign corporation, or “CFC,” we may be treated as receiving a deemed distribution (taxable as ordinary income) each year from such foreign corporation in an amount equal to our pro rata share of certain of the corporation’s income for the tax year (including both ordinary earnings and capital gains), whether or not the corporation makes an actual distribution during such year. In general, a foreign corporation will be classified as a CFC if more than 50% of the shares of the corporation, measured by reference to combined voting power or value, is owned (directly, indirectly or by attribution) by U.S. Shareholders. A “U.S. Shareholder,” for this purpose, is any U.S. person that possesses (actually or constructively) 10% or more of the combined voting power of all classes of shares of a corporation or 10% or more of the total value of all classes of shares of a corporation. If we are treated as receiving a deemed distribution from a CFC, we will be required to include such distribution in our investment company taxable income regardless of whether we receive any actual distributions from such CFC, and such income will be subject to the Annual Distribution Requirement and will be taken into account for purposes of the Excise Tax Distribution Requirement

Income inclusions from a QEF or a CFC will be “good income” for purposes of the 90% Income Test provided that they are derived in connection with our business of investing in stocks and securities or the QEF or the CFC distributes such income to us in the same taxable year to which the income is included in our income.

Foreign exchange gains and losses realized by us in connection with certain transactions involving non-dollar debt securities, certain foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency option contracts, foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currencies, or payables or receivables denominated in a foreign currency are subject to Code provisions that generally treat such gains and losses as ordinary income and losses and may affect the amount, timing and character of distributions to our stockholders. Any such transactions that are not directly related to our investment in securities (possibly including speculative currency positions or currency derivatives not used for hedging purposes) could, under future Treasury regulations, produce income not among the types of “qualifying income” from which a RIC must derive at least 90% of its annual gross income.

In accordance with certain applicable Treasury regulations and guidance published by the IRS, a RIC that is publicly offered may treat a distribution of its own stock as fulfilling its RIC distribution requirements if each stockholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC, subject to a limitation that the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all stockholders must be at least 20% of the aggregate declared distribution. If too many stockholders elect to receive cash, the cash available for distribution must be allocated among stockholders electing to receive cash (with the balance of the distribution paid in stock). In no event will any stockholder, electing to receive cash, receive less than the lesser of (a) the portion of the distribution such stockholder elected to receive in cash, or (b) an amount equal to his or her entire distribution times the percentage limitation on cash available for distribution. If these and certain other requirements are met, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the amount of the dividend paid in stock will be equal to the amount of cash that could have been received instead of stock. We have no current intention of paying dividends in shares of our stock in accordance with these Treasury regulations or published guidance.

If we fail to qualify for treatment as a RIC, and certain relief provisions are not applicable, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on all of our taxable income (including our net capital gains) imposed at regular corporate rates. We would not be able to deduct distributions to our shareholders, nor would they be required to be made. Distributions, including distributions of net long-term capital gain, would generally be taxable to our shareholders as ordinary dividend income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain holding period and other limitations under the Code, our corporate shareholders would be eligible to claim a dividend received deduction with respect to such dividend and our non-corporate shareholders would generally be able to treat such dividends as “qualified dividend income,” which is subject to reduced rates of U.S. federal income tax. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the shareholder’s adjusted tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain. In order to requalify as a RIC, in addition to the other requirements discussed above, we would be required to distribute all of our previously undistributed earnings attributable to the period we failed to qualify as a RIC by the end of the first year that we intend to requalify as a RIC. If we fail to requalify as a RIC for a period greater than two taxable years, we may be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates on any net built-in gains with respect to certain of our assets (i.e., the excess of the aggregate gains, including items of income, over aggregate losses that would have been realized with respect to such assets if we had been liquidated) that we elect to recognize on requalification or when recognized over the next five years.

Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to the Adviser. The Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures of the Adviser are described below. The guidelines are reviewed periodically by the Adviser and our non-interested directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change.

As an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, the Adviser has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of its clients. As part of this duty, the Adviser recognizes that it must vote client securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best interests of its clients. These policies and procedures for voting proxies for the Adviser’s investment advisory clients are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule 206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act.

Proxy Policies

The Adviser will seek to vote all proxies relating to our portfolio securities in the best interest of our shareholders. The Adviser reviews on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted to a shareholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by the Company. Although the Adviser will generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on its clients’ portfolio securities, the Adviser may vote for such a proposal if there exists compelling long-term reasons to do so.

The Adviser’s proxy voting decisions are made by senior officers who are responsible for monitoring each of our investments. To ensure that the Adviser’s vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, the Adviser requires that: (i) anyone involved in the decision making process disclose to the Adviser’s chief compliance officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in the decision-making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how the Adviser intends to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.

Proxy Voting Records

You may obtain information about how the Adviser voted proxies by making a written request for proxy voting information to: Blue Owl Capital Corporation II, Attention: Investor Relations, 399 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022, or by calling Blue Owl Capital Corporation II at (212) 419-3000.

We are committed to maintaining the confidentiality, integrity and security of non-public personal information relating to investors. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information we collect, how we protect that information and why, in certain cases, we may share information with select other parties.

Generally, we do not collect any non-public personal information other than certain biographical information which is used only so that we can service your account, send you annual reports, proxy statements, and other information required by law. With regard to this information, we maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards designed to protect the non-public personal information of our investors.

We may share information that we collect regarding an investor with certain of our service providers for legitimate business purposes, for example, in order to process trades or mail information to investors. In addition, we may disclose information that we collect regarding an investor as required by law or in connection with regulatory or law enforcement inquiries.

Reporting Obligations

We will furnish our shareholders with annual reports containing audited financial statements, quarterly reports, and such other periodic reports as we determine to be appropriate or as may be required by law.

We make available free of charge on our website (www.blueowlproducts.com) our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K. The SEC also maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains such information. The reference to our website is an inactive textual reference only and the information contained on our website is not a part of this Form 10-K.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our securities involves a number of significant risks. You should consider carefully the following information before making an investment in our securities. The risks below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or not presently deemed material by us may also impair our operations and performance. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The following is a summary of the principal risks that you should carefully consider before investing in our securities.

We are subject to risks related to macroeconomic factors.

•Difficult market and geopolitical conditions could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

•Capital markets disruption and economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

•Future increases in inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our portfolio companies.

•Fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our portfolio companies.

We are subject to risks related to our business and operations.

•The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

•We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss and may increase the risk of investing in us.

•Defaults and provisions under our current borrowings or any future borrowing facility or notes may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

•If we are unable to obtain additional debt financing, or if our borrowing capacity is materially reduced, our business could be materially adversely affected.

•Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our Adviser’s ability to manage and support our investment process. If our Adviser were to lose a significant number of its key professionals, or terminate the Investment Advisory Agreement, our ability to achieve our investment objective could be significantly harmed.

•Our ability to achieve our investment objective also depends to a significant extent upon Blue Owl’s relationships with corporations, financial institutions and investment firms, the inability of Blue Owl to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.

•We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which could delay further deployment of our capital, reduce returns and result in losses.

•Our investment portfolio is recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Adviser in accordance with procedures approved by our Board and, as a result, there is and will be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.

•Our Board may change our operating policies and strategies without prior notice or shareholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse to our shareholders.

•Cybersecurity risks and cyber data security incidents could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and confidential information in our possession and damage to our business relationships.

•Use of AI technologies by us could lead to the exposure of our data or other adverse effects and increase competitive, operational, legal, and regulatory risks in ways that we cannot predict.

•We are subject to risks in using custodians, counterparties, administrators and other agents.

We are subject to risks related to our Adviser and its affiliates.

•Our Adviser and its affiliates, including our officers and some of our directors, may face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and our affiliates, which could result in increased risk-taking or speculative investments, or cause our Adviser to use substantial leverage.

•The time and resources that individuals associated with our Adviser devote to us may be diverted, and we may face additional competition due to, among other things, the fact that neither our Adviser nor its affiliates is prohibited from raising money for or managing another entity that makes the same types of investments that we target.

•Our Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for their respective other accounts and clients or issuers in which we may invest.

•We may be obligated to pay our Adviser incentive fees even if we incur a net loss due to a decline in the value of our portfolio and even if our earned interest income is not payable in cash.

•Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.

We are subject to risks related to business development companies.

•The requirement that we invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets could preclude us from investing in accordance with our current business strategy; conversely, the failure to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets could result in our failure to maintain our status as a BDC.

•Regulations governing our operation as a BDC and RIC affect our ability to raise capital and the way in which we raise additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth. As a BDC, the necessity of raising additional capital may expose us to risks, including risks associated with leverage.

We are subject to risks related to our investments.

•Our investments in portfolio companies may be risky, and we could lose all or part of our investments.

•We have invested and may continue to invest through joint ventures, partnerships and other special purpose vehicles and our investments through these vehicles may entail greater risks, or risks that we otherwise would not incur, if we otherwise made such investments directly.

•Defaults by our portfolio companies could jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity investments that we hold which could harm our operating results.

•Subordinated liens on collateral securing debt investments that we may make to portfolio companies may be subject to control by senior creditors with first priority liens. If there is a default, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay in full both the first priority creditors and us.

•We generally will not control the business operations of our portfolio companies and, due to the illiquid nature of our holdings in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our interests in our portfolio companies.

•We and our portfolio companies are, and will continue to be, exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates.

•International investments create additional risks.

•Our portfolio may be focused on a limited number of portfolio companies or industries, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of its debt instruments or if there is a downturn in a particular industry.

We are subject to risks related to an investment in our common stock.

•The net asset value of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

•The amount of any distributions we may make on our common stock is uncertain. We may not be able to pay distributions to shareholders, or be able to sustain distributions at any particular level, and our distributions per share, if any, may not grow over time, and our distributions per share may be reduced. We have not established any limits on the extent to which we may use borrowings, if any, and we may use sources other than from cash flows from operations to fund distributions (which may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in portfolio companies).

•Our shares are not listed, and we do not intend to list our shares, on an exchange, nor quoted through a quotation system. Therefore, our shareholders will have limited liquidity and may not receive a full return of invested capital (including front-end commissions, fees and expenses), upon selling their shares or upon liquidation of our Company.

We are subject to risks related to an investment in our unsecured notes.

•Our unsecured notes are effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness we have currently incurred or may incur in the future.

•Our unsecured notes are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.

•A downgrade, suspension or withdrawal of the credit rating assigned by a rating agency to us or our unsecured notes, if any, or change in the debt markets, could cause the liquidity or market value of our unsecured notes to decline significantly.

We are subject to risks related to U.S. federal income tax.

•We cannot predict how new tax legislation will affect us, our investments, or our stockholders, and any such legislation could adversely affect our business.

•We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates if we are unable to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code.

•We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.

We are subject to general risks.

•Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business or cause us to alter our business strategy.

•Heightened scrutiny of the financial services industry by regulators may materially and adversely affect our business.

Macroeconomic Factors

Difficult market and geopolitical conditions could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business, financial conditions and results of operations may be affected by conditions and trends in the global financial markets and the global economic and political climate relating to, among other things, fluctuations in interest rates, the availability and cost of credit, future increases in inflation, economic uncertainty, changes in laws (including laws and regulations relating to our taxation, taxation of our clients and applicable to alternative asset managers), trade policies, commodity prices, tariffs (including retaliatory tariffs), currency exchange rates and controls, political elections and administration transitions, and national and international political events (including contract terminations or funding pauses, government agency closures, prolonged government shutdowns, wars and other forms of conflict, terrorist acts, and security operations), work stoppages, labor shortages and labor

disputes, supply chain disruptions and catastrophic events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes and global health pandemics.

Changes in trade policies, including the imposition of new tariffs or increases in existing tariffs between the United States, Mexico, Canada, China or other countries, or reactionary measures in response thereto including retaliatory tariffs, legal challenges, or currency manipulation, could adversely affect the market conditions in which we operate. Although the Supreme Court recently invalidated the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), certain tariff rates and obligations established through trade agreements that were negotiated during active IEEPA tariffs remain in effect, and the current administration has announced widely applicable tariffs pursuant to the Trade Act of 1974, effective February 24, 2026. The administration has indicated that it will continue seeking to implement tariffs through other statutory authorities as well. The scope of the Supreme Court’s decision may create market uncertainty as it relates to the availability of refunds for prior tariffs and the imposition of new tariffs to replace those imposed under IEEPA.

These factors are outside of our control and may negatively impact the businesses in which we invest directly or indirectly and, in turn, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. We monitor developments and seek to manage our investments in a manner consistent with achieving our investment objective, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so.

Global financial markets have experienced heightened volatility in recent periods, including as a result of economic and political events in or affecting the world’s major economies, such as the ongoing wars and conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, as well as continued political and social unrest in Venezuela, the Middle East and regions of North Africa. Concerns over economic recession, future increases in inflation, interest rate volatility, fluctuations in oil and gas prices resulting from global production and demand levels and geopolitical tension, have exacerbated market volatility. Market volatility has been further exacerbated by social unrest, changes regarding immigration and work permit policies and other political and security concerns both in the United States and across various international regions. Due to interrelationships within the global financial markets, our business may be adversely affected by such issues both within and outside of the directly affected regions.

During periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns, which may be across one or more industries, sectors or geographies, the companies in which we invest may experience decreased revenues, financial losses, credit rating downgrades, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased funding costs. During such periods, those companies may also have difficulty in pursuing growth strategies, expanding their businesses and operations and be unable to meet their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including obligations and expenses payable us. Negative financial results in our portfolio companies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares and/or debt securities to decline.

Capital markets disruption and economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In recent years, the U.S. corporate debt markets have been impacted by inflation. Uncertain market conditions caused by increased inflation or other conditions may make it difficult to extend the maturity of or refinance our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness with similar terms and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business. The debt capital that will be available to us in the future, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions than what we currently experience, including being in an elevated interest rate environment. If we are unable to raise or refinance debt, then our equity investors may not benefit from the potential for increased returns on equity resulting from leverage and we may be limited in our ability to make new commitments or to fund existing commitments to our portfolio companies. An inability to extend the maturity of, or refinance, our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Significant disruption or volatility in the capital markets may also have a negative effect on the valuations of our investments. While most of our investments are not publicly traded, applicable accounting standards require us to assume as part of our valuation process that our investments are sold in a principal market to market participants (even if we plan on holding an investment through its maturity). Significant disruption or volatility in the capital markets may also affect the pace of our investment activity and the potential for liquidity events involving our investments. Thus, the illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments to access capital if required, and as a result, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments if we were required to sell them for liquidity purposes. An inability to raise or access capital could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations and cause our net asset value to decline. In addition, adverse or volatile market conditions may make equity capital difficult to raise because, subject to some limited exceptions, as a BDC, we are generally not able to issue additional shares of our common stock at a price less than net asset value without first obtaining approval for such issuance from our shareholders and independent directors. In addition, unfavorable economic conditions may require us to modify the payment terms of our investments, including changes in “payment in kind” or “PIK” interest provisions and/or cash interest rates, and also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us on terms we deem acceptable.

Future increases in inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our portfolio companies.

Certain of our portfolio companies operate in industries that have been, or may be, impacted by inflation. Ongoing inflationary pressures have increased the costs of labor, energy and raw materials and have adversely affected consumer spending, economic growth and our portfolio companies’ operations. If such portfolio companies are unable to pass any increases in the costs of their operations along to their customers, it could adversely affect their operating results. Such conditions would increase the risk of default on their obligations as a borrower. In addition, any projected future decreases in our portfolio companies’ operating results due to inflation could adversely impact the fair value of those investments. Any decreases in the fair value of our investments could result in future unrealized losses and therefore reduce our net assets resulting from operations. Any decreases in the fair value of our investments could result in future realized or unrealized losses.

Fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our portfolio companies.

Fluctuations in interest rates could have a dampening effect on overall economic activity, the financial condition of our portfolio companies and the financial condition of the end customers who ultimately create demand for the capital we supply, all of which could negatively affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, lower interest rates may increase prepayment risk for our portfolio company investments with higher interest rates. The Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate three times in 2025. Although the Federal Reserve has signaled the potential for additional federal funds rate cuts, there remains uncertainty around the rate and timing of decreases. Uncertainty surrounding future Federal Reserve actions may have a material effect on our business making it particularly difficult for us to obtain financing at attractive rates, impacting our ability to execute on our growth strategies or future acquisitions.

Risks Related to Our Business

The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

We may acquire a significant percentage of our investments from privately held companies in directly negotiated transactions. Substantially all of these investments are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than exchange-listed securities or other securities for which there is an active trading market. We typically would be unable to exit these investments unless and until the portfolio company has a liquidity event such as a sale, refinancing, or initial public offering.

The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult or impossible for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Moreover, investments purchased by us that are liquid at the time of purchase may subsequently become illiquid due to events relating to the issuer, market events, economic conditions or investor perceptions.

We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss and may increase the risk of investing in us.

The use of borrowings, also known as leverage, increases the volatility of investments by magnifying the potential for gain or loss on invested equity capital. We currently borrow under our credit facilities and have issued or assumed other senior securities, and in the future may borrow from, or issue additional senior securities to, banks, insurance companies, funds, institutional investors and other lenders and investors. Holders of these senior securities have fixed-dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our shareholders. If the value of our assets decreases, leverage would cause our net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have if we did not employ leverage. Similarly, any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to service our debt or make distributions to our shareholders. In addition, our shareholders will bear the burden of any increase in our expenses as a result of our use of leverage, including interest expenses and any increase in the base management or incentive fees payable to our Adviser attributable to the increase in assets purchased using leverage. There can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful.

Our ability to service any borrowings that we incur will depend largely on our financial performance and will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. Moreover, the management fee will be payable based on our average gross assets excluding cash and cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed amounts, which may give our Adviser an incentive to use leverage to make additional investments. See “—Our Adviser and its affiliates, including our officers and some of our directors, may face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and our affiliates, which could result in increased risk-taking or speculative investments, or cause our Adviser to use substantial leverage.” The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our Adviser’s and our Board’s assessment of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain credit at all or on terms acceptable to us, which could affect our return on capital. However, to the extent that we use leverage to finance our assets, our financing costs will reduce cash available for distributions to shareholders. Moreover, we may not be able to meet our financing obligations and, to the extent that we cannot, we risk the loss of some or all of our assets to liquidation or sale to satisfy the obligations. In such an event, we may be forced to sell assets at significantly depressed prices due to market conditions or otherwise, which may result in losses.

In addition to having fixed-dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common shareholders, obligations to lenders may be secured by a first priority security interest in our portfolio of investments and cash. As a BDC, generally, the ratio of our total assets (less total liabilities other than indebtedness represented by senior securities) to our total indebtedness represented by senior securities plus any preferred stock, if any, must be at least 200%. If this ratio declines below 200%, we cannot incur additional debt and could be required to sell a portion of our investments to repay some indebtedness when it may be disadvantageous to do so. This could have a material adverse effect on our operations, and we may not be able to service our debt or make distributions.

The following table illustrates the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our common stock assuming various annual returns on our portfolio, net of expenses. Leverage generally magnifies the return of shareholders when the portfolio return is positive and magnifies their losses when the portfolio return is negative. The calculations in the table below are hypothetical, and actual returns may be higher or lower than those appearing in the table below.


	Assumed Return on Our Portfolio (Net of Expenses)
	-10%		-5%		0%		5%		10%
Corresponding return to common shareholder(1)	-22.5	%	-13.9	%	-5.2	%	3.5	%	12.2	%

______________

(1)Assumes, as of December 31, 2025, (i) $1.65 billion in total assets, (ii) $0.68 billion in outstanding indebtedness, (iii) $0.95 billion in net assets and (iv) weighted average interest rate, excluding fees (such as fees on undrawn amounts and amortization of financing costs), of 7.9%.

See “ITEM 7. —MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS —Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” for more information regarding our borrowings.

Defaults and provisions under our current borrowings or any future borrowing facility or notes may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our borrowings may include customary covenants, including certain limitations on our incurrence of additional indebtedness and on our ability to make distributions to our shareholders, or redeem, repurchase or retire shares of stock, upon the occurrence of certain events and certain financial covenants related to asset coverage and liquidity and other maintenance covenants, as well as customary events of default. In the event we default under the terms of our current or future borrowings, our business could be adversely affected as we may be forced to sell a portion of our investments quickly and prematurely at what may be disadvantageous prices to us in order to meet our outstanding payment obligations and/or support working capital requirements under the terms of our current or future borrowings, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. An event of default under the terms of our current or any future borrowings could result in an accelerated maturity date for all amounts outstanding thereunder, and in some instances, lead to a cross-default under other borrowings. This could reduce our liquidity and cash flow and impair our ability to grow our business. Collectively, substantially all of our assets are currently pledged as collateral under our credit facilities. If we were to default on our obligations under the terms of our credit facilities or any future secured debt instrument the agent for the applicable creditors would be able to assume control of the disposition of any or all of our assets securing such debt, including the selection of such assets to be disposed and the timing of such disposition, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Any security interests and/or negative covenants required by a credit facility we enter into or notes we issue may limit our ability to create liens on assets to secure additional debt and may make it difficult for us to restructure or refinance indebtedness at or prior to maturity or obtain additional debt or equity financing.

A credit facility may be backed by all or a portion of our loans and securities on which the lenders will have a security interest. We may pledge up to 100% of our assets and may grant a security interest in all of our assets under the terms of any debt instrument we enter into with lenders. If we were to default under the terms of any debt instrument, the agent for the applicable lenders would be able to assume control of the timing of disposition of any or all of our assets securing such debt, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, if our borrowing base under a credit facility were to decrease, we may be required to secure additional assets in an amount sufficient to cure any borrowing base deficiency. In the event that all of our assets are secured at the time of such a borrowing base deficiency, we could be required to repay advances under a credit facility or make deposits to a collection account, either of which could have a material adverse impact on our ability to fund future investments and to make distributions.

In addition, we may be subject to limitations as to how borrowed funds may be used, which may include restrictions on geographic and industry concentrations, loan size, payment frequency and status, average life, collateral interests and investment ratings, as well as regulatory restrictions on leverage which may affect the amount of funding that may be obtained. There may also be certain requirements relating to portfolio performance, including required minimum portfolio yield and limitations on delinquencies and charge-offs, a violation of which could limit further advances and, in some cases, result in an event of default.

Under the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility, we have agreed not to incur any additional secured indebtedness other than in certain limited circumstances in which the incurrence is permitted under the Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, if our borrowing base under the Revolving Credit Facility were to decrease, we would be required to secure additional assets or repay advances under the Revolving Credit Facility which could have a material adverse impact on our ability to fund future investments and to make distributions.

In addition, under the terms of our credit facilities, we are subject to limitations as to how borrowed funds may be used, as well as regulatory restrictions on leverage which may affect the amount of funding that we may obtain. There may also be certain requirements relating to portfolio performance, a violation of which could limit further advances and, in some cases, result in an event of default. This could reduce our liquidity and cash flow and impair our ability to grow our business.

If we are unable to obtain additional debt financing, or if our borrowing capacity is materially reduced, our business could be materially adversely affected.

We may want to obtain additional debt financing, or need to do so upon maturity of our credit facilities, in order to obtain funds which may be made available for investments. Our credit facilities and notes currently expire between November 2026 and November 2030. If we are unable to increase, renew or replace any such facilities and enter into new debt financing facilities or other debt financing on commercially reasonable terms, our liquidity may be reduced significantly. In addition, if we are unable to repay amounts outstanding under any such facilities and are declared in default or are unable to renew or refinance these facilities, we may not be able to make new investments or operate our business in the normal course. These situations may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as lack of access to the credit markets, a severe decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, an economic downturn or an operational problem that affects us or third parties, and could materially damage our business operations, results of operations and financial condition. See “—Capital markets disruption and economic uncertainty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.”

Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our Adviser’s ability to manage and support our investment process. If our Adviser were to lose a significant number of its key professionals, or terminate the Investment Advisory Agreement, our ability to achieve our investment objective could be significantly harmed.

We do not have any employees. Additionally, we have no internal management capacity other than our appointed executive officers and will be dependent upon the investment expertise, skill and network of business contacts of our Adviser to achieve our investment objective. Our Adviser evaluates, negotiates, executes, monitors, and services our investments. Our success depends to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of our Adviser, including its key professionals. The departure of a significant number of key professionals from our Adviser could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.

Our ability to achieve our investment objective also depends on the ability of our Adviser to identify, analyze, invest in, finance, and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria. Our Adviser’s capabilities in structuring the investment process, and providing competent, attentive and efficient services to us depend on the involvement of investment professionals of adequate number and sophistication to match the corresponding flow of transactions. Any failure to find, hire, train, supervise and manage new investment professionals could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the Investment Advisory Agreement has a termination provision that allows the agreement to be terminated by us on 60 days' notice without penalty by the vote of a Majority of the Outstanding Shares of our common stock or by the vote of our independent directors and generally may be terminated at any time, without penalty, by our Adviser upon 120 days' notice to us. Furthermore, the Investment Advisory Agreement automatically terminates in the event of its assignment, as defined in the 1940 Act, by the Adviser. If the Adviser resigns or is terminated, or if we do not obtain the requisite approvals of shareholders and our Board to approve an agreement with the Adviser after an assignment, we may not be able to find a new investment adviser or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms prior to the termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, or at all. If we are unable to do so quickly, our operations are likely to experience a disruption and costs under any new agreements that we enter into could increase. Our financial condition, business and results of operations, as well as our ability to meet our payment obligations under our indebtedness and pay distributions, are likely to be adversely affected, and the value of our common stock may decline.

Our ability to achieve our investment objective also depends to a significant extent upon Blue Owl’s relationships with corporations, financial institutions and investment firms, the inability of Blue Owl to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.

Blue Owl depends on its relationships with corporations, financial institutions and investment firms, and we rely to a significant extent upon these relationships to provide us with potential investment opportunities. The investment management business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, business relationships, quality of service provided to clients, fund investor liquidity, fund terms (including fees and economic sharing arrangements), brand recognition and business reputation. If Blue Owl fails to maintain its reputation it may not be able to maintain its existing relationships

or develop new relationships or sources of investment opportunities, and we may not be able to grow our investment portfolio. In addition, there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us.

Our cash and cash equivalents could be adversely affected if the financial institutions in which we hold our cash and cash equivalents fail.

We regularly maintain cash balances at third-party financial institutions in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. If a depository institution fails to return these deposits or is otherwise subject to adverse conditions in the financial or credit markets, our access to invested cash or cash equivalents could be limited which adversely impact our results of operations or financial condition.

We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which could delay further deployment of our capital, reduce returns and result in losses.

We may compete for investments with other BDCs and investment funds (including registered investment companies, private equity funds and mezzanine funds), including the other Blue Owl Clients or other funds managed by our Adviser or its affiliates comprising Blue Owl’s Credit platform (including Blue Owl's alternative credit products), the private funds managed by Blue Owl’s GP Strategic Capital platform, the funds and accounts managed by Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform, as well as traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and other sources of funding. Moreover, alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, continue to increase their investment focus in our target market of privately owned U.S. companies. We may experience increased competition from banks and investment vehicles who may continue to lend to the middle market. Additionally, the U.S. Federal Reserve and other bank regulators may periodically provide incentives to U.S. commercial banks to originate more loans to U.S. middle-market private companies. As a result of these market participants and regulatory incentives, competition for investment opportunities in privately owned U.S. companies is strong and may intensify. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than us. These characteristics could allow our competitors to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships and offer better pricing and more flexible structuring than we are able to do.

Numerous factors increase our competitive risks, including, but not limited to:

•Some of our competitors may have or are perceived to have more expertise or financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do;

•We may not perform as well as competitors’ funds or other available investment products;

•Some of our competitors have raised significant amounts of capital, and many of them have similar investment objectives to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities;

•Some of our competitors may have lower fees or alternative fee arrangements;

•Some of our competitors may have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us, which may create competitive disadvantages for us;

•Some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances, different risk assessments or lower return thresholds than us, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and to bid more aggressively than us or to agree to less restrictive legal terms and protections for investments that we want to make; and

•Some of our competitors may be subject to less regulation or fewer conflicts of interest and, accordingly, may have more flexibility to undertake and execute certain businesses or investments than we do, bear less compliance expense than we do or be viewed differently in the marketplace.

We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms, and investment structure criteria. If we are forced to match these competitors’ investment terms criteria, we may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on our investments or may bear substantial risk of capital loss. A significant increase in the number and/or the size of our competitors in our target market could force us to accept less attractive investment terms. Furthermore, many competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC or the source of income, asset diversification and distribution requirements we must satisfy to maintain our RIC tax treatment. The competitive pressures we face, and the manner in which we react or adjust to competitive pressures, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, effective yield on investments, investment returns, leverage ratio, and cash flows. As a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time. Also, we may not be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective.

Our investment portfolio is recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Adviser in accordance with procedures approved by our Board and, as a result, there is and will be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.

Under the 1940 Act, we are required to carry our portfolio investments at market value or, if there is no readily available market value, at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by our Adviser and approved by our Board. There is not a public market or active secondary market for many of the types of investments in privately held companies that we hold and intend to

make. Our investments may not be publicly traded or actively traded on a secondary market but, instead, may be traded on a privately negotiated over-the-counter secondary market for institutional investors, if at all. As a result, we will value these investments quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith in accordance with valuation policy and procedures approved by our Board.

The determination of fair value, and thus the amount of unrealized appreciation or depreciation we may recognize in any reporting period, is to a degree subjective, and our Adviser has a conflict of interest in determining fair value. We will value our investments quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith by our Adviser, based on, among other things, input of our Audit Committee and independent third-party valuation firm(s) engaged at the direction of our Adviser. The types of factors that may be considered in determining the fair values of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow, current market interest rates and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, the valuations may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time due to changes in current market conditions. The determinations of fair value in accordance with procedures approved by our Board may differ materially from the values that would have been used if an active market and market quotations existed for such investments. Our net asset value could be adversely affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of the investments were materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.

Our Board may change our operating policies and strategies without prior notice or shareholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse to our shareholders.

Our Board has the authority to modify or waive current operating policies, investment criteria and strategies without prior notice and without shareholder approval. We cannot predict the effect any changes to current operating policies, investment criteria and strategies would have on our business, net asset value, operating results and the value of our securities. However, the effects might be adverse, which could negatively impact our ability to pay you distributions and cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

Any unrealized depreciation we experience on our portfolio may be an indication of future realized losses, which could reduce our income available for distribution.

As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at the fair value as determined in good faith in accordance with procedures approved by our Board. Decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments relative to amortized cost will be recorded as unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized losses in our portfolio could be an indication of a portfolio company’s inability to meet its repayment obligations to us with respect to the affected loans. This could result in realized losses in the future and ultimately in reductions of our income available for distribution in future periods. In addition, decreases in the market value or fair value of our investments will reduce our net asset value. See “ITEM 7 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Critical Accounting Policies — Investments at Fair Value.”

Cybersecurity risks and cyber data security incidents could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and confidential information in our possession and damage to our business relationships.

There has been an increase in the frequency and sophistication of the cyber and security threats we face, with attacks ranging from those common to businesses generally to those that are more advanced and persistent, which may target us because, as an alternative asset management firm, we hold confidential and other price sensitive information about existing and potential investments. Malicious cyber activity involving ransomware, extortion, business email compromise, social engineering and other security threats could originate from a wide variety of sources, including cyber criminals, nation state hackers, hacktivists and other outside parties. Additionally, cyber-attacks and other security threats have become increasingly complex as a result of the emergence of new AI technologies, which are able to identify and target new vulnerabilities in information technology systems. As a result, we may face a heightened risk of a security breach or disruption with respect to confidential information resulting from an attack by computer hackers, foreign governments or cyber terrorists.

The efficient operation of our business is dependent on computer hardware and software systems, as well as data processing systems and the secure processing, storage and transmission of information, which, despite implementation of a variety of security measures, are vulnerable to security breaches and cyber-attacks. A cyber-attack is considered to be an intentional attack or an unintentional event or series of events and involves gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption or otherwise compromising the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our systems or infrastructure. Some factors that could create a heightened risk of a cyber incident include the use of remote work tools and/or third-party service providers, including cloud-based service providers. In addition, we may be the target of social engineering, fraudulent emails or other targeted attempts to gain unauthorized access to proprietary or sensitive information. In addition to cyber-related threats, our and our affiliates’ information systems and those of our third-party service providers may be subject to failures or interruptions arising from other causes beyond our control, including sudden electrical or telecommunications outages, natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes or hurricanes, disease pandemics, social unrest and geopolitical events including wars and acts of terrorism. Any such events could materially disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business and financial results. The result of any cyber-attack may include disrupted operations, including in our,

our affiliates’, our investors’, our counterparties’, or third parties’ operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, fraudulent transfers or requests for transfers of money, liability for stolen or improperly accessed assets or information (including personal information), increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation or damage to our business relationships and reputation, in each case causing our business and results of operations to suffer.

The rapid evolution and increased availability of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies (collectively, “AI technologies”) may also intensify cybersecurity risks by making such attacks and other cybersecurity incidents more difficult to detect, contain, and mitigate. For example, threat actors could impersonate Blue Owl or its employees, including through the use of AI technologies. Such technologies make such impersonation more likely to occur or appear more credible.

As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those provided by third-party service providers, including increased risks resulting from remote work. We cannot guarantee that third parties and infrastructure in our networks or our partners’ networks have not been compromised or that they do not contain exploitable defects or bugs that could result in a breach of or disruption to our information technology systems or the third-party information technology systems that support our services. Our ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and they may not have adequate information security measures in place. Outages of and interruptions to third-party software vendors’ services, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with a third-party service provider, have previously resulted in and could in the future result in temporary disruptions to our and our affiliates’ normal operations. We have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls designed to mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber intrusions and rely on industry accepted security measures and technology to securely maintain confidential and proprietary information maintained on our information systems. However, these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber-attack, do not guarantee that a cyber-attack will not occur or that our financial results, operations or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident, especially because the cyber-attack techniques change frequently or are not recognized until launched and because cyber-attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources.

Cybersecurity risks are exacerbated by the rapidly increasing volume of highly sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and intellectual property, personally identifiable information of our clients and others and other sensitive information that we collect and store in our data centers, on our cloud environments and on our networks. Our products may also invest in strategic assets having a national or regional profile or in infrastructure assets, the nature of which could expose them to a greater risk of being subject to a terrorist attack or security breach than other assets or businesses. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information are critical to our operations. A significant actual or potential theft, loss, corruption, exposure, fraudulent use or misuse of personally identifiable, proprietary business data or other sensitive information, by third parties, as a result of the negligence or malfeasance of third party service providers that have access to such confidential information or otherwise, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or intellectual property or a violation of our privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in significant remediation and other costs, fines, litigation or regulatory actions against us and significant reputational harm, any of which could harm our business and results of operations.

Use of AI technologies by us could lead to the exposure of our data or other adverse effects and increase competitive, operational, legal, and regulatory risks in ways that we cannot predict.

Recent technological advances in AI technologies, as well as the rapid growth and widespread use thereof, present risks to our business, products, portfolio companies and investments. AI technologies may result in significant and disruptive changes in companies, sectors or industries, including those in which we invest, and any such changes could render our Adviser’s underwriting models obsolete or create new and unpredictable operational, legal and/or regulatory risks. To the extent our competitors make more efficient or extensive use of AI technologies, there is a possibility that such competitors will gain a competitive advantage. Many jurisdictions have passed or are considering laws and regulations concerning AI technologies, which could adversely affect our business, products, portfolio companies and investments. Additionally, we and the companies in which we invest could be further exposed to the risks of AI technologies if third-party service providers or any counterparties, whether or not known to us, use AI technologies in their business activities. We will not be able to control the use of AI technologies in third-party products or services, including those provided by our and our affiliates’ service providers. Additionally, the Adviser expects to use AI technologies in connection with its business activities, including to support our due diligence and investment activities. AI technologies are generally highly reliant on the collection and analysis of large amounts of data, and it is not possible or practicable to review all data upon which AI technologies are trained or which are otherwise utilized. AI technologies are also highly reliant on the accuracy, adequacy, completeness and objectivity of their underlying data, and any inaccuracies, deficiencies, errors or biases in this data could lead to errors affecting our decision-making and investment processes, which could have adverse impacts on us and our portfolio companies.

We are subject to risks in using custodians, counterparties, administrators and other agents.

Our business is dependent on our and third parties’ communications and information systems. Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, could cause delays or other problems in our activities. Our financial, accounting, data processing, portfolio monitoring, backup or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. There could be:

•sudden electrical or telecommunications outages;

•natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes;

•disease pandemics;

•events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts;

•outages due to idiosyncratic issues at specific service providers; and

•cyber-attacks.

These events, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and negatively affect the net asset value of our common stock and our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

Increased data protection regulation may result in increased complexities and risk in connection with the operation of our business.

Our business is highly dependent on information systems and technology. The costs related to cyber or other security threats or disruptions may not be fully insured or indemnified by other means. Cybersecurity has become a priority for regulators in the U.S. and around the world. The SEC has also particularly focused on cybersecurity, and we expect increased scrutiny of our policies and systems designed to manage our cybersecurity risks and our related disclosures as a result. In May 2024, the SEC adopted amendments to Regulation S-P that require covered institutions, such as investment companies, to develop, implement, and maintain written policies and procedures for an incident response program that is reasonably designed to detect, respond to, and recover from unauthorized access to or use of customer information. The amendments also require that the response program include procedures for, with certain limited exceptions, covered institutions to provide notice to individuals whose sensitive customer information was or is reasonably likely to have been accessed or used without authorization. The amendments took effect on August 2, 2024, and had a compliance deadline of December 3, 2025 for large entities. We also face and expect to continue to face increased costs to comply with the new SEC rules, including increased costs for cybersecurity training and management.

Many jurisdictions in which we operate have laws and regulations relating to data privacy, cybersecurity and/or information security to which we may be subject (collectively, “Privacy Laws”). Compliance with applicable Privacy Laws may require adhering to stringent legal and operational requirements, which could increase compliance costs for us and require the dedication of additional time and resources to compliance. A failure to comply with applicable Data Protection Legislation could result in fines, sanctions, enforcement actions or other penalties or reputational damage. In addition, the SEC has indicated in recent periods that one of its examination priorities for the Division of Examinations is to continue to examine cybersecurity procedures and controls, including testing the implementation of these procedures and controls.

There may be substantial financial penalties or fines for a failure to comply with applicable Privacy Laws (which may include insufficient security for our personal or other sensitive information). For example, failure to comply with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the “GDPR”).

Our operations will be impacted by a growing movement to adopt comprehensive privacy and data protection laws where such laws focus on privacy as an individual right in general. Further, the Company’s portfolio companies and/or each of their affiliates are subject to regulations related to privacy, data protection and information security in the jurisdictions in which they do business. Such laws and regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, thus increasing costs, operational and legal burdens and the potential for significant liability on regulated entities.

Non-compliance with any applicable Privacy Laws represents a serious risk to our business. Some jurisdictions have also enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of personal information. For example, the SEC’s most recent amendments to Regulation S-P require notification of affected customers no later than 30 days after becoming aware of a security incident that compromises their sensitive customer information. Breaches in security could potentially jeopardize our, our employees’ or our product investors’ or counterparties’ confidential or other information processed and stored in, or transmitted through, our computer systems and networks (or those of our third party vendors), or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our employees’, our product investors’, our counterparties’ or third parties’ operations, which could result in significant losses, increased costs, disruption of our business, liability to our product investors and other counterparties, fines or penalties, litigation, regulatory intervention or reputational damage, which could also lead to loss of product investors or clients.

We and our portfolio companies are subject to increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors, regulators and our shareholders with respect to ESG-related topics.

We and our portfolio companies face increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors that measure companies’ ESG performance, regulators and our shareholders related to ESG-related topics, including in relation to diversity and inclusion, human rights, environmental stewardship, support for local communities, corporate governance and transparency. For example, we and the companies in which we invest risk damage to our brands and reputations if we or they do not act (or are perceived to not act) responsibly either with respect to responsible investing processes or ESG-related practices. Adverse incidents related to ESG practices could impact the value of our brand or the companies in which we invest, or the cost of our or their operations and relationships with investors, all of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Further, there can be no assurance that any of our Adviser’s ESG initiatives or commitments will meet the standards or expectations of our shareholders or other stakeholders. There can be no assurance that our Adviser will be able to accomplish any goals related to responsible investing or ESG practices, as statements regarding its ESG and responsible investing commitments and priorities reflect its current estimates, plans and/or aspirations and are not guarantees that it will be able to achieve them within the timelines announced or at all. Additionally, the Adviser may determine in its discretion that it is not feasible or practical to implement or complete certain aspects of its responsible investing program or ESG initiatives based on cost, timing or other considerations.

In recent years, certain investors have placed increasing importance on policies and practices related to responsible investing and ESG for the products to which they commit capital, and investors may decide not to commit capital to future fundraises based on their assessment of the Adviser’s approach to and consideration of ESG-related issues or risks. Similarly, a variety of organizations measure the performance of companies on ESG topics, and the results of these assessments are widely publicized. If the Adviser’s responsible investing or ESG-related practices or ratings do not meet the standards set by such investors or organizations, or if the Adviser receives a negative rating or assessment from any such organization, or if the Adviser fails, or is perceived to fail, to demonstrate progress toward its ESG priorities and initiatives, they may choose not to invest in us, and we may face reputational damage. Similarly, it is expected that investor and/or shareholder demands will require the Adviser to spend additional resources on and place continued importance on business relevant ESG factors in its review of prospective investments and management of existing ones. Devoting additional resources to our responsible investing or ESG-related practices could increase the amount of expenses we or our investments are required to bear. For example, collecting, measuring, and reporting ESG information and metrics can be costly, difficult and time consuming, is subject to evolving reporting standards, and can present numerous operational, reputational, financial, legal and other risks. To the extent our access to capital from investors focused on ESG ratings or ESG-related matters is impaired, we may not be able to maintain or increase the size of our existing products or raise sufficient capital for new products, which may adversely affect our revenues. Further, interest on the part of investors and regulators in ESG-related topics and themes and increased demand for, and scrutiny of, ESG-related disclosure by asset managers, has also increased the risk that asset managers could be perceived as, or accused of, making inaccurate or misleading statements regarding the ESG-related investment strategies of their and their funds’ responsible investing or ESG-related efforts or initiatives, or “greenwashing.” This risk may also materialize where ESG-related statements and/or disclosures made by our portfolio companies are materially inconsistent with our ESG-related statements or disclosures, including those made on a voluntary basis or pursuant to any applicable regulation, such as Regulation EU 2019/2088 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (the “SFDR”). Such perception or accusation could damage our reputation, result in litigation or regulatory actions and adversely impact our ability to raise capital.

At the same time, various stakeholders may have differing approaches to responsible investing activities or divergent views on the consideration of ESG topics, including in the countries in which our Adviser operates and invests, as well as in the states and localities where our Adviser serves public sector clients. These differing views increase the risk that any action or lack thereof with respect to our Adviser’s consideration of responsible investing or ESG-related practices will be perceived negatively. Several states, the executive branch, federal agencies and Congress have enacted, proposed or indicated an intent to pursue “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or initiatives, issued related legal opinions and engaged in related investigations and litigation. For example: (i) boycott bills target financial institutions that “boycott” or “discriminate against” companies in certain industries (e.g., energy and mining) and prohibit state entities from doing business with such institutions and/or investing the state’s assets (including pension plan assets) through such institutions and (ii) ESG investment prohibitions require that state entities or managers/administrators of state investments make investments based solely on pecuniary factors without consideration of ESG factors. If investors subject to such legislation view our responsible investing or ESG practices as being in contradiction of such “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or legal opinions, such investors may not invest in us and it could negatively affect the results of operations or cash flows. Further, asset managers have been subject to scrutiny related to ESG-focused industry working groups, initiatives and associations, including organizations advancing action to address climate change or climate-related risk. In addition, state attorneys general, among others, have asserted that the Supreme Court’s decision striking down race-based affirmative action in higher education in June 2023 should be analogized to private employment matters and private contract matters. Cases alleging discrimination based on similar arguments have been filed since that decision, with scrutiny of certain corporate DEI practices increasing throughout 2025. Additionally, in January 2025, the current U.S. Presidential administration signed a number of executive orders focused on DEI (the “Executive Orders”), which include a broad mandate to eliminate federal DEI programs and a caution to the private sector to end what may be viewed as illegal DEI discrimination and preferences. The Executive Orders have resulted in compliance investigations of private entities, including publicly traded companies, and changes to federal contracting regulations. If the Adviser does not successfully

manage expectations across these varied stakeholder interests, it could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation and/or constrain our investment and fundraising opportunities. Such scrutiny of both ESG and DEI related practices could expose the Adviser to additional compliance obligations, the risk of litigation, investigations or challenges by federal or state authorities, result in reputational harm and/or discourage certain investors from investing in us.

We are subject to increasing scrutiny from regulators with respect to ESG-related issues and the regulatory disclosure landscape surrounding related topics continues to evolve.

Responsible investing, ESG practices and ESG-related disclosures have been the subject of increased focus by certain regulators, and regulatory initiatives related to ESG-specific topics that are applicable to us, our products and our products’ portfolio companies could adversely affect our business. There has been a growing regulatory interest across jurisdictions in improving transparency regarding the definition, measurement and disclosure of ESG factors in order to allow investors to validate and better understand sustainability claims, including in the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom.

For example, the SEC sometimes reviews compliance with ESG commitments in examinations, and it has taken enforcement actions against registered investment advisers for not establishing adequate or consistently implementing ESG policies and procedures to meet ESG commitments to investors.

In addition, in October 2023, California enacted legislation that will ultimately require certain companies that (i) do business in California to publicly disclose their Scopes 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse gas emissions, with third party assurance of such data, (Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act, or “SB 253”), and issue public reports on their climate-related financial risk and related mitigation measures (Climate-Related Financial Risk Act, or “SB 261”) and (ii) operate in California and make certain climate-related claims to provide enhanced disclosures around the achievement of climate-related claims, including the use of voluntary carbon credits to achieve such claims. Pending litigation against SB 253 and SB 261 creates ongoing uncertainty around the enforceability of related disclosure obligations and may result in additional compliance burdens, increased legal and compliance costs, and enhanced disclosure obligations. From a European perspective, the European Union has in place regulation aimed at increasing transparency for investors of sustainability-related policies, processes, performance and commitments which apply to certain of our products, including, without limitation: (a) the SFDR, for which most rules took effect beginning on March 10, 2021 and (b) Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment and amending the SFDR. In November 2025, the European Commission published a draft legislative proposal to revise SFDR to introduce, among others, new categories for sustainability-related financial products with related criteria that are required to be met for each category. Relatedly, the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) has identified promoting transparency through effective sustainability disclosures and addressing greenwashing as one of its key priorities per ESMA’s sustainable finance roadmap and strategy. ESMA has also introduced guidelines on funds with ESG, impact, transition or sustainability-related terms in their names.

There are still some uncertainties regarding the operation of some of these requirements and how they might evolve, and an established market practice is still being developed in certain cases, which can lead to diverging implementation and/or operationalization, data gaps or methodological challenges which may affect our ability to collect relevant data. These regimes continue to evolve and there is still a lack of clarity and established practice around the approach to their supervision and enforcement, which may vary across national competent authorities. There is a risk that a development or reorientation in the regulatory requirements or market practice in this respect could be adverse to our investments if they are perceived to be less valuable as a consequence of, among other things, their carbon footprint or perceived “greenwashing.” Compliance with requirements of this nature may also increase risks relating to financial supervision and enforcement action. There is also a risk that market expectations in relation to the SFDR categorization of financial products, could adversely affect our ability to raise capital, especially from EEA investors.

In November 2023, the Sustainability Labelling and Disclosure of Sustainability-Related Financial Information Instrument 2023 (“SDR”) introduced sustainability disclosure requirements, voluntary investment product labels and an ‘anti-greenwashing’ rule. The anti-greenwashing rule applies to all UK-authorized firms in relation to sustainability-related claims made in their communications, and/or communications of financial promotions with, clients in the UK. The balance of the new regime is currently directed at UK investment funds and UK-regulated asset management firms as well as distributors of such funds.

In Asia, examples of ESG-related regulations including those by regulators in Singapore and Hong Kong, have released guidelines for asset managers to integrate climate risk considerations in investment and risk management processes, together with enhanced disclosure and reporting and have also issued enhanced rules for certain ESG funds on general ESG risk management and disclosure.

As a result of these and other legislative and regulatory initiatives, we or the Adviser may be required to provide additional disclosure to our investors with respect to ESG matters. This exposes us to increased disclosure risks, for example due to a lack of available or credible data, and the potential for conflicting disclosures may also expose us to an increased risk of misstatement litigation or miss-selling allegations. Failure to manage these risks could result in a material adverse effect on our business in a number of ways. Compliance with frameworks of this nature may create an additional compliance burden and increased legal, compliance, governance, reporting and other costs to funds and/or fund managers because of the need to collect certain information to meet the disclosure requirements. In addition, where there are uncertainties regarding the operation of the framework, a lack of official,

conflicting or inconsistent regulatory guidance, a lack of established market practice and/or data gaps or methodological challenges affecting the ability to collect relevant data, funds and/or fund managers may be required to engage third party advisers and/or service providers to fulfil the requirements, thereby exacerbating any increase in compliance burden and costs. To the extent that any applicable jurisdictions enact similar laws and/or frameworks, there is a risk that we may not be able to maintain alignment of a particular investment with such frameworks, and/or may be subject to additional compliance burdens and costs, which might adversely affect us.

We may be the target of litigation or similar proceedings in the future and we are subject to public perception risks.

We could generally be subject to litigation or similar proceedings in the future, including securities litigation and derivative actions by our stockholders. Any litigation or similar proceedings could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources from our business or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, in recent periods, there has been increased negative publicity with respect to the private credit industry, which could in the future harm our reputation.

Risks Related to Our Adviser and Its Affiliates

Our Adviser and its affiliates, including our officers and some of our directors, may face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and our affiliates, which could result in increased risk-taking or speculative investments, or cause our Adviser to use substantial leverage.

Our Adviser and its affiliates receive fees from us in return for their services. These fees may include certain incentive fees based on the amount of appreciation of our investments and arrangement, structuring or similar fees from portfolio companies in which we invest. These fees could influence the advice provided to us or create an incentive for our Adviser to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such incentive fees. Generally, the more equity we sell in public offerings and the greater the risk assumed by us with respect to our investments, including through the use of leverage, the greater the potential for growth in our assets and profits, and, correlatively, the fees payable by us to our Adviser. The way in which the incentive fee is determined may encourage our Adviser to use leverage to increase the leveraged return on our investment portfolio.

In addition, the fact that our base management fee is payable based upon our average gross assets (which includes any borrowings used for investment purposes) may encourage our Adviser to use leverage to make additional investments. Such a practice could make such investments more risky than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during cyclical economic downturns. Under certain circumstances, the use of substantial leverage (up to the limits prescribed by the 1940 Act) may increase the likelihood of our defaulting on our borrowings, which would be detrimental to holders of our securities.

These compensation arrangements could affect our Adviser’s or its affiliates’ judgment with respect to public offerings of equity, incurrence of debt, and investments made by us, which allow our Adviser to earn increased asset management fees.

The time and resources that individuals associated with our Adviser devote to us may be diverted, and we may face additional competition due to, among other things, the fact that neither our Adviser nor its affiliates is prohibited from raising money for or managing another entity that makes the same types of investments that we target.

Blue Owl is not prohibited from raising money for and managing future investment entities, in addition to the Blue Owl Clients, that make the same or similar types of investments as those we target. As a result, the time and resources that our Adviser devotes to us may be diverted, and during times of intense activity in other investment programs they may devote less time and resources to our business than is necessary or appropriate. In addition, we may compete with any such investment entity also managed by our Adviser or its affiliates for the same investors and investment opportunities. Furthermore, certain members of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee or our affiliates are officers of Blue Owl and will devote a portion of their time to the operations of Blue Owl, including with respect to public company compliance.

Our Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for their respective other accounts and clients or issuers in which we may invest.

Our Adviser and its affiliates may provide a broad range of financial services to companies in which we may invest, including providing arrangement, syndication, origination structuring and other services to portfolio companies, and will generally be paid fees for such services, in compliance with applicable law, by the portfolio company. Any compensation received by our Adviser or its affiliates for providing these services will not be shared with us and may be received before we realize a return on our investment. In addition, we may invest in companies managed by entities in which funds managed by GP Strategic Capital have acquired a minority interest. Our Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for these companies, on the one hand, and investments recommended to us, on the other hand and could, in certain instances, have an incentive not to pursue actions against a portfolio company that would be in our best interest

Additionally, because our Adviser and its affiliates manage assets for, or may in the future manage assets for, other investment companies, pooled investment vehicles and/or other accounts (including institutional clients, pension plans, insurance companies, co-invest vehicles and certain high net worth individuals), including the Blue Owl Clients, and we may compete for capital and

investment opportunities with these entities, certain of which may have investment objectives that overlap with ours. As a result, conflicts may arise with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities among those products. For example, the Adviser is permitted to allocate an investment to a number of products across its platforms that it views as appropriate for the particular investment objectives, strategies and characteristics of such products. These conflicts include conflicts of interest relating to the allocation of investment opportunities by our Adviser and its affiliates; compensation to our Adviser; services that may be provided by our Adviser and its affiliates to issuers in which we may invest; investments by us and other clients of our Adviser, subject to the limitations of the 1940 Act; the formation of additional investment funds managed by our Adviser; differing recommendations given by our Adviser to us versus other clients; our Adviser’s use of information gained from issuers in our portfolio for investments by other clients, subject to applicable law; restrictions on our Adviser’s use of “inside information” with respect to potential investments by us; the allocation of certain expenses; and cross transactions.

For instance, our Adviser and its affiliates may receive asset management performance-based, or other fees from certain accounts that are higher than the fees received by our Adviser from us. In addition, certain members of Blue Owl’s Credit platform’s investment committees and other executives and employees of our Adviser or its affiliates will hold and receive interest in Blue Owl and its affiliates, in addition to cash and carried interest compensation. In these instances, a portfolio manager for our Adviser may have an incentive to favor the higher fee and/or performance-based fee accounts over us and/or to favor Blue Owl. In addition, a conflict of interest exists to the extent our Adviser, its affiliates, or any of their respective executives, portfolio managers or employees have proprietary or personal investments in other investment companies or accounts or when certain other investment companies or accounts are investment options in our Adviser’s or its affiliates’ employee benefit plans or employee offerings. In these circumstances, personnel of our Adviser may have incentive to favor these other investment companies or accounts over us. In addition, investments by more than one Blue Owl product in a portfolio company also have the potential to raise the risk of using assets of one Blue Owl product to support positions taken by another.

To mitigate these conflicts, the Blue Owl Credit Advisers will seek to execute such transactions for all of the participating investment accounts, including us, on a fair and equitable basis and in accordance with the Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ investment allocation policies, taking into account such factors as differences with respect to available capital; the current or anticipated size of a product; minimum investment amounts; the remaining life of a product; differences in investment objectives, guidelines or strategies; diversification; portfolio construction considerations; liquidity needs; legal, tax and regulatory requirements and other considerations deemed relevant to the Adviser and in accordance with its policies and procedures. We may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, the prior approval of the SEC. We, our Adviser and certain affiliates have been granted exemptive relief by the SEC to permit us to co-invest with other funds managed by our Adviser or certain of its affiliates in a manner consistent with our positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. See “—Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.”

Actions taken by our Adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the Blue Owl Clients as a result of any conflict of interest may be adverse to us, which could harm our performance. For example, we may invest in the same credit obligations as other Blue Owl Clients, although, to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, our investments may include different obligations or levels of the capital structure of the same issuer. The interests of Blue Owl Clients invested in different levels of the capital structure of a portfolio company may not always be aligned and actions taken for one Blue Owl Client may be adverse to one or more other products, which may give rise to conflicts of interest. The interests of these different Blue Owl Clients may diverge significantly particularly in the case of financial distress of the portfolio company. For example, in a bankruptcy proceeding or out-of-court restructuring, the interests of a Blue Owl Client owning equity or subordinated debt securities may be subordinated or otherwise adversely affected by virtue of a different Blue Owl Client's actions in respect of its own interests as a senior debt holder. While the Blue Owl Credit Advisers and their affiliates have developed general guidelines regarding when two or more funds can invest in different parts of the same company’s capital structure and created a process that they employ to handle those conflicts when they arise, their decision to permit the investments to occur in the first instance or their judgment on how to mitigate the conflict could be challenged or deemed insufficient. If the Blue Owl Credit Advisers and their affiliates fail to appropriately address those conflicts, it could negatively impact their reputation and ability to raise additional funds and the willingness of counterparties to do business with them or result in potential litigation against them.

From time to time, fees and expenses generated in connection with potential portfolio investments that are not consummated and other investment related expenses may be allocable to us and one or more Blue Owl Clients. These expenses will be allocated in a manner that is fair and equitable over time and in accordance with policies adopted by the Blue Owl Credit Advisers and the Investment Advisory Agreement; however, the method for allocation expenses may vary depending on the nature of the expense and such determinations involve inherent discretion.

Our Adviser and its affiliates may give advice and recommend securities to other clients which may differ from advice given to, or securities recommended or bought for, us even though such other clients’ investment objectives may be similar to ours, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, from time to time, our Adviser could cause us to purchase a security or other investment from, or sell a security or other investment to, another Blue Owl Client. Such cross transaction would be in accordance with applicable regulations and our and our Adviser’s valuation and cross-trades policies; however, such cross transactions could give rise to additional conflicts of interest.

Our Board will seek to monitor these conflicts but there can be no assurances that such monitoring will fully mitigate any such conflicts.

Reductions, waivers or absorptions of fees and costs can temporarily result in higher returns to shareholders than they would otherwise receive if full fees and costs were charged.

The Adviser and its affiliates are permitted to reduce, waive or absorb some of the fees or costs otherwise due by us. While this activity can be seen as friendly to shareholders, reductions, waivers and absorptions of fees and costs result in higher returns to shareholders than such shareholders would receive if full fees and costs were charged. There is no guarantee that any reductions, waivers or absorptions will occur in the future, and any reductions, waivers and absorptions are entirely at the discretion of the Adviser.

Products within Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform may enter into sale lease-back transactions with our portfolio companies or with borrowers under our credit facilities.

From time to time, companies in which we have invested or may invest, may enter into sale-leaseback transactions with products within Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform. As a result of these arrangements we could be a creditor to, or equity owners of, a company at the same time that company is a tenant of a product within Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform. If such a company were to encounter financial difficulty or default on its obligations as a borrower, our Adviser could be required to take actions that may be adverse to those of Blue Owl’s Real Assets platform in enforcing our rights under the relevant facilities or agreements, or vice versa. This could lead to actual or perceived conflicts of interest.

Our access to confidential information may restrict our ability to take action with respect to some investments, which, in turn, may negatively affect our results of operations.

We, directly or through our Adviser, may obtain confidential information about the companies in which we have invested or may invest or be deemed to have such confidential information. Our Adviser may come into possession of material, non-public information through its members, officers, directors, employees, principals or affiliates. In addition, funds managed by GP Strategic Capital may invest in entities that manage our portfolio companies and, as a result, may obtain additional confidential information about our portfolio companies. The possession of such information may, to our detriment, limit the ability of us and our Adviser to buy or sell a security or otherwise to participate in an investment opportunity. In certain circumstances, employees of our Adviser may serve as board members or in other capacities for portfolio or potential portfolio companies, which could restrict our ability to trade in the securities of such companies. For example, if personnel of our Adviser come into possession of material non-public information with respect to our investments, such personnel will be restricted by our Adviser’s information-sharing policies and procedures or by law or contract from sharing such information with our management team, even where the disclosure of such information would be in our best interests or would otherwise influence decisions taken by the members of the management team with respect to that investment. This conflict and these procedures and practices may limit the freedom of our Adviser to enter into or exit from potentially profitable investments for us, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to fully leverage the resources and industry expertise of our Adviser in the course of its duties. Additionally, there may be circumstances in which one or more individuals associated with our Adviser will be precluded from providing services to us because of certain confidential information available to those individuals or to other parts of our Adviser.

We may be obligated to pay our Adviser incentive fees even if we incur a net loss due to a decline in the value of our portfolio and even if our earned interest income is not payable in cash.

The Investment Advisory Agreement entitles our Adviser to receive an incentive fee based on our pre-incentive fee net investment income regardless of any capital losses. In such case, we may be required to pay our Adviser an incentive fee for a fiscal quarter even if there is a decline in the value of our portfolio or if we incur a net loss for that quarter.

Any incentive fee payable by us that relates to the pre-incentive fee net investment income may be computed and paid on income that may include interest that has been accrued but not yet received or interest in the form of securities received rather than cash (“payment-in-kind” or “PIK” income”). PIK income will be included in the pre-incentive fee net investment income used to calculate the incentive fee to our Adviser even though we do not receive the income in the form of cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest income, it is possible that accrued interest income previously included in the calculation of the incentive fee will become uncollectible. Our Adviser is not obligated to reimburse us for any part of the incentive fee it received that was based on accrued interest income that we never receive as a result of a subsequent default.

The quarterly incentive fee on income is recognized and paid without regard to: (i) the trend of pre-incentive fee net investment income as a percent of adjusted capital over multiple quarters in arrears which may in fact be consistently less than the quarterly preferred return, or (ii) the net income or net loss in the current calendar quarter, the current year or any combination of prior periods.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be required to recognize taxable income in some circumstances in which we do not receive a corresponding payment in cash and to make distributions with respect to such income to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC and/or minimize U.S. federal income or excise tax. Under such circumstances, we may have difficulty meeting the Annual Distribution Requirement necessary to maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code. This difficulty in making the required distribution may be amplified to the extent that we are required to pay the incentive fee on income with respect to such accrued income. As a result, we may have to sell some of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital, or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates.

Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.

We are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with certain of our affiliates without the prior approval of a majority of our independent directors and, in some cases, the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our outstanding voting securities will be our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act, and we will generally be prohibited from buying or selling any securities from or to such affiliate on a principal basis, absent the prior approval of our Board and, in some cases, the SEC. The 1940 Act also prohibits certain “joint” transactions with certain of our affiliates, including other funds or clients advised by our Adviser or its affiliates, which in certain circumstances could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times to the extent the transaction involves a joint investment), without prior approval of our Board and, in some cases, the SEC. If a person acquires more than 25% of our voting securities, we will be prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to such person or certain of that person’s affiliates, or entering into prohibited joint transactions with such persons, absent the prior approval of the SEC. Similar restrictions limit our ability to transact business with our officers or directors or their affiliates or anyone who is under common control with us. The SEC has interpreted the BDC regulations governing transactions with affiliates to prohibit certain joint transactions involving entities that share a common investment adviser. As a result of these restrictions, we may be prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to any portfolio company that is controlled by a fund managed by either of our Adviser or its affiliates without the prior approval of the SEC, which may limit the scope of investment or disposition opportunities that would otherwise be available to us.

We rely on an order for exemptive relief (the “Order”) from the SEC, to co-invest with other funds managed by our Adviser or its affiliates in a manner consistent with our positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. The Order requires that a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of the Board make certain findings (1) in most instances when we co-invest with our affiliates in an issuer where our affiliate has an existing investment in the issuer, and (2) if we dispose of an asset acquired in a transaction under the Order unless the disposition is done on a pro rata basis. Pursuant to the Order, the Board will oversee our participation in the co-investment program. As required by the Order, we have adopted, and the Board has approved, policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the Order, and the Adviser and our Chief Compliance Officer will provide reporting to the Board.

We may make investments that could give rise to a conflict of interest.

We do not expect to invest in, or hold securities of, companies that are controlled by an affiliate’s other clients. However, our Adviser or an affiliate’s other clients may invest in, and gain control over, one of our portfolio companies. If our Adviser or an affiliate’s other client, or clients, gains control over one of our portfolio companies, it may create conflicts of interest and may subject us to certain restrictions under the 1940 Act. As a result of these conflicts and restrictions our Adviser may be unable to implement our investment strategies as effectively as they could have in the absence of such conflicts or restrictions. For example, as a result of a conflict or restriction, our Adviser may be unable to engage in certain transactions that it would otherwise pursue. In order to avoid these conflicts and restrictions, our Adviser may choose to exit such investments prematurely and, as a result, we may forego any positive returns associated with such investments. In addition, to the extent that an affiliate’s other client holds a different class of securities than us as a result of such transactions, our interests may not be aligned.

Our Adviser’s liability is limited under the Investment Advisory Agreement, and we are required to indemnify our Adviser against certain liabilities, which may lead our Adviser to act in a riskier manner on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.

Our Adviser has not assumed any responsibility to us other than to render the services described in the Investment Advisory Agreement (and, separately, under the Administration Agreement), and it will not be responsible for any action of our Board in declining to follow our Adviser’s advice or recommendations. Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, our Adviser and its directors, officers, shareholders, members, agents, employees, controlling persons, and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of our Adviser will not be liable to us for their acts under the Investment Advisory Agreement, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their duties. We have also agreed to indemnify, defend and protect our Adviser and its directors, officers, shareholders, members, agents, employees, controlling persons and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of our Adviser with respect to all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses resulting from acts of our Adviser not arising out of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their duties. However, in accordance with Section 17(i) of the 1940 Act, neither our Adviser nor any of its affiliates, directors, officers, members, employees, agents, or representatives may be protected against any liability to us or our investors to which it would otherwise be subject by reason

of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of its office. These protections may lead our Adviser to act in a riskier manner when acting on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.

There are risks associated with any potential merger with or purchase of assets of another fund.

Our Adviser may in the future recommend to our Board that we merge with or acquire all or substantially all of the assets of one or more funds including a fund that could be managed by our Adviser or its affiliates (including another BDC). We do not expect that our Adviser would recommend any such merger or asset purchase unless it determines that it would be in our best interests, with such determination dependent on factors it deems relevant, which may include our historical and projected financial performance and that of any proposed merger partner, portfolio composition, potential synergies from the merger or asset sale, available alternative options and market conditions. In addition, no such merger or asset purchase would be consummated absent the meeting of various conditions required by applicable law or contract, at such time, which may include approval of the board of directors and common equity holders of both funds. If our Adviser is the investment adviser of both funds, various conflicts of interest would exist with respect to any such transaction. Such conflicts of interest may potentially arise from, among other things, differences between the compensation payable to our Adviser by us and by the entity resulting from such a merger or asset purchase or efficiencies or other benefits to our Adviser as a result of managing a single, larger fund instead of two separate funds.

Our Adviser’s failure to comply with pay-to-play laws, regulations and policies could have an adverse effect on our Adviser, and thus, us.

A number of U.S. states and municipal pension plans have adopted so-called “pay-to-play” laws, regulations or policies which prohibit, restrict or require disclosure of payments to (and/or certain contacts with) state officials by individuals and entities seeking to do business with state entities, including those seeking investments by public retirement funds. The SEC has adopted a rule that, among other things, prohibits an investment adviser from providing advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after the adviser or certain of its executives or employees makes a contribution to certain elected officials or candidates. If our Adviser, any of its employees or affiliates or any service provider acting on its behalf, fails to comply with such laws, regulations or policies, such non-compliance could have an adverse effect on our Adviser, and thus, us.

Our Adviser’s net worth is not available to satisfy our liabilities and other obligations.

The North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”), in its Omnibus Guidelines Statement of Policy adopted on March 29, 1992 and as amended on May 7, 2007 and from time to time, requires that our affiliates and Adviser, or our Sponsor under the Omnibus Guidelines, have an aggregate financial net worth, exclusive of home, automobiles and home furnishings, of 5.0% of the first $20 million of both the gross amount of securities currently being offered in our offering and the gross amount of any originally issued direct participation program securities sold by our affiliates and sponsors within the past 12 months, plus 1.0% of all amounts in excess of the first $20 million. Based on these requirements, our Adviser and its affiliates have an aggregate financial net worth in excess of those amounts required by the Omnibus Guidelines. However, no portion of such net worth will be available to us to satisfy any of our liabilities or other obligations. The use of our own funds to satisfy such liabilities or other obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Business Development Companies

The requirement that we invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets could preclude us from investing in accordance with our current business strategy; conversely, the failure to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets could result in our failure to maintain our status as a BDC.

As a BDC, the 1940 Act prohibits us from acquiring any assets other than certain qualifying assets unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. Therefore, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets. Conversely, if we fail to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could lose our status as a BDC, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules could prevent us from making additional investments in existing portfolio companies, which could result in the dilution of our position, or could require us to dispose of investments at an inopportune time to comply with the 1940 Act. If we were forced to sell non-qualifying investments in the portfolio for compliance purposes, the proceeds from such sale could be significantly less than the current value of such investments.

Failure to maintain our status as a BDC would reduce our operating flexibility.

If we do not remain a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more regulatory restrictions, including a greater required asset coverage ratio and additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates, and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility.

Regulations governing our operation as a BDC and RIC affect our ability to raise capital and the way in which we raise additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth. As a BDC, the necessity of raising additional capital may expose us to risks, including risks associated with leverage.

As a result of the Annual Distribution Requirement to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC, we may need to access the capital markets periodically to raise cash to fund new investments in portfolio companies. Currently, we may issue “senior securities,” including borrowing money from banks or other financial institutions only in amounts such that the ratio of our total assets (less total liabilities other than indebtedness represented by senior securities) to our total indebtedness represented by senior securities plus preferred stock, if any, equals at least 200% after such incurrence or issuance. If we issue senior securities, we will be exposed to risks associated with leverage, including an increased risk of loss. Our ability to issue different types of securities is also limited. Compliance with RIC distribution requirements may unfavorably limit our investment opportunities and reduce our ability in comparison to other companies to profit from favorable spreads between the rates at which we can borrow and the rates at which we can lend. Therefore, we intend to seek to continuously issue equity securities, which may lead to shareholder dilution.

If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy the asset coverage test under the 1940 Act, which would prohibit us from paying distributions and could prevent us from qualifying for tax treatment as a RIC, which would generally result in U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates on any income and net gains. If we cannot satisfy the asset coverage test, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our debt financing, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous. Also, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness would not be available for distribution to our shareholders.

In addition, as market conditions permit, we have and may continue to securitize our loans to generate cash for funding new investments. To securitize loans, we have and may continue to create a wholly owned subsidiary, contribute a pool of loans to the subsidiary and have the subsidiary issue primarily investment grade debt securities to purchasers who would be expected to be willing to accept a substantially lower interest rate than the loans earn. We have and may continue to retain all or a portion of the equity in the securitized pool of loans. Our retained equity would be exposed to any losses on the portfolio of loans before any of the debt securities would be exposed to such losses.

Risks Related to Our Investments

Our investments in portfolio companies may be risky, and we could lose all or part of our investments.

Our strategy focuses primarily on originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle market companies, with a focus on originated transactions sourced through the networks of our Adviser. Short transaction closing timeframes associated with originated transactions coupled with added tax or accounting structuring complexity and international transactions may result in higher risk in comparison to non-originated transactions.

Most debt securities in which we intend to invest will not be rated by any rating agency and, if they were rated, they would be rated as below investment grade quality and are commonly referred to as “high yield” or “junk.” Debt securities rated below investment grade quality are generally regarded as having predominantly speculative characteristics and may carry a greater risk with respect to a borrower’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. In addition, some of the loans in which we may invest may be “covenant-lite” loans. We use the term “covenant-lite” loans to refer generally to loans that do not have a complete set of financial maintenance covenants. Generally, “covenant-lite” loans provide borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders because their covenants are incurrence-based, which means they are only tested and can only be breached following an affirmative action of the borrower, rather than by a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition. Accordingly, to the extent we invest in “covenant-lite” loans, we may have fewer rights against a borrower and may have a greater risk of loss on such investments as compared to investments in or exposure to loans with financial maintenance covenants.

First-Lien Debt. When we make a first-lien loan, we generally take a security interest in the available assets of the portfolio company, including the equity interests of its subsidiaries, which we expect to help mitigate the risk that we will not be repaid. However, there is a risk that the collateral securing our loans may decrease in value over time, may be difficult to sell in a timely manner, may be difficult to appraise, and may fluctuate in value based upon the success of the business and market conditions, including as a result of the inability of the portfolio company to raise additional capital. In some circumstances, our lien is, or could become, subordinated to claims of other creditors. Consequently, the fact that a loan is secured does not guarantee that we will receive principal and interest payments according to the loan’s terms, or at all, or that we will be able to collect on the loan should we need to enforce our remedies.

Unitranche Loans. In addition, in connection with any unitranche loans (including “last out” portions of such loans) in which we may invest, we would enter into agreements among lenders. Under these agreements, our interest in the collateral of the first-lien loans may rank junior to those of other lenders in the loan under certain circumstances. This may result in greater risk and loss of principal on these loans.

Second-Lien and Mezzanine Debt. Our investments in second-lien and mezzanine debt generally are subordinated to senior loans and will either have junior security interests or be unsecured. As such, other creditors may rank senior to us in the event of insolvency. This may result in greater risk and loss of principal.

Equity Investments. When we invest in first-lien debt, second-lien debt or mezzanine debt, we may acquire equity securities, such as warrants, options and convertible instruments, as well. In addition, we may invest directly in the equity securities of portfolio companies. We may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder, as well as a “put,” or right to sell such securities back to the issuer, upon the occurrence of specified events. In many cases, we may also seek to obtain registration rights in connection with these equity interests, which may include demand and “piggyback” registration rights, which grants us the right to register our equity interest when either the portfolio company or another investor in the portfolio company files a registration statement with the SEC to issue securities. We seek to dispose of these equity interests and realize gains upon our disposition of these interests. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.

We have invested and may continue to invest through joint ventures, partnerships and other special purpose vehicles and our investments through these vehicles may entail greater risks, or risks that we otherwise would not incur, if we otherwise made such investments directly.

We may make indirect investments in portfolio companies through joint ventures, partnerships or other special purpose vehicles (“Investment Vehicles”). In general, the risks associated with indirect investments in portfolio companies through a joint venture, partnership or other special purpose vehicle are similar to those associated with a direct investment in a portfolio company; however, if we are not the sole investor in such Investment Vehicle, the investment may involve risks not present in investments where a third party is not involved.

For any such investments, the optimization of the joint venture may be a complex, costly and time-consuming process and if we experience difficulties in this process, the anticipated benefits may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected, which could have an adverse effect on us for an undetermined period after any such acquisition. There can be no assurances that we will realize any potential operating efficiencies, synergies and other benefits anticipated in connection with such joint ventures.

While we intend to analyze the credit and business of a potential portfolio company in determining whether to make an investment in an Investment Vehicle, we will nonetheless be exposed to the creditworthiness of the Investment Vehicle and any third party. In the event of a bankruptcy proceeding against the portfolio company, the assets of the portfolio company may be used to satisfy its obligations prior to the satisfaction of our investment in the Investment Vehicle (i.e., our investment in the Investment Vehicle could be structurally subordinated to the other obligations of the portfolio company). If a third party is involved, we are subject to the risk that such third-party could have financial difficulties resulting in a negative impact on the Investment Vehicle, could have economic or business interests or goals which are inconsistent with ours, or could be in a position to take (or block) action in a manner contrary to our investment objective or the increased possibility of default by, diminished liquidity or insolvency of, the third party, due to a sustained or general economic downturn. In addition, if we are not the sole investor in an Investment Vehicle, we may be required to rely on our partners in the Investment Vehicle when making decisions regarding such Investment Vehicle’s investments, accordingly, the value of the investment could be adversely affected if our interests diverge from those of our partners in the Investment Vehicle.

Any strategic investments that we pursue are subject to risks and uncertainties.

We have pursued and may continue to pursue growth through strategic investments in new businesses, including through investments in our specialty finance vehicles. Completion and timing of any such strategic investments may be subject to a number of contingencies, including the uncertainty in reaching a commercial agreement with our counterparty, our ability to obtain required board, shareholder and regulatory approvals, as well as any required financing (or the risk that these are obtained subject to terms and conditions that are not anticipated). We may not be required to announce an acquisition or strategic transaction until a definitive agreement is reached and the announcement or consummation of any such transaction may adversely impact our business relationships or engender competitive responses.

In addition, the proposal and negotiation of strategic investments, whether or not completed, as well as the integration of those businesses into our existing portfolio, could result in substantial expenses and the diversion of our Adviser’s time, attention and resources from our day-to-day operations.

Our ability to manage our growth through strategic investments will depend, in part, on our success in addressing these risks. Any failure to effectively implement our acquisition or strategic investment strategies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Broadly syndicated loans, including “covenant-lite” loans, may expose us to different risks, including with respect to liquidity, price volatility, ability to restructure loans, credit risks and less protective loan documentation, than is the case with loans that contain financial maintenance covenants.

Our investments may consist of broadly syndicated loans that were not originated by us. Under the documentation for such loans, a financial institution or other entity typically is designated as the administrative agent and/or collateral agent. This agent is granted a lien on any collateral on behalf of the other lenders and distributes payments on the indebtedness as they are received. The agent is the party responsible for administering and enforcing the loan and generally may take actions only in accordance with the instructions of a

majority or two-thirds in commitments and/or principal amount of the associated indebtedness. Accordingly, we may be precluded from directing such actions unless we or our investment adviser is the designated administrative agent or collateral agent or we act together with other holders of the indebtedness. If we are unable to direct such actions, we cannot assure shareholders that the actions taken will be in our best interests.

There is also a risk that a loan agent may become bankrupt or insolvent. Such an event would delay, and possibly impair, any enforcement actions undertaken by holders of the associated indebtedness, including attempts to realize upon the collateral securing the associated indebtedness and/or direct the agent to take actions against the related obligor or the collateral securing the associated indebtedness and actions to realize on proceeds of payments made by obligors that are in the possession or control of any other financial institution. In addition, we may be unable to remove the agent in circumstances in which removal would be in our best interests. Moreover, agented loans typically allow for the agent to resign with certain advance notice.

In addition, a significant number of high yield loans in the market, in particular the broadly syndicated loan market, may consist of “covenant-lite” loans. Generally, “covenant-lite” loans provide borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders because their covenants are incurrence-based, which means they are only tested and can only be breached following an affirmative action of the borrower, rather than by a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition. Ownership of “covenant-lite” loans may expose us to different risks, including with respect to liquidity, price volatility, ability to restructure loans, credit risks and less protective loan documentation, than is the case with loans that contain financial maintenance covenants.

We may be subject to risks associated with our investments in bank loans.

We may invest in bank loans and participations. These obligations are subject to unique risks, including:

•the possible invalidation of an investment transaction as a fraudulent conveyance under relevant creditors’ rights laws,

•so-called lender-liability claims by the issuer of the obligations,

•environmental liabilities that may arise with respect to collateral securing the obligations, and

•limitations on our ability to directly enforce its rights with respect to participations.

In addition, the illiquidity of bank loans may make it difficult for us to sell such investments to access capital if required. As a result, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments if we were required to sell them for liquidity purposes. Compared to securities and to certain other types of financial assets, purchases and sales of loans take relatively longer to settle. This extended settlement process can (i) increase the counterparty credit risk borne by us; (ii) leave us unable to timely vote, or otherwise act with respect to, loans it has agreed to purchase; (iii) delay us from realizing the proceeds of a sale of a loan; (iv) inhibit our ability to re-sell a loan that it has agreed to purchase if conditions change (leaving us more exposed to price fluctuations); (v) prevent us from timely collecting principal and interest payments; and (vi) expose us to adverse tax or regulatory consequences. To the extent the extended loan settlement process gives rise to short-term liquidity needs, we may hold cash, sell investments or temporarily borrow from banks or other lenders.

In purchasing participations, we generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement, nor any rights of set-off against the borrower, and we may not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the debt obligation in which we have purchased the participation. As a result, we will assume the credit risk of both the borrower and the institution selling the participation.

In analyzing each bank loan or participation, our Adviser compares the relative significance of the risks against the expected benefits of the investment. Successful claims by third parties arising from these and other risks will be borne by us.

If the assets securing the loans that we make decrease in value, then we may lack sufficient collateral to cover losses.

To attempt to mitigate credit risks, we intend to take a security interest in the available assets of our portfolio companies. There is no assurance that we will obtain sufficient collateral to cover losses or properly perfect our liens.

There is a risk that the collateral securing our loans may decrease in value over time, may be difficult to sell in a timely manner, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based upon the success of the business and market conditions, including as a result of the inability of a portfolio company to raise additional capital. In some circumstances, our lien could be subordinated to claims of other creditors. Consequently, the fact that a loan is secured does not guarantee that we will receive principal and interest payments according to the loan’s terms, or that we will be able to collect on the loan should we be forced to enforce our remedies.

We may suffer a loss if a portfolio company defaults on a loan and the underlying collateral is not sufficient.

In the event of a default by a portfolio company on a secured loan, we will only have recourse to the assets collateralizing the loan. If the underlying collateral value is less than the loan amount, we will suffer a loss. In addition, we may make loans that are unsecured, which are subject to the risk that other lenders may be directly secured by the assets of the portfolio company. In the event of a default, those collateralized lenders would have priority over us with respect to the proceeds of a sale of the underlying assets. In cases described above, we may lack control over the underlying asset collateralizing our loan or the underlying assets of the portfolio

company prior to a default, and as a result the value of the collateral may be reduced by acts or omissions by owners or managers of the assets.

In the event of bankruptcy of a portfolio company, we may not have full recourse to its assets in order to satisfy our loan, or our loan may be subject to “equitable subordination.” This means that depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided significant “managerial assistance,” if any, to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. In addition, certain of our loans are subordinate to other debt of the portfolio company. If a portfolio company defaults on our loan or on debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a portfolio company bankruptcy, our loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt receives payment. Where debt senior to our loan exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit our ability to amend our loan documents, assign our loans, accept prepayments, exercise our remedies (through “standstill” periods) and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to the portfolio company. Bankruptcy and portfolio company litigation can significantly increase collection losses and the time needed for us to acquire the underlying collateral in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value, causing us to suffer losses.

Borrowers of broadly syndicated loans may be permitted to designate unrestricted subsidiaries under the terms of their financing agreements, which would exclude such unrestricted subsidiaries from restrictive covenants under the financing agreement with the borrower. Without restriction under the financing agreement, the borrower could take various actions with respect to the unrestricted subsidiary including, among other things, incur debt, grant security on its assets, sell assets, pay dividends or distribute shares of the unrestricted subsidiary to the borrower’s shareholders. Any of these actions could increase the amount of leverage that the borrower is able to incur and increase the risk involved in our investments in broadly syndicated loans accordingly.

If the value of collateral underlying our loan declines or interest rates increase during the term of our loan, a portfolio company may not be able to obtain the necessary funds to repay our loan at maturity through refinancing.

Decreasing collateral value and/or increasing interest rates may hinder a portfolio company’s ability to refinance our loan because the underlying collateral cannot satisfy the debt service coverage requirements necessary to obtain new financing. In some instances a borrower may engage in liability management exercises with certain of its investors who agree to provide additional capital or capital on modified terms in exchange for a superior position in the portfolio company’s capital structure. In such instances, the collateral securing our investment may be reduced or our lien may be further subordinated. If a borrower is unable to repay our loan at maturity, we could suffer a loss which may adversely impact our financial performance.

We may not realize any income or gains from our equity investments.

We have invested in and may continue to invest in equity-related securities, including common equity, warrants, preferred stock and convertible preferred securities. These equity interests we acquire may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value if the company fails to perform financially or achieve its growth objectives. We will generally have little, if any, control over the timing of any gains we may realize from our equity investments since these securities may have restrictions on their transfer or may not have an active trading market.

Equity investments also have experienced significantly more volatility in their returns and may under-perform relative to fixed income securities during certain periods. An adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value. Also, prices of equity investments are sensitive to general movements in the stock market and a drop in the stock market may depress the price of common stock investments to which we have exposure. Equity prices fluctuate for several reasons including changes in investors' perceptions of the financial condition of an issuer or the general condition of the relevant stock market, or when political or economic events affecting the issuers occur. In addition, common stock prices may be particularly sensitive to rising interest rates, as the cost of capital rises and borrowing costs increase.

Although we expect to receive current income in the form of dividend payments on any convertible preferred equity investments, a substantial portion of the gains we expect to receive from our investments in such securities will likely be from the capital gains generated from the sale of our equity investments upon conversion of our convertible securities, the timing of which we cannot predict and we cannot guarantee that such sale will happen at all. We do not expect to generate capital gains from the sale of our portfolio investments on a level or uniform basis from quarter to quarter. In addition, any convertible preferred stock instruments will generally provide for conversion upon the portfolio companies’ achievement of certain milestone events, including a qualified public offering and/or a senior exchange listing for their common stock. However, there can be no assurance that our portfolio companies will obtain either a junior or senior exchange listing or, even if a listing is obtained, that an active trading market will ever develop in the common stock of our publicly traded portfolio companies. In addition, even if our portfolio companies obtain an exchange listing, we may be subject to lock-up provisions that prohibit us from selling our investments into the public market for specified periods of time after such listing. As a result, the market price of securities that we hold may decline substantially before we are able to sell these securities following an exchange listing.

Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience. Furthermore, due to the expected growth of our portfolio companies, we do not generally expect to receive dividend income from our common stock investments. In the case of

cumulative preferred stock, there is no assurance that any dividends will ever be paid by a portfolio company. Dividends to any equity holders may be suspended or cancelled at any time.

Investments in equity securities can carry additional risks and may have other characteristics that require investments to be made indirectly through blocker entities or otherwise. In addition, if an issuer of equity securities in which we have invested sells additional shares of its equity securities, our interest in the issuer may be diluted and the value of our investment could decrease.

We may invest, to the extent permitted by law, in the equity securities of investment funds that are operating pursuant to certain exceptions to the 1940 Act and in advisers to similar investment funds and, to the extent we so invest, will bear our ratable share of any such company’s expenses, including management and performance fees. We will also remain obligated to pay the base management fee, income based fee and capital gains incentive fee to our investment adviser with respect to the assets invested in the securities and instruments of such companies. With respect to each of these investments, each of our common stockholders will bear his or her share of the base management fee, income based fee and capital gains incentive fee due to our investment adviser as well as indirectly bearing the management and performance fees and other expenses of any such investment funds or advisers. For the foregoing reasons, investments in equity securities can be highly speculative and carry a substantial risk of loss of investment.

An investment strategy focused primarily on privately held companies presents certain challenges, including the lack of available information about these companies.

We invest primarily in privately held companies. Investments in private companies pose certain incremental risks as compared to investments in public companies including that they generally:

•have reduced access to the capital markets, resulting in diminished capital resources and ability to withstand financial distress;

•may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations under their debt obligations that we hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of our realizing any guarantees we may have obtained in connection with our investment;

•may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and changing market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;

•are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons and, therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on the company and, in turn, on us; and

•have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position.

In addition, investments in private companies tend to be less liquid. The securities of private companies are not publicly traded or actively traded on the secondary market and are, instead, traded on a privately negotiated over-the-counter secondary market for institutional investors. These over-the-counter secondary markets may be inactive during an economic downturn or a credit crisis and in any event often have lower volumes than publicly traded securities even in normal market conditions. In addition, the securities in these companies will be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities.

If there is no readily available market for these investments, we are required to carry these investments at fair value as determined by our Board. As a result, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded these investments. We may also face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that we, our Adviser or any of its affiliates have material nonpublic information regarding such portfolio company or where the sale would be an impermissible joint transaction under the 1940 Act. The reduced liquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to dispose of them at a favorable price, and, as a result, we may suffer losses.

Finally, little public information generally exists about private companies and these companies may not have third-party credit ratings or audited financial statements. We must therefore rely on the ability of our Adviser to obtain adequate information through due diligence to evaluate the creditworthiness and potential returns from investing in these companies, and to monitor the activities and performance of these investments. To the extent that we (or other clients of our Adviser) may hold a larger number of investments, greater demands will be placed on our Adviser’s time, resources and personnel in monitoring such investments, which may result in less attention being paid to any individual investment and greater risk that our investment decisions may not be fully informed.

Additionally, these companies and their financial information will not generally be subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other rules that govern public companies. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments.

To the extent we invest in publicly traded companies, we may be unable to obtain financial covenants and other contractual rights, which subjects us to additional risks.

We have invested and may continue to invest in instruments issued by publicly-held companies, we may be subject to risks that differ in type or degree from those involved with investments in privately-held companies. Such risks include, without limitation, greater volatility in the valuation of such companies, increased obligations to disclose information regarding such companies, limitations on our ability to dispose of such instruments at certain times, increased likelihood of shareholder litigation against such companies’ board members and increased costs associated with each of the aforementioned risks. In addition, to the extent we invest in publicly traded debt instruments, we may not be able to obtain financial covenants or other contractual rights that we might otherwise be able to obtain when making privately-negotiated investments. We may not have the same access to information in connection with investments in public debt instruments that we would expect to have in connection with privately-negotiated investments. If we or our Adviser were deemed to have material, nonpublic information regarding the issuer of a publicly traded instrument in which we have invested, we may be limited in our ability to make new investments or sell existing investments in such issue.

The credit ratings of certain of our investments may not be indicative of the actual credit risk of such rated instruments.

Rating agencies rate debt securities based upon their assessment of the likelihood of the receipt of principal and interest payments. Rating agencies do not consider the risks of fluctuations in market value or other factors that may influence the value of debt securities. Therefore, the credit rating assigned to a particular instrument may not fully reflect the true risks of an investment in such instrument. Credit rating agencies may change their methods of evaluating credit risk and determining ratings. These changes may occur quickly and often. While we may give some consideration to ratings, ratings may not be indicative of the actual credit risk of our investments in rated instruments.

Prepayments of our debt investments by our portfolio companies could adversely impact our results of operations and reduce our return on equity.

We are subject to the risk that the investments we make in our portfolio companies may be repaid prior to maturity. When this occurs, we will generally reinvest these proceeds in temporary investments, pending their future investment in new portfolio companies or distribution to our shareholders. These temporary investments will typically have substantially lower yields than the debt being prepaid and we could experience significant delays in reinvesting these amounts.

Any future investment in a new portfolio company may also be at lower yields than the debt that was repaid. As a result, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if one or more of our portfolio companies elect to prepay amounts owed to us. Additionally, prepayments, net of prepayment fees, could negatively impact our return on equity. This risk will be more acute when interest rates decrease, as we may be unable to reinvest at rates as favorable as when we made our initial investment.

A redemption of convertible securities held by us could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.

A convertible security may be subject to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the convertible security’s governing instrument. If a convertible security held by us is called for redemption, we will be required to permit the issuer to redeem the security, convert it into the underlying common stock or sell it to a third party. Any of these actions could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.

To the extent original issue discount (“OID”) and payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest income constitute a portion of our income, we will be exposed to risks associated with the deferred receipt of cash representing such income.

Our investments may include OID and PIK instruments. To the extent OID and PIK constitute a portion of our income, we will be exposed to risks associated with such income being required to be included in income for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and taxable income prior to receipt of cash, including the following:

•Original issue discount instruments may have unreliable valuations because the accruals require judgments about collectability or deferred payments and the value of any associated collateral;

•Original issue discount instruments may create heightened credit risks because the inducement to the borrower to accept higher interest rates in exchange for the deferral of cash payments typically represents, to some extent, speculation on the part of the borrower;

•For U.S. GAAP purposes, cash distributions to shareholders that include a component of OID income do not come from paid-in capital, although they may be paid from the offering proceeds. Thus, although a distribution of OID income may come from the cash invested by the shareholders, the 1940 Act does not require that shareholders be given notice of this fact;

•The presence of OID and PIK creates the risk of non-refundable cash payments to our Adviser in the form of incentive fees on income based on non-cash OID and PIK accruals that may never be realized; and

•In the case of PIK, “toggle” debt, which gives the issuer the option to defer an interest payment in exchange for an increased interest rate in the future, the PIK election has the simultaneous effect of increasing the investment income, thus increasing the potential for realizing incentive fees.

Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.

Our strategy focuses on investing primarily in the debt of privately owned U.S. companies with a focus on originated transactions sourced through the networks of our Adviser. Our portfolio companies may have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt in which we invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may entitle the holders to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments with respect to the debt instruments in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, any holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution. After repaying such senior creditors, such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt instruments in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company and our portfolio company may not have sufficient assets to pay all equally ranking credit even if we hold senior, first-lien debt.

Our portfolio companies may be highly leveraged.

Some of our portfolio companies may be highly leveraged, which may have adverse consequences to these companies and to us as an investor. These companies may be subject to restrictive financial and operating covenants and the leverage may impair these companies’ ability to finance their future operations and capital needs. As a result, these companies’ flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions and to take advantage of business opportunities may be limited. Further, a leveraged company’s income and net assets will tend to increase or decrease at a greater rate than if borrowed money were not used.

If we cannot obtain debt financing or equity capital on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire investments and to expand our operations will be adversely affected.

Any working capital reserves we maintain may not be sufficient for investment purposes, and we may require additional debt financing or equity capital to operate. We generally are required to distribute at least 90% of our net ordinary income and net short-term capital gains in excess of net long-term capital losses, if any, to our shareholders to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC. Accordingly, in the event that we need additional capital in the future for investments or for any other reason we may need to access the capital markets periodically to issue debt or equity securities or borrow from financial institutions in order to obtain such additional capital. These sources of funding may not be available to us due to unfavorable economic conditions, which could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. Consequently, if we cannot obtain further debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire additional investments and to expand our operations will be adversely affected. As a result, we would be less able to diversify our portfolio and achieve our investment objective, which may negatively impact our results of operations and reduce our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. See “—If we are unable to obtain additional debt financing, or if our borrowing capacity is materially reduced, our business could be materially adversely affected.”

Defaults by our portfolio companies could jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity investments that we hold which could harm our operating results.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its debt financing and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity investments that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, some of the loans in which we may invest may be “covenant-lite” loans. We use the term “covenant-lite” loans to refer generally to loans that do not have a complete set of financial maintenance covenants. Generally, “covenant-lite” loans provide borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders because their covenants are incurrence-based, which means they are only tested and can only be breached following an affirmative action of the borrower, rather than by a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition. Accordingly, to the extent we invest in “covenant-lite” loans, we may have fewer rights against a borrower and may have a greater risk of loss on such investments as compared to investments in or exposure to loans with financial maintenance covenants.

As part of our lending activities, we may in certain opportunistic circumstances originate loans to companies that are experiencing significant financial or business difficulties, including companies involved in bankruptcy or other reorganization and liquidation proceedings. Any such investment would involve a substantial degree of risk. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to a company that we fund, we may lose all or part of the amounts advanced to the borrower or may be required to accept collateral with a value less than the amount of the loan advanced by us to the borrower.

Subordinated liens on collateral securing debt investments that we may make to portfolio companies may be subject to control by senior creditors with first priority liens. If there is a default, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay in full both the first priority creditors and us.

Certain debt investments that we will make in portfolio companies will be secured on a second priority lien basis by the same collateral securing senior debt of such companies. We also make debt investments in portfolio companies secured on a first priority basis. The first priority liens on the collateral will secure the portfolio company’s obligations under any outstanding senior debt and may secure certain other future debt that may be permitted to be incurred by the portfolio company under the agreements governing the debt. In the event of a default, the holders of obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral will generally control the liquidation of and be entitled to receive proceeds from any realization of the collateral to repay their obligations in full before us.

In addition, the value of the collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the debt obligations secured by the first priority or second priority liens after payment in full of all obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral. If such proceeds are not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the debt obligations secured by the first priority or second priority liens, then we, to the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the collateral, will only have an unsecured claim against the portfolio company’s remaining assets, if any.

We may also make unsecured debt investments in portfolio companies, meaning that such investments will not benefit from any interest in collateral of such companies. Liens on any such portfolio company’s collateral, if any, will secure the portfolio company’s obligations under its outstanding secured debt and may secure certain future debt that is permitted to be incurred by the portfolio company under its secured debt agreements. The holders of obligations secured by such liens will generally control the liquidation of, and be entitled to receive proceeds from, any realization of such collateral to repay their obligations in full before us. In addition, the value of such collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from sales of such collateral would be sufficient to satisfy our unsecured debt obligations after payment in full of all secured debt obligations. If such proceeds were not sufficient to repay the outstanding secured debt obligations, then our unsecured claims would rank equally with the unpaid portion of such secured creditors’ claims against the portfolio company’s remaining assets, if any.

The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing the debt investments we make in our portfolio companies with senior debt outstanding may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more inter-creditor agreements that we enter into with the holders of senior debt. Under such an inter-creditor agreement, at any time obligations that have the benefit of the first priority liens are outstanding, any of the following actions that may be taken in respect of the collateral will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first priority liens: the ability to cause the commencement of enforcement proceedings against the collateral; the ability to control the conduct of such proceedings; the approval of amendments to collateral documents; releases of liens on the collateral; and waivers of past defaults under collateral documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if our rights are adversely affected.

Certain of our investments may be adversely affected by laws relating to fraudulent conveyance or voidable preferences.

Certain of our investments could be subject to federal bankruptcy law and state fraudulent transfer laws, which vary from state to state, if the debt obligations relating to certain investments were issued with the intent of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or, in certain circumstances, if the issuer receives less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in return for issuing such debt obligations. If the debt proceeds are used for a buyout of shareholders, this risk is greater than if the debt proceeds are used for day-to-day operations or organic growth. If a court were to find that the issuance of the debt obligations was a fraudulent transfer or conveyance, the court could void or otherwise refuse to recognize the payment obligations under the debt obligations or the collateral supporting such obligations, further subordinate the debt obligations or the liens supporting such obligations to other existing and future indebtedness of the issuer or require us to repay any amounts received by us with respect to the debt obligations or collateral. In the event of a finding that a fraudulent transfer or conveyance occurred, we may not receive any repayment on such debt obligations.

Under certain circumstances, payments to us and distributions by us to our shareholders may be reclaimed if any such payment or distribution is later determined to have been a fraudulent conveyance, preferential payment or similar transaction under applicable bankruptcy and insolvency laws. Furthermore, investments in restructurings may be adversely affected by statutes relating to, among other things, fraudulent conveyances, voidable preferences, lender liability and the court’s discretionary power to disallow, subordinate or disenfranchise particular claims or re-characterize investments made in the form of debt as equity contributions.

There may be circumstances where our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.

Although we intend to structure certain of our investments as senior debt, if one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company or a representative of us or our Adviser sat on the board of directors of such portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize our debt investment and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. In situations where a bankruptcy carries a high degree of political significance, our legal rights may be subordinated to other creditors.

In addition, a number of U.S. judicial decisions have upheld judgments obtained by borrowers against lending institutions on the basis of various evolving legal theories, collectively termed “lender liability.” Generally, lender liability is founded on the premise that a lender has violated a duty (whether implied or contractual) of good faith, commercial reasonableness and fair dealing, or a similar duty owed to the borrower or has assumed an excessive degree of control over the borrower resulting in the creation of a fiduciary duty owed to the borrower or its other creditors or shareholders. Because of the nature of our investments in portfolio companies (including that, as a BDC, we may be required to provide managerial assistance to those portfolio companies if they so request upon our offer), we may be subject to allegations of lender liability.

We generally will not control the business operations of our portfolio companies and, due to the illiquid nature of our holdings in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our interests in our portfolio companies.

We do not currently, and do not expect in the future to control most of our portfolio companies, although we may have board representation or board observation rights, and our debt agreements may impose certain restrictive covenants on our borrowers. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions with which we disagree and the management of such company, as representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests as a debt investor. Due to the lack of liquidity for our investments in private companies, we may not be able to dispose of our interests in our portfolio companies as readily as we would like or at a favorable value. As a result, a portfolio company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.

We and our portfolio companies are, and will continue to be, exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates.

General interest rate fluctuations and changes in credit spreads on floating rate loans may have a substantial negative impact on our portfolio company investments and our investment opportunities and, accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on our rate of return on invested capital, our net investment income and our net asset value. The majority of our debt investments have, and are expected to have, variable interest rates that reset periodically based on benchmarks such as the SOFR, the SONIA, the Euro Interbank Offered Rate, the Federal Funds rate or Prime rate. The Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate three times in 2025. A reduction in the interest rates on new investments relative to interest rates on current investments could have an adverse impact on our net investment income. On the other hand, increases in interest rates have made and may continue to make it more difficult for our portfolio companies to service their obligations under the debt investments that we will hold and may increase defaults even where our investment income increases. Elevated interest rates could also cause borrowers to shift cash from other productive uses to the payment of interest, which may have a material adverse effect on their business and operations and could, over time, lead to increased defaults. Additionally, higher interest rate loans may be less liquid as fewer investors may be willing to purchase such loans in the secondary market in light of the increased risk of a default by the borrower and the heightened risk of a loss of an investment in such loans. All of these risks may be exacerbated when interest rates rise rapidly and/or significantly. Decreases in credit spreads on debt that pays a floating rate of return would have an impact on the income generation of our floating rate assets. Trading prices for debt that pays a fixed rate of return tend to fall as interest rates rise. Trading prices tend to fluctuate more for fixed rate securities that have longer maturities.

Conversely, when interest rates decline, borrowers may refinance their loans at lower interest rates, which could shorten the average life of the loans and reduce the associated returns on the investment, as well as require our Adviser and the Adviser’s personnel to incur management time and expense to re-deploy such proceeds, including on terms that may not be as favorable as our existing loans.

In addition, because we borrow money to make investments, our net investment income will depend, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. In periods of declining interest rates, we may earn less interest income from investments and our cost of funds will also decrease, to a lesser extent, given certain of our currently outstanding indebtedness bears interest at fixed rates, resulting in lower net investment income. Conversely, in periods of rising interest rates, our interest income will increase as the majority of our portfolio bears interest at variable rates while our cost of funds will also increase, to a lesser extent, resulting in an increase to our net investment income. In addition, in periods of elevated interest rates, our cost of funds increases, which tends to reduce our net investment income. We can offer no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income.

We may hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as interest rate swap agreements, futures, options and forward contracts, subject to applicable legal requirements, including all necessary registrations (or exemptions from registration) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. In addition, our interest expense may not decrease at the same rate as overall interest rates because of our fixed rate borrowings, which could lead to greater declines in our net investment income. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged borrowings. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We do not have a policy governing the maturities of our investments. This means that we are subject to greater risk (other things being equal) than a fund invested solely in shorter-term securities. A decline in the prices of the debt we own could adversely affect our net asset value. Also, an increase in interest rates available to investors could make an investment in our common stock less attractive if we are not able to increase our dividend rate.

International investments create additional risks.

We may make investments in portfolio companies that are domiciled outside of the United States. Our investments in foreign portfolio companies are deemed “non-qualifying assets,” which means that, as required by the 1940 Act, such investments, along with other investments in non-qualifying assets, may not constitute more than 30% of our total assets at the time of our acquisition of any such asset, after giving effect to the acquisition. Notwithstanding the limitation on our ownership of foreign portfolio companies, such investments subject us to many of the same risks as our domestic investments, as well as certain additional risks, including the following:

•foreign governmental laws, rules and policies, including those relating to taxation and bankruptcy and restricting the ownership of assets in the foreign country or the repatriation of profits from the foreign country to the United States and any adverse changes in these laws;

•foreign currency devaluations that reduce the value of and returns on our foreign investments;

•adverse changes in the availability, cost and terms of investments due to the varying economic policies of a foreign country in which we invest;

•adverse changes in tax rates, the tax treatment of transaction structures and other changes in operating expenses of a particular foreign country in which we invest;

•the assessment of foreign-country taxes (including withholding taxes, transfer taxes and value added taxes, any or all of which could be significant) on income or gains from our investments in the foreign country;

•changes that adversely affect the social, political and/or economic stability of a foreign country in which we invest; high inflation in the foreign countries in which we invest, which could increase the costs to us of investing in those countries;

•deflationary periods in the foreign countries in which we invest, which could reduce demand for our assets in those countries and diminish the value of such investments and the related investment returns to us; and

•legal and logistical barriers in the foreign countries in which we invest that materially and adversely limit our ability to enforce our contractual rights with respect to those investments.

In addition, we may make investments in countries whose governments or economies may prove unstable. Certain of the countries in which we may invest may have political, economic and legal systems that are unpredictable, unreliable or otherwise inadequate with respect to the implementation, interpretation and enforcement of laws protecting asset ownership and economic interests. In some of the countries in which we may invest, there may be a risk of nationalization, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, which may have an adverse effect on our portfolio companies in those countries and the rates of return that we are able to achieve on such investments. We may also lose the total value of any investment which is nationalized, expropriated or confiscated. The financial results and investment opportunities available to us, particularly in developing countries and emerging markets, may be materially and adversely affected by any or all of these political, economic and legal risks.

We expose ourselves to risks when we engage in risk management activities.

We may in the future enter into hedging transactions, which may expose us to risks associated with such transactions. We may seek to utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates and the relative value of certain debt securities from changes in market interest rates. Use of these hedging instruments may include counter-party credit risk. The scope of risk management activities we undertake varies based on the level of interest rates, prevailing foreign currency exchange rates, the types of investments that are made and other changing market conditions. To the extent we have non-U.S. investments, particularly investments denominated in non-U.S. currencies, our hedging costs will increase.

Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions would not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions were to decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the underlying portfolio positions were to increase. It also may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price.

The success of our hedging strategy, if any will depend on our ability to correctly identify appropriate exposures for hedging. Unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or other exposures that we might hedge may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary, as may the time period in which the hedge is effective relative to the time period of the related exposure.

For a variety of reasons, we may not seek to (or be able to) establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the positions being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities

denominated in non-U.S. currencies because the value of those securities is likely to fluctuate as a result of factors not related to currency fluctuations. Income derived from hedging transactions also is not eligible to be distributed to non-U.S. stockholders free from withholding taxes. Changes to the regulations applicable to the financial instruments we use to accomplish our hedging strategy could affect the effectiveness of that strategy. See “—The market structure applicable to derivatives imposed by the Dodd-Frank Act, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the SEC may affect our ability to use over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives for hedging purposes” and “We are, and will continue to be, exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates.”

The market structure applicable to derivatives imposed by the Dodd-Frank Act, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the SEC may affect our ability to use over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives for hedging purposes.

The CFTC and the SEC have issued final rules establishing that certain swap transactions are subject to CFTC regulation. Engaging in such swap or other commodity interest transactions such as futures contracts or options on futures contracts may cause us to fall within the definition of “commodity pool” under the Commodity Exchange Act and related CFTC regulations. Our Adviser has claimed relief from CFTC registration and regulation as a commodity pool operator with respect to our operations, with the result that we are limited in our ability to use futures contracts or options on futures contracts or engage in swap transactions. Specifically, we are subject to strict limitations on using such derivatives other than for hedging purposes, whereby the use of derivatives not used solely for hedging purposes is generally limited to situations where (i) the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish such positions does not exceed five percent of the liquidation value of our portfolio, after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such contracts we have entered into; or (ii) the aggregate net notional value of such derivatives does not exceed 100% of the liquidation value of our portfolio.

The Dodd-Frank Act also imposed requirements relating to real-time public and regulatory reporting of OTC derivative transactions, enhanced documentation requirements, position limits on an expanded array of derivatives, and recordkeeping requirements. Taken as a whole, these changes could significantly increase the cost of using uncleared OTC derivatives to hedge risks, including interest rate and foreign exchange risk; reduce the level of exposure we are able to obtain for risk management purposes through OTC derivatives (including as the result of the CFTC imposing position limits on additional products); reduce the amounts available to us to make non-derivatives investments; impair liquidity in certain OTC derivatives; and adversely affect the quality of execution pricing obtained by us, all of which could adversely impact our investment returns.

In addition, as a result of rules adopted by U.S. and foreign regulators concerning certain financial contracts, including OTC derivatives, entered into with counterparties that have been designated as global systemically important banking organizations, we may be restricted in our ability to terminate such contracts following the occurrence of certain insolvency-related default events. Transactions with these counterparties, therefore, carry heightened risk in the event that the counterparty defaults on its obligations to us.

Our ability to enter into transactions involving derivatives and financial commitment transactions may be limited.

Rule 18f-4 requires a BDC (or a registered investment company) that uses derivatives to, among other things, comply with a value-at-risk leverage limit, adopt a derivatives risk management program and implement certain testing and board reporting requirements. Rule 18f-4 exempts BDCs that qualify as “limited derivatives users” from the aforementioned requirements, provided that these BDCs adopt written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to manage the BDC’s derivatives risks and comply with certain recordkeeping requirements. Under Rule 18f-4, a BDC may enter into an unfunded commitment agreement that is not a derivatives transaction, such as an agreement to provide financing to a portfolio company, if the BDC has, among other things, a reasonable belief, at the time it enters into such an agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all of its unfunded commitment agreements, in each case as it becomes due. Collectively, these requirements may limit our ability to use derivatives and/or enter into certain other financial contracts.

We may enter into total return swaps that would expose us to certain risks, including market risk, liquidity risk and other risks similar to those associated with the use of leverage.

A total return swap is a contract in which one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in the market value of the assets underlying the total return swap, which may include a specified security or loan, basket of securities or loans or securities or loan indices during the specified period, in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate. A total return swap is typically used to obtain exposure to a security, loan or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or loan or investing directly in such market. A total return swap may effectively add leverage to our portfolio because, in addition to our total net assets, we would be subject to investment exposure on the amount of securities or loans subject to the total return swap. A total return swap is also subject to the risk that a counterparty will default on its payment obligations thereunder or that we will not be able to meet our obligations to the counterparty. In addition, because a total return swap is a form of synthetic leverage, such arrangements are subject to risks similar to those associated with the use of leverage.

Our portfolio may be focused on a limited number of industries, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if there is a downturn in a particular industry.

Beyond the asset diversification requirements associated with our qualification as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification. While we are not targeting any specific industries, our investments may be focused on

relatively few industries. To the extent that we hold large positions in a small number of issuers, or within a particular industry, our net asset value may be subject to greater fluctuation. We may also be more susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence or a downturn in particular industry. As a result, the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly adversely affected if a small number of investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Additionally, a downturn in any particular industry in which we are invested could significantly affect our aggregate returns. Further, any industry in which we are meaningfully concentrated at any given time could be subject to significant risks that could adversely impact our aggregate returns. For example, as of December 31, 2025, our investments in internet software and services represented 10.9% of our portfolio at fair value. Our investments in internet software and services are subject to substantial risks, including, but not limited to, intense competition, changing technology, shifting user needs, frequent introductions of new products and services, competitors in different industries and ranging from large established companies to emerging startups, decreasing average selling prices of products and services resulting from rapid technological changes, cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents and various legal and regulatory risks. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, our investments in manufacturing represented 9.8% of our portfolio at fair value. Generally, our investments in the manufacturing industry are subject to various risks including, but not limited to, safety or product liability issues, costs of raw material and energy, including crude oil, competition in global markets and regulatory risks.

We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain various required licenses in U.S. states or in any other jurisdiction where they may be required in the future.

We are required to have and may be required in the future to obtain various state licenses to, among other things, originate commercial loans, and may be required to obtain similar licenses from other authorities, including outside of the United States, in the future in connection with one or more investments. Applying for and obtaining required licenses can be costly and take several months. We cannot assure you that we will maintain or obtain all of the licenses that we need on a timely basis. We also are and will be subject to various information and other requirements to maintain and obtain these licenses, and we cannot assure you that we will satisfy those requirements. Our failure to maintain or obtain licenses that we require, now or in the future, might restrict investment options and have other adverse consequences.

Certain investment analyses and decisions by our Adviser may be required to be undertaken on an expedited basis.

Investment analyses and decisions by our Adviser may be required to be undertaken on an expedited basis to take advantage of certain investment opportunities. While we generally will not seek to make an investment until our Adviser has conducted sufficient due diligence to make a determination as to the acceptability of the credit quality of the investment and the underlying issuer, in such cases, the information available to our Adviser at the time of making an investment decision may be limited. Therefore, no assurance can be given that our Adviser will have knowledge of all circumstances that may adversely affect an investment. In addition, our Adviser may rely upon independent consultants and others in connection with its evaluation of proposed investments. No assurance can be given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by such independent consultants and we may incur liability as a result of such consultants’ actions, many of whom we will have limited recourse against in the event of any such inaccuracies.

We may not have the funds or ability to make additional investments in our portfolio companies.

After our initial investment in a portfolio company, we may be called upon from time to time to provide additional funds to such company or have the opportunity to increase our investment through the exercise of a warrant or other right to purchase common stock. There is no assurance that we will make, or will have sufficient funds to make, follow-on investments. Even if we do have sufficient capital to make a desired follow-on investment, we may elect not to make a follow-on investment because we may not want to increase our level of risk, we prefer other opportunities, we are limited in our ability to do so by compliance with BDC requirements, or in order to maintain our RIC status. Our ability to make follow-on investments may also be limited by our Adviser’s allocation policies. Any decision not to make a follow-on investment or any inability on our part to make such an investment may have a negative impact on a portfolio company in need of such an investment, may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful investment or may reduce the expected return to us on the investment.

Climate change and climate-related effects may expose us to systemic, global, macroeconomic risks and could adversely affect our business and the businesses of our products’ portfolio companies.

Global climate change is widely considered to be a significant threat to the global economy. We and the companies in which we invest may face risks associated with climate change, including physical risks such as an increased frequency or severity of extreme weather events and rising sea levels and temperatures. In addition, climate change may also impact our profitability and costs, as well as pose systemic risks for our businesses and those of the companies in which we invest. For example, to the extent weather conditions are affected by climate change, energy use by us or the companies in which we invest could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of any changes. Increases in the cost of energy could adversely affect the cost of operations of us or the companies in which we invest. On the other hand, a decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect the financial condition of some of the companies in which we invest through decreased revenues. Additionally, extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, including costs of insurance (particularly for real estate in certain regions), and can contribute to increased system stresses, including service interruptions.

While the United States has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement, various other regulatory and voluntary initiatives launched by international, federal, state, and regional policymakers and regulatory authorities as well as private actors seeking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may expose our business operations, products and products’ portfolio companies to other types of transition risks, such as: (i) political and policy risks, (including changing regulatory incentives, and legal requirements, including with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, that could result in increased costs or changes in business operations), (ii) regulatory and litigation risks, (including changing legal requirements that could result in increased permitting, tax and compliance costs, enhanced disclosure obligations, changes in business operations, or the discontinuance of certain operations, and litigation seeking monetary or injunctive relief related to impacts related to climate change), (iii) technology and market risks, (including declining market for investments in industries seen as greenhouse gas intensive or less effective than alternatives in reducing greenhouse gas emissions), (iv) business trend risks, (including requirements for certain portfolio companies related to capital expenditures, product or service redesigns, and changes to operations and supply chains to meet changing customer expectations, and the increased attention to ESG considerations by our investors, including in connection with their determination of whether to invest), and (v) potential harm to our reputation if our shareholders believe that we are not adequately or appropriately responding to climate change and/or climate risk management, including through the way in which we operate our business, the composition of portfolio, our new investments or the decisions we make to continue to conduct or change our activities in response to climate change considerations.

Risks Related to an Investment in Our Common Stock

The value of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

These factors include:

•changes in the value of our portfolio of investments and derivative instruments as a result of changes in market factors, such as interest rate shifts, and also portfolio specific performance, such as portfolio company defaults, among other reasons;

•changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly with respect to RICs or BDCs;

•loss of RIC tax treatment or BDC status;

•distributions that exceed our net investment income and net income as reported according to U.S. GAAP;

•changes in earnings or variations in operating results;

•changes in accounting guidelines governing valuation of our investments;

•adverse publicity about the investment management industry generally or individual scandals specifically;

•a breach of our computer systems, software or networks, or misappropriation of our proprietary information;

•any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses from levels expected by investors;

•departure of our Adviser or certain of its key personnel;

•general economic trends and other external factors; and

•loss of a major funding source.

A shareholder’s interest in us will be diluted if we issue additional shares, which could reduce the overall value of an investment in us.

Our shareholders do not have preemptive rights to purchase any shares we issue in the future. Our charter authorizes us to issue up to 450 million shares of common stock. Pursuant to our charter, a majority of our entire Board may amend our charter to increase the number of shares of common stock we may issue without shareholder approval. Our Board may elect to sell additional shares in the future or issue equity interests in private offerings. To the extent we issue additional equity interests at or below net asset value, your percentage ownership interest in us may be diluted. In addition, depending upon the terms and pricing of any additional offerings and the value of our investments, you may also experience dilution in the book value and fair value of your shares.

Under the 1940 Act, we generally are prohibited from issuing or selling our common stock at a price below net asset value per share, which may be a disadvantage as compared with certain public companies. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options, or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of our common stock if our Board and independent directors determine that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our shareholders, and our shareholders, including a majority of those shareholders that are not affiliated with us, approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price that, in the determination of our Board, closely approximates the fair value of such securities (less any distributing commission or discount). If we raise additional funds by issuing common stock or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, then the percentage ownership of our shareholders at that time will decrease and you will experience dilution.

Certain provisions of our charter and actions of our Board could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the value of shares of our common stock.

Our charter, as well as certain statutory and regulatory requirements, contain certain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire us. Our Board is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-

year terms, which could prevent shareholders from removing a majority of directors in any given election. Our Board may, without shareholder action, authorize the issuance of shares in one or more classes or series, including shares of preferred stock; and our Board may, without shareholder action, amend our charter to increase the number of shares of our common stock, of any class or series, that we will have authority to issue. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change of control in circumstances that could give the holders of shares of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the value of shares of our common stock.

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk.

The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative investment options, including volatility or loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies may be highly speculative and aggressive and, therefore, an investment in our common stock may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.

We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.

We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including our ability or inability to make investments in companies that meet our investment criteria, the interest rate payable on the loans or other debt securities we originate or acquire, the level of our expenses (including our borrowing costs), variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any previous period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods or the full fiscal year.

The amount of any distributions we may make on our common stock is uncertain. We may not be able to pay distributions to shareholders, or be able to sustain distributions at any particular level, and our distributions per share, if any, may not grow over time, and our distributions per share may be reduced. We have not established any limits on the extent to which we may use borrowings, if any, and we may use sources other than cash flows from operations to fund distributions (which may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in portfolio companies).

Subject to our Board’s discretion and applicable legal restrictions, we intend to authorize and declare cash distributions on a monthly or quarterly basis and pay such distributions on a monthly or quarterly basis. We expect to pay distributions out of assets legally available for distribution. However, we cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a consistent targeted level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. Our ability to pay distributions might be adversely affected by the impact of the risks described herein. In addition, the inability to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to us as a BDC under the 1940 Act can limit our ability to pay distributions. Distributions from offering proceeds also could reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in debt or equity securities of portfolio companies. We cannot assure you that we will pay distributions to our shareholders in the future.

Distributions on our common stock may exceed our taxable earnings and profits. Therefore, portions of the distributions that we pay may represent a return of capital to you. A return of capital is a return of a portion of your original investment in shares of our common stock. As a result, a return of capital will (i) lower your adjusted tax basis in your shares and thereby increase the amount of capital gain (or decrease the amount of capital loss) realized upon a subsequent sale or redemption of such shares, and (ii) reduce the amount of funds we have for investment in portfolio companies. We have not established any limit on the extent to which we may use offering proceeds to fund distributions.

We may pay our distributions from offering proceeds in anticipation of future cash flow, which may constitute a return of your capital and will lower your adjusted tax basis in your shares, thereby increasing the amount of capital gain (or decreasing the amount of capital loss) realized upon a subsequent sale or redemption of such shares, even if such shares have not increased in value or have, in fact, lost value. Distributions from offering proceeds also could reduce the amount of capital we ultimately have available to invest in portfolio companies.

Our stockholders could receive shares of our common stock as dividends, which could result in adverse tax consequences to them.

Although we currently do not intend to do so, we are permitted to declare a large portion of a dividend in shares of common stock instead of cash at the election of each stockholder. Revenue procedures issued by the IRS allow a publicly offered RIC to distribute its own stock as a dividend for the purpose of fulfilling its distribution requirements, if certain conditions are satisfied. Among other things, the aggregate amount of cash available to be distributed to all stockholders is required to be at least 20% of the aggregate declared distribution. The Internal Revenue Service has also issued private letter rulings on cash/stock dividends paid by RICs and real estate investment trusts where the cash component is limited to 20% of the total distribution if certain requirements are satisfied. Stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend (including the portion payable in stock) as ordinary income (or, in certain circumstances, long-term capital gain) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, stockholders could be required to pay income taxes with respect to such dividends in excess of the cash dividends received. It is unclear to what extent we will be able to pay taxable dividends in cash and common stock (whether pursuant to IRS Revenue Procedures, a private letter ruling or otherwise).

Preferred stock could be issued with rights and preferences that would adversely affect holders of our common stock.

Under the terms of our charter, our Board is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series without shareholder approval, which could potentially adversely affect the interests of existing shareholders. In particular, holders of preferred stock are required to have certain voting rights when there are unpaid dividends and priority over other classes of securities as to distribution of assets or payment of dividends.

If we issue preferred stock or convertible debt securities, the net asset value of our common stock may become more volatile.

We cannot assure you that the issuance of preferred stock and/or convertible debt securities would result in a higher yield or return to the holders of our common stock. The issuance of preferred stock or convertible debt would likely cause the net asset value of our common stock to become more volatile. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock, or the interest rate on the convertible debt securities, were to approach the net rate of return on our investment portfolio, the benefit of such leverage to the holders of our common stock would be reduced. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock, or the interest rate on the debt securities, were to exceed the net rate of return on our portfolio, the use of leverage would result in a lower rate of return to the holders of common stock than if we had not issued the preferred stock or convertible debt securities. Any decline in the net asset value of our investment would be borne entirely by the holders of our common stock. Therefore, if the market value of our portfolio were to decline, the leverage would result in a greater decrease in net asset value to the holders of our common stock than if we were not leveraged through the issuance of preferred stock or debt securities. This decline in net asset value would also tend to cause a greater decline in the market price, if any, for our common stock.

There is also a risk that, in the event of a sharp decline in the value of our net assets, we would be in danger of failing to maintain required asset coverage ratios, which may be required by the preferred stock or convertible debt, or our current investment income might not be sufficient to meet the dividend requirements on the preferred stock or the interest payments on the debt securities. In order to counteract such an event, we might need to liquidate investments in order to fund the redemption of some or all of the preferred stock or convertible debt. In addition, we would pay (and the holders of our common stock would bear) all costs and expenses relating to the issuance and ongoing maintenance of the preferred stock, convertible debt, or any combination of these securities. Holders of preferred stock or convertible debt may have different interests than holders of common stock and may at times have disproportionate influence over our affairs.

Holders of any preferred stock that we may issue will have the right to elect certain members of the Board and have class voting rights on certain matters.

The 1940 Act requires that holders of shares of preferred stock must be entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to elect a majority of the directors if dividends on such preferred stock are in arrears by two years or more, until such arrearage is eliminated. In addition, certain matters under the 1940 Act require the separate vote of the holders of any issued and outstanding preferred stock, including changes in fundamental investment restrictions and conversion to open end status and, accordingly, preferred shareholders could veto any such changes. Restrictions imposed on the declarations and payment of dividends or other distributions to the holders of our common stock and preferred stock, both by the 1940 Act and by requirements imposed by rating agencies, might impair our ability to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Our shares are not listed on an exchange or quoted through a quotation system and will not be listed for the foreseeable future, if ever. Therefore, our shareholders will have limited liquidity and may not receive a full return of invested capital (including front-end commissions, fees and expenses), upon selling their shares or upon liquidation of our Company.

Our shares are illiquid investments for which there is not a secondary market nor is it expected that any such secondary market will develop in the future. We intend to contemplate a liquidity event for our shareholders within three to four years after the completion of our continuous offering. A future liquidity event could include: (i) a listing of our shares on a national securities exchange; (ii) a merger or another transaction approved by our Board in which our shareholders will receive cash or shares of a listed company; or (iii) a sale of all or substantially all of our assets either on a complete portfolio basis or individually followed by a liquidation. Certain types of liquidity events, such as a listing, would allow us to retain our investment portfolio while providing our shareholders with access to a trading market for their securities.

We do not know at this time what circumstances will exist in the future and therefore we do not know what factors our Board will consider in determining whether to pursue a liquidity event in the future. A liquidity event may include a sale, merger or rollover transaction with one or more affiliated investment companies managed by our Adviser or a listing with either an internal or external management structure.

Also, since a portion of the public offering price from the sale of shares in our offering will be used to pay offering expenses and recurring expenses, the full offering price paid by our shareholders was not invested in portfolio companies. As a result, even if we do complete a liquidity event, you may not receive a return of all of your invested capital. If we do not successfully complete a liquidity event, liquidity for your shares will be limited to participation in our share repurchase program, which may not be for a sufficient number of shares to meet your request and which we have no obligation to maintain. In addition, any shares repurchased pursuant to our share repurchase program may have been purchased at a price which may have reflected a discount from the purchase price shareholders paid for the shares being repurchased. At this time we do not intend to continue to engage in share repurchases.

If our shares are listed on a national securities exchange or quoted through a quotation system, we cannot assure you a public trading market will develop or, if one develops, that such trading market can be sustained. Shares of companies offered in an initial public offering often trade at a discount to the initial offering price due to underwriting discounts and related offering expenses. Also, shares of closed-end investment companies and BDCs frequently trade at a discount from their net asset value. This characteristic of closed-end investment companies is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per share of common stock may decline. We cannot predict whether our common stock, if listed on a national securities exchange, will trade at, above or below net asset value.

Shareholders will have limited opportunities to sell their shares.

Prior to the third quarter of 2025, we offered, on a quarterly basis, to repurchase shares of our common stock on terms determined by our Board in its complete discretion. Our Board has complete discretion to determine whether we will engage in any share repurchase, and if so, the terms of such repurchase. At this time we do not intend to continue to engage in share repurchases; however, we expect to prioritize return of capital distributions which will be made to all shareholders on a quarterly basis. These quarterly return of capital distributions are intended to replace quarterly share repurchases and may be funded by repayments, earnings, proceeds from the sale of assets or strategic transactions.

Risks Related to an Investment in our Unsecured Notes

Our unsecured notes are effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness we have currently incurred or may incur in the future.

We have issued notes that are unsecured by any of our assets or any of the assets of our subsidiaries. As a result, these notes are effectively subordinated, or junior, to any secured indebtedness or other obligations we or our subsidiaries have currently incurred and may incur in the future (or any indebtedness that is initially unsecured that we later secure) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. Substantially all of our subsidiaries’ assets are currently pledged as collateral under our credit facilities. In any liquidation, dissolution, bankruptcy or other similar proceeding, the holders of any of our existing or future secured indebtedness and the secured indebtedness of our subsidiaries may assert rights against the assets pledged to secure that indebtedness in order to receive full payment of their indebtedness before the assets may be used to pay other creditors, including the holders of the unsecured notes. Secured indebtedness is effectively senior to the notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.

Our unsecured notes are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.

The unsecured notes are exclusively our obligations and not of any of our subsidiaries. None of our subsidiaries are a guarantor of the unsecured notes and the unsecured notes are not required to be guaranteed by any subsidiaries we may acquire or create in the future. Except to the extent we are a creditor with recognized claims against our subsidiaries, all claims of creditors (including trade creditors) and holders of preferred stock, if any, of our subsidiaries will have priority over our equity interests in such subsidiaries (and therefore the claims of our creditors, including holders of the unsecured notes) with respect to the assets of such subsidiaries. Even if we are recognized as a creditor of one or more of our subsidiaries, our claims would still be effectively subordinated to any security interests in the assets of any such subsidiary and to any indebtedness or other liabilities of any such subsidiary senior to our claims. Consequently, our unsecured notes will be structurally subordinated, or junior, to our SPV Asset Facility and all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by any of our subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities and any subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities that we may in the future acquire or establish. Our subsidiaries may incur indebtedness in the future, all of which would be structurally senior to the unsecured notes.

A downgrade, suspension or withdrawal of the credit rating assigned by a rating agency to us or our notes, if any, or change in the debt markets, could cause the liquidity or market value of our notes to decline significantly.

Our credit ratings are an assessment by rating agencies of our ability to pay our debts when due. Consequently, real or anticipated changes in our credit ratings will generally affect the market value of our notes. These credit ratings may not reflect the potential impact of risks relating to the structure or marketing of our notes. Credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the issuing organization in its sole discretion.

An increase in market interest rates could result in a decrease in the market value of our unsecured notes.

The condition of the financial markets and prevailing interest rates have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future, which could have an adverse effect on the market prices of our unsecured notes. In general, as market interest rates rise, debt securities bearing interest at fixed rates of interest decline in value. We cannot predict the future level of market interest rates.

The indenture under which the unsecured notes were issued contains limited protection for holders of our unsecured notes.

The indenture offers limited protection to holders of our unsecured notes. The terms of the indenture and the unsecured notes do not restrict our or any of our subsidiaries’ ability to engage in, or otherwise be a party to, a variety of corporate transactions, circumstances or events that could have an adverse impact on an investment in the unsecured notes. In particular, the terms of the indenture and the unsecured notes will not place any restrictions on our or our subsidiaries’ ability to:

•issue securities or otherwise incur additional indebtedness or other obligations other than an incurrence of indebtedness or other obligations that would cause a violation of Section 18(a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act or any successor provisions of the 1940 Act, but giving effect, in either case, to any exemptive relief granted to us by the SEC. Currently, these provisions generally prohibit us from incurring additional borrowings, including through the issuance of additional debt securities, unless our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowings;

•pay dividends on, or purchase or redeem or make any payments in respect of, capital stock or other securities ranking junior in right of payment to the unsecured notes;

•sell assets (other than certain limited restrictions on our ability to consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets);

•create liens (including liens on the shares of our subsidiaries) or enter into sale and leaseback transactions;

•enter into transactions with affiliates;

•make investments; or

•create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to us from our subsidiaries.

Furthermore, the terms of the indenture and the unsecured notes do not protect holders of the unsecured notes in the event that we experience changes (including significant adverse changes) in our financial condition, results of operations or credit ratings, as they do not require that we or our subsidiaries adhere to any financial tests or ratios or specified levels of net worth, revenues, income, cash flow or liquidity.

Our ability to recapitalize, incur additional debt and take a number of other actions that are not limited by the terms of the unsecured notes may have important consequences for a holder of the unsecured notes, including making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the unsecured notes or negatively affecting the trading value of the unsecured notes.

Certain of our current debt instruments include more protections for their holders than the indenture and the unsecured notes. In addition, other debt we issue or incur in the future could contain more protections for its holders than the indenture and the unsecured notes, including additional covenants and events of default. The issuance or incurrence of any such debt with incremental protections could affect the market for and trading levels and prices of the unsecured notes.

We may not be able to repurchase the unsecured notes upon a Change of Control Repurchase Event.

Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control Repurchase Event, as defined in the indenture that governs the unsecured notes, as supplemented, subject to certain conditions, we will be required to offer to repurchase all outstanding unsecured notes at 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The source of funds for that purchase of the unsecured notes will be our available cash or cash generated from our operations or other potential sources, including borrowings, investment repayments, sales of assets or sales of equity. We cannot assure you that sufficient funds from such sources will be available at the time of any Change of Control Repurchase Event to make required repurchases of the unsecured notes tendered. Our debt instruments may contain restrictions and provisions that we would have to comply with in connection with any repurchase of the unsecured notes. If the holders of the unsecured notes exercise their right to require us to repurchase all the unsecured notes upon a Change of Control Repurchase Event, the financial effect of this repurchase could cause a default under our existing or future debt instruments, even if the Change of Control Repurchase Event itself would not cause a default. It is possible that we will not have sufficient funds at the time of the Change of Control Repurchase Event to make the required repurchase of the unsecured notes or our other debt.

If an active trading market does not develop for the unsecured notes, noteholders may not be able to resell them.

We do not intend to apply for listing of the unsecured notes on any securities exchange or for quotation of the unsecured notes on any automated dealer quotation system. If no active trading market develops, noteholders may not be able to resell the unsecured notes at their fair market value or at all. If the unsecured notes are traded after their initial issuance, they may trade at a discount from their initial offering price depending on prevailing interest rates, the market for similar securities, our credit ratings, general economic conditions, our financial condition, performance and prospects and other factors. We cannot assure noteholders that a liquid trading market will develop for the unsecured notes, that noteholders will be able to sell the unsecured notes at a particular time or that the price noteholders receive when they sell will be favorable. To the extent an active trading market does not develop for the unsecured notes, the liquidity and trading price for the unsecured notes may be harmed. Accordingly, noteholders may be required to bear the financial risk of an investment in the unsecured notes for an indefinite period of time.

Risks Related to U.S. Federal Income Tax

We cannot predict how new tax legislation will affect us, our investments, or our stockholders, and any such legislation could adversely affect our business.

Legislative or other actions relating to taxes could have a negative effect on us. The laws pertaining to U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. The likelihood of any such legislation being enacted is uncertain. New legislation and any U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative

interpretations or court decisions interpreting such legislation could have adverse tax consequences, such as significantly and negatively affecting our ability to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC or negatively affecting the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to us and our investors as a result of such qualification. For example, on July 4, 2025, the United States enacted “An Act to Provide for reconciliation Pursuant to Title II of H. Con. Res. 14” (the “Act”), also known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which includes significant amendments to the Code. The Act did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Shareholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor regarding tax legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our common stock.

We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates if we are unable to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code.

To maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code, we must meet the following minimum annual distribution, income source and asset diversification requirements. See “ITEM 1. BUSINESS — Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

The Annual Distribution Requirement for a RIC generally will be satisfied if we distribute to our shareholders on an annual basis at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income,” which is generally our net ordinary income plus the excess, if any, of realized net short term capital gains over realized net long term capital losses. In addition, a RIC may, in certain cases, satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement by distributing dividends relating to a taxable year after the close of such taxable year under the “spillover dividend” provisions of Subchapter M. We would be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at regular corporate rates, on retained income and/or gains, including any short term capital gains or long term capital gains. We also must make distributions to satisfy the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement and avoid a 4% excise tax on certain undistributed income. Because we may use debt financing, we are subject to (i) an asset coverage ratio requirement under the 1940 Act and may, in the future, be subject to (ii) certain financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the distribution requirements. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, or choose or are required to retain a portion of our taxable income or gains, we could (1) be required to pay excise taxes and (2) fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment.

The income source requirement will be satisfied if we obtain at least 90% of our annual income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to loans of certain securities, gains from the sale of stock or other securities or foreign currencies, net income from certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships,” (as that term is defined in the Code) or other income derived from the business of investing in stock or securities.

In addition, we are required to satisfy certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each quarter of our taxable year. Specifically, to satisfy these requirements (1) at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash items (including receivables), U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities, if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and(2) no more than 25% of the value of our assets may be invested in (i) the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of one issuer, (ii) the securities, other than the securities of other RICs, of two or more issuers that are controlled by us and which are determined under applicable Treasury regulations, to be engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses, or (iii) the securities of certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships (as that term is defined in the Code).” Failure to meet these requirements may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, and therefore will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in substantial losses.

If we fail to qualify for or maintain RIC tax treatment for any reason, and certain cure provisions are not applicable, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates on all of our taxable income (including our net capital gains). We would not be able to deduct distributions to our shareholders, nor would they be required to be made. The resulting taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution, and the amount of our distributions.

We may invest in certain debt and equity investments through subsidiaries that are classified as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and the net taxable income of these subsidiaries will be subject to U.S. federal income and state and local taxes imposed at corporate rates. We may invest in certain foreign debt and equity investments, which could be subject to foreign taxes (such as income tax, withholding, and value added taxes).

We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which we do not receive a corresponding payment in cash. For example, since we will likely hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having OID (such as debt instruments with PIK, secondary market purchases of debt securities at a discount to par, interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or debt instruments that were issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a portion of the OID that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. We may also have to include in income other amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as unrealized appreciation for foreign currency forward contracts and deferred loan origination fees that are paid after origination of the loan or are

paid in non-cash compensation such as warrants or stock. Furthermore, we may invest in non-U.S. corporations (or other non-U.S. entities treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that could be treated under the Code and U.S. Treasury regulations as “passive foreign investment companies” and/or “controlled foreign corporations.” The rules relating to investment in these types of non-U.S. entities are designed to limit deferral and generally require the current inclusion of income derived by the entity. In certain circumstances, this could require us to recognize income where we do not receive a corresponding payment in cash.

Unrealized appreciation on derivatives, such as foreign currency forward contracts, may be included in taxable income while the receipt of cash may occur in a subsequent period when the related contract expires. Any unrealized depreciation on investments that the foreign currency forward contracts are designed to hedge are not currently deductible for tax purposes. This can result in increased taxable income whereby we may not have sufficient cash to pay distributions or we may opt to retain such taxable income and pay U.S. federal income or excise tax. In such cases we could still rely upon the “spillover provisions” to maintain RIC tax treatment.

We anticipate that a portion of our income may constitute OID or other income required to be included in taxable income prior to receipt of cash. Further, we may elect to amortize market discounts with respect to debt securities acquired in the secondary market and include such amounts in our taxable income in the current year, instead of upon disposition, as an election not to do so would limit our ability to deduct interest expenses for tax purposes. Because any OID or other amounts accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of the accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to our shareholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even if we will not have received any corresponding cash amount. As a result, we may have difficulty meeting the Annual Distribution Requirement necessary to maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code. We may have to sell some of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital, make a partial share distribution, or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, and choose not to make a qualifying share distribution, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates.

If we are not treated as a “publicly offered regulated investment company,” as defined in the Code, certain U.S. shareholders will be treated as having received a dividend from us in the amount of such U.S. shareholders’ allocable share of the base management fee and incentive fees paid to our Adviser and some of our expenses, and these fees and expenses will be treated as miscellaneous itemized deductions of such U.S. shareholders.

A “publicly offered regulated investment company” is a RIC whose shares are either (i) continuously offered pursuant to a public offering within the meaning of Section 4 of the Securities Act, (ii) regularly traded on an established securities market or (iii) held by at least 500 persons at all times during the taxable year. While we anticipate that we will constitute a publicly offered RIC, there can be no assurance that we will in fact so qualify for any of our taxable years. If we are not treated as a publicly offered regulated investment company for any calendar year, each U.S. shareholder that is an individual, trust or estate will be treated as having received a dividend from us in the amount of such U.S. shareholder’s allocable share of the base management fee and incentive fees paid to our Adviser and certain of our other expenses for the calendar year, and these fees and expenses will be treated as miscellaneous itemized deductions of such U.S. shareholder.

General Risk Factors

Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business or cause us to alter our business strategy.

We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws at the local, state, and federal levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, could change from time to time, including as the result of interpretive guidance or other directives from the current U.S. Presidential administration, and new laws, regulations and interpretations could also come into effect. Any new or changed laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, and political uncertainty could increase regulatory uncertainty in the near term.

A single political party currently controls both the executive and legislative branches of government, which increases the likelihood that legislation may be adopted that could significantly affect the regulation of U.S. financial markets. Regulatory changes could result in greater competition from banks and other lenders with which we compete for lending and other investment opportunities. The United States may also potentially withdraw from or renegotiate various trade agreements and take other actions that would change current trade policies of the United States. In addition, in June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed its longstanding approach under the Chevron doctrine, which provided for judicial deference to regulatory agencies. As a result of this decision, there may be increased challenges to existing agency regulations and it is unclear how lower courts will apply the decision in the context of other regulatory schemes without more specific guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court. For example, the decision could significantly impact consumer protection, advertising, privacy, AI technologies, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering practices and other regulatory regimes with which we are required to comply. Any such regulatory developments could result in uncertainty about and changes in the ways such regulations apply to us and our portfolio companies, and may require additional resources to ensure our continued compliance. We cannot predict which, if any, of these actions will be taken or, if taken, their effect on the financial stability of the United States. Such actions could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes to the laws and regulations governing our permitted investments may require a change to our investment strategy. Such changes could differ materially from our strategies and plans as set forth in this report and may shift our investment focus from the areas of expertise of our Adviser. Thus, any such changes, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment in us.

Economic sanction laws in the U.S. and other jurisdictions may prohibit us and our affiliates from transacting with certain countries, individuals and companies.

Economic sanction laws in the U.S. and other jurisdictions may restrict or prohibit us or our affiliates from transacting with certain countries, territories, individuals and entities. In the U.S., the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) administers and enforces laws, executive orders and regulations establishing U.S. economic and trade sanctions, which restrict or prohibit, among other things, direct and indirect transactions with, and the provision of services to, certain countries, territories, industry sectors, individuals and entities. These types of sanctions may significantly restrict or completely prohibit lending activities in certain jurisdictions, and violation of any such laws or regulations, may result in significant legal and monetary penalties, as well as reputational damage. OFAC sanctions programs change frequently, which may make it more difficult for us or our affiliates to ensure compliance. Moreover, OFAC enforcement is increasing, which may increase the risk that we become the subject of such actual or threatened enforcement. Sanctions laws and regulations enforced by other countries may conflict with U.S. law such that compliance with both becomes difficult or even impossible.

Additionally, Section 2019 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (the “ITRA”) amended the Exchange Act to require companies subject to SEC reporting obligations under Section 13 of the Exchange Act to disclose in their periodic reports specified dealings or transactions involving Iran or other individuals and entities targeted by OFAC during the period covered by the relevant periodic report. In some cases, the ITRA requires companies to disclose these types of transactions even if they were permissible under U.S. law. Companies that currently may be or may have been at the time considered our affiliates, may have from time to time publicly filed and/or provided to us such disclosures. We do not independently verify or participate in the preparation of these disclosures. We are required, either periodically or annually to separately file with the SEC a notice when such activities have been disclosed, and the SEC is required to post such notice of disclosure on its website and send the report to the President and certain U.S. Congressional committees. Disclosure of such activity, even if such activity is not subject to sanctions under applicable law, and any sanctions actually imposed on us or our affiliates as a result of these activities, could harm our reputation and have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and any failure to disclose any such activities as required could additionally result in fines or penalties.

Failure to comply with anti-corruption laws or with regulations regarding the prevention of money laundering or terrorism or national security could adversely affect our business.

We and the Adviser are committed to complying with all applicable anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. As a result, the Adviser may forgo investment opportunities because of our unwillingness to participate in transactions that may expose us to risks under applicable anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. Law enforcement agencies in the European Union, the United Kingdom, the United States and elsewhere devote significant resources to enforcement of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations. Any failure to comply with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations could have serious legal, financial and reputational consequences, including operational disruptions and significant financial penalties.

As part of our responsibility for the prevention of money laundering under applicable laws, we may require detailed verification of a prospective investor’s identity and the source of such prospective investor’s funds. We may from time to time request additional information as may be required for us to satisfy our obligations under these and other laws that may be adopted in the future. Additionally, we may from time to time be obligated to file reports with regulatory authorities in various jurisdictions with regard to, among other things, the identity of our investors and suspicious activities involving investments in us. In the event it is determined that any investor, or any direct or indirect owner of any investor, is a person identified in any of these laws as a prohibited person, or is otherwise engaged in activities of the type prohibited under these laws, we may be obligated, among other actions to be taken, to withhold distributions of any funds otherwise owing to such investor or to cause such investor’s interests to be cancelled or otherwise redeemed (without the payment of any consideration in respect of those interests).

The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 and the USA PATRIOT Act require that financial institutions (a term that includes banks, broker-dealers and investment companies) establish and maintain compliance programs to guard against money laundering activities. These implementing regulations were amended to include registered investment advisers within scope of financial institutions that will be obliged to adopt stand-alone anti-money laundering programs, though the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) has postponed the effective date of the amendment to January 1, 2028 and announced its intention to revisit the scope and applicability of the amendment to certain asset managers at a future date. Laws or regulations may presently or in the future require us, any of our affiliates or other service providers to establish additional anti-money laundering procedures, to collect information with respect to our products’ investors, to share information with governmental authorities with respect to our products’ investors or to implement additional restrictions on the transfer of the interests. These requirements can lead to increased expenses and exposure to enforcement actions.

Heightened scrutiny of the financial services industry by regulators may materially and adversely affect our business.

The financial services industry has been the subject of heightened scrutiny by regulators around the globe. In particular, the SEC and its staff have focused more narrowly on issues relevant to alternative asset management firms, including by forming specialized units devoted to examining such firms and, in certain cases, bringing enforcement actions against the firms, their principals and employees. In recent periods there have been a number of enforcement actions within the industry, and it is expected that the SEC will continue to pursue enforcement actions against asset managers. The current administration and the current leadership of the SEC have indicated that they intend to not adopt certain proposals or modify or repeal certain regulations perceived as burdensome to private fund advisers, particularly those related to sustainability investing and cybersecurity. This enforcement activity and the evolving regulatory landscape have caused, and could further cause us to reevaluate certain practices and adjust our compliance control function as necessary and appropriate.

The SEC’s recent lists of examination priorities include such items as assessments of investment advisers’ adherence to fiduciary standards of conduct and effectiveness of advisers’ compliance programs, as well as specific priority areas for advisers to private funds, including disclosure of conflicts of interests and risks, and adequacy of policies and procedures; and advisory of alternative investment strategies or complex investment products. The SEC also highlighted its focus on investment advisers that are dually registered as broker-dealers and compliance with newly adopted SEC rules, including Regulations S-ID and S-P. Many firms have received inquiries during examinations or directly from the SEC’s Division of Enforcement regarding various transparency-related topics, including the acceleration of monitoring fees, the allocation of broken-deal expenses, outside business activities of firm principals and employees, group purchasing arrangements, and general conflicts of interest disclosures. While we believe we have made appropriate and timely disclosures regarding the foregoing, the SEC staff may disagree.

Further, the SEC has previously highlighted BDC board oversight and valuation practices as one of its areas of focus in investment adviser examinations and has instituted enforcement actions against advisers for misleading investors about valuation.

If the SEC were to investigate our Adviser and find errors in its methodologies or procedures, our Adviser could be subject to penalties and fines, which could in turn harm our reputation and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Similarly, from time to time we or our Adviser could become the subject of litigation or other similar claims. Any investigations, litigation or similar claims could continue without resolution for long periods of time and could consume substantial amounts of our management’s time and attention, and that time and attention and the devotion of associated resources could, at times, be disproportionate to the amounts at stake. Investigations, litigations and other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties, and a material adverse impact on our financial statements could occur for the period in which the effect of an unfavorable final outcome in an investigation, litigation or other similar claims becomes probable and reasonably estimable. In addition, we could incur expenses associated with defending ourselves against investigations, litigation and other similar claims, and these expenses could be material to our earnings in future periods.

Credit funds have been the subject of increasing regulatory focus at international and regional levels. To the extent that we are engaged in lending activity, we may be subject to restrictions on our activities and be obliged to comply with regulatory reporting and disclosure requirements. The International Organization of Securities Commissions (“IOSCO”) and the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) have called on regulators to consider issues arising from the rapid growth in private finance, including in relation to systemic risk, transparency, leverage, liquidity, and conflicts of interest. It is likely that regulators will continue to focus on the credit funds sector and may introduce further regulatory requirements in the future.

Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

The Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), our charter and our bylaws contain provisions that may discourage, delay or make more difficult a change in control of the Company or the removal of our directors. We are subject to the Maryland Business Combination Act (the “Business Combination Act”), subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. Our board of directors has adopted a resolution exempting from the Business Combination Act any business combination between us and any other person, subject to prior approval of such business combination by our board, including approval by a majority of our disinterested directors. If the resolution exempting business combinations is repealed or our board or disinterested directors do not approve a business combination, the Business Combination Act may discourage third parties from trying to acquire control of us and may increase the difficulty of consummating such an offer. Our bylaws exempt from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act (the “Control Share Acquisition Act”) acquisitions of our stock by any person. If we amend our bylaws to repeal the exemption from the Control Share Acquisition Act, subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act, the Control Share Acquisition Act also may make it more difficult for a third party to obtain control of us and may increase the difficulty of consummating such an offer.

Our Bylaws include an exclusive forum selection provision, which could limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other agents.

Our Bylaws require that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City (or, if that court does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Northern Division) shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf (ii) any action asserting a claim of

breach of any standard of conduct or legal duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other agents to us or to our shareholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the MGCL or the Charter or the Bylaws (as either may be amended from time to time), or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This exclusive forum selection provision in our Bylaws will not apply to claims arising under the federal securities laws, including the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. There is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such a provision, and investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. In addition, this provision may increase costs for shareholders in bringing a claim against us or our directors, officers or other agents. Any investor purchasing or otherwise acquiring our shares is deemed to have notice of and consented to the foregoing provision. The exclusive forum selection provision in our Bylaws may limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other agents, which may discourage lawsuits against us and such persons. It is also possible that, notwithstanding such exclusive forum selection provision, a court could rule that such provision is inapplicable or unenforceable. If this occurred, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in another forum, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We expend significant financial and other resources to comply with the requirements of being a public entity.

As a public entity, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, which are discussed below. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls, significant resources and management oversight are required. We have implemented procedures, processes, policies and practices for the purpose of addressing the standards and requirements applicable to public companies. These activities may divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity Processes and Risk Assessment

We rely on the cybersecurity program implemented by Blue Owl, the indirect affiliate of our Adviser. Blue Owl has implemented a cybersecurity program, which is focused on (i) protecting confidential business, client, investor and employee information; (ii) maintaining the security and availability of its systems and data; (iii) supporting compliance with applicable laws and regulations; (iv) documenting cybersecurity incidents and its responses; and (v) notification of cybersecurity incidents to, and communications with, appropriate internal and external parties.

Blue Owl has implemented an information security governance policy (the “ISG Policy”) governing cybersecurity risk, which is designed to facilitate the protection of sensitive or confidential business, client, investor and any employee information that it stores or processes and the maintenance of critical services and systems. Blue Owl’s cybersecurity program is managed by Blue Owl’s Chief Technology Officer and Head of Technology Infrastructure (together, “Blue Owl IT Management”), who report to Blue Owl’s Chief Operating Officer. Blue Owl IT Management and its team are responsible for implementing proactive and reactive measures, including Blue Owl’s monitoring and alert response processes, vulnerability management, changes made to its critical systems, including software and network changes, and various other technological and administrative safeguards. Blue Owl’s cybersecurity processes and systems are designed to protect against unauthorized access of information through its systems and infrastructure, including by cyber-attacks, and Blue Owl’s policy and processes include, as appropriate, encryption, data loss prevention technology, authentication technology, entitlement management, access control, anti-virus and anti-malware software, and transmission of data over private networks. Blue Owl’s processes and systems aim to prevent or mitigate two main types of cybersecurity risk: first, cybersecurity risks associated with its physical and digital devices and infrastructure, and second, cybersecurity risks associated with third parties, such as people and organizations who have access to its devices, infrastructure or confidential or sensitive information. The cybersecurity-control principles that form the basis of Blue Owl’s cybersecurity program are informed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (“NIST”).

Blue Owl’s cybersecurity program is periodically reviewed by third parties, including benchmarking to best practices and industry frameworks to help Blue Owl identify areas for continued focus and improvement. Annual penetration testing of its network, including critical systems and systems that store confidential or sensitive information, is conducted with third party consultants and vulnerabilities are reviewed and addressed by Blue Owl IT Management . When Blue Owl engages vendors and other third party partners who will have access to sensitive data or client systems and facilities, its infrastructure technology team assesses their cybersecurity programs and processes.

Blue Owl also provides its employees with cybersecurity awareness training at onboarding and annually. Blue Owl conducts regular phishing tests and provides additional training as appropriate. This assessment is conducted on the basis of, among other factors, the types of services provided and the extent and type of data accessed or processed by a third-party vendor.

Governance and Oversight of Cybersecurity Risks

Blue Owl has developed an incident response framework to identify, assess, manage and report cybersecurity events, which is managed and implemented by Blue Owl’s Cyber Risk Operating Committee (the “C-ROC”), a cross-functional management committee that includes its General Counsel, Global Chief Operating Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Blue Owl IT Management. The incident response framework determines when the C-ROC should provide notifications regarding certain cybersecurity incidents, with different severity thresholds triggering notifications to different recipient groups, including senior members of Blue Owl’s management, Blue Owl’s Audit Committee or Blue Owl’s Board of Directors. The C-ROC is responsible for gathering information with respect to a cybersecurity incident, assessing its severity and potential responses, as well as communicating with business heads and senior management, as appropriate.

Blue Owl’s cybersecurity program, which is overseen by the C-ROC, is managed by IT Management as part of its responsibility for enterprise-wide cybersecurity strategy, policies, implementing Blue Owl’s monitoring and alert response processes, vulnerability management, changes made to our critical systems, including software and network changes and various other technological and administrative safeguards. The team is led by Blue Owl’s Chief Technology Officer, who has over 25 years of experience advising on technology strategy, including digital transformation, cybersecurity, business analytics and infrastructure, and Blue Owl’s Head of Technology Infrastructure, who has over 20 years of experience in the information technology field with a focus on IT risk governance and management, information security, incident response capabilities and assessing effectiveness of controls. The C-ROC meets regularly and forms cross-enterprise teams, as needed, to manage and implement key policies and initiatives of Blue Owl’s cybersecurity program.

Blue Owl’s Global Chief Compliance Officer updates our Board quarterly on actions taken by the C-ROC and Blue Owl’s Chief Technology Officer annually reports to the Audit Committee as well as the full Board, as appropriate, on cybersecurity matters. Such reporting includes updates on Blue Owl’s cybersecurity program, the external threat environment and Blue Owl’s programs to address and mitigate the risks associated with the evolving cybersecurity threat environment. These reports also include as appropriate updates on Blue Owl’s preparedness, prevention, detection, responsiveness and recovery with respect to cyber incidents.

Impact of Cybersecurity Risks

In 2025, we did not experience a material cybersecurity incident, and we are not aware of any cybersecurity risks that are reasonably likely to materially affect our business. While we do not believe that our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition have been materially adversely affected by any cybersecurity incidents, we describe whether and how future incidents could have a material impact on our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition in “ITEM 1A. Risk Factors — Cybersecurity risks and cyber data security incidents could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and confidential information in our possession and damage to our business relationships” and “Increased data protection regulation may result in increased complexities and risk in connection with the operation of our business.”

Item 2. Properties

Our corporate headquarters are located at 399 Park Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, New York 10022 and are provided by the Adviser in accordance with the terms of our Administration Agreement. We believe that our office facilities are suitable and adequate for our business as it is contemplated to be conducted.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Neither we nor the Adviser are currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, are any material legal proceeding threatened against us. From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. Our business is also subject to extensive regulation, which may result in regulatory proceedings against us. While the outcome of any such future legal or regulatory proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that any such future proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Share Issuances

We currently have the authority to issue 450,000,000 common shares at $0.01 per share par value. Prior to our continuous public offering, we issued 100 shares of common stock to our Adviser and 277,788 shares of our common stock to certain individuals and entities affiliated with our Adviser in a private placement. We issued 151,364,239 shares of common stock in our continuous public offering prior to its termination on April 30, 2021.

The following table summarizes transactions with respect to shares of our common stock during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:


	December 31, 2025			December 31, 2024
($ in thousands, except share amounts)	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount

Reinvestment of distributions	4,816,721	$	41,296	5,734,171	$	51,222
Repurchased shares	(17,598,030)	(150,967)		(18,348,487)	(163,763)
Total Shares/Net Repurchases	(12,781,309)	(109,671)		(12,614,316)	(112,541)

Prior to the termination of the Company’s continuous public offering, in the event of a material decline in its net asset value per share, which the Company considered to be a 2.5% decrease below its then current net offering price, the Company’s Board would reduce the offering price in order to establish a new net offering price per share that was not more than 2.5% above the net asset value. The Company will not sell shares at a net offering price below the net asset value per share unless the Company obtains the requisite approval from its shareholders.

The Company determined not to file additional post-effective amendments to its registration statement and terminated its offering as of April 30, 2021.

The following table presents shares issued pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan during the year ended December 31, 2025:


Date of Issuance	Record Date	Number of Shares	Purchase Price per Share





















































January 29, 2025	January 28, 2025	404,165	$	8.79
February 13, 2025	December 31, 2024	133,727	$	8.80
February 26, 2025	February 25, 2025	407,046	$	8.78
March 26, 2025	March 25, 2025	394,211	$	8.75
April 30, 2025	April 29, 2025	400,981	$	8.63
May 13, 2025	March 31, 2025	65,631	$	8.72
May 28, 2025	May 27, 2025	402,219	$	8.62
June 25, 2025	June 24, 2025	383,563	$	8.61
July 30, 2025	July 29, 2025	385,457	$	8.57
August 27, 2025	August 26, 2025	388,223	$	8.55
September 25, 2025	September 24, 2025	378,020	$	8.45
October 29, 2025	October 28, 2025	383,524	$	8.35
November 26, 2025	November 25, 2025	343,590	$	8.31
December 31, 2025	December 30, 2025	346,364	$	8.27

Distributions

The Board authorized and declared weekly distribution amounts per share of common stock through June 30, 2021, and monthly and/or quarterly distribution amounts per share of common stock thereafter, in each case payable monthly and/or quarterly in arrears. The following table presents cash distributions per share for shareholders of record during the year ended December 31, 2025:

For the Year Ended December 31, 2025

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Dividend

Distribution Per Share(1)

Distribution Amount

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

November 8, 2024

January 28, 2025

January 29, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,664

February 18, 2025

February 25, 2025

February 26, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,696

February 18, 2025

March 25, 2025

March 26, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,720

February 18, 2025

March 31, 2025

May 13, 2025

Quarterly

0.0100

1,249

February 18, 2025

April 29, 2025

April 30, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,492

May 6, 2025

May 27, 2025

May 28, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,520

May 6, 2025

June 24, 2025

June 25, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,542

May 6, 2025

July 29, 2025

July 30, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,192

August 5, 2025

August 26, 2025

August 27, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,215

August 5, 2025

September 24, 2025

September 25, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,238

August 5, 2025

October 28, 2025

October 29, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

6,832

November 4, 2025

November 25, 2025

November 26, 2025

Monthly

0.0533

6,090

November 4, 2025

December 30, 2025

December 31, 2025

Monthly

0.0533

6,108

Total

0.7166

87,558

_______________

(1)Totals presented may not sum due to rounding.

With respect to distributions, we have adopted an “opt-in” dividend reinvestment plan for common shareholders. As a result, in the event of a declared distribution, each shareholder that has not “opted-in” to the dividend reinvestment plan will have their dividends or distributions automatically received in cash rather than reinvested in additional shares of our common stock. Shareholders who receive distributions in the form of shares of common stock will be subject to the same U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences as if they received cash distributions. On February 17, 2026, our Board determined to terminate our distribution reinvestment plan. As a result, commencing with distributions payable on or after March 18, 2026, all distributions will be paid in cash. See “Recent Developments — Termination of Dividend Reinvestment Plan.”

We may fund our cash distributions to shareholders from any source of funds available to us, including but not limited to offering proceeds, net investment income from operations, capital gains proceeds from the sale of assets, dividends or other distributions paid to us on account of preferred and common equity investments in portfolio companies and expense support from the Adviser, which is subject to recoupment. In no event, however, will funds be advanced or borrowed for purpose of distributions, if the amount of such distributions would exceed our accrued and received Net Revenues for the previous four quarters, less paid and accrued operating expenses with respect to such revenues and costs.

Through November 7, 2023, the date on which our Expense Support Arrangement was terminated, a portion of our distributions resulted from expense support from the Adviser, each of which is subject to repayment by us within three years from the date of payment. The purpose of this arrangement was to avoid distributions being characterized as a return of capital. Shareholders should understand that any such distributions were not based on our investment performance. Shareholders should also understand that our repayments of expense support reduce the distributions that they would otherwise receive. As of March 31, 2024, all expense support payments made to us by the Adviser had either been recouped by the Adviser or expired. There can be no assurance that we will achieve the performance necessary to sustain these distributions, or be able to pay distributions at all.

tables reflect the sources of cash distributions on a U.S. GAAP basis that we have declared on our shares of common stock during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:


	Year Ended December 31, 2025
Source of Distribution	Per Share		Amount		Percentage
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net investment income	$	0.61	$	73,991	84.5	%
Net realized gain on investments	—		—		—
Excess (undistributed)	0.11		13,567		15.5
Total	$	0.72	$	87,558	100.0	%


	Year Ended December 31, 2024
Source of Distribution	Per Share		Amount		Percentage
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net investment income	$	0.80	$	108,469	99.2	%
Net realized gain on investments	—		—		—
Excess (undistributed)	0.01		892		0.8
Total	$	0.81	$	109,361	100.0	%

Holders

As of February 26, 2026, there were approximately 10,371 holders of record of our common stock.

Share Repurchases

Prior to the third quarter of 2025, we offered, on a quarterly basis, to repurchase shares of our common stock on such terms as may be determined by the Board in its complete discretion. All shares purchased by us pursuant to the terms of each offer to repurchase were retired and are authorized and unissued shares. At this time, we do not intend to engage in quarterly share repurchases.

The following table presents the shares repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2025:


Offer Date	Tender Offer Expiration	Tender Offer		Purchase Price per Share		Shares Repurchased
($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
























February 19, 2025	March 24, 2025	$	36,805	$	8.75	4,206,258
May 16, 2025	June 27, 2025	$	53,838	$	8.61	6,252,963
August 18, 2025	September 25, 2025	$	60,324	$	8.45	7,138,809

Senior Securities

Information about our senior securities is shown in the following table as of the end of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017.



Class and Period	Total Amount Outstanding Exclusive of Treasury Securities(1) ($ in millions)		Asset Coverage per Unit(2)		Involuntary Liquidating Preference per Unit(3)		Average Market Value per Unit(4)
Revolving Credit Facility
December 31, 2025	$	11.6	$	2,395	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2024	$	50.4	$	2,306	$	—	N/A
Promissory Note(5)
December 31, 2020	$	—	$	—	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2019	$	—	$	2,687	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2018	$	—	$	2,397	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2017	$	—	$	4,969	$	—	N/A
SPV Asset Facility I
December 31, 2025	$	315.0	$	2,395	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2024	$	195.0	$	2,306	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	60.0	$	2,390	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	374.2	$	2,288	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2021	$	412.2	$	2,213	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2020	$	365.1	$	2,416	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2019	$	265.7	$	2,687	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2018	$	302.5	$	2,397	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2017	$	20.0	$	4,969	$	—	N/A
SPV Asset Facility II(6)

December 31, 2023	$	125.0	$	2,390	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	176.0	$	2,288	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2021	$	255.0	$	2,213	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2020	$	191.0	$	2,416	$	—	N/A
CLO XIII
December 31, 2025	$	—	$	2,395	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2024	$	260.0	$	2,306	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	260.0	$	2,390	$	—	N/A
2024 Notes(7)

December 31, 2023	$	100.0	$	2,390	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2022	$	450.0	$	2,288	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2021	$	450.0	$	2,213	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2020	$	350.0	$	2,416	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2019	$	300.0	$	2,687	$	—	N/A
2026 Notes
December 31, 2025	$	350.0	$	2,395	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2024	$	350.0	$	2,306	$	—	N/A
December 31, 2023	$	350.0	$	2,390	$	—	N/A

______________

(1)Total amount of each class of senior securities outstanding at the end of the period presented.

(2)Asset coverage per unit is the ratio of the carrying value of our total assets, less all liabilities excluding indebtedness represented by senior securities in this table, to the aggregate amount of senior securities representing indebtedness. Asset coverage per unit is expressed in terms of dollar amounts per $1,000 of indebtedness and is calculated on a consolidated basis.

(3)The amount to which such class of senior security would be entitled upon our involuntary liquidation in preference to any security junior to it. The “—” in this column indicates information that the SEC expressly does not require to be disclosed for certain types of senior securities.

(4)Not applicable because the senior securities are not registered for public trading.

(5)Promissory Note expired on December 31, 2020.

(6)SPV Asset Facility II was terminated in 2024.

(7)2024 Notes matured in November 2024.

Item 6. Reserved.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with “ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA”. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or the future performance or financial condition of Blue Owl Capital Corporation II and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS”. This discussion also should be read in conjunction with the “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements” in this Annual Report. Actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in any forward-looking statements.

Overview

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) is an externally managed, non-diversified closed-end management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). Formed as a Maryland corporation on October 15, 2015, we are externally managed by Blue Owl Credit Advisors LLC (the “Adviser”, “our Adviser” or “OCA”) which is responsible for sourcing potential investments, conducting due diligence on prospective investments, analyzing investment opportunities, structuring investments and monitoring our portfolio on an ongoing basis. Our investment objective is to generate current income, and to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns. Our investment strategy focuses on primarily originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle market companies. Within this space, we predominantly focus on investing in institutionally-backed, upper middle market businesses, which we categorize as those generating greater than $50 million of EBITDA annually. We invest in senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, equity and equity-related securities including warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity, which may or may not be convertible into a portfolio company’s common equity. We may hold our investments directly or through specialty financing portfolio companies and joint ventures. Except for our specialty financing company investments, our equity investments are typically not control-oriented investments and we may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder.

We have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and we intend to operate in a manner so as to continue to qualify for the tax treatment applicable to RICs. On February 28, 2017, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, OR Lending II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which holds a California finance lenders license. OR Lending II LLC makes loans to borrowers headquartered in California.

The Adviser is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), an indirect affiliate of Blue Owl Capital Inc. (“Blue Owl”) (NYSE: OWL) and part of Blue Owl’s Credit platform. Subject to the overall supervision of our board of directors (the “Board” or “our Board”), the Adviser manages our day-to-day operations, and provides investment advisory and management services to us. The Adviser or its affiliates may engage in certain origination activities and receive attendant arrangement, structuring or similar fees. The Adviser is responsible for managing our business and activities, including sourcing investment opportunities, conducting research, performing diligence on potential investments, structuring our investments, and monitoring our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis through a team of investment professionals.

In April 2017, we commenced our continuous public offering, commenced operations and made our first portfolio company investment. We terminated our continuous public offering as of April 30, 2021. Prior to the termination of our continuous public offering, we issued 151,364,239 shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $1.39 billion, including seed capital contributed by our Adviser in September 2016 and approximately $10.0 million in gross proceeds raised in the private placement from certain individuals and entities affiliated with our Adviser.

The Adviser also serves as investment adviser to Blue Owl Capital Corporation and Blue Owl Credit Income Corp.

Blue Owl consists of three investment platforms: (1) Credit, which includes several strategies, including direct lending, alternative credit, investment grade credit, liquid credit and other adjacent investment strategies, (2) GP Strategic Capital, which primarily focuses on acquiring equity stakes in, or providing debt financing to, large, multi-product private equity and private credit firms and (3) Real Assets, which primarily focuses on the strategies of net lease real estate, real estate credit and digital infrastructure, which focuses on acquiring, financing, developing and operating data centers and related digital infrastructure assets. The Adviser is part of the direct lending strategy of Blue Owl’s Credit platform focuses on lending to primarily upper-middle market companies, both private equity-sponsored and non-sponsored and provides a range of customized financing solution across debt and equity-related instruments. In addition to the Adviser, Blue Owl’s Credit platform’s direct lending strategy is comprised of the Adviser, Blue Owl Technology Credit Advisors LLC (“OTCA”), Blue Owl Credit Private Fund Advisors LLC (“OPFA”), Blue Owl Technology Credit Advisors II LLC (“OTCA II”) and Blue Owl Diversified Credit Advisors LLC (“ODCA” and together with OTCA, OPFA, OTCA II

and the Adviser, the “Blue Owl Credit Advisers”), which also are registered investment advisers. As of December 31, 2025, the Adviser and its affiliates had $157.76 billion of assets under management across Blue Owl’s Credit platform.

The management of our investment portfolio is the responsibility of the Adviser and the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. The Investment Team is led by Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz and Craig W. Packer and is supported by certain members of the Adviser’s senior executive team and Blue Owl’s Credit platform’s direct lending investment committees. Blue Owl’s four direct lending investment committees focus on a specific investment strategy (Diversified Lending, Technology Lending, First Lien Lending and Opportunistic Lending). Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz, Craig W. Packer and Alexis Maged sit on each of Blue Owl’s direct lending investment committees. In addition to Messrs. Ostrover, Lipschultz, Packer and Maged, the Diversified Lending Investment Committee is comprised of Matthias Ederer, Patrick Linnemann, Meenal Mehta and Logan Nicholson. See “Item 5. — Other Information.” We consider the individuals on the Diversified Lending Investment Committee to be our portfolio managers. The Investment Team, under the Diversified Lending Investment Committee’s supervision, sources investment opportunities, conducts research, performs due diligence on potential investments, structures our investments and will monitor our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis.

The Diversified Lending Investment Committee meets regularly to consider our investments, direct our strategic initiatives and supervise the actions taken by the Adviser on our behalf. In addition, the Diversified Lending Investment Committee reviews and determines whether to make prospective investments (including approving parameters or guidelines pursuant to which certain investments may be made or sold consistent with our investment objective), structures financings and monitors the performance of the investment portfolio. Each investment opportunity requires the approval of a majority of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. Follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies may require the Diversified Lending Investment Committee's approval beyond that obtained when the initial investment in the portfolio company was made. In addition, temporary investments, such as those in cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less, may require approval by the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. The compensation packages of Diversified Lending Investment Committee members from the Adviser include various combinations of discretionary bonuses and variable incentive compensation based primarily on performance for services provided and may include shares of Blue Owl.

We may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, the prior approval of the SEC. We rely on an order for exemptive relief (the “Order”) to co-invest with other funds managed by the Adviser or certain affiliates, in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. Pursuant to such Order, we are generally permitted to co-invest with certain of our affiliates if such co-investments are done on the same terms and at the same time, as further detailed in the Order. The Order requires that a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of the Board make certain findings (1) in most instances when we co-invest with our affiliates in an issuer where our affiliate has an existing investment in the issuer, and (2) if we dispose of an asset acquired in a transaction under the Order unless the disposition is done on a pro rata basis. Pursuant to the Order, the Board will oversee our participation in the co-investment program. As required by the Order, we have adopted, and the Board has approved, policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the Order, and the Adviser and our Chief Compliance Officer will provide reporting to the Board.

The Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ investment allocation policies seek to ensure equitable allocation of investment opportunities over time between us and other funds managed by our Adviser or its affiliates. As a result of the Order, there could be significant overlap in our investment portfolio and the investment portfolio of the BDCs, interval fund, private funds and separately managed accounts managed by the Blue Owl Credit Advisers (collectively, the “Blue Owl Credit Clients”) and/or other funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates that avail themselves of the Order. In addition, the Adviser and its affiliates are permitted to allocate an investment to a number of products across platforms that it views as appropriate for the particular investment objectives, strategies and characteristics of such products.

From time to time, we may form wholly-owned subsidiaries to facilitate our normal course of business.

Certain of our consolidated subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal and state corporate-level income taxes.

We have elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act and as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, we are required to comply with various statutory and regulatory requirements, such as:

•the requirement to invest at least 70% of our assets in “qualifying assets”, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act;

•source of income limitations;

•asset diversification requirements; and

•the requirement to distribute (or be treated as distributing) in each taxable year at least the sum of (i) 90% of our investment company taxable income and (ii) 90% of our tax-exempt interest for that taxable year.

Our Investment Framework

Our investment objective is to generate current income, and to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns. Our investment strategy focuses primarily on originating and making loans to, and

making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle market companies. Since our Adviser and its affiliates began investment activities in April 2016 through December 31, 2025, our Adviser and its affiliates have originated $187.04 billion aggregate principal amount of investments, of which $182.92 billion aggregate principal amount of investments prior to any subsequent exits or repayments, was retained by either us or a corporation or fund advised by our Adviser or its affiliates. We seek to participate in transactions sponsored by what we believe to be high-quality private equity and venture capital firms capable of providing both operational and financial resources. We seek to generate current income primarily in U.S. middle market companies, both sponsored and non-sponsored, through direct originations of senior secured loans or originations of unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, investments in equity and equity-related securities including warrants, preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity. We may hold our investments directly or through specialty financing portfolio companies and joint ventures. Except for our specialty financing company investments, our equity investments are typically not control-oriented investments and we may structure such equity investments to include provisions protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder.

In general, we define “middle market companies” to mean companies with earnings before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, or “EBITDA,” between $25 million and $500 million annually and/or annual revenue of $125 million to $5 billion. Within this space, we predominantly focus on investing in upper middle market businesses, where we can structure larger transactions. which we believe to be more resilient and of greater strategic significance. We categorize “upper middle market” companies as those generating $50 million or more of EBITDA annually. We may on occasion invest in smaller or larger companies if an attractive opportunity presents itself, especially when there are dislocations in the capital markets, including the high yield and syndicated loan markets. We note that over time, the average EBITDA of companies in our portfolio has grown significantly as the scale of private market solutions has grown. Across our investments, we typically seek to be senior in the capital structure, targeting a loan-to-value ratio (the amount of outstanding debt as a percentage of the value of the company) of 50% or below on average, which may provide a level of downside protection and help preserve capital.

We expect that our portfolio composition will be comprised predominantly of directly originated debt and income producing securities, with a lesser allocation to equity or equity-linked opportunities which we may hold directly or through specialty purpose vehicles and joint ventures. In addition, we may invest a portion of our portfolio in opportunistic investments and publicly traded debt investments and we may evaluate and enter into strategic portfolio transactions that may result in additional portfolio companies that we are considered to control. These types of investments are intended to supplement our core strategy and further enhance returns to our shareholders. These investments may include high-yield bonds and broadly-syndicated loans, including “covenant light” loans (as defined below), and other publicly traded debt instruments, typically originated and structured by banks on behalf of large corporate borrowers with employee counts, revenues, EBITDAs and enterprise values larger than those of middle market companies, and equity investments in portfolio companies that make senior secured loans or invest in broadly syndicated loans, structured products, asset-based solutions or other forms of specialty finance, which may include, but is not limited to, investments such as life settlement, royalty interests and equipment finance.

Our portfolio composition may fluctuate from time to time based on market conditions and interest rates.

Covenants are contractual restrictions that lenders place on companies to limit the corporate actions a company may pursue. The loans in which we expect to invest may have financial maintenance covenants, which are used to proactively address materially adverse changes in a portfolio company’s financial performance or may take the form of “covenant-lite” loans which generally refer to loans that do not have a complete set of financial maintenance covenants. Generally, “covenant-lite” loans provide borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders because their covenants are incurrence-based, which means they are only tested and can only be breached following an affirmative action of the borrower, rather than by a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition. Accordingly, to the extent we invest in “covenant-lite” loans, we may have fewer rights against a borrower and may have a greater risk of loss on such investments as compared to investments in or exposure to loans with financial maintenance covenants.

As of December 31, 2025, our average debt investment size in each of our portfolio companies was approximately $8.6 million based on fair value. The investment size will vary with the size of our capital base and market conditions. As of December 31, 2025, excluding certain investments that fall outside of our typical borrower profile, our portfolio companies representing 95.0% of our total debt portfolio based on fair value, had weighted average annual revenue of $921.0 million, weighted average annual EBITDA of $201 million, an average interest coverage of 1.91 and an average net loan-to value of 42.5%.

The companies in which we invest use our capital to support their growth, acquisitions, market or product expansion, refinancings and/or recapitalizations. The debt in which we invest typically is not rated by any rating agency, but if these instruments were rated, they would likely receive a rating of below investment grade (that is, below BBB- or Baa3), which is often referred to as “high yield” or “junk.”

Key Components of Our Results of Operations

Investments

We focus primarily on the direct origination of loans to institutionally-backed, upper middle market companies domiciled in the United States.

Our level of investment activity (both the number of investments and the size of each investment) can and will vary substantially from period to period depending on many factors, including the amount of debt and equity capital available to middle market companies, the level of merger and acquisition activity for such companies, the general economic environment and the competitive environment for the types of investments we make.

In addition, as part of our risk strategy on investments, we may reduce the levels of certain investments through partial sales or syndication to additional lenders.

Revenues

We generate revenues primarily in the form of interest income from the investments we hold. In addition, we generate income from dividends on either direct equity investments or equity interests obtained in connection with originating loans, such as options, warrants or conversion rights. Our debt investments typically have a term of three to ten years. As of December 31, 2025, 97.0% of our debt investments based on fair value bear interest at a floating rate, subject to interest rate floors, in certain cases. Interest on our debt investments is generally payable either monthly or quarterly.

Our investment portfolio consists primarily of floating rate loans, and our credit facilities bear interest at floating rates. Macro trends in base interest rates like the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) and any alternative reference rates may affect our net investment income over the long term. However, because we generally originate loans to a small number of portfolio companies each quarter, and those investments vary in size, our results in any given period, including the interest rate on investments that were sold or repaid in a period compared to the interest rate of new investments made during that period, often are idiosyncratic, and reflect the characteristics of the particular portfolio companies that we invested in or exited during the period and not necessarily any trends in our business or macro trends. Generally, because our portfolio consists primarily of floating rate loans, we expect our earnings to benefit from a prolonged higher rate environment.

Loan origination fees, original issue discount and market discount or premium are capitalized, and we accrete or amortize such amounts under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) as interest income using the effective yield method for term instruments and the straight-line method for revolving or delayed draw instruments. Repayments of our debt investments can reduce interest income from period to period. The frequency or volume of these repayments may fluctuate significantly. We record prepayment premiums on loans as interest income. We may also generate revenue in the form of commitment, loan origination, structuring, or due diligence fees, fees for providing managerial assistance to our portfolio companies and possibly consulting fees.

Dividend income on equity investments is recorded on the record date for private portfolio companies or on the ex-dividend date for publicly traded companies.

Our portfolio activity also reflects the proceeds from sales of investments. We recognize realized gains or losses on investments based on the difference between the net proceeds from the disposition and the amortized cost basis of the investment without regard to unrealized gains or losses previously recognized. We record current period changes in fair value of investments that are measured at fair value as a component of the net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments in the consolidated statements of operations.

Expenses

Our primary operating expenses include the payment of the management fee, the incentive fee, expenses reimbursable under the Administration Agreement and Investment Advisory Agreement, legal and professional fees, interest and other debt expenses and other operating expenses. The management fee and incentive fee compensate our Adviser for work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing, monitoring and realizing our investments.

Except as specifically provided below, all investment professionals and staff of the Adviser, when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory and management services to us, the base compensation, bonus and benefits, and the routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, are provided and paid for by the Adviser. We bear our allocable portion of the compensation paid by the Adviser (or its affiliates) to our chief compliance officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs (based on a percentage of time such individuals devote, on an estimated basis, to our business affairs). We bear all other costs and expenses of our operations, administration and transactions, including, but not limited to (i) investment advisory fees, including management fees and incentive fees, to the Adviser, pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement; (ii) our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by the Adviser in performing its administrative obligations under the Administration Agreement; and (iii) all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions including, without limitation, those relating to:

•expenses deemed to be “organization and offering expenses” for purposes of FINRA Conduct Rule 2310(a)(12) (exclusive of commissions, the dealer manager fee, any discounts and other similar expenses paid by investors at the time of sale of our stock);

• cost of corporate and organizational expenses relating to offerings of shares of our common stock;

• cost of calculating our net asset value, including the cost of any third-party valuation services;

• cost of effecting any sales and repurchases of our common stock and other securities;

•fees and expenses payable under any dealer manager agreements, if any;

•debt service and other costs of borrowings or other financing arrangements;

•costs of hedging;

•expenses, including travel expense, incurred by the Adviser, or members of the investment team, or payable to third parties, performing due diligence on prospective portfolio companies and, if necessary, enforcing our rights;

•escrow agent, transfer agent and custodial fees and expenses;

•fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts;

•federal and state registration fees, any stock exchange listing fees and fees payable to rating agencies;

•U.S. federal, state and local taxes;

•independent directors’ fees and expenses, including certain travel expenses;

•costs of preparing financial statements and maintaining books and records and filing reports or other documents with the SEC (or other regulatory bodies) and other reporting and compliance costs, including registration fees, listing fees and licenses, and the compensation of professionals responsible for the preparation of the foregoing;

• costs of any reports, proxy statements or other notices to our shareholders (including printing and mailing costs);

• costs of any shareholder or director meetings and the compensation of personnel responsible for the preparation of the foregoing and related matters;

•commissions and other compensation payable to brokers or dealers;

•research and market data;

•fidelity bond, directors’ and officers’ errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums;

•direct costs and expenses of administration, including printing, mailing, long distance telephone and staff;

•fees and expenses associated with independent audits, outside legal and consulting costs;

•costs of winding up;

•costs incurred in connection with the formation or maintenance of entities or vehicles to hold our assets for tax or other purposes;

•extraordinary expenses (such as litigation or indemnification); and

•costs associated with reporting and compliance obligations under the 1940 Act and applicable federal and state securities laws.

We expect, but cannot assure, that our general and administrative expenses will increase in dollar terms during periods of asset growth, but will decline as a percentage of total assets during such periods.

Reimbursement of Administrative Services

We will reimburse our Adviser for the administrative expenses necessary for its performance of services to us. However, such reimbursement will be made at an amount equal to the lower of our Adviser’s costs or the amount that we would be required to pay for comparable administrative services in the same geographic location. Also, such costs will be reasonably allocated to us on the basis of assets, revenues, time records or other reasonable methods. We will not reimburse our Adviser for any services for which it receives a separate fee, for example rent, depreciation, utilities, capital equipment or other administrative items allocated to a controlling person of our Adviser.

Leverage

The amount of leverage we use in any period depends on a variety of factors, including cash available for investing, the cost of financing and general economic and market conditions. Generally, our total borrowings are limited so that we cannot incur additional borrowings, including through the issuance of additional debt securities, if such additional indebtedness would cause our asset coverage ratio to fall below 200%, as defined in the 1940 Act; however, recent legislation has modified the 1940 Act by allowing a BDC to increase the maximum amount of leverage it may incur from an asset coverage ratio of 200% to an asset coverage ratio of 150%, if certain requirements are met. The reduced asset coverage requirement would permit a BDC to double the amount of leverage it could incur. We are permitted to increase our leverage capacity if shareholders representing at least a majority of the votes cast, when quorum is met, approve a proposal to do so. If we receive such shareholder approval, we would be permitted to increase our leverage capacity on the first day after such approval. Alternatively, we may increase the maximum amount of leverage we may incur to an asset coverage ratio of 150% if the required majority (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of the independent members of our Board approves such increase with such approval becoming effective after one year. In either case, we would be required to extend to our shareholders, as of the date of such approval, the opportunity to sell the shares of common stock that they hold and we would be required to make certain disclosures on our website and in SEC filings regarding, among other things, the receipt of approval to increase our leverage, our leverage capacity and usage, and risks related to leverage. For shareholders accepting such an offer, the Company would be required to repurchase 25% of such shareholders’ eligible shares in each of the four calendar quarters following the calendar quarter in which the approval occurs. In addition, before incurring any such additional leverage, we would have to

renegotiate or receive a waiver from the contractual leverage limitations under our existing credit facilities and notes. Our current target leverage ratio is 0.75x.

In any period, our interest expense will depend largely on the extent of our borrowings and we expect interest expense will increase as we increase our leverage over time subject to the limits of the 1940 Act. In addition, we may dedicate assets to financing facilities.

Market Trends

We believe the middle market lending environment provides opportunities for us to meet our goal of making investments that generate attractive risk-adjusted returns.

Limited Availability of Capital for Middle Market Companies. The middle market is a large addressable market. According to GE Capital’s National Center for the Middle Market Mid-Year 2025 Middle Market Indicator, there are approximately 200,000 U.S. middle market companies, which have approximately 48 million aggregate employees. Moreover, the U.S. middle market accounts for one-third of private sector gross domestic product (“GDP”). GE defines U.S. middle market companies as those between $10 million and $1 billion in annual revenue, which we believe has significant overlap with our definition of U.S. middle market companies. We believe U.S. middle market companies will continue to require access to debt capital to refinance existing debt, support growth and finance acquisitions. We believe that regulatory and structural factors, industry consolidation and general risk aversion, limit the amount of traditional financing available to U.S. middle market companies. We believe that many commercial and investment banks have, in recent years, de-emphasized their service and product offerings to middle market businesses in favor of lending to large corporate clients and managing capital markets transactions. In addition, these lenders may be constrained in their ability to underwrite and hold bank loans and high yield securities for middle market issuers as they seek to meet existing and future regulatory capital requirements. We also believe that there is a lack of market participants that are willing to hold meaningful amounts of certain middle market loans. As a result, we believe our ability to minimize syndication risk for a company seeking financing by being able to hold its loans without having to syndicate them, coupled with reduced capacity of traditional lenders to serve the middle market, present an attractive opportunity to invest in middle market companies.

Capital Markets Have Been Unable to Fill the Void in U.S. Middle Market Finance Left by Banks. Access to underwritten bond and syndicated loan markets is challenging for middle market companies due to loan issue size and liquidity. For example, high yield bonds are generally purchased by institutional investors, such as mutual funds and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) who, among other things, are focused on the liquidity characteristics of the bond being issued in order to fund investor redemptions and/or comply with regulatory requirements. Accordingly, the existence of an active secondary market for bonds is an important consideration in these entities’ initial investment decision.

Syndicated loans arranged through a bank are done either on a “best efforts” basis or are underwritten with terms plus provisions that permit the underwriters to change certain terms, including pricing, structure, yield and tenor, otherwise known as “flex”, to successfully syndicate the loan, in the event the terms initially marketed are insufficiently attractive to investors. Furthermore, banks are generally reluctant to underwrite middle market loans because the arrangement fees they may earn on the placement of the debt generally are not sufficient to meet the banks’ return hurdles. Loans provided by companies such as ours provide certainty to issuers in that we have a more stable capital base and have the ability to invest in illiquid assets, and we can commit to a given amount of debt on specific terms, at stated coupons and with agreed upon fees. As we are the ultimate holder of the loans, we do not require market “flex” or other arrangements that banks may require when acting on an agency basis. In addition, our Adviser has teams focused on both liquid credit and private credit and these teams are able to collaborate with respect to syndicated loans.

Secular Trends Supporting Growth for Private Credit. We believe that periods of market volatility, such as the current period of market volatility caused, in part, by uncertainty regarding inflation and interest rates, and current geopolitical conditions, have accentuated the advantages of private credit. The availability of capital in the liquid credit market is highly sensitive to market conditions whereas we believe private lending has proven to be a stable and reliable source of capital through periods of volatility. We believe the opportunity set for private credit will continue to expand even as the public markets remain open. Financial sponsors and companies today are familiar with direct lending and have seen firsthand the strong value proposition that a private solution can offer. Scale, certainty of execution and flexibility all provide borrowers with a compelling alternative to the syndicated loan and high yield markets. Based on our experience, larger, higher quality credits that have traditionally been issuers in the syndicated and high yield markets are increasingly seeking private solutions independent of credit market conditions. In our view, this is supported by financial sponsors wanting to work with collaborative financing partners that have scale and breadth of capabilities. This has driven substantial growth in direct lending portfolio companies over time. Given the dynamics mentioned above, we believe this trend is poised to continue and that the large amount of uninvested capital held by funds of private equity firms broadly, estimated by Preqin Ltd., an alternative assets industry data and research company, to be $2.70 trillion as of December 31, 2025, will continue to serve as a tailwind to the space.

Attractive Investment Dynamics. An imbalance between the supply of, and demand for, middle market debt capital creates attractive pricing dynamics. We believe the directly negotiated nature of middle market financings also generally provides more favorable terms to the lender, including stronger covenant and reporting packages, better call protection, and lender-protective change of control provisions. Additionally, we believe BDC managers’ expertise in credit selection and ability to manage through credit

cycles has generally resulted in BDCs experiencing lower loss rates than U.S. commercial banks through credit cycles. Further, we believe that historical middle market default rates have been lower, and recovery rates have been higher, as compared to the larger market capitalization, broadly distributed market, leading to lower cumulative losses. Lastly, we believe that in the current environment, lenders with available capital may be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities as the economy reopens and may be able to achieve improved economic spreads and documentation terms.

Conservative Capital Structures. With more conservative capital structures, U.S. middle market companies have exhibited higher levels of cash flows available to service their debt. In addition, U.S. middle market companies often are characterized by simpler capital structures than larger borrowers, which facilitates a streamlined underwriting process and, when necessary, restructuring process.

Attractive Opportunities in Investments in Loans. We invest in senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, equity and equity-related securities. We believe that opportunities in senior secured loans are significant because of the floating rate structure of most senior secured debt issuances and because of the strong defensive characteristics of these types of investments. We believe that debt issues with floating interest rates offer a superior return profile as compared with fixed-rate investments, since floating rate structures are generally less susceptible to declines in value experienced by fixed-rate securities in a rising interest rate environment. Senior secured debt also provides strong defensive characteristics. Senior secured debt has priority in payment among an issuer’s security holders whereby holders are due to receive payment before junior creditors and equity holders. Further, these investments are secured by the issuer’s assets, which may provide protection in the event of a default.

Portfolio and Investment Activity

Our platform continues to find attractive investment opportunities for deployment, predominantly in first lien originations to large borrowers and we intend to continue investing in accordance with our investment objective.

We continue to focus on investing in upper middle market businesses in non-cyclical industries we view as recession resistant and that we are familiar with, including defensive service-oriented sectors that provide intangible mission critical solutions and products such as healthcare, business services, technology and insurance brokerage. These companies have diversified revenue streams, strong recurring cash flow profiles and healthy liquidity.

Blue Owl serves as the lead, co-lead or administrative agent on many of our investments and the majority of our investments are supported by sophisticated financial sponsors who provide operational and financial resources.

We believe that the construction of our current portfolio coupled with our experienced investment team and strong underwriting standards leave us well-positioned for the current economic environment. Many of the companies in which we invest are continuing to see modest growth in both revenues and EBITDA. However, in the event of further geopolitical, economic and financial market instability, in the U.S. and elsewhere, it is possible that the results of some of the middle market companies similar to those in which we invest could be challenged.

Pro forma for these asset sales, we believe the portfolio remains attractive and well-diversified as portfolio composition, sector concentrations, credit quality and borrower characteristics remain substantially consistent with the prior portfolio. The portfolio will contain the same number of portfolio companies at 183 across 30 industries with over 80% in senior secured loans, an average position size of 0.5% and 2.2% of the portfolio on non-accrual at fair value. Other key metrics will remain largely unchanged including: weighted average EBITDA of approximately $200mm, interest coverage at 1.9x, as well as weighted average spread and maturities. We believe this consistency reflects our disciplined portfolio construction, which has underpinned our strong net annualized total return since inception. We also maintain a strong liquidity position, with approximately $447.0 million in cash and undrawn debt capacity, and a conservative leverage profile, with net debt-to-equity of 0.52x pro forma for these asset sales.

As of December 31, 2025, based on fair value, our portfolio consisted of 77.4% first lien senior secured debt investments (of which 48.0% we consider to be unitranche debt investments (including “last-out” portions of such loans)), 8.3% second-lien senior

secured debt investments, 2.5% unsecured investments, 0.5% specialty finance debt investments, 4.3% preferred equity investments, 5.1% common equity investments, 1.9% specialty finance equity investments and less than 1% joint venture investments.

As of December 31, 2025, our weighted average total yield of the portfolio at fair value and amortized cost was 9.9% and 9.7%, respectively, and our weighted average yield of accruing debt and income producing securities at fair value and amortized cost was 10.3% and 10.2%, respectively.

As of December 31, 2025, we had investments in 183 portfolio companies with an aggregate fair value of $1.58 billion. Our current target leverage ratio is 0.75x. As of December 31, 2025, we had net leverage of 0.65x debt-to-equity.

The table below presents our investment activity for the following periods (information presented herein is at par value unless otherwise indicated):


	For the Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2025			2024
New investment commitments:
Gross originations		$	297,427		$	933,502
Less: Sell downs		(1,637)			(3,808)
Total new investment commitments		$	295,790		$	929,694
Principal amount of new investments funded:
First-lien senior secured debt investments		$	197,831		$	702,657
Second-lien senior secured debt investments		6,570			32,000
Unsecured debt investments		1,409			16,943
Specialty finance debt investments		2,309			—
Preferred equity investments		1,575			—
Common equity investments		3,659			11,035
Specialty finance equity investments		16,001			—
Joint venture investments		145			190
Total principal amount of new investments funded		$	229,499		$	762,825

Drawdowns (repayments) on revolvers and delayed draw term loans, net		46,358			—

Principal amount of investments sold or repaid:
First-lien senior secured debt investments(3)		$	(515,508)		$	(542,000)
Second-lien senior secured debt investments		(89,139)			(252,584)
Unsecured debt investments		(2,161)			(26,337)
Specialty finance debt investments		—			—
Preferred equity investments		(254)			(5,932)
Common equity investments		(19,589)			(1,490)
Specialty finance equity investments		(7,613)			—
Joint venture investments		—			—
Total principal amount of investments sold or repaid		$	(634,264)		$	(828,343)

Number of new investment commitments in new portfolio companies(1)		39			70
Average new investment commitment amount in new portfolio companies		$	5,465,316		$	10,894,000
Weighted average term for new investment commitments (in years)		5.3			5.3
Percentage of new debt investment commitments at floating rates		94.9		%	97.9		%
Percentage of new debt investment commitments at fixed rates		5.1		%	2.1		%
Weighted average interest rate of new investment commitments(2)		9.2		%	9.9		%
Weighted average spread over applicable base rate of new debt investment commitments at floating rates		5.2		%	5.4		%

_______________

(1)Number of new investment commitments represents commitments to a particular portfolio company.

(2)Assumes each floating rate commitment is subject to the greater of the interest rate floor (if applicable) or 3-month SOFR, which was 3.65% and 4.31% as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

(3)Includes scheduled paydowns.

The table below presents investments at fair value and amortized cost as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025				As of December 31, 2024
($ in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
First-lien senior secured debt investments(1)	$	1,251,162	$	1,221,372	$	1,532,596	$	1,515,900
Second-lien senior secured debt investments	159,446		131,054		229,288		200,284
Unsecured debt investments	37,347		38,673		33,526		33,594
Specialty finance debt investments	7,483		7,491		5,016		5,040
Preferred equity investments	67,578		67,143		60,177		59,385
Common equity investments	55,486		80,120		62,167		103,225
Specialty finance equity investments	25,571		30,360		15,236		17,773
Joint ventures	334		337		190		191
Total Investments	$	1,604,407	$	1,576,550	$	1,938,196	$	1,935,392

_______________

(1)We consider 48% and 49% of first-lien senior secured debt investments to be unitranche loans as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

The table below describes investments by industry composition based on fair value as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025			As of December 31, 2024
Advertising and media	2.8	%		2.5	%
Aerospace and defense	1.2			2.9
Asset Based Lending and Fund Finance(1)	2.3			1.2
Automotive Services	3.0			2.2
Buildings and real estate	5.1			3.5
Business services	2.0			3.1
Chemicals	4.7			4.2
Consumer products	2.7			5.0
Containers and packaging	2.4			1.8
Distribution	1.8			3.0
Education	0.5			0.6
Energy equipment and services	0.6			0.5
Financial services	4.4			3.3
Food and beverage	6.0			8.4
Healthcare equipment and services	2.7			2.9
Healthcare providers and services	9.8			7.2
Healthcare technology	7.8			8.0
Household products	2.4			1.9
Human resource support services	2.0			1.5
Infrastructure and environmental services	1.2			1.2
Insurance(3)	2.0			6.5
Internet software and services	10.9			10.1
Joint ventures(4)	0.0		(5)	0.0		(5)
Leisure and entertainment	2.5			2.2
Manufacturing	9.8			8.1
Pharmaceuticals(2)	0.8			0.5
Professional services	3.2			2.5
Specialty retail	3.7			3.5
Telecommunications	0.2			0.5
Transportation	1.5			1.2
Total	100.0	%		100.0	%

_______________

(1)Includes investments in Amergin AssetCo and BOCSO.

(2)Includes investment in LSI Financing DAC and LSI Financing LLC.

(3)Includes investments in Fifth Season.

(4)Includes investment in Credit SLF and Blue Owl Leasing.

(5)Rounds to less than 0.1%.

The table below describes investments by geographic composition based on fair value as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025		As of December 31, 2024
United States:
Midwest	22.3	%	21.7	%
Northeast	18.3		15.5
South	38.4		30.0
West	15.3		25.4
International	5.7		7.4
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%

The table below presents the weighted average yields and interest rates of our investments at fair value as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025		As of December 31, 2024
Weighted average total yield of portfolio(1)	9.9	%	10.9	%
Weighted average total yield of accruing debt and income producing securities(1)	10.3	%	11.3	%
Weighted average interest rate of accruing debt securities	9.7	%	10.6	%
Weighted average spread over base rate of all accruing floating rate investments	5.8	%	6.0	%

_______________

(1)For non-stated rate income producing investments, computed based on (a) the dividend or interest income earned for the respective trailing twelve months ended on the measurement date, divided by (b) the ending fair value. In instances where historical dividend or interest income data is not available or not representative for the trailing twelve months ended, the interest or dividend income is annualized.

The weighted average yield of our accruing debt and income producing securities is not the same as a return on investment for our shareholders but, rather, relates to our investment portfolio and is calculated before the payment of all of our and our subsidiaries’ fees and expenses. The weighted average yield was computed using the effective interest rates as of each respective date, including accretion of original issue discount and loan origination fees, but excluding investments on non-accrual status, if any. There can be no assurance that the weighted average yield will remain at its current level.

Our Adviser monitors our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis. It monitors the financial trends of each portfolio company to determine if they are meeting their respective business plans and to assess the appropriate course of action with respect to each portfolio company. Our Adviser has several methods of evaluating and monitoring the performance and fair value of our investments, which may include the following:

•assessment of success of the portfolio company in adhering to its business plan and compliance with covenants;

•periodic and regular contact with portfolio company management and, if appropriate, the financial or strategic sponsor, to discuss financial position, requirements and accomplishments;

•comparisons to other companies in the portfolio company’s industry; and

•review of monthly or quarterly financial statements and financial projections for portfolio companies.

An investment will be placed on the Adviser's credit watch list when select events occur and will only be removed from the watch list with oversight of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee and/or other agents of Blue Owl’s Credit platform. Once an investment is on the credit watch list, the Adviser works with the borrower to resolve any financial stress through amendments, waivers or other alternatives. If a borrower defaults on its payment obligations, the Adviser's focus shifts to capital recovery. If an investment needs to be restructured, the Adviser's workout team partners with the investment team and all material amendments, waivers and restructurings require the approval of a majority of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee.

As part of the monitoring process, our Adviser employs an investment rating system to categorize our investments. In addition to various risk management and monitoring tools, our Adviser rates the credit risk of all investments on a scale of 1 to 5. This system is intended primarily to reflect the underlying risk of a portfolio investment relative to our initial cost basis in respect of such portfolio investment (i.e., at the time of origination or acquisition), although it may also take into account the performance of the portfolio company’s business, the collateral coverage of the investment and other relevant factors. The rating system is as follows:


Investment Rating						Description
1						Investments rated 1 involve the least amount of risk to our initial cost basis. The borrower is performing above expectations, and the trends and risk factors for this investment since origination or acquisition are generally favorable;

2						Investments rated 2 involve an acceptable level of risk that is similar to the risk at the time of origination or acquisition. The borrower is generally performing as expected and the risk factors are neutral to favorable. All investments or acquired investments in new portfolio companies are initially assessed a rating of 2;

3						Investments rated 3 involve a borrower performing below expectations and indicates that the loan’s risk has increased somewhat since origination or acquisition;

4						Investments rated 4 involve a borrower performing materially below expectations and indicates that the loan’s risk has increased materially since origination or acquisition. In addition to the borrower being generally out of compliance with debt covenants, loan payments may be past due (but generally not more than 120 days past due); and

5						Investments rated 5 involve a borrower performing substantially below expectations and indicates that the loan’s risk has increased substantially since origination or acquisition. Most or all of the debt covenants are out of compliance and payments are substantially delinquent. Loans rated 5 are not anticipated to be repaid in full and we will reduce the fair market value of the loan to the amount we anticipate will be recovered.

Our Adviser rates the investments in our portfolio at least quarterly and it is possible that the rating of a portfolio investment may be reduced or increased over time. For investments rated 3, 4 or 5, our Adviser enhances its level of scrutiny over the monitoring of such portfolio company.

The Adviser has built out its portfolio management team to include workout experts who closely monitor our portfolio companies and who, on at least a quarterly basis, assess each portfolio company’s operational and liquidity exposure and outlook to understand and mitigate risks; and, on at least a monthly basis, evaluates existing and newly identified situations where operating results are deviating from expectations. As part of its monitoring process, the Adviser focuses on projected liquidity needs and where warranted, re-underwriting credits and evaluating downside and liquidation scenarios.

The Adviser focuses on downside protection by leveraging existing rights available under our credit documents; however, for investments that are significantly underperforming or which may need to be restructured, the Adviser’s workout team partners with the investment team and all material amendments, waivers and restructurings require the approval of a majority of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. As of December 31, 2025, 1.4% of our portfolio at fair value is on non-accrual.

The table below shows the composition of our portfolio on the 1 to 5 rating scale as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025				As of December 31, 2024
Investment Rating	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio(1)		Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
($ in thousands)
1	$	182,103	11.6	%	$	149,636	7.7	%
2	1,177,657		74.7		1,536,225		79.3
3	190,376		12.1		227,474		11.8
4	9,000		0.6		18,813		1.0
5	17,414		1.1		3,244		0.2
Total	$	1,576,550	100.0	%	$	1,935,392	100.0	%

________________

(1) Totals presented may not sum due to rounding.

The table below shows the amortized cost of our performing and non-accrual debt investments as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025				As of December 31, 2024
($ in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Percentage		Amortized Cost		Percentage
Performing	$	1,405,297	96.6	%	$	1,770,799	98.4	%
Non-accrual	50,141		3.4		29,627		1.6
Total	$	1,455,438	100.0	%	$	1,800,426	100.0	%

Specialty Financing Portfolio Companies and Joint Ventures

Specialty Financing Portfolio Companies

Amergin was created to invest in a leasing platform focused on railcar, aviation and other long-lived transportation assets. Amergin acquires existing on-lease portfolios of new and end-of-life railcars and related equipment and selectively purchases off-lease assets and is building a commercial aircraft portfolio through aircraft financing and engine acquisition on a sale and lease back basis. Amergin consists of Amergin AssetCo and Amergin Asset Management LLC, which has entered into a Servicing Agreement with Amergin AssetCo. As of December 31, 2025, the fair market value of our investment in Amergin Asset Management LLC was $2.1 million. We made an initial equity commitment to Amergin AssetCo on July 1, 2022. As of December 31, 2025, the fair market value of our investment in Amergin AssetCo was $12.0 million, of which $4.5 million is equity and $7.5 million is debt, and we had an unfunded equity commitment of $2.2 million. We do not consolidate our equity interest in Amergin AssetCo.

Fifth Season is a portfolio company created to invest in life insurance based assets, including secondary and tertiary life settlement and other life insurance exposures using detailed analytics, internal life expectancy review and sophisticated portfolio management techniques. On July 18, 2022, we made an initial equity commitment to Fifth Season. As of December 31, 2025, the fair value of our equity investment in Fifth Season was $6.4 million. We do not consolidate our equity interest in Fifth Season.

LSI Financing DAC is a portfolio company formed to acquire contractual rights to revenue pursuant to earnout agreements generally in the life sciences space. On December 14, 2022, we made an initial equity commitment to LSI Financing DAC. As of December 31, 2025, the fair value of our investment in LSI Financing DAC was $0.2 million. We do not consolidate our equity interest in LSI Financing DAC.

LSI Financing LLC is a separately managed portfolio company formed to indirectly own royalty purchase agreements and loans in the life sciences space. The Adviser provides consulting services to a subsidiary of LSI Financing LLC in exchange for a fee. The Adviser has agreed to waive a portion of the management fee payable by us pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement equal to the pro rata amount of such consulting fee. On November 25th, 2024, we redeemed a portion of its interest in LSI Financing DAC in exchange for common shares of LSI Financing LLC. As of December 31, 2025, our investment at fair value in LSI Financing LLC was $10.6 million and our total commitment was $13.8 million. We do not consolidate our equity interest in LSI Financing LLC.

BOCSO was formed to invest in alternative credit assets, including asset-based finance (“ABF”). ABF is a subsector of private credit focused on generating income from pools of financial, physical or other assets. We believe exposure to alternative credit presents an attractive opportunity as alternative credit is a growing subsector of private credit. On September 18, 2025, we made an initial equity contribution to BOCSO. As of December 31, 2025, our investment at fair value in BOCSO was $6.5 million and our total commitment was $6.5 million. As of December 31, 2025, the portfolio consists of three investments totaling $0.50 billion at cost and fair value, respectively, ranging in costs from $24.8 million to $304.4 million and with a fair value ranging from $24.8 million and $303.9 million. The largest investment is 62.0% of the total cost of BOCSO’s portfolio. As of December 31, 2025, the portfolio asset class composition was 62.0% ABF — Specialty finance, 33.0% ABF — Leasing, and 5.0% ABF — Commercial Real Estate. We do not consolidate our equity interest in BOCSO.

Joint Ventures

On May 6, 2024, Credit SLF, a Delaware limited liability company, was formed as a joint venture between the Credit SLF Members. The Credit SLF Members co-manage Credit SLF. Credit SLF’s principal purpose is to make investments in senior secured loans to middle-market companies, broadly syndicated loans and senior and subordinated notes issued by collateralized loan

obligations. Credit SLF is managed by a board consisting of an equal number of representatives appointed by each Credit SLF Member and which acts unanimously. Investment decisions must be approved by Credit SLF’s board. Our investment in Credit SLF is a co-investment made with our affiliates in accordance with the terms of the exemptive relief that we received from the SEC. We do not consolidate our non-controlling interest in Credit SLF.

Refer to Exhibit 99.2 for the Credit SLF’s Supplemental Financial Information.

On June 30, 2025, Blue Owl Leasing, a Delaware limited liability company, was formed as a joint venture between the Blue Owl Leasing Members. The Blue Owl Leasing Members co-manage Blue Owl Leasing. Blue Owl Leasing’s principal purpose is to make investments in leases and loans. Investment decisions must be approved by Blue Owl Leasing. Our investment in Blue Owl Leasing is a co-investment made with our affiliates in accordance with the terms of the exemptive relief that we received from the SEC. We do not consolidate our non-controlling interest in Blue Owl Leasing.

As of December 31, 2025, our investment at fair value in Blue Owl Leasing was $90 thousand. As of December 31, 2025, Blue Owl Leasing had a $39.6 million investment.

Refer to Exhibit 99.3 for the Blue Owl Leasing’s Supplemental Financial Information.

Results of Operations

For a discussion of our results for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our a nnual r eport on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 6, 2025, which are incorporated herein by reference.

The below table presents our operating results for the following periods:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2025		2024		$ Change
Total Investment Income		$	195,915	$	256,887	$	(60,972)
Less: Total Operating Expenses		120,620		145,644		(25,024)
Net Investment Income (Loss) Before Taxes		75,295		111,243		(35,948)
Less: Income tax expense (benefit), including excise tax expense (benefit)		1,304		2,774		(1,470)
Net Investment Income (Loss) After Taxes		73,991		108,469		(34,478)
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)		(26,181)		(11,758)		(14,423)
Net realized gain (loss)		(23,740)		(14,747)		(8,993)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations		$	24,070	$	81,964	$	(57,894)

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations can vary from period to period as a result of various factors, including the level of investment originations and exit activity, expenses, the recognition of realized gains and losses and changes in unrealized appreciation and depreciation on the investment portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2025, our net asset value per share decreased, primarily driven by decreases in the fair value of certain debt investments.

Investment Income

The table below presents the investment income for the following periods:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2025		2024		$ Change
Interest income from investments		$	163,618	$	207,915	$	(44,297)
Payment-in-kind interest income		14,297		27,975		(13,678)
Dividend income		15,593		16,976		(1,383)
Other income		2,407		4,021		(1,614)
Total Investment Income		$	195,915	$	256,887	$	(60,972)

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024

Investment income decreased to $195.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, from $256.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to a decrease in interest income and PIK interest income, as a result of a decline in weighted average yield from 10.9% to 9.9%, while our debt portfolio at par decreased primarily due to a decrease in portfolio size from $1.95 billion to $1.48 billion. Included in interest income are other fees such as prepayment fees and accelerated amortization of upfront fees from unscheduled paydowns, which are non-recurring in nature, these fee decreased from $8.0 million to $5.9 million period-over-period due to a decrease in repayment activity. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, as a percentage of total income, PIK income decreased to 10.1% from 13.0%, as a result of repayment activity and several investments converting to cash pay.

Dividend income decreased to $15.6 million from $17.0 million in the prior year period, primarily due to a decrease in dividends earned from our equity investments. We expect that investment income will vary based on a variety of factors, including the pace of our originations and repayments.

Expenses

The table below presents expenses for the following periods:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2025		2024		$ Change
Interest expense		$	68,094	$	82,860	$	(14,766)
Management fee, net		26,917		30,817		(3,900)
Performance based incentive fees		15,472		23,006		(7,534)
Professional fees		5,210		3,888		1,322
Directors’ fees		785		785		—
Other general and administrative		4,142		4,288		(146)
Total Operating Expenses		$	120,620	$	145,644	$	(25,024)

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024

Total operating expenses decreased to $120.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, from $145.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to decreases in interest expense, incentive fees, and management fees. The decrease in interest expense of $14.8 million was driven by a decrease in our daily weighted average borrowings from $897.5 million to $788.0 million and by a decrease in our weighted average interest rate from 8.3% to 7.9% (including the impact of fees on undrawn portions of our credit facilities) period-over-period. The decrease of $7.5 million in incentive fees was due to a decrease in investment income period-over-period. The decrease in management fees of $3.9 million was due to a decrease in average gross assets driven by sales and repayments of portfolio investments.

Income Taxes, Including Excise Taxes

We have elected to be treated as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code, and we intend to operate in a manner so as to continue to qualify for the tax treatment applicable to RICs. To qualify for tax treatment as a RIC, we must, among other things, distribute to our shareholders in each taxable year generally at least the sum of (i) 90% of our investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, and (ii) 90% of our net tax-exempt income for that taxable year. To maintain our tax treatment as a RIC, we, among other things, intend to make the requisite distributions to our shareholders, which generally relieves us from U.S. federal income taxes at corporate rates.

Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we can be expected to carry forward taxable income (including net capital gains, if any) in excess of current year dividend distributions from the current tax year into the next tax year and pay a nondeductible 4% U.S. federal excise tax on such taxable income, as required. To the extent that we determine that our estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions from such income, we will accrue excise tax on estimated excess taxable income.

For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recorded U.S. federal and state income tax expenses of $1.3 million and $2.8 million, including U.S. federal excise tax expense of $(255) thousand and $1.3 million, respectively.

Certain of our consolidated subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recorded a current net tax expense of $(255) thousand and $1.3 million, for taxable subsidiaries, respectively. The income tax expense for our taxable consolidated subsidiaries will vary depending on the level of investment income earnings and realized gains from the exits of investments held by such taxable subsidiaries during the respective periods.

Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)

We fair value our portfolio investments quarterly and any changes in fair value are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. During the following periods, net unrealized gains (losses) were comprised of the following:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2025		2024		$ Change
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments		$	(27,753)	$	(13,395)	$	(14,358)
Income tax (provision) benefit		(70)		8		(78)
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies		1,642		1,629		13
Net Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss)		$	(26,181)	$	(11,758)	$	(14,423)

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the net unrealized loss was primarily driven by decreases in the fair value of certain debt investments, partially offset by reversal of a prior period unrealized losses that were realized during the period in connection with the exits of certain investments. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the net unrealized loss was primarily driven by market conditions and markdowns on certain debt investment offset by markups on certain debt and equity investments as detailed below.

The tables below present the ten largest contributors to the change in net unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the following periods:


Portfolio Company	For the Year Ended December 31, 2025		Portfolio Company	For the Year Ended December 31, 2024
($ in thousands)			($ in thousands)
H-Food Holdings, LLC	$	17,223	KPCI Holdings, L.P.	$	7,092
CIBT Global, Inc.	4,774		The Better Being Co., LLC (fka Nutraceutical International Corporation)	3,531
Notorious Topco, LLC (dba Beauty Industry Group)	2,898		Loparex Midco B.V.	3,516
Valence Surface Technologies LLC	2,331		Valence Surface Technologies LLC	1,967
EOS Finco S.A.R.L	(3,364)		Remaining Portfolio Companies	(1,283)
Pluralsight, LLC(1)	(4,301)		EOS U.S. Finco LLC	(2,068)
PCF Midco II, LLC (dba PCF Insurance Services)	(5,619)		Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.	(2,401)
Remaining Portfolio Companies	(7,869)		Peraton Corp.	(2,727)
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)	(8,138)		National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)	(4,592)
Packaging Coordinators Midco, Inc.	(9,813)		Walker Edison Furniture Company(1)	(6,563)
Conair Holdings LLC	(15,875)		H-Food Holdings, LLC	(9,867)
Total	$	(27,753)	Total	$	(13,395)

_______________

(1)Portfolio company is a non-controlled, affiliated investment.

Net Realized Gain (Loss)

The table below presents the realized gains and losses on fully exited and partially exited portfolio companies during the following periods:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2025		2024		$ Change
Net realized gain (loss) on investments		$	(24,126)	$	(11,842)	$	(12,284)
Net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions		386		(2,905)		3,291
Net Realized Gain (Loss)		$	(23,740)	$	(14,747)	$	(8,993)

For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized net realized losses on investments of $24.1 million, as compared to losses of $11.8 million in the prior year period, primarily driven by the full or partial sales of investments and the restructuring of certain debt investments. We realized a modest gain, as opposed to a loss year-over-year, on foreign currency transactions, primarily as a result of fluctuations in the GBP and EUR exchange rates vs. USD.

Realized Gross Internal Rate of Return

Since we began investing in 2017 through December 31, 2025, our exited investments have resulted in an aggregate cash flow realized gross internal rate of return to us of approximately 9.7% (based on total capital invested of $3.4 billion and total proceeds from these exited investments of $4.2 billion).

IRR is a measure of our discounted cash flows (inflows and outflows). Specifically, IRR is the discount rate at which the net present value of all cash flows is equal to zero. That is, IRR is the discount rate at which the present value of total capital invested in each of our investments is equal to the present value of all realized returns from that investment. Our IRR calculations are unaudited.

Capital invested, with respect to an investment, represents the aggregate cost basis allocable to the realized or unrealized portion of the investment, net of any upfront fees paid at closing for the term loan portion of the investment.

Realized returns, with respect to an investment, represents the total cash received with respect to each investment, including all amortization payments, interest, dividends, prepayment fees, upfront fees (except upfront fees paid at closing for the term loan portion of an investment), administrative fees, agent fees, amendment fees, accrued interest, and other fees and proceeds.

Gross IRR, with respect to an investment, is calculated based on the dates that we invested capital and dates we received distributions, regardless of when we made distributions to our shareholders. Initial investments are assumed to occur at time zero.

Gross IRR reflects historical results relating to our past performance and is not necessarily indicative of our future results. In addition, gross IRR does not reflect the effect of management fees, expenses, incentive fees or taxes borne, or to be borne, by us or our shareholders, and would be lower if it did.

Aggregate cash flow realized gross IRR on our exited investments reflects only invested and realized cash amounts as described above and does not reflect any unrealized gains or losses in our portfolio.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our liquidity and capital resources are generated primarily from cash flows from interest, dividends and fees earned from our investments and principal repayments and proceeds from sales of our investments, our credit facilities, debt securitization transaction and other secured and unsecured debt. The primary uses of our cash are for (i) investments in portfolio companies and other investments and to comply with certain portfolio diversification requirements, (ii) the cost of operations (including paying our Adviser), (iii) debt service, repayment and other financing costs of any borrowings and (iv) cash distributions to the holders of our shares.

We may from time to time enter into additional credit facilities, increase the size of our existing credit facilities or issue additional debt securities. Any such incurrence or issuance would be subject to prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual and regulatory restrictions and other factors. In accordance with the 1940 Act, with certain limited exceptions, we are only allowed to incur borrowings, issue debt securities or issue preferred stock, if immediately after the borrowing or issuance, the ratio of total assets (less total liabilities other than indebtedness) to total indebtedness plus preferred stock, is at least 200% (or 150% if certain conditions are met). In addition, from time to time, we may seek to retire, repurchase, or exchange debt securities in open market purchases or by other means, including privately negotiated transactions, in each case dependent on market conditions, liquidity, contractual obligations, and other matters. The amounts involved in any such transactions, individually or in the aggregate, may be material.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, our asset coverage ratios were 240% and 231%, respectively. We seek to carefully consider our unfunded commitments for the purpose of planning our ongoing financial leverage. Further, we maintain sufficient borrowing capacity within the 200% (or 150% if certain conditions are met) asset coverage limitation to cover any outstanding unfunded commitments we are required to fund.

Cash as of December 31, 2025, taken together with our available debt of $272.7 million, is expected to be sufficient for our investing activities and to conduct our operations in the near term. Subsequent to year-end, on February 18, 2026, we entered into loan sale agreements with four institutional investors to sell a portion of our portfolio company investments having aggregate total debt commitments of $600.0 million at a price of 99.8% of par value as part of a $1.4 billion transaction. See “Recent Developments — Asset Sale.” On February 17, 2026, the Company entered into an Omnibus Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement and Guarantee and Security Agreement in order to, among other things, reduce the maximum commitment of the Revolving Credit Facility from $225.0 million to $75.0 million. See “Recent Developments — Revolving Credit Facility Amendment.”

Our long-term cash needs will include principal payments on outstanding indebtedness and funding of additional portfolio investments. Funding for long-term cash needs will come from unused net proceeds from financing activities. We believe that our liquidity and sources of capital are adequate to satisfy our short and long-term cash requirements. We cannot, however, be certain that these sources of funds will be available at a time and upon terms acceptable to us in sufficient amounts in the future.

As of December 31, 2025, we had $59.4 million in cash, including foreign cash. During the year ended December 31, 2025, cash provided by operating activities was $390.9 million, primarily as a result of repayments and selldowns of portfolio investments of $581.0 million and other operating activities of $51.2 million, partially offset by funding portfolio investments of $241.3 million. Lastly, we used $382.5 million of cash for financing activities during the period, as a result of distributions paid of $48.8 million, repurchased shares $152.3 million, deferred financing costs paid of $1.4 million, and net repayments on our credit facilities of $180.0 million.

As of December 31, 2024, we had $50.9 million in cash, including foreign cash. During the year ended December 31, 2024, cash provided by operating activities was $192.9 million, primarily as a result of selldowns and repayments of portfolio investments of $745.9 million and other operating activities of $62.3 million, partially offset by funding portfolio investments of $615.3 million. Lastly, we used $268.4 million of cash for financing activities during the period, as a result of distributions paid of $59.8 million and repurchased shares of $162.5 million, partially offset by net borrowings of $39.3 million, net of deferred financing costs of $6.8 million. Our long-term cash needs will include principal payments on outstanding indebtedness and funding of additional portfolio investments. Funding for long-term cash needs will come from unused net proceeds from financing activities. We believe that our

liquidity and sources of capital are adequate to satisfy our short and long-term cash requirements. We cannot, however, be certain that these sources of funds will be available at a time and upon terms acceptable to us in sufficient amounts in the future.

Net Assets

Share Issuances

The table below summarizes transactions with respect to shares of our common stock during the following periods.


	For the Year Ended
	December 31, 2025			December 31, 2024
($ in thousands, except share amounts)	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount

Reinvestment of distributions	4,816,721	$	41,296	5,734,171	$	51,222
Repurchased shares	(17,598,030)	(150,967)		(18,348,487)	(163,763)
Total Shares/Net Repurchases	(12,781,309)	$	(109,671)	(12,614,316)	$	(112,541)

Prior to the termination of our continuous public offering, in the event of a material decline in our net asset value per share, our Board reduced the offering price in order to establish a new net offering price per share. We will not sell shares at a net offering price below the net asset value per share unless we obtain the requisite approval from our shareholders.

We determined not to file additional post-effective amendments to our registration statement and terminated our offering as of April 30, 2021.

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, shares issued pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan were issued as follows:


Date of Issuance	Record Date	Number of Shares	Purchase Price per Share





































January 30, 2024	December 31, 2023	213,228	$	9.03
January 31, 2024	January 30, 2024	431,463	$	9.01
February 28, 2024	February 27, 2024	431,753	$	9.01
March 27, 2024	March 26, 2024	420,004	$	9.01
May 1, 2024	April 30, 2024	420,937	$	8.99
May 13, 2024	March 31, 2024	209,715	$	8.99
May 29, 2024	May 28, 2024	424,861	$	8.99
June 26, 2024	June 25, 2024	425,419	$	9.00
July 31, 2024	July 30, 2024	417,972	$	8.91
August 13, 2024	June 30, 2024	139,068	$	8.90
August 28, 2024	August 27, 2024	421,784	$	8.91
September 25, 2024	September 24, 2024	414,999	$	8.85
October 30, 2024	October 29, 2024	410,454	$	8.84
November 12, 2024	September 30, 2024	135,993	$	8.84
November 27, 2024	November 26, 2024	413,780	$	8.82
December 26, 2024	December 24, 2024	402,741	$	8.80
January 29, 2025	January 28, 2025	404,165	$	8.79
February 13, 2025	December 31, 2024	133,727	$	8.80
February 26, 2025	February 25, 2025	407,046	$	8.78
March 26, 2025	March 25, 2025	394,211	$	8.75
April 30, 2025	April 29, 2025	400,981	$	8.63
May 13, 2025	March 31, 2025	65,631	$	8.72


Date of Issuance	Record Date	Number of Shares	Purchase Price per Share

May 28, 2025	May 27, 2025	402,219	$	8.62
June 25, 2025	June 24, 2025	383,563	$	8.61
July 30, 2025	July 29, 2025	385,457	$	8.57
August 27, 2025	August 26, 2025	388,223	$	8.55
September 25, 2025	September 24, 2025	378,020	$	8.45
October 29, 2025	October 28, 2025	383,524	$	8.35
November 26, 2025	November 25, 2025	343,590	$	8.31
December 31, 2025	December 30, 2025	346,364	$	8.27

Distributions

Our Board has authorized and declared monthly and/or quarterly distribution amounts per share of common stock, in each case payable monthly and/or quarterly in arrears. The following table presents cash distributions per share that were declared for the following period:

For the Year Ended December 31, 2025

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Dividend

Distribution Per Share(1)

Distribution Amount

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

November 8, 2024

January 28, 2025

January 29, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,664

February 18, 2025

February 25, 2025

February 26, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,696

February 18, 2025

March 25, 2025

March 26, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,720

February 18, 2025

March 31, 2025

May 13, 2025

Quarterly

0.0100

1,249

February 18, 2025

April 29, 2025

April 30, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,492

May 6, 2025

May 27, 2025

May 28, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,520

May 6, 2025

June 24, 2025

June 25, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,542

May 6, 2025

July 29, 2025

July 30, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,192

August 5, 2025

August 26, 2025

August 27, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,215

August 5, 2025

September 24, 2025

September 25, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,238

August 5, 2025

October 28, 2025

October 29, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

6,832

November 4, 2025

November 25, 2025

November 26, 2025

Monthly

0.0533

6,090

November 4, 2025

December 30, 2025

December 31, 2025

Monthly

0.0533

6,108

Total

0.7166

87,558

_______________

(1)Totals presented may not sum due to rounding.

During certain periods, our distributions may exceed our earnings. As a result, it is possible that a portion of the distributions we make may represent a return of capital. A return of capital generally is a return of a shareholder’s investment rather than a return of earnings or gains derived from our investment activities. Each year a statement on Form 1099-DIV identifying the tax character of the

distributions will be mailed to our shareholders. The tax character of the distributions are not determined until the Company’s taxable year end.

The following table presents cash distributions per share that were declared for the following period:

For the Year Ended December 31, 2024

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Dividend

Distribution Per Share

Distribution Amount

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

December 21, 2023

January 30, 2024

January 31, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,433

December 21, 2023

February 27, 2024

February 28, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,459

December 21, 2023

March 26, 2024

March 27, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,485

February 21, 2024

March 31, 2024

May 13, 2024

Quarterly

0.03

4,054

February 21, 2024

April 30, 2024

May 1, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,106

May 7, 2024

May 28, 2024

May 29, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,145

May 7, 2024

June 25, 2024

June 26, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,171

May 7, 2024

June 30, 2024

August 13, 2024

Quarterly

0.02

2,663

May 7, 2024

July 30, 2024

July 31, 2024

Monthly

0.06

7,987

August 6, 2024

August 27, 2024

August 28, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,021

August 6, 2024

September 24, 2024

September 25, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,046

August 6, 2024

September 30, 2024

November 12, 2024

Quarterly

0.02

2,615

August 6, 2024

October 29, 2024

October 30, 2024

Monthly

0.06

7,844

November 8, 2024

November 26, 2024

November 27, 2024

Monthly

0.06

7,876

November 8, 2024

December 24, 2024

December 26, 2024

Monthly

0.06

7,901

November 8, 2024

December 31, 2024

February 14, 2025

Quarterly

0.02

2,555

Total

0.81

109,361

We may fund our cash distributions to shareholders from any source of funds available to us, including but not limited to offering proceeds, net investment income from operations, capital gains proceeds from the sale of assets, dividends or other distributions paid to us on account of preferred and common equity investments in portfolio companies and, prior to November 7, 2023, expense support from the Adviser. In no event, however, will funds be advanced or borrowed for purpose of distributions, if the amount of such distributions would exceed our accrued and received net revenues for the previous four quarters, less paid and accrued operating expenses with respect to such revenues and costs.

Through November 7, 2023, the termination date of the Expense Support Agreement by the Adviser, a portion of our distributions resulted from expense support from the Adviser which were subject to repayment by us within three years from the date of payment. The purpose of this arrangement was to avoid distributions being characterized as a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Shareholders should understand that any such distributions were not based on our investment performance and can only be sustained if we achieve positive investment performance in future periods and/or the Adviser provides expense support. Shareholders should also understand that our future repayments of expense support will reduce the distributions that they would otherwise receive. There can be no assurance that we will achieve the performance necessary to sustain these distributions or be able to pay distributions at all.

Sources of distributions, other than net investment income and realized gains on a U.S. GAAP basis, include required adjustments to U.S. GAAP net investment income in the current period to determine taxable income available for distributions. The tables below reflect the sources of cash distributions on a U.S. GAAP basis that we have declared on our shares of common stock during the following periods:


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2025
Source of Distribution	Per Share		Amount		Percentage
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net investment income	$	0.61	$	73,991	84.5	%
Net realized gain on investments	—		—		—
Excess (undistributed)	0.11		13,567		15.5
Total	$	0.72	$	87,558	100.0	%


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2024
Source of Distribution	Per Share		Amount		Percentage
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net investment income	$	0.80	$	108,469	99.2	%
Net realized gain on investments	—		—		—
Excess (undistributed)	0.01		892		0.8
Total	$	0.81	$	109,361	100.0	%

Share Repurchases

Prior to the third quarter of 2025, we offered, on a quarterly basis, to repurchase shares of our common stock on such terms as may be determined by our Board in its complete discretion. The Board has complete discretion to determine whether we will engage in any share repurchase, and if so, the terms of such repurchase. At the discretion of our Board, we may use cash on hand, cash available from borrowings, and cash from the sale of our investments as of the end of the applicable period to repurchase shares.

All shares purchased by us pursuant to the terms of each offer to repurchase will be retired and thereafter will be authorized and unissued shares.

Any periodic repurchase offers are subject in part to our available cash and compliance with the BDC and RIC qualification and diversification rules promulgated under the 1940 Act and the Code, respectively.


Offer Date	Tender Offer Expiration	Tender Offer		Purchase Price per Share	Shares Repurchased
($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)




















February 27, 2024	March 25, 2024	$	60,509	$9.01	6,715,753
May 24, 2024	June 24, 2024	31,358		9.00	3,484,167
August 26, 2024	September 23, 2024	33,505		8.85	3,785,909
November 25, 2024	December 23, 2024	38,391		8.80	4,362,658
February 19, 2025	March 24, 2025	36,805		8.75	4,206,258
May 16, 2025	June 27, 2025	53,838		8.61	6,252,963
August 18, 2025	September 25, 2025	60,324		8.45	7,138,809

Total Return Since Inception

Cumulative total return for the period April 4, 2017 to December 31, 2025 was 79.6% (without upfront sales load) and 70.6% (with maximum upfront sales load). The following table presents cumulative total returns for the year ended December 31, 2025, rolling 1-year, 3-year and 5-year periods and since inception.

Shareholder Returns (Without Sales Charge)

Shareholder Returns (With Maximum Sales Charge)

Annualized Total Return

YTD

1-Year

3-Year(3)

5-Year(3)

Since Inception(3)

Cumulative Total Return Since Inception(3)

Total Shareholder Returns(1)(2)

2.1%

2.2%

4.9%

7.7%

9.1%

79.6%

70.6%

_______________

(1)Compounded monthly.

(2)Unless otherwise indicated, total return is calculated as the change in net asset value (“NAV”) per share (assuming dividends and distributions, if any, are reinvested in accordance with the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan), if any, divided by the beginning NAV per share.

(3)For the purposes of calculating total return for periods starting prior to the termination of our continuous public offering on April 30, 2021, beginning NAV is equal to the net offering price in effect at that time.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Returns reflect reinvestment of distributions and the deduction of ongoing expenses that are borne by investors, such as management fees, incentive fees, interest expense, offering costs, professional fees, director fees and other general and administrative expenses. An investment in the Company is subject to a maximum upfront sales load of 5% of the offering price, which will reduce the amount of capital available for investment. Operating expenses may vary in the future based on the unpredictable variables.

Debt

Aggregate Borrowings

Our debt obligations consisted of the below as of the following periods(2):


	As of December 31, 2025
($ in thousands)	Aggregate Principal Committed		Outstanding Principal		Amount Available(1)		Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs		Net Carrying Value
Revolving Credit Facility(2)	$	225,000	$	11,598	$	213,402	$	(2,314)	$	9,284
SPV Asset Facility I	375,000		315,000		59,265		(3,327)		311,673


2026 Notes	350,000		350,000		—		(2,150)		347,850
Total Debt	$	950,000	$	676,598	$	272,667	$	(7,791)	$	668,807

_______________

(1)The amount available reflects any limitations related to each credit facility’s borrowing base.

(2)Net carrying value includes the unrealized translation gain (loss) on borrowings denominated in foreign currencies.


	As of December 31, 2024
($ in thousands)	Aggregate Principal Committed		Outstanding Principal		Amount Available		Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs		Net Carrying Value
Revolving Credit Facility(1)	$	250,000	$	50,443	$	199,555	$	(3,074)	$	47,369
SPV Asset Facility I	375,000		195,000		14,286		(2,936)		192,064
CLO XIII	260,000		260,000		—		(2,095)		257,905

2026 Notes	350,000		350,000		—		(4,444)		345,556
Total Debt	$	1,235,000	$	855,443	$	213,841	$	(12,549)	$	842,894

_______________

(1)Net carrying value includes the unrealized translation gain (loss) on borrowings denominated in foreign currencies.

(2)Refer to “Note 5 — Debt” to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for more information on our present debt obligations.

For the following periods, the components of interest expense were as follows:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2025			2024
Interest expense		$	61,966		$	74,699
Amortization of debt issuance costs		6,128			8,161
Total Interest Expense		$	68,094		$	82,860
Average interest rate(1)		7.9		%	8.3		%	(1)
Average daily borrowings		$	788,032		$	897,457

_______________

(1)Includes the impact of fees on undrawn portions on our credit facilities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Portfolio Company Commitments

From time to time, we may enter into commitments to fund investments in the form of revolving credit, delayed draw, or equity commitments, which require us to provide funding when requested by portfolio companies in accordance with underlying loan agreements. We had the following outstanding commitments as of the following periods:


($ in thousands)	As of December 31, 2025		As of December 31, 2024

Total net unfunded revolving loan commitments	$	88,831	$	99,069
Total net unfunded delayed draw loan commitments	52,975		77,698
Total unfunded specialty finance debt commitments	—		—
Total net unfunded revolving and delayed draw loan commitments	$	141,806	$	176,767

Total unfunded specialty finance equity commitments	$	6,124	$	4,996
Total unfunded equity commitments	545		—
	6,669		4,996
Total Unfunded Commitments	$	148,475	$	181,763

We seek to carefully consider our unfunded portfolio company commitments for the purpose of planning our ongoing financial leverage. Further, we consider any outstanding unfunded portfolio company commitments we are required to fund within the 200% asset coverage limitation. As of December 31, 2025, we believe we had adequate financial resources to satisfy the unfunded portfolio company commitments.

Organizational and Offering Costs

The Adviser has incurred organization and offering costs on behalf of us in the amount of $12.4 million for the period from October 15, 2015 (Inception), of which $12.4 million have been charged to us pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement and Administration Agreement, the Adviser is entitled to receive up to 1.5% of gross offering proceeds raised in our continuous public offering until all organization and offering costs paid by the Adviser have been recovered. We terminated our continuous public offering as of April 30, 2021.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, we may become a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business. As of December 31, 2025, we were not aware of any material pending or threatened litigation that would require accounting recognition or financial statement disclosure.

Contractual Obligations

The table below presents a summary of our contractual payment obligations under our credit facilities and notes as of December 31, 2025:


	Payments Due by Period
($ in thousands)	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		After 5 years
Revolving Credit Facility	$	11,598	$	—	$	—	$	11,598	$	—
SPV Asset Facility I	315,000		—		—		315,000		—



2026 Notes	350,000		350,000		—		—		—
Total Contractual Obligations	$	676,598	$	350,000	$	—	$	326,598	$	—

Related Party Transactions

We have entered into a number of business relationships with affiliated or related parties, including the following:

•the Investment Advisory Agreement;

•the Administration Agreement;

•the Expense Support Agreement; and

•the License Agreement.

In addition to the aforementioned agreements, we, our Adviser and certain of our Adviser’s affiliates have been granted exemptive relief by the SEC to permit us to co-invest with other funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. Additionally, we invest in Credit SLF, a controlled affiliated investment, as defined in the 1940 Act.

Refer to “Note 3 — Agreements and Related Party Transactions” to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for further details.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets, and any other parameters used in determining such estimates could cause actual results to differ. Our critical accounting policies should be read in connection with our risk factors as described in “ITEM 1A. - RISK FACTORS.”

Investments at Fair Value

Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds received (excluding prepayment fees, if any) and the amortized cost basis of the investment using the specific identification method without regard to unrealized gains or losses previously recognized, and include investments charged off during the period, net of recoveries. The net change in unrealized gains or losses primarily reflects the change in investment values, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized gains or losses with respect to investments realized during the period.

Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act establishes requirements for determining fair value in good faith for purposes of the 1940 Act. Pursuant to Rule 2a-5, the Board designated the Adviser as our valuation designee to perform fair value determinations relating to the value of assets held by us for which market quotations are not readily available.

Investments for which market quotations are readily available are typically valued at the average bid price of those market quotations. To validate market quotations, we utilize a number of factors to determine if the quotations are representative of fair value, including the source and number of the quotations. Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded or whose market prices are not readily available, as is the case for substantially all of our investments, are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by our Adviser, as the valuation designee, based on, among other things, the input of the independent third-party valuation firm(s) engaged at the direction of our Adviser.

As part of the valuation process, our Adviser, as the valuation designee, takes into account relevant factors in determining the fair value of our investments, including: the estimated enterprise value of a portfolio company (i.e., the total fair value of the portfolio company’s debt and equity), the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments based on its earnings and cash flow, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, a comparison of the portfolio company’s securities to any similar publicly traded securities, and overall changes in the interest rate environment and the credit markets that may affect the price at which similar investments may be made in the future. When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, the Board considers whether the pricing indicated by the external event corroborates its valuation.

Our Adviser, as the valuation designee, undertakes a multi-step valuation process, which includes, among other procedures, the following:

•With respect to investments for which market quotations are readily available, those investments will typically be valued at the average bid price of those market quotations;

•With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available, the valuation process begins with the independent valuation firm(s) providing a preliminary valuation of each investment to the Adviser’s valuation committee;

•Preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with the Adviser’s valuation committee;

•Our Adviser, as the valuation designee, reviews the recommended valuations and determines the fair value of each investment;

•Each quarter, our Adviser, as the valuation designee, provides the Audit Committee a summary or description of material fair value matters that occurred in the prior quarter and on an annual basis, our Adviser, as the valuation

designee, will provide the Audit Committee with a written assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of its fair value process; and

•The Audit Committee oversees the valuation designee and will report to the Board on any valuation matters requiring the Board’s attention.

We conduct this valuation process on a quarterly basis.

We apply Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”), as amended, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP and required disclosures of fair value measurements. ASC 820 determines fair value to be the price that would be received for an investment in a current sale, which assumes an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market (which may be a hypothetical market) that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact. In accordance with ASC 820, we consider its principal market to be the market that has the greatest volume and level of activity. ASC 820 specifies a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes and ranks the level of observability of inputs used in determination of fair value. In accordance with ASC 820, these levels are summarized below:

•Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access.

•Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

•Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which the transfer occurred. In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, we apply the valuation policy approved by our Board that is consistent with ASC 820. Consistent with the valuation policy, our Adviser, as the valuation designee, evaluates the source of the inputs, including any markets in which our investments are trading (or any markets in which securities with similar attributes are trading), in determining fair value. When an investment is valued based on prices provided by reputable dealers or pricing services (that is, broker quotes), our Adviser, as the valuation designee, subjects those prices to various criteria in making the determination as to whether a particular investment would qualify for treatment as a Level 2 or Level 3 investment. For example, our Adviser, as the valuation designee, or the independent valuation firm(s), review pricing support provided by dealers or pricing services in order to determine if observable market information is being used, versus unobservable inputs.

The Company applies the practical expedient provided by the ASC Topic 820 relating to investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). ASC Topic 820 permits an entity holding investments in certain entities that either are investment companies, or have attributes similar to an investment company, and calculate NAV per share or its equivalent for which the fair value is not readily determinable, to measure the fair value of such investments on the basis of that NAV per share, or its equivalent, without adjustment. Investments which are valued using NAV per share as a practical expedient are not categorized within the fair value hierarchy as per ASC Topic 820.

Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of such investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that may ultimately be realized. Further, such investments are generally less liquid than publicly traded securities and may be subject to contractual and other restrictions on resale. If we were required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, we could realize amounts that are different from the amounts presented and such differences could be material.

In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the unrealized gains or losses reflected herein.

Financial and Derivative Instruments

Rule 18f-4 requires BDCs that use derivatives to, among other things, comply with a value-at-risk leverage limit, adopt a derivatives risk management program, and implement certain testing and board reporting procedures. Rule 18f-4 exempts BDCs that qualify as “limited derivatives users” from the aforementioned requirements, provided that these BDCs adopt written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to manage the BDC’s derivatives risks and comply with certain recordkeeping requirements. Rule 18f-4 provides that a BDC may enter into an unfunded commitment agreement that is not a derivatives transaction, such as an agreement to provide financing to a portfolio company, if the BDC has, among other things, a reasonable belief, at the time it enters into such an agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all of its unfunded commitment agreements, in each case as it becomes due. Pursuant to Rule 18f-4, when we trade reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions, including certain tender option bonds, we need to aggregate the amount of any other senior securities representing indebtedness (e.g., bank borrowings, if applicable) when calculating our asset coverage ratio. The Company currently qualifies as a “limited derivatives user” and expects to continue to do so. The Company has adopted a derivatives policy and complies with the recordkeeping requirements of Rule 18f-4.

100

Interest and Dividend Income Recognition

Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion and amortization of discounts or premiums. Certain investments may have contractual PIK interest or dividends, the majority of which is structured at initial underwriting. PIK interest or dividends represent accrued interest or dividends that are added to the principal amount or liquidation amount of the investment on the respective interest or dividend payment dates rather than being paid in cash and generally becomes due at maturity or at the occurrence of a liquidation event. Discounts and premiums to par value on securities purchased are accreted or amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the respective security using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion or amortization of discounts or premiums, if any. Upon prepayment of a loan or debt security, any prepayment premiums, unamortized upfront loan origination fees and unamortized discounts are recorded as interest income in the current period.

Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected in full. Accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment regarding collectability. If at any point we believe PIK interest or dividends are not expected to be realized, the investment generating PIK interest or dividends will be placed on non-accrual status. When a PIK investment is placed on non-accrual status, the accrued, uncapitalized interest or dividends are generally reversed through interest income. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid current and, in management’s judgment, are likely to remain current. Management may make exceptions to this treatment and determine to not place a loan on non-accrual status if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection.

Dividend income on preferred equity securities is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are payable by the portfolio company and are expected to be collected. Dividend income on common equity securities is recorded on the record date for private portfolio companies or on the ex-dividend date for publicly-traded portfolio companies.

Distributions

We have elected to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and intend to qualify annually, as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code. To obtain and maintain our tax treatment as a RIC, we must timely distribute (or be deemed to distribute) in each taxable year to our shareholders at least the sum of :

•90% of our investment company taxable income (which is generally our ordinary income plus the excess of realized short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital losses), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid, for such taxable year; and

•90% of our net tax-exempt interest income (which is the excess of our gross tax exempt interest income over certain disallowed deductions) for such taxable year.

As a RIC, we (but not our shareholders) generally will not be subject to U.S. federal tax on investment company taxable income and net capital gains that we distribute to our shareholders.

We intend to distribute annually all or substantially all of such income. To the extent that we retain our net capital gains or any investment company taxable income, we generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at corporate rates. We can be expected to carry forward our net capital gains or any investment company taxable income in excess of current year dividend distributions and pay the U.S. federal excise tax as described below.

Amounts not distributed on a timely basis in accordance with a calendar year distribution requirement are subject to a nondeductible 4% U.S. federal excise tax payable by us. We may be subject to a nondeductible 4% U.S. federal excise tax if we do not distribute (or are treated as distributing) during each calendar year an amount at least equal to the sum of:

•98% of our net ordinary income excluding certain ordinary gains or losses for that calendar year;

•98.2% of our capital gain net income, adjusted for certain ordinary gains and losses, recognized for the twelve-month period ending on October 31 of that calendar year; and

•certain undistributed amounts from previous years in which we paid no U.S. federal income tax.

While we intend to distribute any income and capital gains in the manner necessary to minimize imposition of the 4% U.S. federal excise tax, sufficient amounts of our taxable income and capital gains may not be distributed and as a result, in such cases, the excise tax will be imposed. In such an event, we will be liable for this tax only on the amount by which we do not meet the foregoing distribution requirement.

We intend to pay monthly distributions to our shareholders out of assets legally available for distribution. All distributions will be paid at the discretion of our Board and will depend on our earnings, financial condition, maintenance of our tax treatment as a RIC, compliance with applicable BDC regulations and such other factors as our Board may deem relevant from time to time.

To the extent our current taxable earnings for a year fall below the total amount of our distributions for that year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a return of capital to our shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, the source of a

101

distribution to our shareholders may be the original capital invested by the shareholder rather than our income or gains. Shareholders should read written disclosure carefully and should not assume that the source of any distribution is our ordinary income or gains.

With respect to distributions, the Company has adopted an “opt-in” dividend reinvestment plan for common shareholders. However, on February 17, 2026, the Board determined to terminate the distribution reinvestment plan and as a result, commencing with distributions payable on or after March 18, 2026, all distributions will be paid in cash. See “Recent Developments — Termination of Dividend Reinvestment Plan.” With respect to distributions paid prior to March 18, 2026, each shareholder that has not “opted-in” to the dividend reinvestment plan will have their dividends or distributions automatically received in cash rather than reinvested in additional shares of our common stock. Shareholders who receive distributions in the form of shares of common stock will be subject to the same U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences as if they received cash distributions.

Income Taxes

We have elected to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. We have also elected to be treated as a RIC under the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2017 and intend to continue to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC. So long as we maintain our tax treatment as a RIC, we generally will not pay U.S. federal income taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute at least annually to our shareholders as distributions. Rather, any tax liability related to income earned and distributed by us represents obligations of our investors and will not be reflected in our consolidated financial statements. However, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates on any income, including capital gains, not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our stockholders.

To qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. In addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment, we generally must distribute to our shareholders, for each taxable year, at least (i) 90% of our “investment company taxable income” for that year, which is generally our net ordinary income plus the excess, if any. of our realized net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term capital losses and (ii) our net tax-exempt income. In addition, a RIC may, in certain cases, satisfy this distribution requirement by distributing dividends relating to a taxable year after the close of such taxable year under the “spillover dividend” provisions of Subchapter M. In order for us to not be subject to U.S. federal excise taxes, we must distribute annually an amount at least equal to the sum of (i) 98% of our net ordinary income (taking into account certain deferrals and elections) for the calendar year, (ii) 98.2% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year and (iii) certain undistributed amounts from previous years on which we paid no U.S. federal income tax. We, at our discretion, may carry forward taxable income in excess of calendar year dividends and pay a 4% nondeductible U.S. excise tax on this income.

Certain of our consolidated subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes imposed at corporate rates.

We evaluate tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing our consolidated financial statements to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the “more-likely-than-not” threshold are reserved and recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. All penalties and interest associated with income taxes are included in income tax expense. Conclusions regarding tax positions are subject to review and may be adjusted at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, on-going analyses of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. There were no material uncertain tax positions through December 31, 2025. As applicable, our prior three tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities.

Recent Developments

Dividends

On February 18, 2026, our Board approved regular monthly distributions (“Regular Distributions”) for February 2026 through March 2026. The regular monthly cash distributions, each in the gross amount of $0.0533 per share, will be payable monthly to shareholders of record as of the monthly record date.

Amendment to Revolving Credit Facility

On February 17, 2026, we entered into an Omnibus Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement and Guarantee and Security Agreement in order to (i) reduce the maximum commitment of the Revolving Credit Facility from $225.0 million to $75.0 million, (ii) shorten the revolver availability period from January 2028 to October 2027, (iii) increase the unused fee from 0.375% to 0.50%-0.65%, (iv) increase the applicable margin from (a) with respect to any ABR Loan, 1.00% to 1.50% per annum, (b) with respect to any term benchmark loan, 2.00% to 2.50% per annum, and (c) with respect to any RFR Loan, 2.00% to 2.50% per annum, (v) expand the ability to make restricted payments, subject to certain conditions, and (vi) reduce the minimum shareholders’ equity test.

Asset Sale

On February 18, 2026, we entered into six separately negotiated loan sale agreements (collectively, the “Loan Sale Agreements”) relating to the disposition of a portion of our portfolio company investments (each, a “Subject Portfolio” and collectively, the “Subject Portfolios”).

102

Pursuant to the Loan Sale Agreements:

•each of Loantaka LLC, Lavalette LLC and Hopatcong LLC, Delaware limited liability companies ( “Purchaser 1,” “Purchaser 2” and “Purchaser 3,” respectively), agreed to purchase a Subject Portfolio comprised of total debt investment commitments of $151.2 million;

•Chestnut Diversified Lending (CP) III LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Purchaser 4”), agreed to purchase a Subject Portfolio comprised of total debt investment commitments of $151.2 million;

•Ovington Diversified Lending (OM) I LP, a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (“Purchaser 5”), agreed to purchase a Subject Portfolio comprised of total debt investment commitments of $149.9 million; and

•Broome Diversified Lending (B) LP, a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (“Purchaser 6” and, together with Purchaser 1, Purchaser 2, Purchaser 3, Purchaser 4 and Purchaser 5, the “Purchasers” and each a “Purchaser”), agreed to purchase a Subject Portfolio comprised of total debt investment commitments of $147.6 million.

The Subject Portfolios represent $600.0 million in aggregate total debt investment commitments. Excluding unfunded commitments, the aggregate fair value of the Subject Portfolios as of February 12, 2026 (the “Subject Portfolio Valuation Date”) was $538.3 million equivalent to 99.8% of par value. The settlement of the sales contemplated by the Loan Purchase Agreements is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2026.

Each Purchaser is a financing vehicle or fund owned by a leading public pension or insurance investor (each, an “Institutional Investor”). Some of the Institutional Investors are investors in funds managed by affiliates of the Adviser; however, each Institutional Investor made its own independent investment decision in connection with its purchase of a Subject Portfolio. Additionally, certain affiliates of the Adviser have agreed to provide the Purchasers or their parent entities with non-discretionary advisory services in connection with the Subject Portfolios.

Each Loan Sale Agreement provides that each Purchaser will purchase the relevant Subject Portfolio for a purchase price equal to its fair value as of the Subject Portfolio Valuation Date adjusted for certain interest activity consistent with market standards. The fair value of each portfolio company investment included in the Subject Portfolios was determined on the Subject Portfolio Valuation Date in accordance with our standard valuation process, in accordance with Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act, which establishes requirements for determining fair value in good faith for purposes of the 1940 Act. We and the Board received a fairness opinion with respect to the sale of the Subject Portfolios.

The Subject Portfolios represent 33.8% of our total investment commitments, including unfunded commitments, as of December 31, 2025. The Subject Portfolios consist of 92.0% first-lien investments, 4.5% second-lien investments and 3.5% unsecured investments, and include investments in 96 portfolio companies across 25 industries. 98.2% of investments in the Subject Portfolios are floating rate and 100.0% of investments in the Subject Portfolios are 1- or 2- rated on our 5-point internal investment ratings scale. The Subject Portfolios have an average investment size of $5.6 million and a weighted average spread of 5.5% and consist of partial sales, representing approximately 59% of our investments in each underlying portfolio company as of December 31, 2025.

We intend to use the proceeds from the Loan Sale Agreements to (i) repay amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Agreement; (ii) repay amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) between ORCC II Financing LLC, our wholly owned subsidiary, as borrower and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as administration agent, and (iii) make a special cash distribution to shareholders. As of the February 18, 2026, approximately $11.8 million was outstanding under the Revolving Credit Agreement and such amounts bear interest at 2.50%. As of February 18, 2026, approximately $275.0 million was outstanding under the Credit Agreement and such amounts bear interest at 2.05%.

Concurrent with our entry into the Loan Sale Agreements, OBDC and OTIC also entered into loan sale agreements with each Purchaser pursuant to which they each sold a portion of their portfolio company investments.

As of the Subject Portfolio Valuation Date, the aggregate investment commitments to be sold to the Purchasers from us, OBDC and OTIC was $1.4 billion.

Termination of Dividend Reinvestment Plan

On February 17, 2026, the Board also determined to terminate our dividend reinvestment plan. As a result, the Regular Distribution payable in March 2026 will be payable only in cash and, subject to Board approval, all future distributions are expected to be paid in cash.

Return of Capital Distribution

On March 5, 2026, the “Board declared a special cash return of capital distribution to shareholders of $2.50 per share, reflecting approximately 30% of our NAV as of December 31, 2025, payable on or before March 31, 2026 to shareholders of record as of March 24, 2026.

103

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are subject to financial market risks, including valuation risk, interest rate risk, currency risk, credit risk and inflation risk. Uncertainty with respect to the imposition of tariffs on and trade disputes with certain countries, the fluctuations in global interest rates, a prolonged government shutdown, the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, continued political unrest in various countries such as Venezuela, the conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa regions, and concerns over future increases in inflation or adverse investor sentiment generally, introduced significant volatility in the financial markets, and the effects of this volatility has materially impacted and could continue to materially impact our market risks, including those listed below.

Valuation Risk

We have invested, and plan to continue to invest, primarily in illiquid debt and equity securities of private companies. Most of our investments will not have a readily available market price, and we value these investments at fair value as determined in good faith by our Adviser, as our valuation designee, based on, among other things, the input of independent third-party valuation firm(s) engaged at the direction of our Adviser, as our valuation designee, and in accordance with our valuation policy. There is no single standard for determining fair value. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments we make. If we were required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, we may realize amounts that are different from the amounts presented and such differences could be material. The independent third-party valuation firm(s) engaged at the discretion of the Adviser and its affiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in a variety of activities and from time to time we may receive or provide additional services to or from such independent third-party valuation firm(s).

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate sensitivity refers to the change in earnings that may result from changes in the level of interest rates. We intend to fund portions of our investments with borrowings, and at such time, our net investment income will be affected by the difference between the rate at which we invest and the rate at which we borrow. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income.

In a low interest rate environment, the difference between the total interest income earned on interest earning assets and the total interest expense incurred on interest bearing liabilities may be compressed, reducing our net income and potentially adversely affecting our operating results. Conversely, in a rising interest rate environment, such difference could potentially increase thereby increasing our net income as indicated per the table below.

As of December 31, 2025, 97.0% of our debt investments based on fair value in our portfolio were at floating rates. Additionally, the weighted average SOFR floor, based on fair value, of our debt investments was 0.8%. The Revolving Credit Facility and SPV Asset Facility bear interest at variable rates with interest floors of 0.0%. The 2026 Notes bear interest at a fixed rate.

Based on our Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2025, the following table shows the annualized impact on net income of hypothetical base rate changes in interest rates on our debt investments (considering interest rate floors for floating rate instruments) assuming each floating rate investment is subject to 3 month reference rate election and there are no changes in our investment and borrowing structure.


($ in millions)	Interest Income		Interest Expense		Net Income(1)
Up 300 basis points	$	41.3	$	(9.8)	$	31.5
Up 200 basis points	27.5		(6.5)		21.0
Up 100 basis points	13.8		(3.3)		10.5
Down 100 basis points	(13.8)		3.3		(10.5)
Down 200 basis points	(27.5)		6.5		(21.0)
Down 300 basis points	(38.3)		9.8		(28.5)

_______________

(1)Excludes the impact of income based fees. See “Note 3 — Agreements and Related Party Transactions” to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for further details for more information on the income based fees.

We may hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using hedging instruments such as additional interest rate swaps, futures, options, and forward contracts. While hedging activities may mitigate our exposure to adverse fluctuations in interest rates, certain hedging transactions, such as interest rate swap agreements, may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates.

104

Currency Risk

From time to time, we may make investments that are denominated in a foreign currency, borrow in certain foreign currencies under our credit facilities or issue notes in certain foreign currencies. These investments, borrowings and issuances are translated into U.S. dollars at each balance sheet date, exposing us to movements in foreign exchange rates. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we cannot assure you that such strategies will be effective or without risk to us. We may utilize instruments such as, but not limited to, forward contracts or cross currency swaps to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates. Instead of entering into a foreign currency forward contract in connection with loans or other investments denominated in a foreign currency, we may borrow in that currency to establish a natural hedge against our loan, issuance or investment. To the extent the loan, issuance or investment is based on a floating rate other than a rate under which we can borrow under our credit facilities, we may utilize interest rate derivatives to hedge our exposure to changes in the associated rate.

Credit Risk

We generally endeavor to minimize our risk of exposure by limiting to reputable financial institutions the counterparties with which we enter into financial transactions. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we held the majority of our cash balances with a single highly rated money center bank and such balances are in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. We seek to mitigate this exposure by monitoring the credit standing of these financial institutions.

Inflation Risk

Inflation is likely to continue in the near to medium-term, particularly in the United States, with the possibility that monetary policy may continue to tighten in response. Persistent inflationary pressures could affect our portfolio companies’ profit margins.

105

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG, New York, New York, PCAOB ID 185)			F-2

Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 202 5 and 202 4			F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 202 5 , 202 4 and 202 3			F-3

Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of December 31, 202 5 and 202 4			F-4

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the Years Ended December 31, 202 5 , 202 4 and 202 3			F-41

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 202 5 , 202 4 and 202 3			F-42

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			F-43

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities of Blue Owl Capital Corporation II and subsidiaries (the Company), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, by correspondence with the custodian, broker, agent banks, or portfolio companies; when replies were not received, we performed other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Assessment of Fair Value of Investments

As discussed in Notes 2 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company determines fair value for investments that are not publicly traded or for which there is no readily determinable market value by using unobservable inputs and assumptions. As of December 31, 2025, the fair value of such investments (“Level 3 investments”) was $1.5 billion.

We identified the assessment of the fair value measurement of substantially all of the Level 3 investments as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate these fair value measurements as they involved a high degree of measurement uncertainty. Specifically, the assessment of these fair value measurements encompassed the evaluation of assumptions related to market yields for similar investments and risk profiles used in yield analyses for debt and other interest-bearing investments and comparable financial performance multiples used in determining enterprise values for equity investments.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design of certain internal controls related to the fair value measurement process, including controls related to the development of the market yields and financial performance multiples assumptions used in the Company’s fair value measurements. We evaluated

the Company’s ability to estimate fair value by comparing a selection of prior period fair values to the prices of transactions occurring subsequent to the prior period fair value measurement date. We evaluated the Company’s market yields used to measure the fair value of its Level 3 investments by comparing such yields for a selection of investments to third-party market and industry data. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in evaluating the reasonableness of the fair value measurement for a selection of Level 3 investments by:

•developing an independent estimate of the fair value using independent market yields and financial performance multiples that were developed using relevant market and portfolio company financial information

•comparing the results of our independent estimate of fair value to the Company’s fair value measurement.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.

New York, New York

March 5, 2026

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	As of December 31, 2025		As of December 31, 2024
Assets
Investments at fair value:
Non-controlled, non-affiliated investments (amortized cost of $1,559,834 and $1,896,092 respectively)	$	1,538,232	$	1,898,336
Non-controlled, affiliated investments (amortized cost of $44,239 and $41,914, respectively)	37,981		36,865
Controlled, affiliated investments (amortized cost of $334 and $190, respectively)	337		191
Total investments at fair value (amortized cost of $1,604,407 and $1,938,196, respectively)	1,576,550		1,935,392
Cash	55,380		49,440

Foreign cash (cost of $3,923 and $1,477, respectively)	3,982		1,451
Interest and dividend receivable	11,866		16,644


Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,057		914
Total Assets	$	1,648,835	$	2,003,841
Liabilities
Debt (net of deferred unamortized debt issuance costs of $7,791 and $12,549, respectively)	$	668,807	$	842,894
Payables to affiliates	12,183		14,993
Distribution payable	—		2,555
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	17,455		19,850
Total Liabilities	698,445		880,292
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Net Assets
Common shares $0.01 par value, 450,000,000 shares authorized; 114,946,017 and 127,727,326 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	1,149		1,277
Additional paid-in-capital	1,021,360		1,138,120
Accumulated undistributed (overdistributed) earnings	(72,119)		(15,848)
Total Net Assets	950,390		1,123,549
Total Liabilities and Net Assets	$	1,648,835	$	2,003,841
Net Asset Value Per Share	$	8.27	$	8.80

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	For the Year Ended December 31,
		2025		2024		2023
Investment Income
Investment income from non-controlled, non-affiliated investments:
Interest income		$	162,005	$	206,655	$	226,198
Payment-in-kind interest income		14,297		27,975		26,864
Dividend income		14,464		16,668		15,933
Other income		2,395		3,944		2,121
Total investment income from non-controlled, non-affiliated investments		193,161		255,242		271,116
Investment income from non-controlled, affiliated investments:
Interest income		1,613		1,260		1,096
Dividend income		1,102		303		441
Other Income		12		77		110
Total investment income from non-controlled, affiliated investments		2,727		1,640		1,647
Investment income from controlled, affiliated investments:

Dividend income		27		5		—

Total investment income from controlled, affiliated investments		27		5		—
Total Investment Income		195,915		256,887		272,763
Operating Expenses

Interest expense		68,094		82,860		67,249
Management fees, net(1)		26,917		30,817		32,775
Performance based incentive fees		15,472		23,006		28,018
Professional fees		5,210		3,888		5,482
Directors' fees		785		785		780
Other general and administrative		4,142		4,288		3,555
Total Operating Expenses		120,620		145,644		137,859

Recoupment of expense support (Note 3)		—		—		11,651
Net Operating Expenses		120,620		145,644		149,510
Net Investment Income (Loss) Before Taxes		75,295		111,243		123,253
Income tax expense (benefit), including excise tax expense (benefit)		1,304		2,774		2,821
Net Investment Income (Loss)		$	73,991	$	108,469	$	120,432
Net Realized and Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Net change in unrealized gain (loss):
Non-controlled, non-affiliated investments		$	(26,544)	$	(6,356)	$	20,022
Non-controlled, affiliated investments		(1,211)		(7,040)		(4,216)
Controlled, affiliated investments		2		1		—
Income tax (provision) benefit		(70)		8		(1,539)
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies		1,642		1,629		2,822
Total Net Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss)		(26,181)		(11,758)		17,089
Net realized gain (loss):
Non-controlled, non-affiliated investments		$	(24,126)	$	(11,842)	$	(7,718)

Foreign currency transactions		386		(2,905)		(10)
Total Net Realized Gain (Loss)		(23,740)		(14,747)		(7,728)
Total Net Realized and Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss)		(49,921)		(26,505)		9,361
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations		$	24,070	$	81,964	$	129,793
Earnings Per Share - Basic and Diluted		$	0.20	$	0.61	$	0.90
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding - Basic and Diluted		121,691,441		135,104,584		144,043,515

_______________

(1) Refer to “Note 3 — Agreements and Related Party Transactions” for additional details on management fee waiver.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(2)(27)		Fair Value		% of Net Assets

Non-controlled/non-affiliated portfolio company investments
Debt Investments(7)
Advertising and media
Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc.(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		2/2031	$	19,341	$	19,220	$	19,341
								19,220		19,341		2.0	%
Aerospace and defense
Peraton Corp.(3)(9)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	7.75%		2/2029	14,494		14,388		11,351
STS PARENT, LLC (dba STS Aviation Group)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		10/2031	7,503		7,468		7,428
STS PARENT, LLC (dba STS Aviation Group)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.00%		10/2030	599		594		590
								22,450		19,369		2.0	%
Asset based lending and fund finance
AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC(3)(4)(6)(31)	Specialty finance debt investment	N/A		12.00%	7/2030	3,263		3,260		3,263
AAM Series 2.1 Aviation Feeder, LLC(3)(4)(6)(31)	Specialty finance debt investment	N/A		12.00%	11/2030	4,228		4,223		4,228
Hg Genesis 8 Sumoco Limited(3)(4)(19)(31)	Unsecured facility	SA+		7.50%	9/2027	£	1,135	1,432		1,526
Hg Genesis 9 SumoCo Limited(3)(4)(14)(31)	Unsecured facility	E+		6.25%	3/2029	€	1,128	1,200		1,325
Hg Saturn Luchaco Limited(3)(4)(19)(31)	Unsecured facility	SA+		8.25%	3/2027	£	9,162	11,687		12,323
								21,802		22,665		2.4	%



Buildings and real estate
Associations Finance, Inc.(3)(4)(6)	Unsecured notes	N/A		14.25%	5/2030	21,456		21,350		21,456
Associations, Inc.(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%		7/2028	47,211		47,173		47,211
Wrench Group LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		9/2032	11,049		10,985		10,994
Wrench Group LLC(3)(4)(12)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	P+	3.75%		9/2031	281		273		274
								79,781		79,935		8.4	%
Business services
DuraServ LLC(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		6/2031	8,702		8,662		8,616
DuraServ LLC(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	4.75%		6/2030	159		154		147
Gainsight, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		7/2027	6,788		6,759		6,788
Hercules Borrower, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		12/2028	13,785		13,748		13,785
Hercules Buyer, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)(3)(4)(6)(33)	Unsecured notes	N/A		0.48%	12/2029	836		836		1,207
KPSKY Acquisition, Inc. (dba BluSky)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		10/2028	957		949		869
KPSKY Acquisition, Inc. (dba BluSky)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.75%		10/2028	1		—		(4)



								31,108		31,408		3.3	%
Chemicals
Advancion Holdings, LLC (fka Aruba Investments Holdings, LLC)(3)(4)(8)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	7.75%		11/2028	22,500		22,348		20,081
DCG ACQUISITION CORP. (dba DuBois Chemical)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		6/2031	6,280		6,227		6,216
Gaylord Chemical Company, L.L.C.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		12/2027	24,178		24,147		24,117
Gaylord Chemical Company, L.L.C.(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.50%		12/2027	1,617		1,616		1,611
Rocket BidCo, Inc. (dba Recochem)(3)(4)(9)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		11/2030	22,073		21,718		22,073

								76,056		74,098		7.8	%

F-4

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(2)(27)	Fair Value	% of Net Assets
Consumer products
Conair Holdings LLC(3)(4)(8)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	7.50%		5/2029	31,280	31,014	14,076
Feradyne Outdoors, LLC(3)(4)(9)(28)(29)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		6.75%	5/2028	699	677	472
Foundation Consumer Brands, LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		2/2029	3,843	3,802	3,824
Lignetics Investment Corp.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		11/2027	12,210	12,191	12,179
SWK BUYER, Inc. (dba Stonewall Kitchen)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		3/2029	728	720	706
WU Holdco, Inc. (dba PurposeBuilt Brands)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		4/2032	11,228	11,201	11,228



							59,605	42,485	4.5	%
Containers and packaging
Arctic Holdco, LLC (dba Novvia Group)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		1/2032	3,788	3,782	3,788
Arctic Holdco, LLC (dba Novvia Group)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.25%		1/2031	49	48	49
Ascend Buyer, LLC (dba PPC Flexible Packaging)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		9/2028	791	787	791
Fortis Solutions Group, LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		10/2028	874	866	857
Fortis Solutions Group, LLC(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.30%		10/2027	26	26	24
Indigo Buyer, Inc. (dba Inovar Packaging Group)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		5/2028	1,164	1,158	1,164
Pregis Topco LLC(3)(4)(8)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	6.75%		8/2029	20,667	20,485	20,667
Pregis Topco LLC(3)(4)(8)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	7.75%		8/2029	9,333	9,238	9,333
							36,390	36,673	3.9	%
Distribution
ABB/Con-cise Optical Group LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.50%		2/2028	850	845	844
Endries Acquisition, Inc.(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		12/2028	23,832	23,719	23,474
Offen, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		7/2030	4,077	4,039	4,036

							28,603	28,354	3.0	%
Education
Pluralsight, LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	3.00%	1.50%	8/2029	3,985	3,985	3,906
Pluralsight, LLC(3)(4)(9)(28)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		7.50%	8/2029	4,573	4,439	3,739
Severin Acquisition, LLC (dba PowerSchool)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	2.50%	2.25%	10/2031	762	756	753
Severin Acquisition, LLC (dba PowerSchool)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	4.75%		10/2031	33	32	32
							9,212	8,430	0.9	%
Energy equipment and services
Dresser Utility Solutions, LLC(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		3/2029	10,129	10,056	10,129
							10,056	10,129	1.1	%
Financial services
Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		6/2031	10,649	10,517	10,649
CCM Midco, LLC (f/k/a Cresset Capital Management, LLC)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		6/2030	1,323	1,306	1,323
Continental Finance Company, LLC(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	8.00%		3/2029	875	868	868
Deerfield Dakota Holdings(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	3.00%	2.75%	9/2032	12,792	12,731	12,728
Finastra USA, Inc.(3)(4)(9)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.25%		9/2029	1,032	1,023	1,040
KRIV Acquisition Inc. (dba Riveron)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		7/2031	1,064	1,036	1,064

F-5

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(2)(27)	Fair Value	% of Net Assets
Minotaur Acquisition, Inc. (dba Inspira Financial)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		6/2030	31,129		30,850	31,129
ML Holdco, Inc. (dba Meridian Link)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		10/2032	1,389		1,382	1,382
NMI Acquisitionco, Inc. (dba Network Merchants)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		9/2028	4,705		4,704	4,705
Smarsh Inc.(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		2/2029	1,032		1,027	1,027
Wipfli Advisory LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		10/2032	2,846		2,839	2,838
								68,283	68,753	7.2	%
Food and beverage
Balrog Acquisition, Inc. (dba Bakemark)(3)(4)(8)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	7.00%		9/2029	5,000		4,977	4,025
BP Veraison Buyer, LLC (dba Sun World)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		5/2029	19,018		18,913	19,018
Eagle Family Foods Group LLC(3)(4)(10)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		8/2030	1,618		1,605	1,618
Fiesta Purchaser, Inc. (dba Shearer's Foods)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	2.75%		2/2029	129		114	128
Gehl Foods, LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		6.25%	6/2030	12,778		12,667	12,778
Hissho Parent, LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		5/2029	1,381		1,374	1,381
Innovation Ventures HoldCo, LLC (dba 5 Hour Energy)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.25%		3/2027	191		190	190
Rushmore Investment III LLC (dba Winland Foods)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		10/2030	44,882		44,525	44,882
Sara Lee Frozen Bakery, LLC (fka KSLB Holdings, LLC)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		7/2027	5,771		5,756	5,740
Vital Bidco AB (dba Vitamin Well)(3)(4)(8)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.25%		10/2031	4,736		4,679	4,736

								94,800	94,496	9.9	%
Healthcare equipment and services
Cambrex Corporation(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		3/2032	785		777	785
Creek Parent, Inc. (dba Catalent)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		12/2031	868		854	864
CSC MKG Topco LLC (dba Medical Knowledge Group)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		2/2029	824		815	824
Nelipak Holding Company(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		3/2031	4,127		4,074	4,061
Nelipak Holding Company(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.50%		3/2031	146		135	131
NELIPAK EUROPEAN HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A.(3)(4)(14)	First lien senior secured EUR term loan	E+	5.50%		3/2031	€	6,082	6,508	7,036
NELIPAK EUROPEAN HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A.(3)(4)(13)(22)	First lien senior secured EUR revolving loan	E+	5.50%		3/2031	€	39	37	38
Patriot Acquisition TopCo S.À R.L. (dba Corza Health, Inc.)(3)(4)(9)(22)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		1/2028	23,618		23,482	23,618
Rhea Parent, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		12/2030	789		786	781
TBRS, Inc. (dba TEAM Technologies)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		11/2031	795		791	791


								38,259	38,929	4.1	%
Healthcare providers and services
Allied Benefit Systems Intermediate LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		10/2030	2,949		2,949	2,934
Bristol Hospice L.L.C.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		08/2032	4,564		4,542	4,564
Commander Buyer, Inc. (dba CenExel)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		6/2032	6,445		6,412	6,445
EresearchTechnology, Inc. (dba Clario)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		1/2032	669		663	669
Ex Vivo Parent Inc. (dba OB Hospitalist)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		9.50%	9/2028	17,589		17,477	17,589
KABAFUSION Parent, LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		11/2031	1,389		1,376	1,389

F-6

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(2)(27)	Fair Value	% of Net Assets
KWOL Acquisition, Inc. (dba Worldwide Clinical Trials)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		12/2029	6,703		6,629	6,687
Maple Acquisition, LLC (dba Medicus)(3)(4)(10)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		5/2031	4,810		4,781	4,810
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)(3)(4)(9)(28)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		10.00%	4/2026	22,907		21,022	9,048
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)(3)(4)(9)(28)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+		10.00%	1/2026	1,174		1,159	1,174
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)(3)(4)(9)(28)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+		12.00%	4/2026	3,485		1,476	1,377
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)(3)(4)(9)(22)(28)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	9.00%		4/2026	1,700		1,619	661
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)(3)(4)(9)(28)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+		9.00%	4/2026	127		—	50
Natural Partners, LLC(3)(4)(9)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		11/2030	2,188		2,168	2,188
OB Hospitalist Group, Inc.(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		9/2027	20,666		20,503	20,666
Pacific BidCo Inc.(3)(4)(10)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		8/2029	2,030		2,004	2,024
PetVet Care Centers, LLC(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%		11/2030	14,977		14,862	13,479
PetVet Care Centers, LLC(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.00%		11/2029	209		196	—
Plasma Buyer LLC (dba PathGroup)(3)(4)(9)(28)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		5/2029	695		654	539
Plasma Buyer LLC (dba PathGroup)(3)(4)(9)(28)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	6.25%		5/2029	26		25	20
Plasma Buyer LLC (dba PathGroup)(3)(4)(9)(28)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.75%		5/2028	79		75	61
Premier Imaging, LLC (dba LucidHealth)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	3.74%	2.26%	3/2026	8,766		8,760	7,889
Premise Health Holding Corp.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		11/2032	7,946		7,926	7,867
Quva Pharma, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	2.75%	3.00%	4/2028	15,352		15,165	14,891
Quva Pharma, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	2.75%	3.00%	4/2026	1,179		1,162	1,144
Quva Pharma, Inc.(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.50%		4/2026	875		873	839
SimonMed, Inc.(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		2/2032	854		851	848
SimonMed, Inc.(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	4.55%		2/2031	44		43	43
Soleo Holdings, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		2/2032	737		733	737
Tivity Health, Inc.(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		6/2029	489		489	489
Unified Women's Healthcare, LP(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		6/2029	11,463		11,397	11,463
Unified Women's Healthcare, LP(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.00%		6/2029	4,482		4,459	4,482
Valeris, Inc. (fka Phantom Purchaser, Inc.)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		9/2031	1,755		1,741	1,755
Vermont Aus Pty Ltd(3)(4)(17)(31)	First lien senior secured AUD term loan	BBSY+	4.50%		3/2028	A$	1,284	848	856
								165,039	149,677	15.7	%
Healthcare technology
BCPE Osprey Buyer, Inc. (dba PartsSource)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		8/2028	579		575	574
BCPE Osprey Buyer, Inc. (dba PartsSource)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.75%		8/2028	281		278	278
BCPE Osprey Buyer, Inc. (dba PartsSource)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.75%		8/2026	43		43	43
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (& Smart Holdings Corp.) (dba Datavant)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		8/2031	8,898		8,855	8,898
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (& Smart Holdings Corp.) (dba Datavant)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		8/2031	1,234		1,228	1,228

F-7

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(2)(27)	Fair Value	% of Net Assets
GI Ranger Intermediate, LLC (dba Rectangle Health)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%		10/2028	889		881	862
GI Ranger Intermediate, LLC (dba Rectangle Health)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.00%		10/2027	10		9	8
Indikami Bidco, LLC (dba IntegriChain)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.00%	2.50%	12/2030	2,819		2,772	2,763
Indikami Bidco, LLC (dba IntegriChain)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	6.00%		12/2030	43		43	42
Indikami Bidco, LLC (dba IntegriChain)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.00%		6/2030	205		201	199
Inovalon Holdings, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	2.75%	2.75%	11/2028	18,205		18,182	17,841
Inovalon Holdings, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+		8.50%	11/2033	7,764		7,764	7,143
Intelerad Medical Systems Incorporated (fka 11849573 Canada Inc.)(3)(4)(9)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%		8/2026	40,787		40,717	40,787
Interoperability Bidco, Inc. (dba Lyniate)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		3/2028	14,580		14,551	14,502
Klick Inc.(3)(4)(8)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		11/2032	7,830		7,791	7,791
Modernizing Medicine, Inc. (dba ModMed)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	2.50%	2.25%	4/2032	772		765	768
RL Datix Holdings (USA), Inc.(3)(4)(10)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		4/2031	7,206		7,206	7,206
RL Datix Holdings (USA), Inc.(3)(4)(19)	First lien senior secured GBP term loan	SA+	5.00%		4/2031	£	3,337	4,503	4,488
Salinger Bidco Inc. (dba Surgical Information Systems)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		8/2031	5,086		5,021	5,086
Salinger Bidco Inc. (dba Surgical Information Systems)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.75%		5/2031	41		35	41
								121,420	120,548	12.7	%
Household products
HGH Purchaser, Inc. (dba Horizon Services)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	3.25%	3.75%	11/2028	35,653		35,481	32,890
HGH Purchaser, Inc. (dba Horizon Services)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.50%		11/2028	2,417		2,412	2,129
Mario Midco Holdings, Inc. (dba Len the Plumber)(3)(4)(9)	Unsecured facility	S+		10.75%	4/2032	254		250	241
Mario Purchaser, LLC (dba Len the Plumber)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		4/2029	793		785	763
Mario Purchaser, LLC (dba Len the Plumber)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.75%		4/2028	50		50	48

								38,978	36,071	3.8	%
Human resource support services
Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.(3)(4)(8)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%		10/2029	16,667		16,525	15,000
IG Investments Holdings, LLC (dba Insight Global)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		9/2028	9,011		9,011	9,011
								25,536	24,011	2.5	%
Infrastructure and environmental services
CHA Vision Holdings, Inc. (fka FR Vision Holdings, Inc.)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		1/2031	7,645		7,576	7,645
Tamarack Intermediate, L.L.C. (dba Verisk 3E)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		3/2029	861		853	861
VCI Asset Holdings 1 LLC(3)(4)(6)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	N/A	10.00%		11/2030	10,000		9,902	9,900



								18,331	18,406	1.9	%
Insurance
Brightway Holdings, LLC(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		12/2027	5,257		5,229	5,257
Brightway Holdings, LLC(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.75%		12/2027	1,792		1,781	1,792

F-8

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(2)(27)	Fair Value	% of Net Assets
Diamond Mezzanine 24 LLC (dba United Risk)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		10/2030	997	992	997
Evolution BuyerCo, Inc. (dba SIAA)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		4/2030	941	933	941
Galway Borrower LLC(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	4.50%		9/2028	351	349	351
Integrity Marketing Acquisition, LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		8/2028	4,453	4,435	4,453
KUSRP Intermediate, Inc. (dba U.S. Retirement and Benefits Partners)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		10.60%	7/2030	2,111	2,096	2,111
Norvax, LLC (dba GoHealth)(3)(4)(9)(28)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		11/2029	539	515	309
Norvax, LLC (dba GoHealth)(3)(4)(9)(28)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	4.50%	7.11%	8/2029	879	369	—
Simplicity Financial Marketing Group Holdings, Inc.(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		12/2031	800	792	800
THG Acquisition, LLC (dba Hilb)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		10/2031	5,021	4,972	4,978
USRP Holdings, Inc. (dba U.S. Retirement and Benefits Partners)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		12/2029	1,617	1,611	1,617


							24,074	23,606	2.5	%
Internet software and services
Anaplan, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		6/2029	3,431	3,431	3,431
Aptean Acquiror, Inc. (dba Aptean)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		1/2031	4,578	4,542	4,578
Aptean Acquiror, Inc. (dba Aptean)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	4.65%		1/2031	104	101	104
Artifact Bidco, Inc. (dba Avetta)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.15%		7/2031	1,550	1,543	1,550
Azurite Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (dba Alteryx, Inc.)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%		3/2031	2,137	2,112	2,137
Bayshore Intermediate #2, L.P. (dba Boomi)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	2.50%	3.00%	10/2028	4,940	4,940	4,940
Bayshore Intermediate #2, L.P. (dba Boomi)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.00%		10/2027	102	101	102
BCTO BSI Buyer, Inc. (dba Buildertrend)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%		12/2028	11,311	11,289	11,311
BCTO WIW Holdings, Inc. (dba When I Work)(3)(4)(6)	Senior convertible notes	N/A		5.50%	8/2030	203	201	201
By Light Professional IT Services LLC(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		7/2031	4,764	4,697	4,693
Catalis Intermediate, Inc. (fka GovBrands Intermediate, Inc.)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		8/2027	2,943	2,919	2,882
CivicPlus, LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	3.25%	2.75%	8/2030	3,267	3,252	3,267
CivicPlus, LLC(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.50%		8/2030	360	358	360
CP PIK DEBT ISSUER, LLC (dba CivicPlus, LLC)(3)(4)(10)	Unsecured notes	S+		11.75%	6/2034	394	391	394
Crewline Buyer, Inc. (dba New Relic)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.75%		11/2030	4,702	4,647	4,666
Delinea Buyer, Inc. (f/k/a Centrify)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%		3/2028	17,114	16,939	17,114
Denali Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (dba Dun & Bradstreet)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		8/2032	8,864	8,736	8,731
EET Buyer, Inc. (dba e-Emphasys)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		11/2027	875	872	875
Einstein Parent, Inc. (dba Smartsheet)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%		1/2031	906	898	899
Granicus, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	3.50%	2.00%	1/2031	3,972	3,942	3,972
Granicus, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	3.00%	2.00%	1/2031	588	584	587

F-9

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(2)(27)	Fair Value	% of Net Assets
H&F Opportunities LUX III S.À R.L (dba Checkmarx)(3)(4)(8)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%		4/2027	14,472	14,445	14,472
Hyland Software, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		9/2030	1,764	1,764	1,764
Litera Bidco LLC(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		5/2028	26,571	26,487	26,571
MINDBODY, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%		9/2027	10,945	10,915	10,945
Ministry Brands Holdings, LLC(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		12/2028	749	741	743
Ministry Brands Holdings, LLC(3)(4)(12)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	P+	4.50%		12/2027	6	5	5
PDI TA Holdings, Inc.(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		2/2031	5,198	5,135	5,132
QAD, Inc.(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		11/2027	4,363	4,363	4,363
Securonix, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	3.50%	3.75%	4/2029	880	875	794
Spaceship Purchaser, Inc. (dba Squarespace)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	3.75%		10/2031	517	517	517
Themis Solutions Inc. (dba Clio)(3)(4)(8)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	1.75%	3.75%	10/2032	986	977	977
Thunder Purchaser, Inc. (dba Vector Solutions)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		6/2028	14,436	14,378	14,436
							157,097	157,513	16.6	%
Leisure and entertainment
Aerosmith Bidco 1 Limited (dba Audiotonix)(3)(4)(9)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%		7/2031	26,657	26,368	26,657
Eternal Buyer, LLC (dba Wedgewood Weddings)(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		6/2032	4,008	3,989	3,988
Troon Golf, L.L.C.(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		8/2028	8,623	8,618	8,623
							38,975	39,268	4.1	%
Manufacturing
Faraday Buyer, LLC (dba MacLean Power Systems)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%		10/2028	17,567	17,348	17,567
FR Flow Control CB LLC (dba Trillium Flow Technologies)(3)(4)(9)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		12/2029	726	721	726
Loparex Midco B.V.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	8.75%		02/2027	197	197	198
Loparex Midco B.V.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		7/2027	1,031	970	1,031
Loparex Midco B.V.(3)(4)(9)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	8.75%		7/2027	28,000	27,457	24,430
Loparex Midco B.V.(3)(4)(9)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	8.50%		7/2027	5,250	5,250	4,948
MHE Intermediate Holdings, LLC (dba OnPoint Group)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%		7/2027	9,783	9,751	9,512
Sonny's Enterprises, LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%		8/2028	46,349	45,984	46,117
Sonny's Enterprises, LLC(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	6.50%		8/2028	2,003	1,976	2,003
Sonny's Enterprises, LLC(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.50%		8/2027	1,133	1,114	1,119


							110,768	107,651	11.3	%
Pharmaceuticals
Puma Buyer, LLC (dba PANTHERx)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.25%		3/2032	1,213	1,205	1,213
							1,205	1,213	0.1	%
Professional services
Essential Services Holding Corporation (dba Turnpoint)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		6/2031	3,128	3,102	3,073
Essential Services Holding Corporation (dba Turnpoint)(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.00%		6/2030	153	151	147
Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		12/2028	10,366	10,314	10,366
Guidehouse Inc.(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		12/2030	936	936	927
Paris US Holdco, Inc. (dba Precinmac)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%		12/2031	723	715	721

F-10

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(2)(27)		Fair Value		% of Net Assets
Relativity ODA LLC(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%		5/2029	19,162		19,104		19,162
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%		5/2028	11,765		11,748		11,765
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)(3)(4)(14)	First lien senior secured EUR term loan	E+	6.75%		5/2028	€	2,009	2,181		2,359
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	6.94%		5/2028	225		225		225
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)(3)(4)(8)(22)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.50%		5/2028	323		322		323
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)(3)(4)(14)	First lien senior secured EUR delayed draw term loan	E+	7.25%		5/2028	€	46	49		54
Vensure Employer Services, Inc.(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		9/2031	976		967		966
								49,814		50,088		5.3	%
Specialty retail
Galls, LLC(3)(4)(9)(22)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%		3/2030	21,255		20,979		21,255
Milan Laser Holdings LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		4/2027	22,002		21,945		21,452
Notorious Holdings LLC (dba Beauty Industry Group)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		9.00%	12/2031	2,935		2,906		2,905
Notorious Topco, LLC (dba Beauty Industry Group)(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		7.25%	12/2030	6,114		6,087		6,084
The Shade Store, LLC(3)(4)(9)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		6.00%	10/2029	1,367		1,068		1,067



								52,985		52,763		5.6	%
Telecommunications
EOS Finco S.A.R.L(3)(9)(28)(31)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		6.00%	10/2029	11,148		8,558		2,756



								8,558		2,756		0.3	%
Transportation
Lytx, Inc.(3)(4)(8)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		2/2028	23,668		23,668		23,668
								23,668		23,668		2.5	%
Total non-controlled/non-affiliated debt investments								$	1,432,073	$	1,382,304	145.4	%
Total non-controlled/non-affiliated misc. debt commitments(22)(23)(Note 7)								$	(389)	$	(282)	—	%
Total non-controlled/non-affiliated portfolio company debt investments								$	1,431,684	$	1,382,022	145.4	%

Equity Investments
Asset based lending and fund finance
AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC(3)(4)(22)(29)(30)(31)	Specialty finance equity investment	N/A			N/A	1,473		1,476		1,931
AAM Series 2.1 Aviation Feeder, LLC(3)(4)(29)(30)(31)	Specialty finance equity investment	N/A			N/A	1,634		1,636		2,589
Amergin Asset Management, LLC(3)(4)(29)(30)	Specialty finance equity investment	N/A			N/A	50,000,000		—		2,137
Blue Owl Cross-Strategy Opportunities LLC(3)(5)(26)(30)(31)(34)	Specialty finance equity investment	N/A			N/A	6,493		6,493		6,481
								9,605		13,138		1.4	%
Automotive services
CD&R Value Building Partners I, L.P. (dba Belron)(3)(5)(29)(30)(31)	LP Interest	N/A			N/A	1,121		1,089		1,492
Metis HoldCo, Inc. (dba Mavis Tire Express Services)(3)(4)(6)(30)	Series A Convertible Preferred Stock	N/A		7.00%	N/A	32,308		44,102		44,653
Percheron Horsepower-A LP (dba Big Brand Tire & Service)(3)(5)(22)(29)(30)(31)	Limited Partner Interest	N/A			N/A	1,336		1,340		1,608
								46,531		47,753		5.0	%
Buildings and real estate
Dodge Construction Network Holdings, L.P.(3)(4)(29)(30)	Class A-2 Common Units	N/A			N/A	431,889		368		52
Dodge Construction Network Holdings, L.P.(3)(4)(6)(30)	Series A Preferred Units	N/A		8.25%	N/A	0		9		6

F-11

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(2)(27)	Fair Value	% of Net Assets
							377	58	—	%
Business services



Hercules Buyer, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)(3)(4)(29)(30)(33)	Common Units	N/A			N/A	350,000	352	505
Knockout Intermediate Holdings I Inc. (dba Kaseya Inc.)(3)(4)(10)(30)	Perpetual Preferred Stock	S+		10.75%	N/A	252	348	346
							700	851	0.1	%
Consumer products
ASP Conair Holdings LP(3)(4)(29)(30)	Class A Units	N/A			N/A	12,857	1,286	209
							1,286	209	—	%
Containers and packaging
TCB Holdings I LLC (dba TricorBraun)(3)(4)(6)(30)	Class A Preferred Units	N/A		14.00%	N/A	1,000	1,103	1,059
							1,103	1,059	0.1	%
Education
Paradigmatic Holdco LLC (dba Pluralsight)(3)(4)(29)(30)	Common stock	N/A			N/A	1,309,529	3,475	—
							3,475	—	—	%
Food and beverage
Hissho Sushi Holdings, LLC(3)(4)(29)(30)	Class A Units	N/A			N/A	7,502	34	95
							34	95	—	%
Healthcare equipment and services
KPCI Co-Invest 2, L.P.(3)(4)(29)(30)(31)	Class A Units	N/A			N/A	32,182	322	322
Maia Aggregator, LP(3)(4)(29)(30)	Class A-2 Units	N/A			N/A	112,360	112	117
Patriot Holdings SCSp (dba Corza Health, Inc.)(3)(4)(6)(30)(31)	Class A Units	N/A		8.00%	N/A	1,515	2,201	2,190
Patriot Holdings SCSp (dba Corza Health, Inc.)(3)(4)(29)(30)(31)	Class B Units	N/A			N/A	20,867	28	152
Rhea Acquisition Holdings, LP(3)(4)(29)(30)	Series A-2 Units	N/A			N/A	119,048	119	122
							2,782	2,903	0.3	%
Healthcare providers and services
Baypine Commander Co-Invest, LP(3)(4)(29)(30)(31)	LP Interest	N/A			N/A	352,409	354	386
KOBHG Holdings, L.P. (dba OB Hospitalist)(3)(4)(29)(30)	Class A Interests	N/A			N/A	1,291	1,291	1,525
KWOL Acquisition, Inc. (dba Worldwide Clinical Trials)(3)(4)(29)(30)	Class A Interest	N/A			N/A	30	301	418
Romulus Intermediate Holdings 1 Inc. (dba PetVet Care Centers)(3)(4)(6)(30)	Series A Preferred Stock	N/A		15.00%	N/A	1,721	2,286	1,916
XOMA Corporation(3)(4)(29)(30)	Warrants	N/A			N/A	1,800	12	18
							4,244	4,263	0.4	%
Healthcare technology
Minerva Holdco, Inc.(3)(4)(6)(30)	Senior A Preferred Stock	N/A		10.75%	N/A	1,000	1,505	1,506
ModMed Software Midco Holdings, Inc. (dba ModMed)(3)(4)(6)(30)	Series A Preferred Units	N/A		13.00%	N/A	170	181	182
							1,686	1,688	0.2	%
Human resource support services
Sunshine Software Holdings, Inc. (dba Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.)(3)(4)(6)(30)	Series A Preferred Stock	N/A		10.50%	N/A	5,500	8,388	7,176
							8,388	7,176	0.8	%

F-12

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(2)(27)		Fair Value		% of Net Assets
Infrastructure and environmental services
Valor Compute Infrastructure L.P.(3)(4)(22)(29)(30)(31)	LP Interest	N/A			N/A	$	175	175		175
VCI Intermediate TopCo 1 LLC(3)(4)(29)(30)(31)	Class B Units	N/A			N/A	$	500	500		500
								675		675		0.1	%
Insurance
Evolution Parent, LP (dba SIAA)(3)(4)(29)(30)	LP Interest	N/A			N/A	8,919		892		1,152
Fifth Season Investments LLC(3)(4)(30)	Specialty finance equity investment	N/A			N/A	1		5,976		6,444
GoHealth, Inc.(3)(4)(29)(30)	Common stock	N/A			N/A	7,413		41		—
GrowthCurve Capital Sunrise Co-Invest LP (dba Brightway)(3)(4)(29)(30)	LP Interest	N/A			N/A	12,494		127		131
								7,036		7,727		0.8	%
Internet software and services
Bird Holding B.V. (fka MessageBird Holding B.V.)(3)(4)(29)(30)(31)	Extended Series C Warrants	N/A			N/A	25,540		157		28
Brooklyn Lender Co-Invest 2, L.P. (dba Boomi)(3)(4)(29)(30)	Common Units	N/A			N/A	1,345,119		1,345		2,257
Insight CP (Blocker) Holdings, L.P. (dba CivicPlus, LLC)(3)(4)(29)(30)(31)	LP Interest	N/A			N/A	32		32		42
Nscale Global Holdings Limited(3)(4)(29)(30)(31)	Preferred equity	N/A			N/A	608		608		608
Nscale Global Holdings Limited(3)(4)(29)(30)(31)	Series B Preferred Shares	N/A			N/A	1,067		405		405
Project Alpine Co-Invest Fund, LP(3)(4)(29)(30)(31)	LP Interest	N/A			N/A	1,000		1,001		1,313
Thunder Topco L.P. (dba Vector Solutions)(3)(4)(29)(30)	Common Units	N/A			N/A	819,817		820		975
VEPF Torreys Aggregator, LLC (dba MINDBODY, Inc.)(3)(4)(6)(30)	Series A Preferred Stock	N/A		12.00%	N/A	3,750		4,899		5,548
WMC Bidco, Inc. (dba West Monroe)(3)(4)(6)(30)	Senior Preferred Stock	N/A		11.25%	N/A	2,385		3,744		3,738

								13,011		14,914		1.6	%
Manufacturing
Gloves Holdings, LP (dba Protective Industrial Products)(3)(4)(29)(30)	LP Interest	N/A			N/A	8,523		936		1,321

Windows Entities(3)(4)(30)(32)	LLC Units	N/A			N/A	10,615		20,107		46,211
								21,043		47,532		5.0	%
Pharmaceuticals
LSI Financing 1 DAC(3)(4)(30)(31)	Specialty finance equity investment	N/A			N/A	204		207		202
								207		202		—	%
Specialty retail
Notorious Purchaser II, Inc. (dba Beauty Industry Group)(3)(4)(29)(30)	Class B Common Stock	N/A			N/A	489		5,967		5,967
								5,967		5,967		0.6	%
Total non-controlled/non-affiliated portfolio company equity investments								$	128,150	$	156,210	16.4	%
Total non-controlled/non-affiliated portfolio company investments								$	1,559,834	$	1,538,232	161.9	%

Non-controlled/affiliated portfolio company investments
Debt Investments(7)
Advertising and media
Swipe Acquisition Corporation (dba PLI)(3)(4)(8)(24)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	8.00%		11/2027	8,972		8,969		8,972

F-13

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


		Interest
Company(1)(25)	Investment	Ref. Rate	Cash	PIK	Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(2)(27)		Fair Value		% of Net Assets
Swipe Acquisition Corporation (dba PLI)(3)(4)(8)(22)(24)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%		11/2027	5,261	5,232		5,248
							14,201		14,220		1.5	%
Household products
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC(3)(4)(9)(22)(24)(28)	First lien senior secured loan	S+		6.75%	3/2027	7,953	5,116		77
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC(3)(4)(6)(22)(24)(28)	First lien senior secured loan	N/A	10.00%		2/2026	2,251	2,190		2,271
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC(3)(4)(9)(22)(24)(28)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+		6.25%	3/2027	2,247	2,247		0
							$	9,553	$	2,348	0.2	%
Total non-controlled/affiliated portfolio company debt investments							$	23,754	$	16,568	1.7	%

Equity Investments
Advertising and media
New PLI Holdings, LLC (dba PLI)(3)(4)(24)(29)(30)	Class A Common Units	N/A			N/A	10,755	5,952		10,837
							5,952		10,837		1.1	%
Household products
Walker Edison Holdco LLC(3)(4)(24)(29)(30)	Common Units	N/A			N/A	49,159	4,750		—
							4,750		—		—	%
Pharmaceuticals
LSI Financing LLC(3)(5)(22)(24)(30)(31)	Specialty finance equity investment	N/A			N/A	9,783	9,783		10,576
							9,783		10,576		1.1	%
Total non-controlled/affiliated portfolio company equity investments							$	20,485	$	21,413	2.3	%
Total non-controlled/affiliated portfolio company investments							$	44,239	$	37,981	4.0	%

Controlled/affiliated portfolio company investments
Equity Investments
Joint ventures
Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC(3)(5)(24)(26)(30)(31)	LLC Interest	N/A			N/A	244	244		247
Blue Owl Leasing LLC(3)(5)(24)(26)(30)(31)	LLC Interest	N/A			N/A	90	90		90
							334		337
Total controlled/affiliated equity investments							$	334	$	337	—	%
Total controlled/affiliated portfolio company investments							$	334	$	337	—	%
Total Investments							$	1,604,407	$	1,576,550	165.9	%

_______________

(1)Certain portfolio company investments are subject to contractual restrictions on sales. Refer to footnote 30 for additional information on the Company’s restricted securities.

(2)The amortized cost represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion and amortization of discounts and premiums, as applicable, on debt investments using the effective interest method.

(3)Represents co-investment made with the Company’s affiliates in accordance with the terms of exemptive relief that the Company received from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. See “Note 3 — Agreements and Related Party Transactions.”

(4)These investments were valued using unobservable inputs and are considered Level 3 investments.

(5)Investment measured at net asset value (“NAV”).

(6)Investment contains a fixed-rate structure.

(7)Unless otherwise indicated, loan contains a variable rate structure, and may be subject to an interest rate floor. Variable rate loans bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to either the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR” or “S,” which can include one-, three-, six- or twelve-month SOFR), Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR” or “E”, which can include one-, two-, three- or six-month EURIBOR), Canadian Overnight Repo Rate Average (“CORRA” or “C”) (which can include one- or three-month CORRA), SONIA (“SONIA” or “SA”), Australian Bank Bill Swap Bid Rate (“BBSY” or “B”) (which can include one-, three-, or six-month BBSY) or an alternate base rate (which can include the Federal Funds Effective Rate or the Prime Rate (“PRIME” or “P”)), at the borrower’s option, and which reset periodically based on the terms of the loan agreement.

(8)The interest rate on these loans is subject to 1 month SOFR, which as of December 31, 2025 was 3.69%.

F-14

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

(9)The interest rate on these loans is subject to 3 month SOFR, which as of December 31, 2025 was 3.65%.

(10)The interest rate on these loans is subject to 6 month SOFR, which as of December 31, 2025 was 3.57%.

(11)The interest rate on these loans is subject to 12 month SOFR, which as of December 31, 2025 was 3.42%.

(12)The interest rate on these loans is subject to Prime, which as of December 31, 2025 was 6.75%.

(13)The interest rate on this loan is subject to 1 month EURIBOR, which as of December 31, 2025 was 1.94%.

(14)The interest rate on this loan is subject to 3 month EURIBOR, which as of December 31, 2025 was 2.03%.

(15)Reserved.

(16)Reserved.

(17)The interest rate on these loans is subject to 3 month BBSY, which as of December 31, 2025 was 3.74%.

(18)Reserved.

(19)The interest rate on this loan is subject to SONIA, which as of December 31, 2025 was 3.73%.

(20)Reserved.

(21)Reserved.

(22)Position or portion thereof is a debt or equity commitment. See below for more information on the Company’s commitments. See “Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies.”


					Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment		Commitment		Fair Value(23)
Non-controlled/non-affiliated - debt commitments
Aerosmith Bidco 1 Limited (dba Audiotonix)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2027	$	—	$	9,732	$	—
Arctic Holdco, LLC (dba Novvia Group)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	1/2027	250		154		—
Artifact Bidco, Inc. (dba Avetta)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2027	—		379		—
Associations, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2028	1,530		2,041		—
Brightway Holdings, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	1/2027	1,792		569		—
Cambrex Corporation	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	3/2027	—		117		—
Cambrex Corporation	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2026	—		219		—
CCM Midco, LLC (f/k/a Cresset Capital Management, LLC)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	1/2027	4		295		—
CCM Midco, LLC (f/k/a Cresset Capital Management, LLC)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	67		82		—
CHA Vision Holdings, Inc. (fka FR Vision Holdings, Inc.)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2027	71		1,229		—
CivicPlus, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	5/2027	360		250		—
Commander Buyer, Inc. (dba CenExel)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2027	—		1,762		—
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (& Smart Holdings Corp.) (dba Datavant)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2027	60		246		—
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (& Smart Holdings Corp.) (dba Datavant)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	8/2027	—		71		—
DCG ACQUISITION CORP. (dba DuBois Chemical)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	666		273		—
DuraServ LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	11/2027	—		1,921		(10)
EresearchTechnology, Inc. (dba Clario)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	1/2027	15		91		—
Essential Services Holding Corporation (dba Turnpoint)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	—		613		(8)
Eternal Buyer, LLC (dba Wedgewood Weddings)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2027	—		804		—
FR Flow Control CB LLC (dba Trillium Flow Technologies)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	—		147		—
Galls, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	3/2026	4,458		877		—
Galway Borrower LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2026	317		1,236		—
Hercules Borrower, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	12/2028	—		757		—
Indigo Buyer, Inc. (dba Inovar Packaging Group)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2026	77		143		—
Integrity Marketing Acquisition, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	8/2026	—		283		—
Interoperability Bidco, Inc. (dba Lyniate)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	—		952		(5)
Klick Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	11/2027	—		835		(2)
KPSKY Acquisition, Inc. (dba BluSky)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2028	1		58		—
KRIV Acquisition Inc. (dba Riveron)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2027	—		216		—
KWOL Acquisition, Inc. (dba Worldwide Clinical Trials)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	8/2027	2,406		54		—
Litera Bidco LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	11/2026	5,434		479		—
Litera Bidco LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	5/2027	—		2,487		—
Maple Acquisition, LLC (dba Medicus)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	5/2026	—		1,069		—

F-15

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


				Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment	Commitment	Fair Value(23)
ML Holdco, Inc. (dba Meridian Link)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2027	—	361	(1)
Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	2/2026	410	1,187	—
NELIPAK EUROPEAN HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A.	First lien senior secured EUR delayed draw term loan	3/2027	—	2,799	(21)
Nelipak Holding Company	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	3/2027	806	495	—
Paris US Holdco, Inc. (dba Precinmac)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	12/2026	—	186	—
Pluralsight, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	8/2029	—	1,637	(33)
RL Datix Holdings (USA), Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	4/2027	—	1,625	—
Salinger Bidco Inc. (dba Surgical Information Systems)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	8/2026	—	492	—
Severin Acquisition, LLC (dba PowerSchool)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2027	33	124	—
SimonMed, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	2/2027	101	44	—
Simplicity Financial Marketing Group Holdings, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	12/2026	91	99	—
Smarsh Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	1/2027	—	186	—
Soleo Holdings, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	2/2027	—	108	—
Sonny's Enterprises, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2027	2,003	2,288	—
Spaceship Purchaser, Inc. (dba Squarespace)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2027	—	100	—
STS PARENT, LLC (dba STS Aviation Group)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2026	—	2,100	(11)
Tamarack Intermediate, L.L.C. (dba Verisk 3E)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2027	62	149	—
TBRS, Inc. (dba TEAM Technologies)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	11/2026	—	93	—
Themis Solutions Inc. (dba Clio)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2027	—	420	(4)
THG Acquisition, LLC (dba Hilb)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2026	303	740	—
Troon Golf, L.L.C.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2026	619	625	—
Unified Women's Healthcare, LP	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2027	—	808	—
Vensure Employer Services, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2026	—	16	—
Wipfli Advisory LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	4/2028	—	1,067	(2)
Wrench Group LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2027	—	1,507	—
WU Holdco, Inc. (dba PurposeBuilt Brands)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	4/2027	—	2,720	—
Aerosmith Bidco 1 Limited (dba Audiotonix)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2030	—	4,116	—
Anaplan, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2028	—	972	—
Aptean Acquiror, Inc. (dba Aptean)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2031	104	260	—
Arctic Holdco, LLC (dba Novvia Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2031	49	222	—
Artifact Bidco, Inc. (dba Avetta)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2030	—	271	—
Ascend Buyer, LLC (dba PPC Flexible Packaging)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2028	15	91	—
Associations, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2028	—	2,873	—
Azurite Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (dba Alteryx, Inc.)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2031	—	238	—
Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2030	—	1,975	—
Bayshore Intermediate #2, L.P. (dba Boomi)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2027	102	309	—
BCPE Osprey Buyer, Inc. (dba PartsSource)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2026	43	9	—
BCTO BSI Buyer, Inc. (dba Buildertrend)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2028	—	1,527	—
BP Veraison Buyer, LLC (dba Sun World)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2029	—	3,868	—
Brightway Holdings, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2027	174	352	—
Bristol Hospice L.L.C.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2032	—	436	—
By Light Professional IT Services LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2031	—	361	(5)
Cambrex Corporation	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2032	6	96	—
Catalis Intermediate, Inc. (fka GovBrands Intermediate, Inc.)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2027	23	162	—
CCM Midco, LLC (f/k/a Cresset Capital Management, LLC)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2029	—	75	—
CHA Vision Holdings, Inc. (fka FR Vision Holdings, Inc.)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2030	—	434	—
CivicPlus, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2030	—	256	—
Commander Buyer, Inc. (dba CenExel)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2032	—	1,175	—
Creek Parent, Inc. (dba Catalent)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2031	—	126	(1)

F-16

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


				Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment	Commitment	Fair Value(23)
Crewline Buyer, Inc. (dba New Relic)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2030	—	472	(4)
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (& Smart Holdings Corp.) (dba Datavant)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2031	—	766	—
DCG ACQUISITION CORP. (dba DuBois Chemical)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2031	—	939	(9)
Deerfield Dakota Holdings	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2032	—	1,189	(6)
Delinea Buyer, Inc. (f/k/a Centrify)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2027	—	1,345	—
Denali Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (dba Dun & Bradstreet)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2032	—	886	(13)
Diamond Mezzanine 24 LLC (dba United Risk)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2030	15	32	—
Dresser Utility Solutions, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2029	—	1,201	—
DuraServ LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2030	159	1,032	—
Eagle Family Foods Group LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2030	—	202	—
EET Buyer, Inc. (dba e-Emphasys)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2027	—	91	—
Einstein Parent, Inc. (dba Smartsheet)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2031	—	94	(1)
EresearchTechnology, Inc. (dba Clario)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2031	—	53	—
Essential Services Holding Corporation (dba Turnpoint)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2030	153	230	—
Eternal Buyer, LLC (dba Wedgewood Weddings)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2032	—	804	(4)
Evolution BuyerCo, Inc. (dba SIAA)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2030	—	52	—
Fiesta Purchaser, Inc. (dba Shearer's Foods)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2029	129	978	—
Fortis Solutions Group, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2027	26	64	—
Foundation Consumer Brands, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2029	—	108	(1)
FR Flow Control CB LLC (dba Trillium Flow Technologies)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2029	—	120	—
Gainsight, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2027	—	936	—
Galls, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2030	695	1,444	—
Galway Borrower LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2028	34	162	—
Gaylord Chemical Company, L.L.C.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2027	1,617	991	—
Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2028	—	526	—
GI Ranger Intermediate, LLC (dba Rectangle Health)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2027	10	64	—
Granicus, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2031	—	548	—
Hercules Borrower, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2028	—	1,173	—
H&F Opportunities LUX III S.À R.L (dba Checkmarx)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2027	—	4,583	—
HGH Purchaser, Inc. (dba Horizon Services)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2028	2,417	1,303	—
Hissho Parent, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2029	—	116	—
Hyland Software, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2029	—	85	—
IG Investments Holdings, LLC (dba Insight Global)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2028	—	963	—
Indigo Buyer, Inc. (dba Inovar Packaging Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2028	—	100	—
Indikami Bidco, LLC (dba IntegriChain)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2030	205	65	—
Integrity Marketing Acquisition, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2028	—	210	—
Intelerad Medical Systems Incorporated (fka 11849573 Canada Inc.)*	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2026	2,712	—	—
Interoperability Bidco, Inc. (dba Lyniate)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2028	226	903	—
KABAFUSION Parent, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2031	—	111	—
Klick Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2031	—	835	(4)
KRIV Acquisition Inc. (dba Riveron)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2031	15	174	—
KWOL Acquisition, Inc. (dba Worldwide Clinical Trials)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2029	—	883	(2)
Lignetics Investment Corp.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2026	—	1,471	(4)
Litera Bidco LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2028	—	1,416	—
Maple Acquisition, LLC (dba Medicus)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2030	—	802	—
Mario Purchaser, LLC (dba Len the Plumber)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2028	50	5	—
MHE Intermediate Holdings, LLC (dba OnPoint Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2027	714	1,071	—

F-17

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


				Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment	Commitment	Fair Value(23)
Milan Laser Holdings LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2027	—	2,837	(71)
MINDBODY, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2027	—	1,071	—
Ministry Brands Holdings, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2027	6	62	—
Minotaur Acquisition, Inc. (dba Inspira Financial)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2030	—	2,435	—
Modernizing Medicine, Inc. (dba ModMed)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2032	—	71	—
Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2030	—	2,402	—
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2026	1,827	17	—
Natural Partners, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2030	—	159	—
NELIPAK EUROPEAN HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A.	First lien senior secured EUR revolving loan	3/2031	46	477	—
Nelipak Holding Company	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2031	146	826	—
NMI Acquisitionco, Inc. (dba Network Merchants)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2028	—	218	—
Norvax, LLC (dba GoHealth)*	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2029	879	—	—
Notorious Topco, LLC (dba Beauty Industry Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2030	—	1,223	(6)
OB Hospitalist Group, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2027	—	2,931	—
Offen, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2029	—	546	(5)
Paris US Holdco, Inc. (dba Precinmac)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2031	7	86	—
Patriot Acquisition TopCo S.À R.L. (dba Corza Health, Inc.)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2028	190	2,465	—
PDI TA Holdings, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2031	301	109	—
PetVet Care Centers, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2029	209	1,883	—
Plasma Buyer LLC (dba PathGroup)*	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2028	79	—	—
Pluralsight, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2029	—	655	(13)
Premise Health Holding Corp.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2031	—	938	(9)
Puma Buyer, LLC (dba PANTHERx)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2032	—	208	—
QAD, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2027	—	571	—
Quva Pharma, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2026	875	307	—
Relativity ODA LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2029	—	1,637	—
Rhea Parent, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2030	—	81	(1)
RL Datix Holdings (USA), Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2030	—	1,423	—
Salinger Bidco Inc. (dba Surgical Information Systems)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2031	41	451	—
Sara Lee Frozen Bakery, LLC (fka KSLB Holdings, LLC)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2027	530	470	—
Securonix, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2028	—	153	(15)
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2028	323	646	—
Severin Acquisition, LLC (dba PowerSchool)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2031	—	94	(1)
SimonMed, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2031	44	53	—
Simplicity Financial Marketing Group Holdings, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2031	—	95	—
Smarsh Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2029	38	61	—
Soleo Holdings, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2032	—	108	—
Sonny's Enterprises, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2027	1,133	1,691	—
Spaceship Purchaser, Inc. (dba Squarespace)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2031	—	83	—
STS PARENT, LLC (dba STS Aviation Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2030	599	242	—
SWK BUYER, Inc. (dba Stonewall Kitchen)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2029	—	70	(2)
Tamarack Intermediate, L.L.C. (dba Verisk 3E)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2029	—	112	—
TBRS, Inc. (dba TEAM Technologies)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2030	—	106	(1)
Themis Solutions Inc. (dba Clio)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2032	—	350	(4)
THG Acquisition, LLC (dba Hilb)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2031	69	453	—
Thunder Purchaser, Inc. (dba Vector Solutions)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2027	—	1,174	—
Troon Golf, L.L.C.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2028	—	625	—
Unified Women's Healthcare, LP	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2029	—	88	—
USRP Holdings, Inc. (dba U.S. Retirement and Benefits Partners)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2029	—	183	—

F-18

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


					Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment		Commitment		Fair Value(23)
Valeris, Inc. (fka Phantom Purchaser, Inc.)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2031	—		227		(1)
Vital Bidco AB (dba Vitamin Well)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2030	—		1,117		—
Wrench Group LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2031	281		1,225		—
Wipfli Advisory LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2032	—		712		(2)
WU Holdco, Inc. (dba PurposeBuilt Brands)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2032	73		774		—

























Total non-controlled/non-affiliated - debt commitments			$	39,325	$	141,220	$	(282)
Non-controlled/non-affiliated - equity commitments
AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC	Specialty finance equity investment	N/A	$	1,473	$	2,156	$	—
Percheron Horsepower-A LP (dba Big Brand Tire & Service)	Limited Partner Interest	N/A	1,336		220		—
Valor Compute Infrastructure L.P.	LP Interest	N/A	175		325		—
Total non-controlled/non-affiliated - equity commitments			$	2,984	$	2,701	$	—
Non-controlled/affiliated - debt commitments
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	2/2026	$	237	$	338	$	—
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	3/2027	514		220		—
Swipe Acquisition Corporation (dba PLI)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2027	1,625		28		—
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC*	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2027	2,247		—		—
Total non-controlled/affiliated - debt commitments			$	4,623	$	586	$	—
Non-controlled/affiliated - equity commitments
LSI Financing LLC	Specialty finance equity investment	N/A	$	9,783	$	3,968	$	—
Total non-controlled/affiliated - equity commitments			$	9,783	$	3,968	$	—
Total Portfolio Company Commitments			$	56,715	$	148,475	$	(282)

*Fully funded

(23)The negative cost and fair value results from unamortized fees, which are capitalized to the investment cost of unfunded commitments.

(24)As defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), the Company is deemed to “control” a portfolio company if the Company owns more than 25% of the portfolio company's voting securities or has the power to exercise control over management or policies, including through a management agreement. As defined in the 1940 Act, the Company is an “affiliated person” of this portfolio company if the Company owns more than 5% or more of the portfolio company’s outstanding voting securities. Transactions related to the Company’s investments in non-controlled affiliates and controlled affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2025, were as follows:


Company	Fair Value at December 31, 2024		Gross Additions(a)		Gross Reductions(b)		Net Change in Unrealized Gain/(Loss)		Realized Gain/(Loss)		Transfers		Fair Value at December 31, 2025		Other Income		Interest Income		Dividend Income
Non-Controlled Affiliates
LSI Financing LLC	$	9,554	$	7,399	$	(7,004)	$	627	$	—	$	—	$	10,576	$	—	$	—	$	660
New PLI Holdings, LLC (dba PLI)	24,830		1,419		(551)		(641)		—		—		25,057		12		1,613		442
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC	2,481		1,289		(225)		(1,197)		—		—		2,348		—		—		—
Total	$	36,865	$	10,107	$	(7,780)	$	(1,211)	$	—	$	—	$	37,981	$	12	$	1,613	$	1,102

Controlled Affiliates
Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC	191		54		—		2		—		—		247		—		—		27
Blue Owl Leasing LLC	—		90		—		—		—		—		90		—		—		—
Total	$	191	$	144	$	—	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	337	$	—	$	—	$	27

(a)Gross additions may include increases in the cost basis of investments resulting from new investments, amounts related to payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest capitalized and added to the principal balance of the respective loans, the accretion of discounts, the exchange of one or more existing investments for one or more new investments and the movement at fair value of an existing portfolio company into this controlled affiliated category from a different category.

(b)Gross reductions may include decreases in the cost basis of investments resulting from principal collections related to investment repayments and sales, return of capital, the amortization of premiums and the exchange of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities.

(25)Unless otherwise indicated, all or a portion of the Company’s portfolio companies are pledged as collateral supporting the available capacity under the SPV Asset Facilities. See “Note 5 — Debt.”

F-19

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

(26)Investment is not pledged as collateral for the credit facilities.

(27)As of December 31, 2025, the net estimated unrealized loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $25.4 million based on a tax cost basis of $1.6 billion. As of December 31, 2025, the estimated aggregate gross unrealized loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $73.1 million and the estimated aggregate gross unrealized gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $47.7 million.

(28)Loan was on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2025.

(29)Investment is non-income producing.

(30)Securities acquired in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and may be deemed to be “restricted securities” under the Securities Act. As of December 31, 2025, the aggregate fair value of these securities is $178.0 million, or 18.7% of the Company’s net assets. the acquisition dates of the restricted securities are as follows:

Portfolio Company

Investment

Acquisition Date

AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC

Specialty finance equity investment

July 1, 2022

AAM Series 2.1 Aviation Feeder, LLC

Specialty finance equity investment

July 1, 2022

Amergin Asset Management, LLC

Specialty finance equity investment

July 1, 2022

ASP Conair Holdings LP

Class A Units

May 17, 2021

Baypine Commander Co-Invest, LP

LP Interest

June 24, 2025

Bird Holding B.V. (fka MessageBird Holding B.V.)

Extended Series C Warrants

May 5, 2021

Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC

LLC Interest

August 1, 2024

Blue Owl Cross-Strategy Opportunities LLC

Specialty finance equity investment

September 19, 2025

Blue Owl Leasing LLC

LLC Interest

June 30, 2025

Brooklyn Lender Co-Invest 2, L.P. (dba Boomi)

Common Units

October 1, 2021

CD&R Value Building Partners I, L.P. (dba Belron)

LP Interest

December 2, 2021

Denali Holding, LP (dba Summit Companies)

Class A Units

September 15, 2021

Dodge Construction Network Holdings, L.P.

Class A-2 Common Units

February 23, 2022

Dodge Construction Network Holdings, L.P.

Series A Preferred Units

February 23, 2022

Evolution Parent, LP (dba SIAA)

LP Interest

April 30, 2021

Fifth Season Investments LLC

Specialty finance equity investment

October 17, 2022

Gloves Holdings, LP (dba Protective Industrial Products)

LP Interest

December 29, 2020

Gloves Holdings, LP (dba Protective Industrial Products)

Limited Partner Interest

December 29, 2020

GoHealth, Inc.

Common stock

August 6, 2025

GrowthCurve Capital Sunrise Co-Invest LP (dba Brightway)

LP Interest

December 16, 2021

Hercules Buyer, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)

Common Units

December 15, 2020

Hissho Sushi Holdings, LLC

Class A Units

May 17, 2022

Insight CP (Blocker) Holdings, L.P. (dba CivicPlus, LLC)

LP Interest

June 8, 2022

Knockout Intermediate Holdings I Inc. (dba Kaseya Inc.)

Perpetual Preferred Stock

June 22, 2022

KOBHG Holdings, L.P. (dba OB Hospitalist)

Class A Interests

September 27, 2021

KPCI Co-Invest 2, L.P.

Class A Units

November 30, 2020

KWOL Acquisition, Inc. (dba Worldwide Clinical Trials)

Class A Interest

August 25, 2025

LSI Financing 1 DAC

Specialty finance equity investment

December 14, 2022

LSI Financing LLC

Specialty finance equity investment

July 7, 2025

Maia Aggregator, LP

Class A-2 Units

February 1, 2022

Metis HoldCo, Inc. (dba Mavis Tire Express Services)

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

May 4, 2021

Minerva Holdco, Inc.

Senior A Preferred Stock

February 15, 2022

ModMed Software Midco Holdings, Inc. (dba ModMed)

Series A Preferred Units

April 30, 2025

New PLI Holdings, LLC (dba PLI)

Class A Common Units

December 23, 2020

Notorious Purchaser II, Inc. (dba Beauty Industry Group)

Class B Common Stock

December 19, 2025

Nscale Global Holdings Limited

Preferred equity

September 29, 2025

Nscale Global Holdings Limited

Series B Preferred Shares

September 29, 2025

Paradigmatic Holdco LLC (dba Pluralsight)

Common stock

August 22, 2024

Patriot Holdings SCSp (dba Corza Health, Inc.)

Class A Units

January 29, 2021

Patriot Holdings SCSp (dba Corza Health, Inc.)

Class B Units

January 29, 2021

Percheron Horsepower-A LP (dba Big Brand Tire & Service)

Limited Partner Interest

September 23, 2025

Project Alpine Co-Invest Fund, LP

LP Interest

June 13, 2022

Rhea Acquisition Holdings, LP

Series A-2 Units

February 18, 2022

Romulus Intermediate Holdings 1 Inc. (dba PetVet Care Centers)

Series A Preferred Stock

November 15, 2023

F-20

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2025

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

Portfolio Company

Investment

Acquisition Date

Sunshine Software Holdings, Inc. (dba Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.)

Series A Preferred Stock

October 15, 2021

TCB Holdings I LLC (dba TricorBraun)

Class A Preferred Units

January 31, 2025

Thunder Topco L.P. (dba Vector Solutions)

Common Units

June 30, 2021

Valor Compute Infrastructure L.P.

LP Interest

October 3, 2025

VCI Intermediate TopCo 1 LLC

Class B Units

November 17, 2025

VEPF Torreys Aggregator, LLC (dba MINDBODY, Inc.)

Series A Preferred Stock

October 15, 2021

Walker Edison Holdco LLC

Common Units

March 1, 2023

Windows Entities

LLC Units

January 16, 2020

WMC Bidco, Inc. (dba West Monroe)

Senior Preferred Stock

November 9, 2021

XOMA Corporation

Warrants

December 15, 2023

(31)This portfolio company is not a qualifying asset under Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, the Company may not acquire any non-qualifying asset unless, at the time such acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of total assets. As of December 31, 2025, non-qualifying assets represented 13.2% of total assets as calculated in accordance with the regulatory requirements.

(32)Investment represents multiple underlying investments in related entities under common management. These underlying investments are on identical terms and include Midwest Custom Windows, LLC with a fair value of $8.0 million, Greater Toronto Custom Windows, Corp. with a fair value of $3.3 million, Garden State Custom Windows, LLC with a fair value of $11.1 million, Long Island Custom Windows, LLC with a fair value of $9.6 million, Jemico, LLC with a fair value of $7.7 million, Atlanta Custom Windows, LLC with a fair value of $3.8 million and Fairchester Custom Windows LLC with a fair value of $2.5 million as of December 31, 2025. Greater Toronto Custom Windows, Corp. is considered a non-qualifying asset.

(33)The Company invests in this portfolio company through underlying blocker entities Hercules Blocker 1 LLC, Hercules Blocker 2 LLC, Hercules Blocker 3 LLC, Hercules Blocker 4 LLC, and Hercules Blocker 5 LLC.

(34)Blue Owl Cross-Strategy Opportunities LLC (“BOCSO”) was formed to hold alternative credit assets, including asset-based finance (“ABF”). ABF is a subsector of private credit focused on generating income from pools of financial, physical or other assets. As of December 31, 2025, the portfolio consists of three investments totaling $0.5 billion at cost and fair value, respectively, ranging in cost from $24.8 million to $304.4 million and with a fair value ranging from 24.8 million to 303.9 million. The largest investment is 62% of the total cost of BOCSO's portfolio. As of December 31, 2025 the portfolio asset class composition was 62% ABF - Specialty finance, 33% ABF - Leasing, and 5% ABF - Commercial Real Estate.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-21

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(3)(28)		Fair Value		Percentage of Net Assets(32)

Non-controlled/non-affiliated portfolio company investments
Debt Investments
Advertising and media
Broadcast Music, Inc. (fka Otis Merger Sub, Inc.)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	02/2030	$	4,514	$	4,413	$	4,480	0.4	%
Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	02/2031	19,496		19,357		19,447		1.7	%





							23,770		23,927		2.1	%
Aerospace and defense
Peraton Corp.(13)(19)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	7.75%	02/2029	14,494		14,359		11,682		1.0	%
STS PARENT, LLC (dba STS Aviation Group)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	10/2031	7,560		7,523		7,522		0.7	%
STS PARENT, LLC (dba STS Aviation Group)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.00%	10/2030	389		384		384		—	%
Valence Surface Technologies LLC(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.75% (3.88% PIK)	12/2026	39,641		39,593		37,263		3.3	%
							61,859		56,851		5.0	%
Asset based lending and fund finance
AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC(21)(25)	First lien senior secured loan		12.00% PIK	07/2030	2,506		2,488		2,506		0.2	%
AAM Series 2.1 Aviation Feeder, LLC(21)(25)	First lien senior secured loan		12.00% PIK	11/2030	2,534		2,528		2,534		0.2	%
Hg Genesis 8 Sumoco Limited(7)(21)	Unsecured facility	SA+	7.00% PIK	09/2027	£	1,381	1,767		1,729		0.2	%
Hg Genesis 9 SumoCo Limited(10)(21)	Unsecured facility	E+	6.25% PIK	03/2029	€	1,172	1,284		1,214		0.1	%
Hg Saturn Luchaco Limited(7)(21)	Unsecured facility	SA+	7.50% PIK	03/2026	£	8,113	10,299		10,161		0.9	%
							18,366		18,144		1.6	%
Buildings and real estate
Associations Finance, Inc.(25)	Unsecured notes		14.25% PIK	05/2030	18,618		18,495		18,618		1.7	%
Associations, Inc.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%	07/2028	48,180		48,132		48,180		4.3	%



							66,627		66,798		6.0	%
Business services

CIBT Global, Inc.(8)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25% (4.25% PIK)	06/2027	173		104		35		—	%
CIBT Global, Inc.(8)(16)	Second lien senior secured loan	P+	7.75% PIK	12/2027	11,237		4,706		—		—	%
Denali BuyerCo, LLC (dba Summit Companies)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	09/2028	5,816		5,750		5,816		0.5	%
Diamondback Acquisition, Inc. (dba Sphera)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	09/2028	619		612		616		0.1	%
DuraServ LLC(5)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%	06/2031	7,592		7,550		7,554		0.7	%
Gainsight, Inc.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%	07/2027	7,275		7,225		7,275		0.6	%
Hercules Borrower, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	12/2026	27,695		27,695		27,695		2.5	%
Hercules Buyer, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)(24)(25)	Unsecured notes		0.48% PIK	12/2029	831		831		1,016		0.1	%
Kaseya Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	06/2029	544		536		544		—	%
Kaseya Inc.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.50%	06/2029	16		16		16		—	%
KPSKY Acquisition, Inc. (dba BluSky)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	10/2028	968		956		888		0.1	%
KPSKY Acquisition, Inc. (dba BluSky)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.75%	10/2028	1		—		(3)		—	%

F-22

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(3)(28)	Fair Value	Percentage of Net Assets(32)
Pye-Barker Fire & Safety, LLC(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%	05/2031	6,693	6,657	6,676	0.6	%
Pye-Barker Fire & Safety, LLC(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	4.50%	05/2030	122	117	119	—	%






						62,755	58,247	5.2	%
Chemicals
Advancion Holdings, LLC (fka Aruba Investments Holdings, LLC)(12)(19)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	7.75%	11/2028	22,500	22,305	21,929	2.0	%
DCG ACQUISITION CORP. (dba DuBois Chemical)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%	06/2031	5,614	5,561	5,586	0.5	%
Gaylord Chemical Company, L.L.C.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	12/2027	25,847	25,788	25,847	2.3	%
Rocket BidCo, Inc. (dba Recochem)(13)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	11/2030	22,000	21,587	21,780	1.9	%
Velocity HoldCo III Inc. (dba VelocityEHS)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	04/2027	5,917	5,857	5,917	0.5	%




						81,098	81,059	7.2	%
Consumer products
Conair Holdings LLC(12)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	7.50%	05/2029	31,280	30,952	28,700	2.6	%
Feradyne Outdoors, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.75% (3.74% PIK)	05/2028	658	658	565	0.1	%
Foundation Consumer Brands, LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.25%	02/2027	2,992	2,950	2,992	0.3	%
Lignetics Investment Corp.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	11/2027	12,336	12,307	12,274	1.1	%
Lignetics Investment Corp.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.50%	10/2026	1,078	1,075	1,071	0.1	%
SWK BUYER, Inc. (dba Stonewall Kitchen)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	03/2029	736	726	713	0.1	%
WU Holdco, Inc. (dba Weiman Products, LLC)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	03/2027	48,911	48,657	48,911	4.4	%



						97,325	95,226	8.5	%
Containers and packaging
Arctic Holdco, LLC (dba Novvia Group)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%	12/2026	2,881	2,843	2,881	0.3	%
Ascend Buyer, LLC (dba PPC Flexible Packaging)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	09/2028	749	745	749	0.1	%
Ascend Buyer, LLC (dba PPC Flexible Packaging)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.75%	09/2027	26	26	26	—	%
Fortis Solutions Group, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	10/2028	884	872	870	0.1	%
Fortis Solutions Group, LLC(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.50%	10/2027	31	31	30	—	%
Indigo Buyer, Inc. (dba Inovar Packaging Group)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.25%	05/2028	879	873	879	0.1	%
Indigo Buyer, Inc. (dba Inovar Packaging Group)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	05/2028	220	218	218	—	%
Pregis Topco LLC(12)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	7.75%	08/2029	9,333	9,217	9,333	0.8	%
Pregis Topco LLC(12)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	6.75%	08/2029	20,667	20,445	20,667	1.8	%


						35,270	35,653	3.2	%

F-23

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(3)(28)	Fair Value	Percentage of Net Assets(32)
Distribution
ABB/Con-cise Optical Group LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.50%	02/2028	850	843	833	0.1	%
BradyPLUS Holdings, LLC (f/k/a BradyIFS Holdings, LLC)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	10/2029	31,418	31,137	31,418	2.8	%
Endries Acquisition, Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	12/2028	22,294	22,158	22,127	2.0	%
Offen, Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	06/2026	4,647	4,636	4,647	0.4	%


						58,774	59,025	5.3	%
Education
Pluralsight, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50% (1.50% PIK)	08/2029	3,944	3,944	3,944	0.4	%
Pluralsight, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.50% PIK	08/2029	4,055	4,055	4,055	0.4	%
Severin Acquisition, LLC (dba PowerSchool)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00% (2.25% PIK)	10/2031	752	745	745	0.1	%

						8,744	8,744	0.8	%
Energy equipment and services
Dresser Utility Solutions, LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	03/2029	9,369	9,286	9,346	0.8	%


						9,286	9,346	0.8	%
Financial services
Baker Tilly Advisory Group, L.P.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%	06/2031	9,342	9,213	9,295	0.8	%
Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc.(12)(19)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	03/2029	14,925	14,655	15,091	1.3	%
Cresset Capital Management, LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	06/2030	520	515	520	—	%
Finastra USA, Inc.(5)(13)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.25%	09/2029	3,992	3,945	3,992	0.4	%
KRIV Acquisition Inc. (dba Riveron)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	07/2029	1,035	1,010	1,035	0.1	%
Minotaur Acquisition, Inc. (dba Inspira Financial)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	06/2030	27,647	27,373	27,508	2.4	%
NMI Acquisitionco, Inc. (dba Network Merchants)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	09/2028	4,755	4,743	4,755	0.4	%
Smarsh Inc.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	02/2029	857	851	857	0.1	%
Smarsh Inc.(5)(12)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.75%	02/2029	3	3	3	—	%












						62,308	63,056	5.6	%
Food and beverage
Balrog Acquisition, Inc. (dba Bakemark)(13)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	7.00%	09/2029	5,000	4,971	5,000	0.4	%
BP Veraison Buyer, LLC (dba Sun World)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	05/2029	19,215	19,083	19,215	1.7	%
EAGLE FAMILY FOODS GROUP LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	08/2030	1,748	1,732	1,740	0.2	%
Fiesta Purchaser, Inc. (dba Shearer's Foods)(12)(19)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	3.25%	02/2031	4,975	4,975	4,974	0.4	%
Gehl Foods, LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.25%	06/2030	11,113	11,009	11,057	1.0	%
Gehl Foods, LLC(5)(13)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	6.25%	06/2030	342	335	340	—	%
H-Food Holdings, LLC(8)(16)	Second lien senior secured loan	P+	6.00%	03/2026	18,200	16,326	728	0.1	%
Hissho Parent, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%	05/2029	1,138	1,131	1,138	0.1	%

F-24

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(3)(28)	Fair Value	Percentage of Net Assets(32)
Innovation Ventures HoldCo, LLC (dba 5 Hour Energy)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.25%	03/2027	720		713	710	0.1	%

Nellson Nutraceutical, LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	12/2025	25,567		25,440	25,567	2.3	%
Rushmore Investment III LLC (dba Winland Foods)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	10/2030	45,339		44,916	45,339	4.0	%
Sara Lee Frozen Bakery, LLC (fka KSLB Holdings, LLC)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%	07/2025	5,146		5,136	5,102	0.5	%
The Better Being Co., LLC (fka Nutraceutical International Corporation)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.50% (3.90% PIK)	09/2026	36,191		36,027	36,191	3.2	%
Vital Bidco AB (dba Vitamin Well)(13)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%	10/2031	4,784		4,719	4,717	0.4	%
Vital Bidco AB (dba Vitamin Well)(5)(12)(21)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	4.50%	10/2030	273		258	258	—	%






							176,771	162,076	14.4	%
Healthcare equipment and services
Creek Parent, Inc. (dba Catalent)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	12/2031	874		859	859	0.1	%
CSC MKG Topco LLC (dba Medical Knowledge Group)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	02/2029	833		822	824	0.1	%
NELIPAK EUROPEAN HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A.(5)(9)	First lien senior secured EUR term loan	E+	5.50%	03/2031	€	6,296	6,712	6,377	0.6	%
Nelipak Holding Company(5)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	03/2031	3,763		3,704	3,677	0.3	%
Patriot Acquisition TopCo S.A.R.L (dba Corza Health, Inc.)(13)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	01/2028	23,667		23,473	23,667	2.1	%
Rhea Parent, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%	12/2030	1,000		997	997	0.1	%
TBRS, Inc. (dba TEAM Technologies)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%	11/2031	702		699	699	0.1	%
TBRS, Inc. (dba TEAM Technologies)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	4.75%	11/2030	6		6	6	—	%


							37,272	37,106	3.3	%
Healthcare providers and services
Allied Benefit Systems Intermediate LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	10/2030	2,979		2,939	2,979	0.3	%

Ex Vivo Parent Inc. (dba OB Hospitalist)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	9.75% PIK	09/2028	15,258		15,114	15,219	1.4	%
KABAFUSION Parent, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	11/2031	889		880	880	0.1	%
KWOL Acquisition Inc. (dba Worldwide Clinical Trials)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%	12/2029	4,307		4,237	4,307	0.4	%
Maple Acquisition, LLC (dba Medicus)(14)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	05/2031	5,612		5,573	5,612	0.5	%
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	8.00% (3.00% PIK)	04/2026	20,950		20,878	16,720	1.5	%
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)(15)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	10.00% PIK	04/2026	1,476		1,476	1,166	0.1	%
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	7.00%	04/2026	1,296		1,289	927	0.1	%
Natural Partners, LLC(13)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%	11/2027	1,232		1,217	1,226	0.1	%
OB Hospitalist Group, Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	09/2027	20,881		20,631	20,829	1.9	%
Pacific BidCo Inc.(14)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00% (2.05% PIK)	08/2029	2,001		1,965	1,951	0.2	%
PetVet Care Centers, LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%	11/2030	15,130		14,996	14,487	1.3	%
Phantom Purchaser, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	09/2031	1,773		1,756	1,760	0.2	%

F-25

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(3)(28)	Fair Value	Percentage of Net Assets(32)
Plasma Buyer LLC (dba PathGroup)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	05/2029	665		656	657	0.1	%
Plasma Buyer LLC (dba PathGroup)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	6.25%	05/2029	20		20	20	—	%
Plasma Buyer LLC (dba PathGroup)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.75%	05/2028	42		42	41	—	%
Premier Imaging, LLC (dba LucidHealth)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00% (6.47% PIK)	03/2026	8,396		8,396	7,788	0.7	%
Premise Health Holding Corp.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	03/2031	8,027		7,917	8,007	0.7	%
Quva Pharma, Inc.(14)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	04/2028	15,354		15,095	15,201	1.4	%
Quva Pharma, Inc.(5)(14)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.50%	04/2026	993		984	981	0.1	%
Tivity Health, Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	06/2029	494		494	494	—	%
Unified Women's Healthcare, LP(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	06/2029	893		888	893	0.1	%
Unified Women's Healthcare, LP(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	06/2029	9,909		9,843	9,909	0.9	%
Unified Women's Healthcare, LP(5)(12)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.25%	06/2029	3,945		3,917	3,945	0.4	%
Vermont Aus Pty Ltd(17)(21)	First lien senior secured AUD term loan	BBSY+	5.75%	03/2028	A$	1,297	880	799	0.1	%











							142,083	136,798	12.6	%
Healthcare technology
BCPE Osprey Buyer, Inc. (dba PartsSource)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	08/2028	585		580	578	0.1	%
BCPE Osprey Buyer, Inc. (dba PartsSource)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.75%	08/2028	122		118	120	—	%
BCPE Osprey Buyer, Inc. (dba PartsSource)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.75%	08/2026	34		34	34	—	%
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (& Smart Holdings Corp.) (dba Datavant)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	08/2031	8,927		8,878	8,905	0.8	%
GI Ranger Intermediate, LLC (dba Rectangle Health)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%	10/2028	898		888	883	0.1	%
GI Ranger Intermediate, LLC (dba Rectangle Health)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.00%	10/2027	9		8	7	—	%
Indikami Bidco, LLC (dba IntegriChain)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50% (2.50% PIK)	12/2030	2,749		2,694	2,735	0.2	%
Indikami Bidco, LLC (dba IntegriChain)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	6.00%	12/2030	22		19	21	—	%
Indikami Bidco, LLC (dba IntegriChain)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.00%	06/2030	97		92	96	—	%
Inovalon Holdings, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	11/2028	38,530		37,976	38,048	3.4	%
Inovalon Holdings, Inc.(13)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	10.50% PIK	11/2033	30,581		30,231	30,275	2.7	%
Intelerad Medical Systems Incorporated (fka 11849573 Canada Inc.)(13)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%	08/2026	41,183		41,009	40,153	3.6	%
Interoperability Bidco, Inc. (dba Lyniate)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.25%	03/2028	14,504		14,462	14,140	1.3	%
Interoperability Bidco, Inc. (dba Lyniate)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.25%	03/2028	59		52	30	—	%

F-26

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(3)(28)	Fair Value	Percentage of Net Assets(32)
RL Datix Holdings (USA), Inc.(14)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	04/2031	7,206		7,139	7,170	0.6	%
RL Datix Holdings (USA), Inc.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.50%	10/2030	180		167	173	—	%
RL Datix Holdings (USA), Inc.(7)	First lien senior secured GBP term loan	SA+	5.50%	04/2031	£	3,337	4,129	4,158	0.4	%
Salinger Bidco Inc. (dba Surgical Information Systems)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	08/2031	5,086		5,013	5,073	0.5	%







							153,489	152,599	13.6	%
Household products
HGH Purchaser, Inc. (dba Horizon Services)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.00% (2.50% PIK)	11/2026	34,648		34,555	32,828	2.9	%
Mario Midco Holdings, Inc. (dba Len the Plumber)(12)	Unsecured facility	S+	10.75% PIK	04/2032	225		221	217	—	%
Mario Purchaser, LLC (dba Len the Plumber)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	04/2029	801		789	777	0.1	%
Mario Purchaser, LLC (dba Len the Plumber)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.75%	04/2028	17		16	15	—	%
SimpliSafe Holding Corporation(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.25%	05/2028	904		895	904	0.1	%



							36,476	34,741	3.1	%
Human resource support services
Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.(12)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%	10/2029	16,667		16,495	14,208	1.3	%
IG Investments Holdings, LLC (dba Insight Global)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	09/2028	9,102		9,102	9,102	0.8	%

							25,597	23,310	2.1	%
Infrastructure and environmental services
CHA Vision Holdings, Inc. (fka FR Vision Holdings, Inc.)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	01/2031	6,064		6,001	6,064	0.5	%
KENE Acquisition, Inc. (dba Entrust Solutions Group)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	02/2031	2,211		2,171	2,183	0.2	%
KENE Acquisition, Inc. (dba Entrust Solutions Group)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.25%	02/2031	102		93	99	—	%
LineStar Integrity Services LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.25%	02/2026	11,246		10,910	10,739	1.0	%
Tamarack Intermediate, L.L.C. (dba Verisk 3E)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	03/2028	808		798	804	0.1	%
Vessco Midco Holdings, LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%	07/2031	3,115		3,086	3,100	0.3	%
Vessco Midco Holdings, LLC(5)(14)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	4.75%	07/2031	273		267	272	—	%







							23,326	23,261	2.1	%
Insurance
Alera Group, Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	10/2028	7,221		7,220	7,221	0.6	%
Alera Group, Inc.(5)(12)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.75%	10/2028	6,728		6,668	6,728	0.6	%
Brightway Holdings, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%	12/2027	4,872		4,837	4,847	0.4	%
Brightway Holdings, LLC(5)(12)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.50%	12/2027	211		207	208	—	%
Diamond Mezzanine 24 LLC (dba United Risk)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	10/2030	713		709	709	0.1	%
Diamond Mezzanine 24 LLC (dba United Risk)(16)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	P+	4.00%	10/2030	48		47	47	—	%
Evolution BuyerCo, Inc. (dba SIAA)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.25%	04/2028	28,908		28,682	28,908	2.6	%
Evolution BuyerCo, Inc. (dba SIAA)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	6.00%	04/2028	821		793	821	0.1	%

F-27

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(3)(28)	Fair Value	Percentage of Net Assets(32)
Galway Borrower LLC(5)(13)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	4.50%	09/2028	44	43	44	—	%
Integrity Marketing Acquisition, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	08/2028	4,151	4,131	4,151	0.4	%
KUSRP Intermediate, Inc. (dba U.S. Retirement and Benefits Partners)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	10.50% PIK	07/2030	1,817	1,804	1,817	0.2	%
Norvax, LLC (dba GoHealth)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.50%	06/2025	462	462	462	—	%
PCF Midco II, LLC (dba PCF Insurance Services)(25)	First lien senior secured loan		9.00% PIK	10/2031	28,509	26,911	27,155	2.4	%
Peter C. Foy & Associates Insurance Services, LLC (dba PCF Insurance Services)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	11/2028	13,705	13,705	13,705	1.2	%
Peter C. Foy & Associates Insurance Services, LLC (dba PCF Insurance Services)(13)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.50%	11/2028	4,534	4,534	4,534	0.4	%
Simplicity Financial Marketing Group Holdings, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	12/2031	714	707	707	0.1	%
Tempo Buyer Corp. (dba Global Claims Services)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%	08/2028	681	673	681	0.1	%
THG Acquisition, LLC (dba Hilb)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%	10/2031	4,723	4,672	4,671	0.4	%
USRP Holdings, Inc. (dba U.S. Retirement and Benefits Partners)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	12/2029	1,634	1,626	1,634	0.1	%






						108,431	109,050	9.7	%
Internet software and services
Anaplan, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	06/2029	8,782	8,780	8,782	0.8	%
Aptean Acquiror, Inc. (dba Aptean)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	01/2031	4,417	4,377	4,407	0.4	%
Artifact Bidco, Inc. (dba Avetta)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%	07/2031	1,550	1,543	1,542	0.1	%
Azurite Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (dba Alteryx, Inc.)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%	03/2031	2,137	2,108	2,121	0.2	%
Bayshore Intermediate #2, L.P. (dba Boomi)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.25% (3.38% PIK)	10/2028	4,762	4,761	4,762	0.4	%
BCTO BSI Buyer, Inc. (dba Buildertrend)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%	12/2026	11,406	11,363	11,406	1.0	%
Catalis Intermediate, Inc. (fka GovBrands Intermediate, Inc.)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	08/2027	3,015	2,977	2,929	0.3	%
CivicPlus, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	08/2027	2,571	2,557	2,571	0.2	%
CP PIK DEBT ISSUER, LLC (dba CivicPlus, LLC)(14)	Unsecured notes	S+	11.75% PIK	06/2034	639	629	639	0.1	%
Crewline Buyer, Inc. (dba New Relic)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.75%	11/2030	4,702	4,639	4,643	0.4	%
Delinea Buyer, Inc. (f/k/a Centrify)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75%	03/2028	17,292	17,045	17,292	1.5	%
Delta TopCo, Inc. (dba Infoblox, Inc.)(14)(19)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	11/2030	27,000	26,868	27,351	2.4	%
EET Buyer, Inc. (dba e-Emphasys)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%	11/2027	884	879	884	0.1	%
Forescout Technologies, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	05/2031	7,842	7,805	7,802	0.7	%
Granicus, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75% (2.25% PIK)	01/2031	3,920	3,886	3,920	0.3	%
Granicus, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.25% (2.25% PIK)	01/2031	581	576	575	0.1	%
H&F Opportunities LUX III S.À R.L (dba Checkmarx)(12)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.50%	04/2026	14,544	14,429	14,508	1.3	%
Hyland Software, Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%	09/2030	1,782	1,758	1,782	0.2	%

F-28

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(3)(28)	Fair Value	Percentage of Net Assets(32)
Icefall Parent, Inc. (dba EngageSmart)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50%	01/2030	4,049	3,978	4,049	0.4	%
Litera Bidco LLC(5)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	05/2028	24,155	24,043	24,094	2.1	%
MINDBODY, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.00%	09/2025	10,945	10,939	10,945	1.0	%
Ministry Brands Holdings, LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	12/2028	756	747	751	0.1	%
PDI TA Holdings, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	02/2031	4,013	3,961	3,973	0.4	%
PDI TA Holdings, Inc.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.50%	02/2031	520	508	513	—	%
QAD, Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.75%	11/2027	4,408	4,408	4,397	0.4	%
Securonix, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.75% (3.75% PIK)	04/2028	847	842	735	0.1	%
Securonix, Inc.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	7.00%	04/2028	3	3	(17)	—	%
Spaceship Purchaser, Inc. (dba Squarespace)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	10/2031	701	698	698	0.1	%
Thunder Purchaser, Inc. (dba Vector Solutions)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	06/2028	14,582	14,503	14,582	1.3	%
When I Work, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	11/2027	925	921	893	0.1	%
































						182,531	183,529	16.3	%
Leisure and entertainment
Aerosmith Bidco 1 Limited (dba Audiotonix)(12)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	07/2031	33,145	32,738	33,062	2.9	%
Troon Golf, L.L.C.(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%	08/2028	8,710	8,704	8,710	0.8	%





						41,442	41,772	3.7	%
Manufacturing
Faraday Buyer, LLC (dba MacLean Power Systems)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%	10/2028	17,746	17,458	17,569	1.6	%
FR Flow Control CB LLC (dba Trillium Flow Technologies)(13)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	12/2029	733	728	728	0.1	%
JSG II, Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%	06/2026	3,374	3,366	3,374	0.3	%

Loparex Midco BV(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%	02/2027	199	199	199	—	%
MHE Intermediate Holdings, LLC (dba OnPoint Group)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%	07/2027	9,453	9,402	9,453	0.8	%
PHM Netherlands Midco B.V. (dba Loparex)(13)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	8.75%	07/2027	28,000	27,163	25,410	2.3	%
PHM Netherlands Midco B.V. (dba Loparex)(13)	Second lien senior secured loan	S+	8.50%	07/2027	5,250	5,250	5,001	0.4	%
Sonny's Enterprises, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.50%	08/2028	46,475	45,989	46,243	4.1	%
Sonny's Enterprises, LLC(5)(13)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	S+	5.50%	08/2028	356	339	354	—	%
Sonny's Enterprises, LLC(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.50%	08/2027	706	674	692	0.1	%
						110,568	109,023	9.7	%








Professional services
Essential Services Holding Corporation (dba Turnpoint)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	06/2031	3,128	3,099	3,097	0.3	%
Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	12/2027	10,392	10,319	10,366	0.9	%
Guidehouse Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.75% (2.00% PIK)	12/2030	926	926	922	0.1	%

F-29

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units		Amortized Cost(3)(28)	Fair Value	Percentage of Net Assets(32)
Paris US Holdco, Inc. (dba Precinmac)(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	12/2031	721		714	714	0.1	%
Relativity ODA LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	4.50%	05/2029	19,162		19,090	19,114	1.7	%
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.00%	05/2028	11,213		11,173	11,269	1.0	%
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)(5)(12)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.50%	05/2028	628		624	630	0.1	%
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)(5)(10)	First lien senior secured EUR term loan	E+	7.25%	05/2028	€	2,026	2,193	2,109	0.2	%
Vensure Employer Services, Inc.(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	09/2031	828		820	820	0.1	%








							48,958	49,041	4.4	%
Specialty retail
Galls, LLC(5)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.50% (1.50% PIK)	03/2030	16,655		16,405	16,655	1.5	%
Milan Laser Holdings LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	04/2027	22,233		22,134	22,233	2.0	%
Notorious Topco, LLC (dba Beauty Industry Group)(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	7.25% (2.50% PIK)	11/2027	26,244		26,035	23,356	2.1	%
The Shade Store, LLC(13)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%	10/2029	6,679		6,477	6,512	0.6	%
The Shade Store, LLC(5)(13)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.00%	10/2028	165		148	148	—	%




							71,199	68,904	6.1	%
Telecommunications
EOS Finco S.A.R.L(14)(21)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.00%	10/2029	8,447		8,098	5,659	0.5	%
Park Place Technologies, LLC(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.25%	03/2031	2,344		2,323	2,333	0.2	%
Park Place Technologies, LLC(5)(12)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	5.25%	03/2030	79		77	78	—	%
PPT Holdings III, LLC (dba Park Place Technologies)(25)	First lien senior secured loan		12.75% PIK	03/2034	827		809	817	0.1	%


							11,307	8,887	0.8	%
Transportation
Lytx, Inc.(12)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	02/2028	23,668		23,668	23,668	2.1	%
							23,668	23,668	2.1	%
Total non-controlled/non-affiliated portfolio company debt investments							1,779,300	1,739,841	154.9	%

Equity Investments
Asset based lending and fund finance
AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC(5)(11)(21)(26)	LLC Interest		N/A	N/A	1,487		1,487	1,667	0.1	%
AAM Series 2.1 Aviation Feeder, LLC(5)(11)(21)(26)	LLC Interest		N/A	N/A	1,422		1,425	1,781	0.2	%
Amergin Asset Management, LLC(11)(26)	Class A Units		N/A	N/A	50,000,000		—	1,555	0.1	%
							2,912	5,003	0.4	%
Automotive Services
CD&R Value Building Partners I, L.P. (dba Belron)(6)(11)(21)(26)	LP Interest		N/A	N/A	1,000		966	1,154	0.1	%
Metis HoldCo, Inc. (dba Mavis Tire Express Services)(25)(26)	Series A Convertible Preferred Stock		7.00% PIK	N/A	32,308		40,986	41,660	3.7	%
							41,952	42,814	3.8	%

F-30

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(3)(28)	Fair Value	Percentage of Net Assets(32)
Buildings and real estate
Dodge Construction Network Holdings, L.P.(13)(26)	Series A Preferred Units	S+	8.25%	N/A	0	9	5	—	%
Dodge Construction Network Holdings, L.P.(11)(26)	Class A-2 Common Units		N/A	N/A	431,889	368	61	—	%
						377	66	—	%
Business Services
Denali Holding, LP (dba Summit Companies)(11)(26)	Class A Units		N/A	N/A	41,874	425	739	0.1	%
Hercules Buyer, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)(11)(24)(26)	Common Units		N/A	N/A	350,000	352	427	—	%

Knockout Intermediate Holdings I Inc. (dba Kaseya Inc.)(14)(26)	Perpetual Preferred Stock	S+	10.75% PIK	N/A	400	548	555	—	%
						1,325	1,721	0.1	%
Consumer Products
ASP Conair Holdings LP(11)(26)	Class A Units		N/A	N/A	12,857	1,286	1,398	0.1	%
						1,286	1,398	0.1	%
Education
Paradigmatic Holdco LLC (dba Pluralsight)(11)(26)	Common stock		N/A	N/A	1,309,529	3,475	3,475	0.3	%
						3,475	3,475	0.3	%
Food and beverage
HFS Matterhorn Topco, Inc.(11)(26)	LLC Interest		N/A	N/A	1,625	1,625	—	—	%
Hissho Sushi Holdings, LLC(11)(26)	Class A Units		N/A	N/A	7,502	60	97	—	%
						1,685	97	—	%
Healthcare equipment and services
KPCI Holdings, L.P.(11)(26)	Class A Units		N/A	N/A	5,665	6,014	15,827	1.4	%
Maia Aggregator, LP(11)(26)	Class A-2 Units		N/A	N/A	112,360	112	102	—	%
Patriot Holdings SCSp (dba Corza Health, Inc.)(21)(25)(26)	Class A Units		8.00% PIK	N/A	1,515	2,033	2,023	0.2	%
Patriot Holdings SCSp (dba Corza Health, Inc.)(11)(21)(26)	Class B Units		N/A	N/A	20,868	28	86	—	%
Rhea Acquisition Holdings, LP(11)(26)	Series A-2 Units		N/A	N/A	119,048	119	144	—	%
						8,306	18,182	1.6	%
Healthcare providers and services
KOBHG Holdings, L.P. (dba OB Hospitalist)(11)(26)	Class A Interests		N/A	N/A	1,291	1,291	1,181	0.1	%
KWOL Acquisition Inc. (dba Worldwide Clinical Trials)(11)(26)	Class A Interest		N/A	N/A	30	301	341	—	%
Romulus Intermediate Holdings 1 Inc. (dba PetVet Care Centers)(25)(26)	Series A Preferred Stock		15.00% PIK	N/A	1,721	1,965	1,849	0.2	%
XOMA Corporation(11)(26)	Warrants		N/A	N/A	1,800	12	21	—	%
						3,569	3,392	0.3	%
Healthcare technology
Minerva Holdco, Inc.(25)(26)	Senior A Preferred Stock		10.75% PIK	N/A	1,000	1,348	1,319	0.1	%
						1,348	1,319	0.1	%



Human resource support services
Sunshine Software Holdings, Inc. (dba Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.)(25)(26)	Series A Preferred Stock		10.50% PIK	N/A	5,500	7,548	6,039	0.5	%
						7,548	6,039	0.5	%

F-31

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(3)(28)		Fair Value		Percentage of Net Assets(32)
Insurance
Evolution Parent, LP (dba SIAA)(11)(26)	LP Interest		N/A	N/A	8,919	892		1,015		0.1	%
Fifth Season Investments LLC(26)	Class A Units		N/A	N/A	0	2,698		2,977		0.3	%
GoHealth, Inc.(11)(18)	Common stock		N/A	N/A	15,139	1,163		203		—	%
GrowthCurve Capital Sunrise Co-Invest LP (dba Brightway)(11)(26)	LP Interest		N/A	N/A	10,513	107		105		—	%
PCF Holdco, LLC (dba PCF Insurance Services)(11)(26)	Class A Units		N/A	N/A	2,513,848	6,375		11,746		1.0	%
						11,235		16,046		1.4	%
Internet software and services
BCTO WIW Holdings, Inc. (dba When I Work)(11)(26)	Class A Common Stock		N/A	N/A	3,000	300		164		—	%
Brooklyn Lender Co-Invest 2, L.P. (dba Boomi)(11)(26)	Common Units		N/A	N/A	1,345,119	1,345		2,019		0.2	%
Insight CP (Blocker) Holdings, L.P. (dba CivicPlus, LLC)(11)(21)(26)	LP Interest		N/A	N/A	31,348	31		39		—	%
Bird Holding B.V. (fka MessageBird Holding B.V.)(11)(21)(26)	Extended Series C Warrants		N/A	N/A	25,540	157		37		—	%
Project Alpine Co-Invest Fund, LP(11)(21)(26)	LP Interest		N/A	N/A	1,000	1,001		1,313		0.1	%
Thunder Topco L.P. (dba Vector Solutions)(11)(26)	Common Units		N/A	N/A	819,817	820		975		0.1	%
VEPF Torreys Aggregator, LLC (dba MINDBODY, Inc.)(25)(26)	Series A Preferred Stock		10.00% PIK	N/A	3,750	4,417		4,638		0.4	%
WMC Bidco, Inc. (dba West Monroe)(25)(26)	Senior Preferred Stock		11.25% PIK	N/A	2,385	3,356		3,320		0.3	%
						11,427		12,505		1.1	%
Manufacturing
Gloves Holdings, LP (dba Protective Industrial Products)(11)(26)	LP Interest		N/A	N/A	7,000	700		829		0.1	%
Windows Entities(26)(27)	LLC Units		N/A	N/A	10,615	20,107		46,210		4.1	%


						20,807		47,039		4.2	%
Pharmaceuticals
LSI Financing 1 DAC(21)(26)	Preferred equity		N/A	N/A	234	237		239		—	%


						237		239		—	%
Total non-controlled/non-affiliated portfolio company equity investments						$	117,489	$	159,335	14.2	%
Total non-controlled/non-affiliated portfolio company investments						$	1,896,789	$	1,899,176	169.0	%

Non-controlled/affiliated portfolio company investments
Debt Investments
Advertising and media
Swipe Acquisition Corporation (dba PLI)(12)(29)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	8.00%	06/2026	631	627		631		0.1	%
Swipe Acquisition Corporation (dba PLI)(12)(29)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	8.00%	11/2027	8,341	8,341		8,341		0.7	%
Swipe Acquisition Corporation (dba PLI)(5)(12)(29)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	5.00%	11/2027	4,407	4,364		4,364		0.4	%
						13,332		13,336		1.2	%
Household products
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC(5)(8)(13)(29)	First lien senior secured loan	S+	6.75% PIK	03/2027	7,893	6,244		1,037		0.1	%
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC(8)(13)(29)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	S+	6.25%	03/2027	2,247	2,247		1,444		0.1	%

						8,491		2,481		0.2	%
Total non-controlled/affiliated portfolio company debt investments						$	21,823	$	15,817	1.4	%

F-32

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


Company(1)(2)(4)(22)(23)	Investment	Interest		Maturity Date	Par / Units	Amortized Cost(3)(28)		Fair Value		Percentage of Net Assets(32)
Equity Investments
Advertising and media
New PLI Holdings, LLC (dba PLI)(11)(26)(29)	Class A Common Units		N/A	N/A	10,755	5,952		11,494		1.0	%
						5,952		11,494		1.0	%
Household Products
Walker Edison Holdco LLC(11)(26)(29)	Common Units		N/A	N/A	49,159	4,750		—		—	%
						4,750		—		—	%
Pharmaceuticals
LSI Financing LLC(6)(21)(26)(29)	Common Equity		N/A	N/A	9,389	9,389		9,554		0.9	%
						9,389		9,554		0.9	%
Total non-controlled/affiliated portfolio company equity investments						$	20,091	$	21,048	1.9	%
Total non-controlled/affiliated portfolio company investments						$	41,914	$	36,865	3.3	%

Controlled/affiliated portfolio company investments
Equity Investments
Joint Venture
Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC(6)(21)(26)(30)(31)	LLC Interest		N/A	N/A	189	190		191		—	%
						190		191		—	%
Total controlled/affiliated portfolio company equity investments						$	190	$	191	—	%
Total controlled/affiliated portfolio company investments						$	190	$	191	—	%

Total non-controlled/non-affiliated misc. debt commitments(5)(33)(Note 7)						$	(697)	$	(840)	(0.1)	%





Total Investments						$	1,938,196	$	1,935,392	172.2	%

_______________

(1)Certain portfolio company investments are subject to contractual restrictions on sales. Refer to footnote 25 for additional information on our restricted securities.

(2)Unless otherwise indicated, all investments are considered Level 3 investments.

(3)The amortized cost represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion and amortization of discounts and premiums, as applicable, on debt investments using the effective interest method.

(4)Unless otherwise indicated, loan contains a variable rate structure, and may be subject to an interest rate floor. Variable rate loans bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to either the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR” or “S,” which can include one-, three- or six- month SOFR), Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR” or “E”, which can include one-, two-, three- or six-month EURIBOR), SONIA (“SONIA” or “SA”), Australian Bank Bill Swap Bid Rate (“BBSY” or “BB”) (which can include one-, three-, or six-month BBSY) or an alternate base rate (which can include the Federal Funds Effective Rate or the Prime Rate (“PRIME” or “P”)), at the borrower’s option, and which reset periodically based on the terms of the loan agreement.

(5)Position or portion thereof is a partially unfunded debt or equity commitment. See below for more information on the Company’s commitments. See “Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies.”


				Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment	Commitment	Fair Value(33)
Non-controlled/non-affiliated - delayed draw debt commitments

Aerosmith Bidco 1 Limited (dba Audiotonix)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2027	—	10,543	(8)
Alera Group, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	11/2025	6,728	380	—
Aptean Acquiror, Inc. (dba Aptean)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	1/2026	71	199	—
Artifact Bidco, Inc. (dba Avetta)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2027	—	379	—
Associations, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2028	598	2,987	—
Baker Tilly Advisory Group, L.P.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	—	1,410	—
BCPE Osprey Buyer, Inc. (dba PartsSource)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2025	51	244	—
BradyPLUS Holdings, LLC (f/k/a BradyIFS Holdings, LLC)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2025	198	721	—
CHA Vision Holdings, Inc. (fka FR Vision Holdings, Inc.)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	1/2026	729	1,001	—

F-33

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


				Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment	Commitment	Fair Value(33)
Cresset Capital Management, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2025	—	254	—
Cresset Capital Management, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	—	149	—
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (& Smart Holdings Corp.) (dba Datavant)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	8/2026	—	307	(1)
DCG ACQUISITION CORP. (dba DuBois Chemical)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	—	939	—
Diamond Mezzanine 24 LLC (dba United Risk)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2026	—	190	—
Dresser Utility Solutions, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2025	—	858	—
DuraServ LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	1,180	1,198	—
Endries Acquisition, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	12/2025	—	1,781	(13)
Essential Services Holding Corporation (dba Turnpoint)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	—	613	(3)
Evolution BuyerCo, Inc. (dba SIAA)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	12/2025	821	4,149	—
Faraday Buyer, LLC (dba MacLean Power Systems)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	11/2025	—	1,882	—
FR Flow Control CB LLC (dba Trillium Flow Technologies)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	—	147	—
Galls, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	3/2026	588	4,757	—
Galway Borrower LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2026	28	1,526	—
Gehl Foods, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	12/2025	342	513	—
Indigo Buyer, Inc. (dba Inovar Packaging Group)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2026	—	221	—
Indikami Bidco, LLC (dba IntegriChain)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	12/2025	22	356	—
Integrity Marketing Acquisition, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	8/2026	—	628	—
Interoperability Bidco, Inc. (dba Lyniate)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	—	952	(24)
Kaseya Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2025	6	24	—
KENE Acquisition, Inc. (dba Entrust Solutions Group)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	2/2026	102	881	—
KPSKY Acquisition, Inc. (dba BluSky)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	11/2025	1	58	—
Litera Bidco LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	5/2027	—	2,487	(6)
Litera Bidco LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	11/2026	2,803	3,166	—
Maple Acquisition, LLC (dba Medicus)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	5/2026	—	1,069	—
Mario Purchaser, LLC (dba Len the Plumber)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2025	18	166	—
Minotaur Acquisition, Inc. (dba Inspira Financial)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	5/2026	—	3,958	—
Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	2/2026	373	1,228	—
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	4/2026	855	197	—
NELIPAK EUROPEAN HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A.	First lien senior secured EUR delayed draw term loan	3/2027	—	2,469	(31)
Nelipak Holding Company	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	3/2027	—	1,302	(16)
Paris US Holdco, Inc. (dba Precinmac)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	12/2026	—	186	(1)
Park Place Technologies, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2025	—	368	—
PDI TA Holdings, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	2/2026	520	411	—
PetVet Care Centers, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	11/2025	—	1,993	(65)
Plasma Buyer LLC (dba PathGroup)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2025	20	5	—
Pluralsight, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	8/2029	—	1,637	—
Pye-Barker Fire & Safety, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	5/2026	1,644	2,969	—

RL Datix Holdings (USA), Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	4/2027	—	1,625	—
Salinger Bidco Inc. (dba Surgical Information Systems)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	8/2026	—	492	—
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2025	37	188	—
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)	First lien senior secured EUR delayed draw term loan	9/2025	8	39	—
Severin Acquisition, LLC (dba PowerSchool)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2027	—	157	(1)

F-34

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


				Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment	Commitment	Fair Value(33)
Simplicity Financial Marketing Group Holdings, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	12/2026	—	190	(1)
Smarsh Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	2/2025	95	95	—
Sonny's Enterprises, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	6/2026	356	4,105	—
Spaceship Purchaser, Inc. (dba Squarespace)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2026	—	42	—
Spaceship Purchaser, Inc. (dba Squarespace)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2027	—	100	—
STS PARENT, LLC (dba STS Aviation Group)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2026	—	2,100	(5)
TBRS, Inc. (dba TEAM Technologies)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	11/2026	—	191	—
THG Acquisition, LLC (dba Hilb)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	10/2026	—	1,044	(5)
Troon Golf, L.L.C.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2026	625	625	—
Unified Women's Healthcare, LP	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	3/2026	3,945	581	—
Vensure Employer Services, Inc.	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	9/2026	—	172	(1)
Vessco Midco Holdings, LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2026	273	765	—
WU Holdco, Inc. (dba Weiman Products, LLC)	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	7/2026	2,264	964	—
Non-controlled/affiliated debt - delayed draw debt commitments
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC	First lien senior secured delayed draw term loan	3/2027	1,633	365	—
Non-controlled/non-affiliated - revolving debt commitments
Aerosmith Bidco 1 Limited (dba Audiotonix)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2030	—	4,391	(11)
Anaplan, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2028	—	972	—
Aptean Acquiror, Inc. (dba Aptean)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2031	—	364	(1)
Artifact Bidco, Inc. (dba Avetta)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2030	—	271	(1)

Ascend Buyer, LLC (dba PPC Flexible Packaging)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2027	26	52	—
Associations, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2028	1,436	1,436	—
Azurite Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (dba Alteryx, Inc.)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2031	—	238	(2)
Baker Tilly Advisory Group, L.P.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2030	—	1,975	(10)
Bayshore Intermediate #2, L.P. (dba Boomi)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2027	—	410	—
BCPE Osprey Buyer, Inc. (dba PartsSource)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2026	34	17	—
BCTO BSI Buyer, Inc. (dba Buildertrend)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2026	—	1,527	—
BP Veraison Buyer, LLC (dba Sun World)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2029	—	3,868	—
Brightway Holdings, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2027	211	316	—
Broadcast Music, Inc. (fka Otis Merger Sub, Inc.)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2030	—	825	(6)
Catalis Intermediate, Inc. (fka GovBrands Intermediate, Inc.)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2027	64	121	—
CHA Vision Holdings, Inc. (fka FR Vision Holdings, Inc.)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2030	—	434	—
CivicPlus, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2027	—	213	—
Creek Parent, Inc. (dba Catalent)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2031	—	126	(2)
Cresset Capital Management, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2029	—	75	—
Crewline Buyer, Inc. (dba New Relic)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2030	—	472	(6)
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (& Smart Holdings Corp.) (dba Datavant)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2031	—	766	(2)
DCG ACQUISITION CORP. (dba DuBois Chemical)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2031	—	939	(5)
Delinea Buyer, Inc. (f/k/a Centrify)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2027	—	1,345	—
Denali BuyerCo, LLC (dba Summit Companies)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2027	—	125	—
Diamond Mezzanine 24 LLC (dba United Risk)*	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2030	48	—	—
Dresser Utility Solutions, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2029	—	1,201	(3)
DuraServ LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2030	—	1,190	(6)
Eagle Family Foods Group LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2030	—	202	(1)

F-35

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


				Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment	Commitment	Fair Value(33)
EET Buyer, Inc. (dba e-Emphasys)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2027	—	91	—
Essential Services Holding Corporation (dba Turnpoint)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2030	—	383	(4)
Evolution BuyerCo, Inc. (dba SIAA)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2027	—	2,230	—
Fiesta Purchaser, Inc. (dba Shearer's Foods)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2029	—	1,108	—
Finastra USA, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2029	244	148	—
Forescout Technologies, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2030	—	1,121	(6)
Fortis Solutions Group, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2027	31	58	—
FR Flow Control CB LLC (dba Trillium Flow Technologies)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2029	—	120	(1)
Gainsight, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2027	487	448	—
Galls, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2030	—	2,139	—
Galway Borrower LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2028	16	179	—
Gaylord Chemical Company, L.L.C.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2027	1,357	1,252	—
Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2027	—	526	(1)
GI Ranger Intermediate, LLC (dba Rectangle Health)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2027	9	65	—
Granicus, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2031	—	548	—
H&F Opportunities LUX III S.À R.L (dba Checkmarx)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2026	—	4,583	(11)
Hercules Borrower, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2026	—	3,343	—
HGH Purchaser, Inc. (dba Horizon Services)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2026	—	3,702	(194)
Hissho Parent, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2029	—	116	—
Hyland Software, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2029	—	85	—
Icefall Parent, Inc. (dba EngageSmart)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2030	—	386	—
IG Investments Holdings, LLC (dba Insight Global)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2028	—	963	—
Indigo Buyer, Inc. (dba Inovar Packaging Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2028	—	100	—
Indikami Bidco, LLC (dba IntegriChain)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2030	97	172	—
Integrity Marketing Acquisition, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2028	—	210	—
Intelerad Medical Systems Incorporated (fka 11849573 Canada Inc.)*	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2026	2,712	—	—
Interoperability Bidco, Inc. (dba Lyniate)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2028	59	1,070	—
KABAFUSION Parent, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2031	—	111	(1)
Kaseya Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2029	8	24	—
KENE Acquisition, Inc. (dba Entrust Solutions Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2031	—	295	(4)
KRIV Acquisition Inc. (dba Riveron)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2029	—	142	—
KWOL Acquisition Inc. (dba Worldwide Clinical Trials)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2029	—	589	—
Lignetics Investment Corp.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2026	1,078	392	—
LineStar Integrity Services LLC*	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2026	1,597	—	—
Litera Bidco LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2028	—	1,416	(4)
Maple Acquisition, LLC (dba Medicus)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2030	—	802	—
Mario Purchaser, LLC (dba Len the Plumber)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2028	17	39	—
MHE Intermediate Holdings, LLC (dba OnPoint Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2027	357	1,429	—
Milan Laser Holdings LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2026	—	2,837	—
MINDBODY, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2025	—	1,071	—
Ministry Brands Holdings, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2027	—	68	(1)
Minotaur Acquisition, Inc. (dba Inspira Financial)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2030	—	2,435	(12)
Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2030	—	2,402	(6)
National Dentex Labs LLC (fka Barracuda Dental LLC)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2026	1,296	421	—

F-36

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


				Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment	Commitment	Fair Value(33)
Natural Partners, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2027	—	159	(1)
NELIPAK EUROPEAN HOLDINGS COÖPERATIEF U.A.	First lien senior secured EUR revolving loan	3/2031	157	303	—
Nelipak Holding Company	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2031	408	563	—
NMI Acquisitionco, Inc. (dba Network Merchants)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2028	—	218	—
Norvax, LLC (dba GoHealth)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2025	462	901	—
Notorious Topco, LLC (dba Beauty Industry Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2027	—	2,113	(232)
OB Hospitalist Group, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2027	—	2,931	(7)
Paris US Holdco, Inc. (dba Precinmac)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2031	—	93	(1)
Park Place Technologies, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2030	79	197	—
Patriot Acquisition TopCo S.A.R.L (dba Corza Health, Inc.)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	1/2028	—	2,654	—
PDI TA Holdings, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2031	—	410	(4)
Peter C. Foy & Associates Insurance Services, LLC (dba PCF Insurance Services)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2027	—	1,035	—
PetVet Care Centers, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2029	—	2,092	(89)
Phantom Purchaser, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2031	—	227	(2)
Plasma Buyer LLC (dba PathGroup)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2028	42	33	—
Pluralsight, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2029	—	655	—
Premise Health Holding Corp.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2030	—	938	(2)
Pye-Barker Fire & Safety, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2030	122	852	—
QAD, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2027	—	571	(1)
Quva Pharma, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2026	993	189	—
Relativity ODA LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2029	—	1,637	(4)
Rhea Parent, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2030	—	172	(2)
RL Datix Holdings (USA), Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2030	180	1,243	—
Salinger Bidco Inc. (dba Surgical Information Systems)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2031	—	492	(1)
Sara Lee Frozen Bakery, LLC (fka KSLB Holdings, LLC)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2025	423	577	—
Securonix, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2028	3	149	—
Sensor Technology Topco, Inc. (dba Humanetics)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	5/2028	628	342	—
Severin Acquisition, LLC (dba PowerSchool)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2031	—	94	(1)
Simplicity Financial Marketing Group Holdings, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2031	—	95	(1)
Smarsh Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	2/2029	3	5	—
Sonny's Enterprises, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2027	706	2,118	—
Spaceship Purchaser, Inc. (dba Squarespace)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2031	—	83	—
STS PARENT, LLC (dba STS Aviation Group)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2030	389	452	—
SWK BUYER, Inc. (dba Stonewall Kitchen)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2029	—	70	(2)
Tamarack Intermediate, L.L.C. (dba Verisk 3E)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2028	—	112	(1)
TBRS, Inc. (dba TEAM Technologies)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2030	6	100	—
Tempo Buyer Corp. (dba Global Claims Services)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2027	—	99	—
The Better Being Co., LLC (fka Nutraceutical International Corporation)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2026	—	2,353	—
The Better Being Co., LLC (fka Nutraceutical International Corporation)*	First lien senior secured revolving loan	9/2026	151	—	—
The Shade Store, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2028	165	523	—
THG Acquisition, LLC (dba Hilb)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2031	39	483	—
Thunder Purchaser, Inc. (dba Vector Solutions)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2027	—	1,174	—

F-37

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)


					Unfunded
Portfolio Company	Commitment Type	Commitment Expiration Date	Funded Commitment		Commitment		Fair Value(33)
Troon Golf, L.L.C.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	8/2028	—		625		—
Unified Women's Healthcare, LP	First lien senior secured revolving loan	6/2029	—		88		—
USRP Holdings, Inc. (dba U.S. Retirement and Benefits Partners)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2029	—		183		—
Valence Surface Technologies LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	12/2026	2,955		2		—
Velocity HoldCo III Inc. (dba VelocityEHS)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	4/2026	—		368		—
Vessco Midco Holdings, LLC	First lien senior secured revolving loan	7/2031	—		346		(2)
Vital Bidco AB (dba Vitamin Well)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	10/2030	273		845		—
When I Work, Inc.	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2027	—		143		(5)
WU Holdco, Inc. (dba Weiman Products, LLC)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2027	1,352		2,591		—


Non-controlled/non-affiliated - equity commitments
LSI Financing LLC	Common Equity	N/A	9,389		191		—
AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC	LLC Interest	N/A	1,487		3,280		—
AAM Series 2.1 Aviation Feeder, LLC	LLC Interest	N/A	1,422		1,525		—

Non-controlled/affiliated debt
Swipe Acquisition Corporation (dba PLI)	First lien senior secured revolving loan	11/2027	771		881		—
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC*	First lien senior secured revolving loan	3/2027	2,247		—		—
Total Portfolio Company Commitments			$	62,970	$	181,763	$	(840)

*Fully funded

(6)Investment measured at net asset value (“NAV”).

(7)The interest rate on this loan is subject to SONIA, which as of December 31, 2024 was 4.70%.

(8)Loan was on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2024.

(9)The interest rate on this loan is subject to 1 month EURIBOR, which as of December 31, 2024 was 2.85%.

(10)The interest rate on this loan is subject to 3 month EURIBOR, which as of December 31, 2024 was 2.71%.

(11)Investment is non-income producing.

(12)The interest rate on these loans is subject to 1 month SOFR, which as of December 31, 2024 was 4.33%.

(13)The interest rate on these loans is subject to 3 month SOFR, which as of December 31, 2024 was 4.31%.

(14)The interest rate on these loans is subject to 6 month SOFR, which as of December 31, 2024 was 4.25%.

(15)The interest rate on these loans is subject to 12 month SOFR, which as of December 31, 2024 was 4.18%.

(16)The interest rate on these loans is subject to Prime, which as of December 31, 2024 was 7.50%.

(17)The interest rate on these loans is subject to 3 month BBSY, which as of December 31, 2024 was 4.42%.

(18)Level 1 investment.

(19)Level 2 investment.

(20)The date disclosed represents the commitment period of the unfunded term loan. Upon expiration of the commitment period, the funded portion of the term loan may be subject to a longer maturity date.

(21)This portfolio company is not a qualifying asset under Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, the Company may not acquire any non-qualifying asset unless, at the time such acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of total assets. As of December 31, 2024, non-qualifying assets represented 9.5% of total assets as calculated in accordance with the regulatory requirements.

(22)Unless otherwise indicated, all or a portion of the Company’s portfolio companies are pledged as collateral supporting the available capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility, SPV Asset Facility and CLO XIII. See “Note 5 — Debt.”

(23)Unless otherwise indicated, represents co-investment made with the Company’s affiliates in accordance with the terms of exemptive relief that the Company received from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. See “Note 3 — Agreements and Related Party Transactions.”

(24)The Company invests in this portfolio company through underlying blocker entities Hercules Blocker 1 LLC, Hercules Blocker 2 LLC, Hercules Blocker 3 LLC, Hercules Blocker 4 LLC, and Hercules Blocker 5 LLC.

(25)Investment contains a fixed-rate structure.

(26)Securities acquired in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and may be deemed to be “restricted securities” under the Securities Act. As of December 31, 2024, the aggregate fair value of these securities is $180.4 million, or 16.1% of the Company’s net assets. The acquisition dates of the restricted securities are as follows:

Portfolio Company

Investment

Acquisition Date

AAM Series 1.1 Rail and Domestic Intermodal Feeder, LLC

LLC Interest

July 1, 2022

AAM Series 2.1 Aviation Feeder, LLC

LLC Interest

July 1, 2022

Amergin Asset Management, LLC

Class A Units

July 1, 2022

F-38

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

Portfolio Company

Investment

Acquisition Date

ASP Conair Holdings LP

Class A Units

May 17, 2021

BCTO WIW Holdings, Inc. (dba When I Work)

Class A Common Stock

November 2, 2021

Blue Owl Credit SLF*

LLC Interest

August 1, 2024

Brooklyn Lender Co-Invest 2, L.P. (dba Boomi)

Common Units

October 1, 2021

CD&R Value Building Partners I, L.P. (dba Belron)

LP Interest

December 2, 2021

Denali Holding, LP (dba Summit Companies)

Class A Units

September 15, 2021

Dodge Construction Network Holdings, L.P.

Class A-2 Common Units

February 23, 2022

Dodge Construction Network Holdings, L.P.

Series A Preferred Units

February 23, 2022

Evolution Parent, LP (dba SIAA)

LP Interest

April 30, 2021

Fifth Season Investments LLC

Class A Units

October 17, 2022

Gloves Holdings, LP (dba Protective Industrial Products)

LP Interest

December 29, 2020

GrowthCurve Capital Sunrise Co-Invest LP (dba Brightway)

LP Interest

December 16, 2021

Hercules Buyer, LLC (dba The Vincit Group)

Common Units

December 15, 2020

HFS Matterhorn Topco, Inc.

LLC Interest

November 23, 2018

Hissho Sushi Holdings, LLC

Class A Units

May 17, 2022

Insight CP (Blocker) Holdings, L.P. (dba CivicPlus, LLC)

LP Interest

June 8, 2022

Knockout Intermediate Holdings I Inc. (dba Kaseya Inc.)

Perpetual Preferred Stock

June 22, 2022

KOBHG Holdings, L.P. (dba OB Hospitalist)

Class A Interests

September 27, 2021

KPCI Holdings, L.P.

Class A Units

November 30, 2020

KWOL Acquisition Inc. (dba Worldwide Clinical Trials)

Class A Interest

December 12, 2023

LSI Financing 1 DAC

Preferred equity

December 14, 2022

LSI Financing LLC

Common Equity

November 25, 2024

Maia Aggregator, LP

Class A-2 Units

February 1, 2022

Bird Holding B.V. (fka MessageBird Holding B.V.)

Extended Series C Warrants

May 5, 2021

Metis HoldCo, Inc. (dba Mavis Tire Express Services)

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

May 4, 2021

Minerva Holdco, Inc.

Senior A Preferred Stock

February 15, 2022

New PLI Holdings, LLC (dba PLI)

Class A Common Units

December 23, 2020

Patriot Holdings SCSp (dba Corza Health, Inc.)

Class B Units

January 29, 2021

Patriot Holdings SCSp (dba Corza Health, Inc.)

Class A Units

January 29, 2021

PCF Holdco, LLC (dba PCF Insurance Services)

Class A Units

November 1, 2021

Paradigmatic Holdco LLC (dba Pluralsight)

Common Units

August 22, 2024

Project Alpine Co-Invest Fund, LP

LP Interest

June 13, 2022

Rhea Acquisition Holdings, LP

Series A-2 Units

February 18, 2022

Sunshine Software Holdings, Inc. (dba Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.)

Series A Preferred Stock

October 15, 2021

Romulus Intermediate Holdings 1 Inc. (dba PetVet Care Centers)

Series A Preferred Stock

November 15, 2023

Thunder Topco L.P. (dba Vector Solutions)

Common Units

June 30, 2021

VEPF Torreys Aggregator, LLC (dba MINDBODY, Inc.)

Series A Preferred Stock

October 15, 2021

Walker Edison Holdco LLC

Common Units

March 1, 2023

Windows Entities

LLC Units

January 16, 2020

WMC Bidco, Inc. (dba West Monroe)

Senior Preferred Stock

November 9, 2021

XOMA Corporation

Warrants

December 15, 2023

* Refer to “Note 4 — Investments – Credit SLF LLC” for further information.

(27)Investment represents multiple underlying investments in related entities under common management. These underlying investments are on identical terms and include Midwest Custom Windows, LLC with a fair value of $8.0 million, Greater Toronto Custom Windows, Corp. with a fair value of $3.3 million, Garden State Custom Windows, LLC with a fair value of $11.1 million, Long Island Custom Windows, LLC with a fair value of $9.6 million, Jemico, LLC with a fair value of $7.7 million, Atlanta Custom Windows, LLC with a fair value of $3.8 million and Fairchester Custom Windows LLC with a fair value of $2.5 million as of December 31, 2024. Greater Toronto Custom Windows, Corp. is considered a non-qualifying asset.

(28)As of December 31, 2024, the net estimated unrealized loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $13.0 million based on a tax cost basis of $1.90 billion. As of December 31, 2024, the estimated aggregate gross unrealized loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $73.9 million and the estimated aggregate gross unrealized gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $60.9 million.

F-39

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Schedule of Investments (continued)

As of December 31, 2024

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

(29)Under the 1940 Act, the Company is deemed to be an “Affiliated Person” of this portfolio company as the Company owns more than 5% but less than 25% of the portfolio company’s outstanding voting securities. Transactions during the year ended December 31, 2024, in which the Company was an Affiliated Person of the portfolio company are as follows:


Company	Fair Value at December 31, 2023		Gross Additions(a)		Gross Reductions(b)		Net Change in Unrealized Gain/(Loss)		Realized Gain/(Loss)		Fair Value at December 31, 2024		Other Income		Interest and PIK Income		Dividend Income
LSI Financing LLC	$	—	$	12,494	$	(3,105)	$	165	$	—	$	9,554	$	—	$	—	$	49
Swipe Acquisition Corporation (dba PLI)	19,842		5,795		(165)		(642)		—		24,830		73		1,260		254
Walker Edison Furniture Company LLC	7,497		1,547		—		(6,563)		—		2,481		4		—		—
Total	$	27,339	$	19,836	$	(3,270)	$	(7,040)	$	—	$	36,865	$	77	$	1,260	$	303

_______________

(30)As defined in the 1940 Act, the Company is deemed to be both an “Affiliated Person” and has “Control” of this portfolio company as the Company owns more than 25% of the portfolio company’s outstanding voting securities or has the power to exercise control over management or policies of such portfolio company, including through a management agreement (“controlled affiliate”). The Company’s investment in controlled affiliates for the period ended December 31, 2024, were as follows:


Company	Fair Value at December 31, 2023		Gross Additions(a)		Gross Reductions(b)		Net Change in Unrealized Gain/(Loss)		Realized Gain/(Loss)		Fair Value at December 31, 2024		Other Income		Interest and PIK Income		Dividend Income
Blue Owl Credit SLF	$	—	$	524	$	(334)	$	1	$	—	$	191	$	—	$	—	$	5
Total	$	—	$	524	$	(334)	$	1	$	—	$	191	$	—	$	—	$	5

_______________

(31)Investment is not pledged as collateral for the credit facilities.

(32)Totals presented may differ than actuals due to rounding.

(33)The negative cost and fair value results from unamortized fees, which are capitalized to the investment cost.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-40

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets

(Amounts in thousands)


	For the Year Ended December 31,
		2025		2024		2023
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
Net investment income (loss)		$	73,991	$	108,469	$	120,432
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)		(26,181)		(11,758)		17,089
Net realized gain (loss)		(23,740)		(14,747)		(7,728)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations		24,070		81,964		129,793
Distributions
Distributions declared from earnings(1)(2)		(87,558)		(109,361)		(107,012)
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Shareholders' Distributions		(87,558)		(109,361)		(107,012)
Capital Share Transactions

Reinvestment of shareholders' distributions		41,296		51,222		48,104
Repurchased shares		(150,967)		(163,763)		(103,659)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share Transactions		(109,671)		(112,541)		(55,555)
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets		(173,159)		(139,938)		(32,774)
Net Assets, at beginning of period		1,123,549		1,263,487		1,296,261
Net Assets, at end of period		$	950,390	$	1,123,549	$	1,263,487

_______________

(1)For the year ended December 31, 2025, distributions declared from earnings were derived from net investment income and return of capital.

(2)For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, distributions declared from earnings were derived from net investment income and capital gains.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-41

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in thousands)


	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2025		2024		2023
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations	$	24,070	$	81,964	$	129,793
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Purchases of investments, net	(241,255)		(615,294)		(254,386)
Proceeds from investments and investment repayments, net	581,029		745,939		521,140
Net change in unrealized (gain) loss on investments	27,753		13,395		(15,806)
Net change in unrealized (gain) loss on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies	(1,642)		(1,629)		(2,822)
Net realized (gain) loss on investments	24,126		11,842		7,718
Net realized (gain) loss on foreign currency transactions relating to investments	(243)		3,135		5
Paid-in-kind interest and dividends	(21,129)		(34,859)		(33,757)
Net accretion/amortization of discount/premium on investments	(8,739)		(12,253)		(8,465)

Amortization of debt issuance costs	6,128		8,161		2,558

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in interest and dividend receivable	4,778		1,167		958
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets	(49)		(1,808)		419

Increase (decrease) in payable to affiliates	(2,810)		(552)		(1,282)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities	(1,075)		(6,260)		11,987
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	390,942		192,948		358,060
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Borrowings on debt	440,003		553,708		900,000
Repayments of debt	(620,000)		(593,000)		(1,005,223)
Debt issuance costs	(1,370)		(6,808)		(12,910)
Distributions paid to shareholders	(48,817)		(59,794)		(57,160)
Repurchased shares	(152,287)		(162,546)		(103,659)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(382,471)		(268,440)		(278,952)
Net increase (decrease) in cash	8,471		(75,492)		79,108
Cash, including foreign cash, beginning of period	50,891		126,383		47,275
Cash, including foreign cash, end of period	$	59,362	$	50,891	126,383

Supplemental and Non-Cash Information
Interest paid during the period	$	62,364	$	78,353	$	57,733
Distributions declared during the period	$	87,558	$	109,361	$	107,012
Distribution payable	$	—	$	2,555	$	4,210
Reinvestment of distributions during the period	$	41,296	$	51,222	$	48,104
Taxes, including excise tax, paid during the period	$	1,535	$	1,063	$	1,249

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-42

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Note 1. Organization and Principal Business

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II (the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation formed on October 15, 2015.

The Company’s investment objective is to generate current income, and to a lesser extent, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities with favorable risk-adjusted returns. The Company’s investment strategy focuses primarily on originating and making loans to, and making debt and equity investments in, U.S. middle market companies. Within this space, the Company predominantly focuses on investing in institutionally-backed, upper middle market businesses, which the Company categorizes as those that generate greater than $50 million of EBITDA annually. The Company invests in senior secured or unsecured loans, subordinated loans or mezzanine loans, broadly syndicated loans and, to a lesser extent, equity and equity-related securities including warrants preferred stock and similar forms of senior equity, which may or may not be convertible into a portfolio company’s common equity. The Company may on occasion invest in smaller or larger companies if an attractive opportunity presents itself, especially when there are dislocations in the capital markets, including the high yield and large syndicated loan markets, which are often referred to as “junk” investments. The Company’s target credit investments will typically have maturities between three and ten years and generally range in size between $10 million and $125 million, although the investment size will vary with the size of the Company’s capital base.

The Company has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). In addition, for tax purposes, the Company is treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Because the Company has elected to be regulated as a BDC and qualifies as a RIC under the Code, the Company’s portfolio is subject to diversification and other requirements.

On February 28, 2017, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, OR Lending II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which holds a California finance lenders license. OR Lending II LLC makes loans to borrowers headquartered in California. From time to time the Company may form wholly-owned subsidiaries to facilitate the normal course of business.

Blue Owl Credit Advisors, LLC (the “Adviser”) serves as the Company’s investment adviser. The Adviser is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), an indirect affiliate of Blue Owl Capital Inc. (“Blue Owl”) (NYSE: OWL) and part of Blue Owl’s Credit platform. Blue Owl consists of three investment platforms: (1) Credit, which includes several strategies, including direct lending, alternative credit, investment grade credit, liquid credit and other adjacent investment strategies (2) GP Strategic Capital, which primarily focuses on acquiring equity stakes in, or providing debt financing to, large, multi-product private equity and private credit firms and (3) Real Assets, which primarily focuses on the strategies of net lease real estate, real estate credit and digital infrastructure, which focuses on acquiring, financing, developing and operating data centers and related digital infrastructure assets. Subject to the overall supervision of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”), the Adviser manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory and management services to, the Company.

In April 2017, the Company commenced its continuous public offering, commenced operations and made its first portfolio company investment. The Company terminated its continuous public offering as of April 30, 2021. Prior to the termination of its continuous public offering, the Company issued 151,364,239 shares of its common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $1.39 billion, including seed capital contributed by the Adviser in September 2016 and approximately $10.0 million in gross proceeds raised in the private placement from certain individuals and entities affiliated with the Adviser.

The Board expects to contemplate a liquidity event for the Company’s shareholders three to four years after the completion of the continuous public offering. The Company considers the offering period to be complete as of the termination date of the most recent public equity offering as the Company did not conduct a public equity offering during the ensuing two year period. A liquidity event could include: (i) a listing of shares on a national securities exchange; (ii) a merger or another transaction approved by the Board in which shareholders will receive cash or shares of a publicly traded company; or (iii) a sale of all or substantially all of its assets either on a complete portfolio basis or individually followed by a liquidation to the Company and distribution of cash to its shareholders. A liquidity event may include a sale, merger or rollover transaction with one or more affiliated investment companies managed by the Adviser. A liquidity event involving a merger or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets would require the approval of its shareholders in accordance with the Company’s charter. Certain types of liquidity events, such as one involving a listing of shares on a national securities exchange, would allow the Company to retain its investment portfolio intact. If the Company determines to list securities on a national securities exchange, the Company expects to, although is not required to, maintain its external management structure. If the Company has not consummated a liquidity event by the five-year anniversary of the completion of the offering, the Board will consider (subject to any necessary shareholder approvals and applicable requirements of the 1940 Act) liquidating the Company and distributing cash to its shareholders, and dissolving the Company in an orderly manner. The Board, as part of its ongoing duties, will review and evaluate any potential liquidity events and options as they become available and their favorability given current market conditions; however, there is no assurance that a liquidity event will be completed at any particular time or at all.

F-43

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The Company is an investment company and, therefore, applies the specialized accounting and reporting guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. The Company’s fiscal year ends on December 31.

Reclassifications

As a result of changes in presentation, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates and such differences could be material.

Cash

Cash consists of deposits held at a custodian bank. Cash is carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company deposits its cash with highly-rated banking corporations and, at times, may exceed the insured limits under applicable law.

Investments at Fair Value

Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds received and the amortized cost basis of the investment using the specific identification method without regard to unrealized gains or losses previously recognized, and include investments charged off during the period, net of recoveries. The net change in unrealized gains or losses primarily reflects the change in investment values, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized gains or losses with respect to investments realized during the period. Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act establishes requirements for determining fair value in good faith for purposes of the 1940 Act. Pursuant to Rule 2a-5, the Board designated the Adviser as the Company’s valuation designee to perform fair value determinations relating to the value of assets held by the Company for which market quotations are not readily available.

Investments for which market quotations are readily available are typically valued at the average bid price of those market quotations. To validate market quotations, the Company utilizes a number of factors to determine if the quotations are representative of fair value, including the source and number of the quotations. Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded or whose market prices are not readily available, as is the case for substantially all of the Company’s investments, are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Adviser, as the valuation designee, based on, among other things, the input of the independent third-party valuation firm(s) engaged at the direction of the Adviser.

As part of the valuation process, the Adviser, as the valuation designee, takes into account relevant factors in determining the fair value of the Company’s investments, including: the estimated enterprise value of a portfolio company (i.e., the total fair value of the portfolio company’s debt and equity), the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments based on its earnings and cash flow, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, a comparison of the portfolio company’s securities to any similar publicly traded securities, and overall changes in the interest rate environment and the credit markets that may affect the price at which similar investments may be made in the future. When an external event such as a purchase or sale transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, the Adviser, as the valuation designee, considers whether the pricing indicated by the external event corroborates its valuation.

F-44

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

The Adviser, as the valuation designee, undertakes a multi-step valuation process, which includes, among other procedures, the following:

•With respect to investments for which market quotations are readily available, those investments will typically be valued at the average bid price of those market quotations;

•Preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with the Adviser’s valuation committee;

•The Adviser, as the valuation designee, reviews the recommended valuations and determines the fair value of each investment;

•Each quarter, the Adviser, as the valuation designee, will provide the Audit Committee a summary or description of material fair value matters that occurred in the prior quarter and on an annual basis, the Adviser, as the valuation designee, will provide the Audit Committee with a written assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of its fair value process; and

•The Audit Committee oversees the valuation designee and will report to the Board on any valuation matters requiring the Board’s attention.

The Company conducts this valuation process on a quarterly basis.

The Company applies Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”), as amended, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP and required disclosures of fair value measurements. ASC 820 determines fair value to be the price that would be received for an investment in a current sale, which assumes an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market (which may be a hypothetical market) that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact. In accordance with ASC 820, the Company considers its principal market to be the market that has the greatest volume and level of activity. ASC 820 specifies a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes and ranks the level of observability of inputs used in determination of fair value. In accordance with ASC 820, these levels are summarized below:

•Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

•Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

•Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which the transfer occurs. In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, the Company applies the valuation policy approved by its Board that is consistent with ASC 820. Consistent with the valuation policy, the Adviser, as the valuation designee, evaluates the source of the inputs, including any markets in which its investments are trading (or any markets in which securities with similar attributes are trading), in determining fair value. When an investment is valued based on prices provided by reputable dealers or pricing services (such as broker quotes), the Adviser, as the valuation designee, subjects those prices to various criteria in making the determination as to whether a particular investment would qualify for treatment as a Level 2 or Level 3 investment. For example, the Adviser, as the valuation designee, or the independent valuation firm(s), reviews pricing support provided by dealers or pricing services in order to determine if observable market information is being used, versus unobservable inputs.

Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company’s investments may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of such investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that may ultimately be realized. Further, such investments are generally less liquid than publicly traded securities and may be subject to contractual and other restrictions on resale. If the Company were required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, it could realize amounts that are different from the amounts presented and such differences could be material.

F-45

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Foreign Currency

Foreign currency amounts are translated into U.S. dollars on the following basis:

•cash, fair value of investments, outstanding debt, other assets and liabilities: at the spot exchange rate on the last business day of the period; and

•purchases and sales of investments, borrowings and repayments of such borrowings, income and expenses: at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions.

The Company includes net changes in fair values on investments held resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations with the change in unrealized gains (losses) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company’s current approach to hedging the foreign currency exposure in its non-U.S. dollar denominated investments is primarily to borrow the par amount in local currency under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility to fund these investments. Fluctuations arising from the translation of foreign currency borrowings are included with the net change in unrealized gains (losses) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Investments denominated in foreign currencies and foreign currency transactions may involve certain considerations and risks not typically associated with those of domestic origin, including unanticipated movements in the value of the foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar.

Interest and Dividend Income Recognition

Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes amortization and accretion of discounts or premiums. Certain investments may have contractual payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest or dividends. PIK interest and dividends represent accrued interest or dividends that are added to the principal amount or liquidation amount of the investment on the respective interest or dividend payment dates rather than being paid in cash and generally becomes due at maturity or at the occurrence of a liquidation event.

The table below presents PIK interest and PIK dividend income for the following periods:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
		2025			2024			2023
PIK Interest Income		$	14,297		$	27,975		$	26,864
PIK Interest Income as a % of Investment Income		7.3		%	10.9		%	9.9		%
PIK Dividend Income		$	5,562		$	5,367		$	5,789
PIK Dividend Income as a % of Investment Income		2.8		%	2.1		%	2.1		%
Total PIK Income		$	19,859		$	33,342		$	32,653
Total PIK Income as a % of Investment Income		10.1		%	13.0		%	12.0		%

Discounts and premiums to par value on securities purchased are amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the respective security using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the amortization and accretion of discounts or premiums, if any. Upon prepayment of a loan or debt security, any prepayment premiums, unamortized upfront loan origination fees and unamortized discounts are recorded as interest income in the current period. Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected in full. Accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment regarding collectability. If at any point the Company believes PIK interest is not expected to be realized, the investment generating PIK interest will be placed on non-accrual status. When a PIK investment is placed on non-accrual status, the accrued, uncapitalized interest or dividends are generally reversed through interest income. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid current and, in management’s judgment, are likely to remain current. Management may make exceptions to this treatment and determine to not place a loan on non-accrual status if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection.

Other Income

From time to time, the Company may receive fees for services provided to portfolio companies. These fees are generally only available to the Company as a result of closing investments, are generally paid at the closing of the investments, are generally non-

F-46

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

recurring and are recognized as revenue when earned upon closing of the investment. The services that the Adviser provides vary by investment, but can include closing, work, diligence or other similar fees and fees for providing managerial assistance to the Company’s portfolio companies.

Offering Expenses

Costs associated with the offering of common shares of the Company were capitalized as deferred offering expenses and were included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities and amortized over a twelve-month period from incurrence. These expenses consist primarily of legal fees and other costs incurred in connection with the Company’s continuous public offering of its common shares, the preparation of the Company’s registration statement, and registration fees. All remaining capitalized and unamortized offering expenses were expensed in connection with the termination of the Company’s offering of common shares as of April 30, 2021.

Debt Issuance Costs

The Company records origination and other expenses related to its debt obligations as deferred financing costs. These expenses are deferred and amortized utilizing the effective yield method over the life of the related debt instrument. Debt issuance costs are presented on the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as a direct deduction from the debt liability. In circumstances in which there is not an associated debt liability amount recorded in the consolidated financial statements when the debt issuance costs are incurred, such debt issuance costs will be reported on the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as an asset until the debt liability is recorded.

Reimbursement of Transaction-Related Expenses

The Company may receive reimbursement for certain transaction-related expenses in pursuing investments. Transaction-related expenses, which are generally expected to be reimbursed by the Company’s portfolio companies, are typically deferred until the transaction is consummated and are recorded in prepaid expenses and other assets on the date incurred. The costs of successfully completed investments not otherwise reimbursed are borne by the Company and are included as a component of the investment’s cost basis.

Cash advances received in respect of transaction-related expenses are recorded as cash with an offset to accrued expenses and other liabilities. Accrued expenses and other liabilities are relieved as reimbursable expenses are incurred.

Income Taxes

The Company has elected to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. The Company has elected to be treated as a RIC under the Code beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2017 and intends to continue to qualify as a RIC. So long as the Company maintains its tax treatment as a RIC, it generally will not pay U.S. federal income taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that it distributes at least annually to its shareholders as dividends. Rather, any tax liability related to income earned and distributed by the Company represents obligations of the Company’s investors and will not be reflected in the consolidated financial statements of the Company. However, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at corporate rates on any income, including capital gains not distributed (or deemed distributed) to its stockholders.

To qualify as a RIC, the Company must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. In addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment, the Company must distribute to its shareholders on a timely basis, at least the sum of (i) 90% of its “investment company taxable income” for that year, which is generally its ordinary income plus the excess, if any, of its realized net short-term capital gains over its realized net long-term capital losses and (ii) its net tax-exempt income. In order for the Company not to be subject to U.S. federal excise taxes, it must distribute annually an amount at least equal to the sum of (i) 98% of its net ordinary income (taking into account certain deferrals and elections) for the calendar year, (ii) 98.2% of its capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year and (iii) certain undistributed amounts from previous years on which the Company paid no U.S. federal income tax. The Company, at its discretion, may carry forward taxable income in excess of calendar year dividends and pay a 4% nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax on this income.

Certain of the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes imposed at corporate rates.

The Company evaluates tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing its consolidated financial statements to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the “more-likely-than-not” threshold are reserved and recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. All penalties and interest associated with income taxes are included in income tax expense. Conclusions regarding tax positions are subject to review and may be adjusted at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, on-going analyses of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. There were no material uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2025. As applicable, the Company’s prior three tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities.

F-47

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Distributions to Common Shareholders

Distributions to common shareholders are recorded on the record date. The amount to be distributed is determined by the Board and is generally based upon the earnings estimated by the Adviser. In addition, the Board may consider the level of undistributed taxable income carried forward from the prior year for distribution in the current year. Net realized long-term capital gains, if any, would generally be distributed at least annually, although the Company may decide to retain such capital gains for investment.

The Company has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of any cash distributions on behalf of shareholders who have “opted in” to the dividend reinvestment plan; however, on February 17, 2026, the Board determined to terminate the distribution reinvestment plan and as a result, commencing with distributions payable on or after March 18, 2026, all distributions will be paid in cash. With respect to distributions paid prior to March 18, 2026, the shareholders who have “opted in” to the dividend reinvestment plan will have their cash distribution automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock, rather than receiving the cash distribution. The Company used newly issued shares to implement the dividend reinvestment plan.

Consolidation

As provided under Regulation S-X and ASC Topic 946 - Financial Services - Investment Companies, the Company will generally not consolidate its investment in a company other than a wholly-owned investment company or controlled operating company whose business consists of providing services to the Company. Accordingly, the Company consolidated the accounts of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries that meet the aforementioned criteria in its consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company does not consolidate its equity interest in Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC (“Credit SLF”) and Blue Owl Leasing. For further description of the Company’s investment in Credit SLF and Blue Owl Leasing, see “Note 4 — Investments.”

Segment Reporting

In accordance with ASC Topic 280 – “Segment Reporting (ASC 280),” the Company has determined that it has a single operating and reporting segment. As a result, the Company’s segment accounting policies are the same as described herein and the Company does not have any intra-segment sales and transfers of assets.

The Company operates through a single operating and reporting segment with an investment objective to generate both current income, and to a lesser extent, capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. The chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is comprised of the Company’s chief executive officer, president, and chief financial officer and chief operating officer and assesses the performance and makes operating decisions of the Company on a consolidated basis primarily based on the Company’s net increase in shareholder’s equity resulting from operations (“net income”). In addition to numerous other factors and metrics, the CODM utilizes net income as a key metric in determining the amount of dividends to be distributed to the Company’s stockholders. As the Company’s operations comprise of a single reporting segment, the segment assets are reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as “total assets” and the significant segment expenses are listed on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740),” which updates annual income tax disclosure requirements related to rate reconciliation, income taxes paid and other disclosures. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 effective December 31, 2025, and concluded the adoption of the standard had no material impact on the consolidated annual financial statements of the Company.

Other than the aforementioned guidance, the Company’s management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 3. Agreements and Related Party Transactions

As of December 31, 2025, the Company had payables to affiliates of $12.2 million, primarily comprised of $6.3 million of management fees and $3.0 million of accrued performance based incentive fees.

As of December 31, 2024, the Company had payables to affiliates of $15.0 million, primarily comprised of $7.6 million of management fees and $6.0 million of accrued performance based incentive fees.

Administration Agreement

The Company has entered into an amended and restated Administration Agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with the Adviser. Under the terms of the Administration Agreement, the Adviser performs, or oversees the performance of, required administrative services, which includes providing office space, equipment and office services, maintaining financial records, preparing

F-48

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

reports to shareholders and reports filed with the SEC, and managing the payment of expenses, and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered by others. On May 5, 2025, the Board approved the continuation of the Administration Agreement.

The Administration Agreement also provides that the Company reimburses the Adviser for certain offering costs.

The Company reimburses the Adviser for services performed for it pursuant to the terms of the Administration Agreement. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Administration Agreement, the Adviser may delegate its obligations under the Administration Agreement to an affiliate or to a third party and the Company will reimburse the Adviser for any services performed for it by such affiliate or third party.

For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 the Company incurred expenses of approximately $2.7 million, $2.6 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for costs and expenses reimbursable to the Adviser under the terms of the Administration Agreement.

Unless earlier terminated as described below, the Administration Agreement will remain in effect for two years from the date it first became effective, and will remain in effect from year to year if approved annually by (1) the vote of the Board, or by the vote of a majority of its outstanding voting securities, and (2) the vote of a majority of the Company’s directors who are not “interested persons” of the Company, of the Adviser or of any of their respective affiliates, as defined in the 1940 Act. The Administration Agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, on 60 days’ written notice, by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Company, or by the vote of the Board or by the Adviser.

No person who is an officer, director, or employee of the Adviser or its affiliates and who serves as a director of the Company receives any compensation from the Company for his or her services as a director. However, the Company reimburses the Adviser (or its affiliates) for an allocable portion of the compensation paid by the Adviser or its affiliates to the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Financial Officer and their respective staffs (based on the percentage of time those individuals devote, on an estimated basis, to the business and affairs of the Company). Directors who are not affiliated with the Adviser receive compensation for their services and reimbursement of expenses incurred to attend meetings.

Investment Advisory Agreement

The Investment Advisory Agreement became effective on May 18, 2021. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Adviser is responsible for managing the Company’s business and activities, including sourcing investment opportunities, conducting research, performing diligence on potential investments, structuring its investments, and monitoring its portfolio companies on an ongoing basis through a team of investment professionals. On May 5, 2025, the Board approved the continuation of the Investment Advisory Agreement.

Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Adviser is responsible for managing the Company’s business and activities, including sourcing investment opportunities, conducting research, performing diligence on potential investments, structuring its investments, and monitoring its portfolio companies on an ongoing basis through a team of investment professionals.

The Adviser’s services under the Investment Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long as its services to the Company are not impaired.

Unless earlier terminated as described below, the Investment Advisory Agreement will remain in effect for two years from the date it first became effective, and will remain in effect from year-to-year thereafter if approved annually by a majority of the Board or by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding voting securities and, in each case, by a majority of independent directors.

The Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate within the meaning of the 1940 Act and related SEC guidance and interpretations in the event of its assignment. In accordance with the 1940 Act, without payment of any penalty, the Company may terminate the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser upon 60 days’ written notice. The decision to terminate the agreement may be made by a majority of the Board or the shareholders holding a majority (as defined under the 1940 Act) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock or the Adviser. In addition, without payment of any penalty, the Adviser may generally terminate the Investment Advisory Agreement upon 60 days’ written notice and, in certain circumstances, the Adviser may only be able to terminate the Investment Advisory Agreement upon 120 days’ written notice.

Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Company will pay the Adviser a base management fee and may also pay a performance based incentive fee. The cost of both the management fee and the incentive fee will ultimately be borne by the Company’s shareholders.

The management fee is payable quarterly in arrears at an annual rate of 1.50% of the average value of the Company’s gross assets, excluding cash and cash-equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed amounts at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters. The management fee for any partial quarter is appropriately prorated. The determination of gross assets reflects changes in the fair value of the Company’s portfolio investments. The fair value of derivatives and swaps held in the Company’s portfolio, which will not necessarily equal the notional value of such derivatives and swaps, is included in the calculation of gross assets.

F-49

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company incurred management fees of approximately $26.9 million, net of $25 thousand in management fee waivers, $30.8 million and $32.8 million, respectively.

The incentive fee consists of two components that are independent of each other, with the result that one component may be payable even if the other is not. A portion of the incentive fee will be based on the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income and a portion will be based on the Company’s capital gains. The portion of the incentive fee based on pre-incentive fee net investment income is determined and paid quarterly in arrears and equals (a) 100% of the pre-incentive fee net investment income between 1.5% quarterly preferred return, and 1.818%, referred to as the upper level breakpoint, of adjusted capital, plus (b) 17.5% of pre-incentive fee net investment income in excess of 1.818% of adjusted capital. Adjusted capital is defined as cumulative proceeds generated from sales of the Company’s common stock, including proceeds from the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan, net of sales load (upfront selling commissions and upfront dealer manager fees) reduced for (i) distributions paid to the Company’s shareholders that represent a return of capital on a tax basis and (ii) amounts paid for share repurchases pursuant to the Company’s share repurchase program, if any, measured as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter. The quarterly preferred return of 1.5% and upper level breakpoint of 1.818% are also adjusted for the actual number of days in each calendar quarter.

For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company incurred net investment income based incentive fees of $15.5 million, $23.0 million and $28.0 million, respectively.

The second component of the incentive fee, the capital gains incentive fee, is payable at the end of each calendar year in arrears, and equals 17.5% of cumulative realized capital gains from inception through the end of each calendar year, less cumulative realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of such calendar year, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gains incentive fee for prior periods. In no event will the capital gains incentive fee payable pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement be in excess of the amount permitted by the Advisers Act, including Section 205 thereof.

While the Investment Advisory Agreement neither includes nor contemplates the inclusion of unrealized gains in the calculation of the capital gains incentive fee, as required by U.S. GAAP, the Company accrues capital gains incentive fees on unrealized gains. This accrual reflects the incentive fees that would be payable to the Adviser if the Company’s entire investment portfolio was liquidated at its fair value as of the balance sheet date even though the Adviser is not entitled to an incentive fee with respect to unrealized gains unless and until such gains are actually realized.

For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company did not incur capital gains based incentive fees.

Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Adviser is entitled to receive up to 1.5% of gross offering proceeds raised in the continuous public offering until all organization and offering costs paid by the Adviser or its affiliates have been recovered. The Company bears all other expenses of its operations and transactions including, without limitation, those relating to: expenses deemed to be “organization and offering expenses” for purposes of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Conduct Rule 2310(a)(12) (exclusive of commissions, the dealer manager fee, any discounts and other similar expenses paid by investors at the time of sale of the Company’s stock); the cost of corporate and organizational expenses relating to offerings of shares of common stock, subject to limitations included in the Investment Advisory Agreement; the cost of calculating the Company’s net asset value, including the cost of any third-party valuation services; the cost of effecting any sales and repurchases of the common stock and other securities; fees and expenses payable under any dealer manager agreements, if any; debt service and other costs of borrowings or other financing arrangements; costs of hedging; expenses, including travel expense, incurred by the Adviser, or members of the Investment Team, or payable to third parties, performing due diligence on prospective portfolio companies and, if necessary, enforcing the Company’s rights; escrow agent, transfer agent and custodial fees and expenses; fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts; federal and state registration fees, any stock exchange listing fees and fees payable to rating agencies; federal, state and local taxes; independent directors’ fees and expenses, including certain travel expenses; costs of preparing financial statements and maintaining books and records and filing reports or other documents with the SEC (or other regulatory bodies) and other reporting and compliance costs, including registration fees, listing fees and licenses, and the compensation of professionals responsible for the preparation of the foregoing; the costs of any reports, proxy statements or other notices to shareholders (including printing and mailing costs); the costs of any shareholder or director meetings and the compensation of personnel responsible for the preparation of the foregoing and related matters; commissions and other compensation payable to brokers or dealers; research and market data; fidelity bond, directors and officers errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums; direct costs and expenses of administration, including printing, mailing, long distance telephone and staff; fees and expenses associated with independent audits, outside legal and consulting costs; costs of winding up; costs incurred in connection with the formation or maintenance of entities or vehicles to hold the Company’s assets for tax or other purposes; extraordinary expenses (such as litigation or indemnification); and costs associated with reporting and compliance obligations under the Advisers Act and applicable federal and state securities laws. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Company shall reimburse the Adviser (or its affiliates) for an allocable portion of the compensation paid by the Adviser (or its affiliates) to the Company’s chief compliance officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs (based on a percentage of time such individuals devote, on an estimated basis, to the business affairs of the Company). Any such reimbursements will not exceed actual expenses incurred by the Adviser and its

F-50

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

affiliates. The Adviser is responsible for the payment of the Company’s organization and offering expenses to the extent that these expenses exceed 1.5% of the aggregate gross offering proceeds, without recourse against or reimbursement by the Company. The Company terminated its continuous public offering as of April 30, 2021.

From time to time, the Adviser may pay amounts owed by the Company to third-party providers of goods or services, including the Board, and the Company will subsequently reimburse the Adviser for such amounts paid on its behalf. Amounts payable to the Adviser are settled in the normal course of business without formal payment terms.

Affiliated Transactions

The Company may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with its affiliates without prior approval of the directors who are not interested persons, and in some cases, the prior approval of the SEC. The Company, the Adviser and certain of their affiliates were granted an order for exemptive relief that permitted co-investing with affiliates of the Company subject to various approvals of the Board and other conditions. On May 6, 2025, the Company, the Adviser and certain of their affiliates were granted a new order for exemptive relief that superseded the prior order for exemptive relief (the “Order”) by the SEC for the Company to co-invest with other funds managed by the Adviser or certain affiliates, in a manner consistent with the Company’s investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. Pursuant to such Order, the Company generally is permitted to co-invest with certain of its affiliates if such co-investments are done on the same terms and at the same time, as further detailed in the Order. The Order requires that a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of the Board make certain findings (1) in most instances when the Company co-invests with its affiliates in an issuer where an affiliate of the Company has an existing investment in the issuer, and (2) if the Company disposes of an asset acquired in a transaction under the Order unless the disposition is done on a pro rata basis. Pursuant to the Order, the Board oversees the Company’s participation in the co-investment program. As required by the Order, the Company has adopted, and the Board has approved, policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the Order, and the Adviser and the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer will provide reporting to the Board.

The Adviser is affiliated with Blue Owl Technology Credit Advisors LLC (“OTCA”), Blue Owl Credit Private Fund Advisors LLC (“OPFA”), Blue Owl Technology Credit Advisors II LLC (“OTCA II”) and Blue Owl Diversified Credit Advisors LLC (“ODCA” together with OTCA, OPFA, OTCA II and the Adviser, the “Blue Owl Credit Advisers”), which are also registered investment advisers. The Blue Owl Credit Advisers are affiliates of Blue Owl and comprise part of Blue Owl’s Credit platform, which includes several strategies, including direct lending, alternative credit, investment grade credit, liquid credit and other adjacent investment strategies. The Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ allocation policies seek to ensure equitable allocation of investment opportunities over time between the Company and other funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates. As a result of the Order, there could be significant overlap in the Company’s investment portfolio and the investment portfolios of the BDCs, interval fund, private funds and separately managed accounts managed by the Blue Owl Credit Advisers (collectively, the “Blue Owl Credit Clients”) and/or other funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates that avail themselves of the Order. In addition, the Adviser and its

affiliates are permitted to allocate an investment to a number of products across platforms that it views as appropriate for the particular

investment objectives, strategies and characteristics of such products.

Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement

On February 6, 2017, the Company entered into an Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement (the “Expense Support Agreement”) with the Adviser, the purpose of which was to ensure that no portion of the Company’s distributions to shareholders will represent a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Expense Support Agreement became effective as of April 4, 2017, the date that the Company met the minimum offering requirement and was terminated on November 7, 2023.

Pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement, prior to its termination on November 7, 2023, on a quarterly basis, the Adviser reimbursed the Company for “Operating Expenses” (as defined below) in an amount equal to the excess of the Company’s cumulative distributions paid to the Company’s shareholders in each quarter over “Available Operating Funds” (as defined below) received by the Company on account of its investment portfolio during such quarter. Any payments required to be made by the Adviser pursuant to the preceding sentence are referred to herein as an “Expense Payment.”

Pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement, “Operating Expenses” was defined as all of the Company’s operating costs and expenses incurred, as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP for investment companies. “Available Operating Funds” means the sum of (i) the Company’s estimated investment company taxable income (including realized net short-term capital gains reduced by realized net long-term capital losses), (ii) the Company’s realized net capital gains (including the excess of realized net long-term capital gains over realized net short-term capital losses) and (iii) dividends and other distributions paid to the Company on account of preferred and common equity investments in portfolio companies, if any (to the extent such amounts listed in clause (iii) are not included under clauses (i) and (ii) above).

Following any quarter in which Available Operating Funds exceed the cumulative distributions paid by the Company in respect of such quarter (the amount of such excess being hereinafter referred to as “Excess Operating Funds”), the Company will pay such Excess Operating Funds, or a portion thereof, in accordance with the stipulations below, as applicable, to the Adviser, until such time

F-51

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

as all Expense Payments made by the Adviser to the Company within three years prior to the last business day of such quarter have been reimbursed. Any payments required to be made by the Company are referred to as a “Reimbursement Payment.”

The specific amount of expenses reimbursed by the Adviser, if any, will be determined at the end of each quarter. The Company’s obligation to make Reimbursement Payments survived the termination of the Expense Support Agreement; however, there are no Reimbursement Payments conditionally due from the Company to the Adviser.

Prior to the termination of the Expense Support Agreement, the amount of Expense Support Payments provided by the Adviser since inception was $32.8 million. As of March 31, 2024, all Expense Support Payments made by the Adviser to the Company had either been recouped by the Adviser or expired.

The following table presents a summary of all expenses supported, and recouped, by the Adviser for each of the following three month periods in which the Company received Expense Support from the Adviser and the associated dates through which such expenses were subject to reimbursement from the Company pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement:


For the Quarter Ended	Amount of Expense Support		Recoupment of Expense Support		Expired Expense Support		Effective Rate of Distribution per Share(1)	Reimbursement Eligibility Expiration	Operating Expense Ratio(2)

June 30, 2017	$	1,061	$	1,061	$	—	7.0%	N/A	16.81%
September 30, 2017	1,023		258		765		7.0%	September 30, 2020	6.15%
December 31, 2017	856		—		856		7.0%	December 31, 2020	2.83%
March 31, 2018	1,871		—		1,871		6.9%	March 31, 2021	2.27%
June 30, 2018	775		—		775		6.9%	June 30, 2021	1.53%
March 31, 2019	1,835		—		1,835		7.0%	March 31, 2022	0.91%
June 30, 2019	1,776		—		1,776		7.0%	June 30, 2022	0.79%
September 30, 2019	1,081		—		1,081		7.0%	September 30, 2022	0.72%
December 31, 2019	2,351		—		2,351		7.0%	December 31, 2022	0.69%
March 31, 2020	6,587		5,857		730		7.7%	March 31, 2023	0.70%
June 30, 2020	5,794		5,794		—		7.4%	N/A	0.70%
September 30, 2020	3,079		—		3,079		7.2%	September 30, 2023	0.63%
December 31, 2020	3,216		3,216		—		6.5%	N/A	0.71%
March 31, 2021	1,449		—		1,449		6.4%	March 31, 2024	0.60%
Total	$	32,754	$	16,186	$	16,568

_______________

(1)The effective rate of distribution per share is expressed as a percentage equal to the projected annualized distribution amount as of the end of the applicable period (which is calculated by annualizing the regular weekly or monthly cash distributions per share as of such date without compounding), divided by the Company’s gross offering price per share as of such date.

(2)The operating expense ratio is calculated by dividing operating expenses, less organizational and offering expenses, base management and incentive fees owed to the Adviser, and interest expense, by the Company’s net assets.

License Agreement

On July 6, 2023, the Company entered into a license agreement (the “License Agreement”), with an affiliate of Blue Owl, pursuant to which the Company was granted a non-exclusive license to use the name “Blue Owl.” Under the License Agreement, the Company has a right to use the Blue Owl name for so long as the Adviser or one of its affiliates remains the Company’s investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, the Company will have no legal right to the “Blue Owl” name or logo.

Controlled, Affiliated/Non-Controlled, Affiliated Portfolio Companies

Under the 1940 Act, the Company is required to separately identify non-controlled investments where it owns 5% but less than 25% of a portfolio company’s outstanding voting securities in “affiliated” companies. In addition, under the 1940 Act, the Company is required to separately identify investments where it owns more than 25% of a portfolio company’s outstanding voting securities and/or has the power to exercise control over the management or policies of such portfolio company as investments in “controlled” companies. Under the 1940 Act, “non-affiliated investments” are defined as investments that are neither controlled investments nor affiliated investments. Detailed information with respect to the Company’s non-controlled, non-affiliated; non-controlled, affiliated; and controlled affiliated investments is contained in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, including the consolidated schedule of investments.

The Company has made an investment in a controlled, affiliated company, Credit SLF and Blue Owl Leasing. For further description, see “Note 4 — Investments.”

F-52

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

The Company has made investments in non-controlled, affiliated companies, including LSI Financing LLC.

LSI Financing LLC is a separately managed portfolio company formed to indirectly own royalty purchase agreements and loans in the life sciences space. The Adviser provides consulting services to a subsidiary of LSI Financing LLC in exchange for a fee. The Adviser has agreed to waive a portion of the management fee payable by the Company pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement equal to the pro rata amount of such consulting fee. On November 25, 2024, the Company redeemed a portion of its interest in LSI Financing DAC in exchange for common shares of LSI Financing LLC. As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s investment at fair value in LSI Financing LLC was $10.6 million and the Company’s total commitment was $13.8 million. The Company does not consolidate its equity interest in LSI Financing LLC.

Note 4. Investments

The information in the tables below is presented on an aggregate portfolio basis, without regard to whether they are non-controlled non-affiliated, non-controlled affiliated or controlled affiliated investments.

The table below presents investments at fair value and amortized cost as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025				As of December 31, 2024
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
First-lien senior secured debt investments	$	1,251,162	$	1,221,372	$	1,532,596	$	1,515,900
Second-lien senior secured debt investments	159,446		131,054		229,288		200,284
Unsecured debt investments	37,347		38,673		33,526		33,594
Specialty finance debt investments	7,483		7,491		5,016		5,040
Preferred equity investments	67,578		67,143		60,177		59,385
Common equity investments	55,486		80,120		62,167		103,225
Specialty finance equity investments	25,571		30,360		15,236		17,773
Joint ventures	334		337		190		191
Total Investments	$	1,604,407	$	1,576,550	$	1,938,196	$	1,935,392

F-53

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

The table below presents the industry composition of investments based on fair value as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025			As of December 31, 2024
Advertising and media	2.8	%		2.5	%
Aerospace and defense	1.2			2.9
Asset Based Lending and Fund Finance(1)	2.3			1.2
Automotive Services	3.0			2.2
Buildings and real estate	5.1			3.5
Business services	2.0			3.1
Chemicals	4.7			4.2
Consumer products	2.7			5.0
Containers and packaging	2.4			1.8
Distribution	1.8			3.0
Education	0.5			0.6
Energy equipment and services	0.6			0.5
Financial services	4.4			3.3
Food and beverage	6.0			8.4
Healthcare equipment and services	2.7			2.9
Healthcare providers and services	9.8			7.2
Healthcare technology	7.8			8.0
Household products	2.4			1.9
Human resource support services	2.0			1.5
Infrastructure and environmental services	1.2			1.2
Insurance(3)	2.0			6.5
Internet software and services	10.9			10.1
Joint ventures(4)	0.0		(5)	0.0		(5)
Leisure and entertainment	2.5			2.2
Manufacturing	9.8			8.1
Pharmaceuticals(2)	0.8			0.5
Professional services	3.2			2.5
Specialty retail	3.7			3.5
Telecommunications	0.2			0.5
Transportation	1.5			1.2
Total	100.0	%		100.0	%

_______________

(1)Includes investments in Amergin AssetCo and BOCSO.

(2)Includes investment in LSI Financing DAC and LSI Financing LLC.

(3)Includes investment in Fifth Season.

(4)Includes investment in Credit SLF and Blue Owl Leasing. See below, within Note 4, for more information.

(5)Rounds to less than 0.1%.

The table below presents the geographic composition of investments based on fair value as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025		As of December 31, 2024
United States:
Midwest	22.3	%	21.7	%
Northeast	18.3		15.5
South	38.4		30.0
West	15.3		25.4
International	5.7		7.4
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%

F-54

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC

Credit SLF, a Delaware limited liability company, is a joint venture among the Company, Blue Owl Capital Corporation (“OBDC”), Blue Owl Credit Income Corp. (“OCIC”), Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. (“OTF”), Blue Owl Technology Income Corp. (“OTIC”), and State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (each, a “Credit SLF Member” and collectively, the “Credit SLF Members”). Credit SLF’s principal purpose is to make investments primarily in senior secured loans to middle market companies, broadly syndicated loans and in senior and subordinated notes issued by collateralized loan obligations. Credit SLF is managed by a board of directors comprised of an equal number of directors appointed by each Credit Member and which acts unanimously. Investment decisions must be approved by Credit SLF’s board. The Credit SLF Members coinvest through Credit SLF, or its wholly owned subsidiaries. Credit SLF’s date of inception was May 6, 2024 and Credit SLF made its first portfolio company investment on July 23, 2024.

Credit SLF’s investments at fair value are determined in accordance with FASB ASC 820, as amended; however, such fair value is not included in the Company’s valuation process.

Other than for purposes of the 1940 Act, the Company does not believe it has control over this portfolio company. Accordingly, the Company does not consolidate its non-controlling interest in Credit SLF.

On May 15, 2025, the Credit SLF Members modified their capital commitments to Credit SLF and the Company’s capital commitment was $244 thousand with zero unfunded commitment.

As of December 31, 2025, the capital commitment and economic ownership of each Credit SLF Member is as follows:


Members	Capital Commitment		Net Contributed Capital		Economic Ownership Interest(1)

Blue Owl Capital Corporation	$	427,085	$	421,348	67.8	%
Blue Owl Capital Corporation II	244		244		0.0	%
Blue Owl Credit Income Corp.	87,169		76,960		12.4	%
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp.	34,937		30,875		5.0	%
Blue Owl Technology Income Corp.	16,161		14,293		2.3	%
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio	80,799		77,674		12.5	%
Total	$	646,395	$	621,394	100.0	%

_______________

(1) This represents each equity holder’s ownership percentage at December 31, 2025 based on net contributed capital.

The table below sets forth Credit SLF’s consolidated financial data as of and for the following periods:


	December 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
Cash	$	124,718	$	17,354
Investments at fair value	$	2,343,367	$	1,164,473
Total Assets	$	2,477,523	$	1,196,367
Total Debt (net of unamortized debt issuance costs)	$	1,728,363	$	750,610
Total Liabilities	$	1,863,454	$	847,556
Total Credit SLF Members’ Equity	$	614,069	$	348,811


	For the Year Ended December 31,	For the Period Ended December 31,
		2025		2024(1)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data

Investment income		$	133,213	$	14,573

Net operating expenses		79,074		8,606
Net investment income (loss)		$	54,139	$	5,967


Total net realized and unrealized gain (loss)		(10,641)		2,904
Net increase (decrease) in Credit SLF Members’ Equity resulting from operations		$	43,498	$	8,871

_______________

(1) Credit SLF’s date of inception was May 6, 2024.

F-55

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

The Company’s proportional share of Credit SLF’s net income generated distributions for the following periods:


	For the Year Ended December 31,		For the Period Ended December 31,
	2025		2024
Dividend income	$	26	$	5

Blue Owl Leasing LLC

Blue Owl Leasing, a Delaware limited liability company, is a joint venture among the Company, OBDC, OCIC, OTF, OTIC, Blue Owl Alternative Credit Fund and California State Teachers Retirement System (each, a “Blue Owl Leasing Member” and collectively, the “Blue Owl Leasing Members”). Blue Owl Leasing’s principal purpose is to make investments, either directly or indirectly through financing subsidiaries or other persons, primarily in leases and loans. Investment decisions must be approved by Blue Owl Leasing. The Blue Owl Leasing Members coinvest through Blue Owl Leasing, or its wholly owned subsidiaries. Blue Owl Leasing’s date of inception was June 30, 2025 and Blue Owl Leasing made its first portfolio company investment on October 23, 2025.

Blue Owl Leasing’s investments at fair value are determined in accordance with FASB ASC 820, as amended; however, such fair value is not included in the Company’s valuation process.

As of December 31, 2025, the capital commitment, called capital and economic ownership of each Blue Owl Leasing Member is as follows:


Members	Capital Commitment		Net Contributed Capital		Economic Ownership Interest(1)
($ in thousands)
Blue Owl Capital Corporation	$	860	$	860	1.3	%
Blue Owl Capital Corporation II	90		90		0.1	%
Blue Owl Credit Income Corp.	30,952		17,237		26.7	%
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp.	8,955		5,105		7.9	%
Blue Owl Technology Income Corp.	3,918		2,233		3.5	%
Blue Owl Alternative Credit Fund	31,000		31,000		48.0	%
California State Teachers Retirement System	10,825		8,075		12.5	%
Total	$	86,600	$	64,600	100.0	%

_______________

(1) This represents each equity holder’s ownership percentage at December 31, 2025, based on net contributed capital.

F-56

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

The table below sets forth Blue Owl Leasing’s consolidated financial data as of and for the following period:




	December 31, 2025
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
Cash	$	34,555
Investments at fair value	39,628
Total Assets	74,531
Total Debt (net of unamortized debt issuance costs)	9,754
Total Liabilities	10,076
Total Blue Owl Leasing Members’ Equity	64,455


	For the Period Ended December 31,
	2025(1)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
Income
Investment income	$	511
Expenses
Net operating expenses	684
Net investment income (loss)	$	(173)


Total net realized and unrealized gain (loss)	28
Net Increase (Decrease) in Blue Owl Leasing Members’ Equity Resulting From Operations	$	(145)

_______________

(1) The Company’s date of inception was June 30, 2025.

Blue Owl Leasing did not distribute any dividends to the Company for the period ended December 31, 2025.

Note 5. Debt

In accordance with the 1940 Act, with certain limitations, the Company is allowed to borrow amounts such that its asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% (or 150% if certain conditions are met) after such borrowing. The Company’s asset coverage was 240% and 231% as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Debt obligations consisted of the below as of the following periods(2):


	As of December 31, 2025
	Aggregate Principal Committed		Outstanding Principal		Amount Available(1)		Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs		Net Carrying Value
Revolving Credit Facility(2)	$	225,000	$	11,598	$	213,402	(2,314)		$	9,284
SPV Asset Facility I	375,000		315,000		59,265		(3,327)		311,673


2026 Notes	350,000		350,000		—		(2,150)		347,850
Total Debt	$	950,000	$	676,598	$	272,667	$	(7,791)	$	668,807

_______________

(1)The amount available reflects any limitations related to each credit facility’s borrowing base.

(2)Net carrying value includes the unrealized translation gain (loss) on borrowings denominated in foreign currencies.


	As of December 31, 2024
	Aggregate Principal Committed		Outstanding Principal		Amount Available		Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs		Net Carrying Value
Revolving Credit Facility(1)	$	250,000	$	50,443	$	199,555	$	(3,074)	$	47,369
SPV Asset Facility I	375,000		195,000		14,286		(2,936)		192,064
CLO XIII	260,000		260,000		—		(2,095)		257,905

2026 Notes	350,000		350,000		—		(4,444)		345,556
Total Debt	$	1,235,000	$	855,443	$	213,841	$	(12,549)	$	842,894

F-57

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

_______________

(1)Net carrying value includes the unrealized translation gain (loss) on borrowings denominated in foreign currencies.

For the following periods, the components of interest expense were as follows:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
		2025			2024			2023
Interest expense		$	61,966		$	74,699		$	64,691
Amortization of debt issuance costs		6,128			8,161			2,558
Total Interest Expense		$	68,094		$	82,860		$	67,249
Average interest rate(1)		7.9		%	8.3		%	6.4		%
Average daily borrowings		$	788,032		$	897,457		$	956,970

_______________

(1)Includes the impact of fees on undrawn portions of the Company’s credit facilities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Revolving Credit Facility

On January 12, 2024 (the “Revolving Credit Facility Closing Date”), the Company entered into a Senior Secured Credit Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The parties to the Revolving Credit Facility include the Company, as Borrower, the lenders and issuing banks from time to time parties thereto, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent.

The Revolving Credit Facility is guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Company in existence as of the Revolving Credit Facility Closing Date of the Revolving Credit Facility, and will be guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Company that are formed or acquired by the Company in the future (each a “Guarantor” and collectively, the “Guarantors”). Proceeds of the Revolving Credit Facility may be used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of portfolio investments.

The Revolving Credit Facility provides for (a) a term loan in an initial amount of $25.0 million (which was paid off on December 31, 2025) and (b) subject to availability under the borrowing base, which is based on the Company’s portfolio investments and other outstanding indebtedness, a revolving credit facility in an initial amount of up to $225.0 million. The amount available for borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility is reduced by any standby letters of credit issued through the Revolving Credit Facility. Maximum capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility may be increased to $1.00 billion through the exercise by the Company of an uncommitted accordion feature through which existing and new lenders may, at their option, agree to provide additional financing. The Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a perfected first-priority interest in substantially all of the portfolio investments held by the Company and each Guarantor, subject to certain exceptions, and includes a $40.0 million limit for swingline loans.

The availability period with respect to the revolving credit facility under the Revolving Credit Facility will terminate on January 12, 2028 (the “Revolving Credit Facility Commitment Termination Date”) and the Revolving Credit Facility will mature on January 12, 2029 (the “Revolving Credit Facility Maturity Date”). During the period from the Revolving Credit Facility Commitment Termination Date to the Revolving Credit Facility Maturity Date, the Company will be obligated to make mandatory prepayments under the Revolving Credit Facility out of the proceeds of certain asset sales and other recovery events and equity and debt issuances.

The Company may borrow amounts in U.S. dollars or certain other permitted currencies. Amounts drawn under the Revolving Credit Facility with respect to the commitments in U.S. dollars will bear interest at either (i) term SOFR plus any applicable credit adjustment spread plus margin of 2.00% per annum or (ii) the alternative base rate plus margin of 1.00% per annum. With respect to loans denominated in U.S. dollars, the Company may elect either the term SOFR or the alternative base rate at the time of drawdown, and such loans may be converted from one rate to another at any time at the Company’s option, subject to certain conditions. Amounts drawn under the Revolving Credit Facility with respect to the commitments in other permitted currencies will bear interest at the relevant rate specified therein (including any applicable credit adjustment spread) plus margin of 2.00% per annum. The Company will also pay a fee of 0.375% on daily undrawn amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The Revolving Credit Facility includes customary covenants, including certain limitations on the incurrence by the Company of additional indebtedness and on the Company’s ability to make distributions to its shareholders, or redeem, repurchase or retire shares of stock, upon the occurrence of certain events and certain financial covenants related to asset coverage and liquidity and other maintenance covenants, as well as customary events of default. The Revolving Credit Facility requires a minimum asset coverage ratio with respect to the consolidated assets of the Company and its subsidiaries to senior securities that constitute indebtedness of no less than 1.50 to 1.00 at any time.

SPV Asset Facilities

Certain of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries are parties to credit facilities (the “SPV Asset Facilities”). Pursuant to the SPV Asset Facilities, from time to time, the Company sells and contributes certain investments to these wholly owned subsidiaries pursuant to sale and contribution agreements by and between the Company and the wholly owned subsidiaries. No gain or loss is

F-58

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

recognized as a result of these contributions. Proceeds from the SPV Asset Facilities are used to finance the origination and acquisition of eligible assets by the wholly owned subsidiary, including the purchase of such assets from us. The Company retains a residual interest in assets contributed to or acquired to the wholly owned subsidiary through the Company’s ownership of the wholly owned subsidiary.

The SPV Asset Facilities are secured by a perfected first priority security interest in the assets of these wholly owned subsidiaries and on any payments received by such wholly owned subsidiaries in respect of those assets. Assets pledged to lenders under the SPV Asset Facilities will not be available to pay the Company’s debts.

The SPV Asset Facilities contain customary covenants, including certain limitations on the incurrence by the Company of additional indebtedness and on the Company’s ability to make distributions to the Company’s shareholders, or redeem, repurchase or retire shares of stock, upon the occurrence of certain events, and customary events of default (with customary cure and notice provisions).

SPV Asset Facility I

On December 1, 2017 (the “SPV Asset Facility I Closing Date”), ORCC II Financing LLC and OR Lending II LLC (collectively, the “Subsidiaries”), each a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Credit Agreement (the “SPV Asset Facility I”). Parties to the SPV Asset Facility I include ORCC II Financing LLC and OR Lending II LLC, as Borrowers, and the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “SPV I Lenders”), Goldman Sachs Bank USA as Sole Lead Arranger, Syndication Agent and Administrative Agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company as Collateral Administrator and Collateral Agent and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC as Collateral Custodian. From time to time, the parties to the SPV Asset Facility I have amended the SPV Asset Facility I and the related transaction documents.

The summary below reflects the terms of the SPV Asset Facility I as amended from time to time, most recently by the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, entered into on July 24, 2025, by the parties to the SPV Asset Facility I, which among other things, removed OR Lending II LLC as a borrower and replaced Cortland Capital Market Services LLC as collateral custodian with State Street Bank and Trust Company.

The maximum principal amount of the SPV Asset Facility I is $375.0 million; the availability of this amount is subject to a borrowing base test, which is based on the amount of the Subsidiaries’ assets from time to time, and satisfaction of certain conditions, including certain concentration limits.

The SPV Asset Facility I provides for a reinvestment period up to and including November 30, 2028 (the “SPV Asset Facility I Commitment Termination Date”). Prior to the SPV Asset Facility I Commitment Termination Date, proceeds received by the Subsidiaries from interest, dividends, or fees on assets must be used to pay expenses and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may be returned to the Company, subject to certain conditions. Proceeds received from principal on assets prior to the SPV Asset Facility I Commitment Termination Date must be used to make quarterly payments of principal on outstanding borrowings. Following the SPV Asset Facility I Commitment Termination Date, proceeds received by the Subsidiaries from interest and principal on collateral assets must be used to make quarterly payments of principal on outstanding borrowings. Subject to certain conditions, between quarterly payment dates prior to and after the SPV Asset Facility I Commitment Termination Date, excess interest proceeds and principal proceeds may be released to the Subsidiaries to make distributions to the Company.

The SPV Asset Facility I will mature on November 30, 2030. Amounts drawn in USD bear interest at Term SOFR plus a 2.05% spread and the spread is also payable on a portion of any undrawn amounts. The Company borrows utilizing three-month SOFR rate loans.

Borrowings of the Subsidiaries are considered the Company’s borrowings for purposes of complying with the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act.

In connection with the SPV Asset Facility I, the Company entered into a Non-Recourse Carveout Guaranty Agreement on the SPV Asset Facility I Closing Date, which was amended and restated twice on March 11, 2019 and April 29, 2019, and was further amended by Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Non-Recourse Carveout Guaranty Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2025 with State Street Bank and Trust Company, on behalf of certain secured parties, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA. Pursuant to the Non-Recourse Carveout Guaranty Agreement, the Company guarantees certain losses, damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims and other obligations incurred in connection with certain instances of fraud or bad faith misrepresentation, material encumbrances of certain collateral, misappropriation of certain funds, certain transfers of assets, and the bad faith or willful breach of certain provisions of the SPV Asset Facility I.

SPV Asset Facility II

On April 14, 2020 (the “SPV Asset Facility II Closing Date”), ORCC II Financing II LLC (“ORCC II Financing II”), a Delaware limited liability company and newly formed subsidiary of the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “SPV Asset Facility II”), with ORCC II Financing II, as Borrower, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “SPV II Lenders”), Natixis, New York

F-59

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Branch, as Administrative Agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company as Collateral Agent and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC as Document Custodian. The parties to the SPV Asset Facility II entered into various amendments, including to increase the maximum principal amount of the SPV Asset Facility II, change the interest rates for amounts drawn in U.S. dollars, to extend the maturity of the SPV Asset Facility II to convert the benchmark rate of the facility from LIBOR to Term SOFR and make certain other changes. The following describes the terms of the SPV Asset Facility II as amended through April 4, 2023 (the “SPV Asset Facility II Third Amendment Date”). On August 5, 2024, ORCC II Financing II repaid all loans under the SPV Asset Facility II and the facility was terminated pursuant to its terms (the “SPV Asset Facility II Termination Date”).

The maximum principal amount of the SPV Asset Facility II as of the SPV Asset Facility II Third Amendment Date was $325.0 million; the availability of this amount was subject to an overcollateralization ratio test, which was based on the value of ORCC II Financing II’s assets from time to time, and satisfaction of certain conditions, including an interest coverage ratio test, certain concentration limits and collateral quality tests.

The SPV Asset Facility II provided for the ability to (1) draw term loans and (2) draw and redraw revolving loans under the SPV Asset Facility II through April 14, 2025 unless the revolving commitments were terminated or converted to term loans sooner as provided in the SPV Asset Facility II (the “SPV Asset Facility II Commitment Termination Date”). Prior to the SPV Asset Facility II Termination Date, proceeds received by ORCC II Financing II from principal and interest, dividends, or fees on assets were used to pay fees, expenses and interest on outstanding borrowings, and the excess may have been returned to the Company, subject to certain conditions. On the SPV Asset Facility II Termination Date, ORCC II Financing II repaid in full all outstanding fees and expenses and all principal and interest on outstanding borrowings.

Amounts drawn bore interest at Term SOFR (or, in the case of certain lenders that are commercial paper conduits, the lower of their cost of funds and Term SOFR plus 0.25%) plus, (x) with respect to revolving loans, 2.75% and (y) with respect to term loans, 2.75% during the SPV Asset Facility II’s reinvestment period and 2.75% thereafter until the SPV Asset Facility II Termination Date. From the SPV Asset Facility II Third Amendment Date to the SPV Asset Facility II Termination Date, there was a commitment fee of 0.75% per annum on the undrawn amount, if any, of the revolving commitments in the SPV Asset Facility II.

Debt Securitization Transaction

The Company incurs secured financing through a debt securitization transaction (the “CLO Transaction”) issued by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary (the “CLO Issuer”), which is backed by a portfolio of collateral obligations consisting of middle-market loans and participation interests in middle-market loans as well as by other assets of the CLO Issuer. The CLO Issuer issues preferred shares which are not secured by the collateral securing the CLO Transaction which the Company purchases. The Company acts as retention holder in connection with the CLO Transaction for the purposes of satisfying certain U.S. and European Union regulations requiring sponsors of securitization transactions to retain exposure to the performance of the securitized assets and as such is required to retain a portion of a CLO Issuer’s preferred shares. Notes issued by the CLO Issuer have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or any state securities (e.g., “blue sky”) laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration with the SEC or pursuant to an applicable exemption from such registration. The Adviser serves as collateral manager for the CLO Issuer under a collateral management agreement. The Adviser is entitled to receive fees for providing these services. The Adviser routinely waives its right to receive such fees but may rescind such waiver at any time; provided, however, that if the Adviser rescinds such waiver, the management fee payable to Adviser pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement will be offset by the amount of the collateral management fee attributable to a CLO Issuer’s equity or notes owned by the Company. Assets pledged to debt holders of the CLO Transaction and the other secured parties under each CLO Transaction’s documentation will not be available to pay the debts of the Company. The Company consolidates the financial statements of the CLO Issuer in its consolidated financial statements.

CLO XIII

On September 12, 2023 (the “CLO XIII Closing Date”), the Company completed a $399.3 million term debt securitization transaction (the “CLO XIII Transaction”). The secured notes and preferred shares issued in the CLO XIII Transaction were issued by the Company’s consolidated subsidiary Owl Rock CLO XIII, LLC, a limited liability organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “CLO XIII Issuer”).

The CLO XIII Transaction was executed by (A) the issuance of the following classes of notes and preferred shares pursuant to an indenture and security agreement dated as of the CLO XIII Closing Date (the “CLO XIII Indenture”), by and among the CLO XIII Issuer and State Street Bank and Trust Company: (i) $228.0 million of AAA(sf) Class A Notes, which bore interest at three-month term SOFR plus 2.55% and (ii) $32.0 million of AA(sf) Class B Notes, which bore interest at three-month term SOFR plus 3.35% (together, the “CLO XIII Secured Notes”). The CLO XIII Secured Notes were scheduled to mature on the Payment Date (as defined in the CLO XIII Indenture) in September, 2035. The CLO XIII Secured Notes were privately placed by Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC as Placement Agent and NatWest Markets Securities Inc. as Co-Placement Agent.

On October 16, 2025, the CLO XIII Issuer redeemed and paid in full all classes of the CLO XIII Secured Notes, plus accrued interest thereon through October 16, 2025.

F-60

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Concurrently with the issuance of the CLO XIII Secured Notes, the CLO XIII Issuer issued approximately $139.3 million of subordinated securities in the form of 139,300 preferred shares at an issue price of U.S. $1,000 per share (the “CLO XIII Preferred Shares”).

As part of the CLO XIII Transaction, the Company entered into a loan sale agreement with the CLO XIII Issuer dated as of the CLO XIII Closing Date, which provided for the contribution of approximately $36.4 million funded par amount of middle-market loans from the Company to the CLO XIII Issuer on the CLO XIII Closing Date and for future sales from the Company to the CLO XIII Issuer on an ongoing basis. No gain or loss will be recognized as a result of these sales and contributions. Such loans constituted part of the initial portfolio of assets securing the CLO XIII Secured Notes. The remainder of the initial portfolio assets securing the CLO XIII Secured Notes consisted of approximately $298.5 million funded par amount of middle-market loans purchased by the CLO XIII Issuer from ORCC II Financing LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under an additional loan sale agreement executed on the CLO XIII Closing Date between the CLO XIII Issuer and ORCC II Financing LLC and OR Lending II LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company, ORCC II Financing LLC and OR Lending II LLC each made customary representations, warranties, and covenants to the CLO XIII Issuer under the applicable loan sale agreement.

The CLO XIII Secured Notes were the secured obligations of the CLO XIII Issuer, and the CLO XIII Indenture includes customary covenants and events of default.

Unsecured Notes

2024 Notes

On November 26, 2019, the Company issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 4.625% notes due November 26, 2024 (the “2024 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act.

On October 21, 2020, the Company issued an additional $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes, the Company issued an additional $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes in private placements in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act.

The 2024 Notes bore interest at a rate of 4.625% per year payable semi-annually on May 26 and November 26 of each year, commencing on May 26, 2020.

On November 15, 2023, the Company caused notice to be issued to the holders of the 2024 Notes regarding its exercise of the option to redeem $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes at 100% of their principal amount, plus the accrued and unpaid interest thereon through, but excluding, the redemption date, December 15, 2023. On December 15, 2023, the Company redeemed in $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes at 100% of their principal amount, plus the accrued and unpaid interest thereon through, but excluding, December 15, 2023. On November 26, 2024, the Company redeemed $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes at 100% of their principal amount, plus the accrued and unpaid interest thereon through, but excluding, November 26, 2024.

2026 Notes

On November 15, 2023, the Company issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 8.450% notes due November 15, 2026 (the “2026 Notes”) in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and for initial resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act. The 2026 Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration.

The 2026 Notes were issued pursuant to the Base Indenture and a Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 15, 2023 (the “Second Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the “2026 Indenture”), between the Company and the Trustee. The 2026 Notes will mature on November 15, 2026, unless repurchased or redeemed in accordance with their terms prior to such date. The 2026 Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.450% per year payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15 of each year, commencing on May 15, 2024. Concurrent with the issuance of the 2026 Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “2026 Registration Rights Agreement”) for the benefit of the purchasers of the 2026 Notes. Pursuant to the 2026 Registration Rights Agreement, the Company filed a registration statement with the SEC and, on September 17, 2024, commenced an offer to exchange the notes initially issued on November 15, 2023 for newly issued registered notes with substantially similar terms, which expired on October 18, 2024 and was completed promptly thereafter.

The 2026 Notes are the Company’s direct, general unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s future indebtedness or other obligations that are expressly subordinated, or junior, in right of payment to the 2026 Notes. The 2026 Notes rank pari passu, or equal, in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness or other

F-61

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

obligations that are not so subordinated. The 2026 Notes rank effectively subordinated, or junior, to any of the Company’s future secured indebtedness or other obligations (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The 2026 Notes are structurally subordinated, or junior, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

The 2026 Indenture contains certain covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to (i) comply with Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act, as modified by Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act, for the period of time during which the 2026 Notes are outstanding, whether or not it is subject to those requirements, and (ii) provide financial information to the holders of the 2026 Notes and the Trustee if the Company is no longer subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the 2026 Indenture.

In addition, if a change of control repurchase event, as defined in the 2026 Indenture, occurs prior to maturity, holders of the 2026 Notes will have the right, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase for cash some or all of the 2026 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2026 Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.

Maturity of Debt Obligations

The table below presents a summary of the Company’s contractual payment obligations under credit facilities and notes as of December 31, 2025:


	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		After 5 years
Revolving Credit Facility	$	11,598	$	—	$	—	$	11,598	$	—
SPV Asset Facility I	315,000		—		—		315,000		—



2026 Notes	350,000		350,000		—		—		—
Total Contractual Obligations	$	676,598	$	350,000	$	—	$	326,598	$	—

Note 6. Fair Value of Investments

Investments

The tables below present the fair value hierarchy of investments as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash	$	59,362	$	—	$	—	$	59,362
Investments:
First-lien senior secured debt investments	$	—	$	2,756	$	1,218,616	$	1,221,372
Second-lien senior secured debt investments	—		11,351		119,703		131,054
Unsecured debt investments	—		—		38,673		38,673
Specialty finance debt investments	—		—		7,491		7,491
Preferred equity investments	—		—		67,143		67,143
Common equity investments	—		—		77,020		77,020
Specialty finance equity investments	—		—		13,303		13,303
Subtotal	—		14,107		1,541,949		1,556,056
Investments measured at Net Asset Value ("NAV")(1)	—		—		—		20,494
Total Investments	$	—	$	14,107	$	1,541,949	$	1,576,550

_______________

(1) Includes investments in Credit SLF, BOCSO and LSI Financing LLC, which are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient and have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

F-62

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)


	As of December 31, 2024
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash	$	50,891	$	—	$	—	$	50,891
Investments:
First-lien senior secured debt investments	$	—	$	20,065	$	1,495,835	$	1,515,900
Second-lien senior secured debt investments	—		60,962		139,322		200,284
Unsecured debt investments	—		—		33,594		33,594
Specialty finance debt investments	—		—		5,040		5,040
Preferred equity investments	—		—		59,385		59,385
Common equity investments	203		—		101,868		102,071
Specialty finance equity investments	—		—		8,219		8,219
Subtotal	203		81,027		1,843,263		1,924,493
Investments measured at Net Asset Value ("NAV")(1)	—		—		—		10,899
Total Investments	$	203	$	81,027	$	1,843,263	$	1,935,392

_______________

(1) Includes investments in Credit SLF and LSI Financing LLC, which are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient and have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

The tables below present changes in the fair value of investments for which Level 3 inputs were used to determine the fair value as of and for the following periods:


	As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2025
	Debt Investments								Equity Investments
	First-lien senior secured		Second-lien senior secured		Unsecured		Specialty finance		Preferred		Common		Specialty finance		Total
Fair value, beginning of period	$	1,495,835	$	139,322	$	33,594	$	5,040	$	59,385	$	101,868	$	8,219	$	1,843,263
Purchases of investments, net	214,322		6,570		757		2,310		2,146		1,610		3,617		231,332
Payment-in-kind	7,520		3,315		4,603		177		5,346		168		—		21,129
Proceeds from investments, net	(470,609)		(33,668)		(1,515)		(20)		(256)		(27,483)		(170)		(533,721)
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments	(9,316)		1,457		1,259		(16)		359		(16,706)		1,637		(21,326)
Net realized gain (loss) on investments	(14,922)		(20,066)		(58)		—		3		11,555		—		(23,488)
Net accretion/amortization of discount/premium on investments	7,453		844		33		—		160		—		—		8,490
Transfers between investment types	(6,008)		—		—		—		—		6,008		—		—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(1)	(5,659)		21,929		—		—		—		—		—		16,270
Fair Value, End of Period	$	1,218,616	$	119,703	$	38,673	$	7,491	$	67,143	$	77,020	$	13,303	$	1,541,949

_______________

(1)Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which the transfers occur. For the year ended December 31, 2025, transfers out of Level 3 were as a result of changes in the observability of significant inputs for certain portfolio companies and an investment measured at net asset value which is no longer categorized within the fair value hierarchy.

F-63

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)


	As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2024
	Debt Investments								Equity Investments
	First-lien senior secured		Second-lien senior secured		Unsecured		Specialty finance		Preferred		Common		Specialty finance		Total
Fair value, beginning of period	$	1,385,406	$	414,265	$	38,261	4,806		$	66,942	$	93,262	6,246		$	2,009,188
Purchases of investments, net	519,177		4,995		4,924		1,235		172		27		3,530		534,060
Payment-in-kind	19,870		4,094		4,890		59		5,791		154		—		34,858
Proceeds from investments, net	(412,768)		(253,322)		(25,861)		(1,084)		(1,066)		(370)		(3,953)		(698,424)
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments	(9,015)		(11,666)		1,789		24		(959)		6,741		2,304		(10,782)
Net realized gain (loss) on investments	(11,978)		(457)		(2,448)		—		—		(185)		92		(14,976)
Net accretion/amortization of discount/premium on investments	8,618		2,451		152		—		392		—		—		11,613
Transfers between investment types	(3,475)		—		11,887		—		(11,887)		3,475		—		—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(1)	—		(21,038)		—		—		—		(1,236)		—		(22,274)
Fair Value, End of Period	$	1,495,835	$	139,322	$	33,594	$	5,040	$	59,385	$	101,868	$	8,219	$	1,843,263

_______________

(1)Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which the transfers occur. For the year ended December 31, 2024, transfers out of Level 3 were as a result of changes in the observability of significant inputs for certain portfolio companies and an investment measured at net asset value which is no longer categorized within the fair value hierarchy.


	As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2023
	Debt Investments								Equity Investments
	First-lien senior secured		Second-lien senior secured		Unsecured		Specialty finance		Preferred		Common		Specialty finance		Total
Fair value, beginning of period	$	1,614,366	$	453,762	$	32,094	$	—	$	58,370	$	84,782	$	1,592	$	2,244,966
Purchases of investments, net	234,219		(3)		—		4,731		1,950		453		4,699		246,049
Payment-in-kind	20,238		4,202		3,847		75		5,218		139		—		33,719
Proceeds from investments, net	(489,017)		(15,750)		(38)		—		—		—		(115)		(504,920)
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments	10,898		(1,278)		2,294		—		1,235		3,138		70		16,357


Net realized gain (loss) on investments	(7,718)		—		(5)		—		—		—		—		(7,723)
Net amortization of discount on investments	7,240		889		69		—		169		—		—		8,367
Transfers between investment types	(4,750)		—		—		—		—		4,750		—		—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(1)	(70)		(27,557)		—		—		—		—		—		(27,627)
Fair Value, End of Period	$	1,385,406	$	414,265	$	38,261	$	4,806	$	66,942	$	93,262	$	6,246	$	2,009,188

_____________________

(1)Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which the transfers occur. For the year ended December 31, 2023, transfers out of Level 3 were as a result of changes in the observability of significant inputs for certain portfolio companies.

F-64

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

The table below presents information with respect to the net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments for which Level 3 inputs were used in determining the fair value that are still held by the Company for the following periods:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
		2025		2024		2023
First-lien senior secured debt investments		$	(12,839)	$	(7,198)	$	3,078
Second-lien senior secured debt investments		(18,803)		(10,348)		(5,290)
Unsecured debt investments		1,259		1,789		2,294
Specialty finance debt investments		(16)		23		—
Preferred equity investments		359		(809)		1,235
Common equity investments		(3,172)		6,716		3,549
Specialty finance equity investments		1,637		2,372		71
Total Investments		$	(31,575)	$	(7,455)	$	4,937

F-65

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

The tables below present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs of the Company’s Level 3 investments as of the following periods. The weighted average range of unobservable inputs is based on fair value of investments. The tables are not intended to be all-inclusive, but instead capture the significant unobservable inputs relevant to the Company’s determination of fair value.

As of December 31, 2025

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input

Range (Weighted Average)

Impact to Valuation from an Increase in Input

First-lien senior secured debt investments

1,155,122

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

6.3% - 20.1% (9.6%)

Decrease

43,696

Recent Transaction

Transaction Price

99.0% - 99.7% (99.3%)

Increase

19,798

Collateral Analysis

Recovery Rate

0.0% - 107.2% (60.1%)

Increase

Second-lien senior secured debt investments

119,703

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

10.0% - 62.4% (22.5%)

Decrease

Unsecured debt investments

37,466

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

5.5% - 17.6% (12.9%)

Decrease

1,207

Market Approach

EBITDA Multiple

12.0x

Increase

Specialty finance debt investments

7,491

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

11.6%

Increase

Preferred equity investments

66,129

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

11.6% - 35.3% (16.4%)

Decrease

1,014

Market Approach

EBITDA Multiple

128.9x

Increase

Common equity investments

64,531

Market Approach

EBITDA Multiple

4.0x - 17.8x (5.5x)

Increase

3,612

Market Approach

Revenue Multiple

8.3x - 13.0x (12.5x)

Increase

5,967

Recent Transaction

Transaction Price

100.0%

Increase

2,190

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

8.5%

Decrease

675

Market Approach

Market Adjustment Factor

(0.0)%

Increase

Market Approach

Gross Profit Multiple

9.0x

Increase

Option Pricing Model

Volatility

70.0%

Increase

Specialty finance equity investments

4,520

Market Approach

Transaction Price

N/A

Increase

6,444

Market Approach

AUM Multiple

1.1x

Increase

2,137

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Discounted Factor

20.0%

Decrease

202

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

11.5%

Decrease

F-66

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

As of December 31, 2024

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input

Range (Weighted Average)

Impact to Valuation from an Increase in Input

First-lien senior secured debt investments

1,463,390

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

7.6% - 35.2% (11.3%)

Decrease

31,419

Recent Transaction

Transaction Price

98.2% - 99.7% (99.1%)

Increase

1,026

Collateral Analysis

Recovery Rate

10.1% - 20.5% (13.3%)

Increase

Second-lien senior secured debt investments

138,594

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

11.4% - 19.8% (16.2%)

Decrease

728

Collateral Analysis

Recovery Rate

4.0%

Increase

Unsecured debt investments

32,579

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

8.6% - 18.1% (13.5%)

Decrease

1,015

Market Approach

EBITDA Multiple

11.8x

Increase

Specialty finance debt investments

5,040

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

12.3%

Decrease

Preferred equity investments

59,385

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

13.2% - 37.1% (17.8%)

Decrease

Common equity investments

96,251

Market Approach

EBITDA Multiple

3.3x - 20.0x (8.8x)

Increase

3,536

Market Approach

Revenue Multiple

5.3x - 14.5x (12.9x)

Increase

2,023

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

8.5%

Decrease

Market Approach

Gross Profit Multiple

10.0x

Increase

Option Pricing Model

Volatility

70.0%

Increase

Specialty finance equity investments

3,448

Market Approach

N/A

2,977

Market Approach

AUM Multiple

1.1x

Increase

1,555

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Discounted Factor

12.5%

Decrease

239

Yield Analysis

Market Yield

12.3%

Decrease

The fair value of the Company’s performing Level 3 debt investments is typically determined utilizing a yield analysis. In a yield analysis, a price is ascribed for each investment based upon an assessment of current and expected market yields for similar investments and risk profiles. Additional consideration is given to the expected life, portfolio company performance since close, and other terms and risks associated with an investment. Among other factors, a determinant of risk is the amount of leverage used by the portfolio company relative to its total enterprise value, and the rights and remedies of the Company’s investment within the portfolio company’s capital structure.

When the debtor is not performing or when there is insufficient value to cover the investment, the Company may utilize a net recovery approach to determine the fair value of debt investments in subject companies. A net recovery analysis typically consists of two steps. First, the total enterprise value for the subject company is estimated using standard valuation approaches, most commonly the market approach. Second, the fair value for each investment in the subject company is then estimated by allocating the subject company’s total enterprise value to the outstanding securities in the capital structure based upon various factors, including seniority, preferences, and other features if deemed relevant to each security in the capital structure.

Significant unobservable quantitative inputs typically used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s Level 3 debt investments primarily include current market yields, including relevant market indices, but may also include quotes from brokers, dealers, and pricing services as indicated by comparable investments. For the Company’s Level 3 equity investments, a market approach, based on comparable financial performance multiples such as publicly-traded company and comparable market transaction multiples of revenues, earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), or some combination thereof and comparable market transactions typically would be used.

F-67

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Debt Not Carried at Fair Value

Fair value is estimated by discounting remaining payments using applicable current market rates, which take into account changes in the Company’s marketplace credit ratings, or market quotes, if available. The table below presents the carrying and fair values of the Company’s debt obligations as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025						As of December 31, 2024
	Net Carrying Value(1)		Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs		Fair Value		Net Carrying Value(1)		Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs		Fair Value
Revolving Credit Facility	$	9,284	$	(2,314)	$	9,284	$	47,369	$	(3,074)	$	47,369
SPV Asset Facility I	311,673		(3,327)		311,673		192,064		(2,936)		192,064

CLO XIII	—		—		—		257,905		(2,095)		257,905

2026 Notes	347,850		(2,150)		359,625		345,556		(4,444)		367,500
Total Debt	$	668,807	$	(7,791)	$	680,582	$	842,894	$	(12,549)	$	864,838

_______________

(1)The carrying values are presented net of debt issuance costs.

The table below presents fair value measurements of the Company’s debt obligations as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025		As of December 31, 2024
Level 1	$	—	$	—
Level 2	359,625		367,500
Level 3	320,957		497,338
Total Debt	$	680,582	$	864,838

Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the carrying amounts of the Company’s other assets and liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities. These financial instruments would be categorized as Level 3 within the hierarchy.

Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies

Portfolio Company Commitments

From time to time, the Company may enter into commitments to fund investments in the form of revolving credit, delayed draw, or equity commitments, which require the Company to provide funding when requested by portfolio companies in accordance with underlying loan agreements. The Company had the following outstanding commitments as of the following periods:


	As of December 31, 2025		As of December 31, 2024

Total net unfunded revolving loan commitments	$	88,831	$	99,069
Total net unfunded delayed draw loan commitments	52,975		77,698
Total unfunded specialty finance debt commitments	—		—
Total net unfunded revolving and delayed draw loan commitments	$	141,806	$	176,767

Total unfunded specialty finance equity commitments	$	6,124	$	4,996
Total unfunded equity commitments	545		—
	6,669		4,996
Total Unfunded Commitments	$	148,475	$	181,763

As of December 31, 2025, the Company believed they had adequate financial resources to satisfy the unfunded portfolio company commitments.

Organizational and Offering Costs

The Adviser incurred organization and offering costs on behalf of the Company in the amount of $12.4 million from October 15, 2015 (Inception), of which $12.4 million was charged to the Company pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement and Administration Agreement, the Adviser is entitled to receive up to 1.5% of gross offering

F-68

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

proceeds raised in the Company’s continuous public offering until all organization and offering costs paid by the Adviser have been recovered. The Company terminated its continuous public offering as of April 30, 2021.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, the Company may become a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of its business. As of December 31, 2025, management was not aware of any material pending or threatened litigation that would require accounting recognition or financial statement disclosure.

Note 8. Net Assets

Share Issuances

The Company currently has the authority to issue 450,000,000 common shares at $0.01 per share par value. Prior to its continuous public offering, the Company issued 100 shares of common stock to the Adviser and 277,788 shares of its common stock to certain individuals and entities affiliated with the Adviser in a private placement. The Company issued 151,364,239 shares of common stock in its continuous public offering prior to its termination on April 30, 2021.

The table below summarizes transactions with respect to shares of the Company’s common stock during the following periods:


	For the Year Ended
	December 31, 2025			December 31, 2024			December 31, 2023
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount

Reinvestment of distributions	4,816,721	$	41,296	5,734,171	$	51,222	5,367,227	$	48,104
Repurchased shares	(17,598,030)	(150,967)		(18,348,487)	(163,763)		(11,530,869)	(103,659)
Total Shares/Net Repurchases	(12,781,309)	$	(109,671)	(12,614,316)	$	(112,541)	(6,163,642)	$	(55,555)

Prior to the termination of the Company’s continuous public offering, in the event of a material decline in its net asset value per share, the Company’s Board reduced the offering price in order to establish a new net offering price per share. The Company will not sell shares at a net offering price below the net asset value per share unless the Company obtains the requisite approval from its shareholders.

The Company determined not to file additional post-effective amendments to its registration statement and terminated its offering as of April 30, 2021.

The table below presents shares issued pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023:

F-69

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)


Date of Issuance	Record Date	Number of Shares	Purchase Price per Share





















February 1, 2023	January 31, 2023	379,272	$	8.89
February 2, 2023	December 31, 2022	126,215	8.89
March 1, 2023	February 28, 2023	380,932	8.88
March 29, 2023	March 28, 2023	376,723	8.90
April 26, 2023	April 25, 2023	377,165	8.90
April 28, 2023	March 31, 2023	125,586	8.90
May 31, 2023	May 30, 2023	380,161	8.88
June 28, 2023	June 27, 2023	366,863	8.96
July 26, 2023	July 25, 2023	365,479	8.97
July 31, 2023	June 30, 2023	121,887	8.97
August 30, 2023	August 29, 2023	366,982	8.99
September 27, 2023	September 26, 2023	355,431	9.08
November 1, 2023	October 31, 2023	428,157	9.02
November 13, 2023	September 30, 2023	356,503	9.00
November 29, 2023	November 28, 2023	432,272	9.04
December 27, 2023	December 26, 2023	427,597	9.03
January 30, 2024	December 31, 2023	213,228	9.03
January 31, 2024	January 30, 2024	431,463	9.01
February 28, 2024	February 27, 2024	431,753	9.01
March 27, 2024	March 26, 2024	420,004	9.01
May 1, 2024	April 30, 2024	420,937	8.99
May 13, 2024	March 31, 2024	209,715	8.99
May 29, 2024	May 28, 2024	424,861	8.99
June 26, 2024	June 25, 2024	425,419	9.00
July 31, 2024	July 30, 2024	417,972	8.91
August 13, 2024	June 30, 2024	139,068	8.90
August 28, 2024	August 27, 2024	421,784	8.91
September 25, 2024	September 24, 2024	414,999	8.85
October 30, 2024	October 29, 2024	410,454	8.84
November 12, 2024	September 30, 2024	135,993	8.84
November 27, 2024	November 26, 2024	413,780	8.82
December 26, 2024	December 24, 2024	402,741	8.80
January 29, 2025	January 28, 2025	404,165	8.79
February 13, 2025	December 31, 2024	133,727	8.80
February 26, 2025	February 25, 2025	407,046	8.78
March 26, 2025	March 25, 2025	394,211	8.75
April 30, 2025	April 29, 2025	400,981	8.63
May 13, 2025	March 31, 2025	65,631	8.72
May 28, 2025	May 27, 2025	402,219	8.62
June 25, 2025	June 24, 2025	383,563	8.61
July 30, 2025	July 29, 2025	385,457	8.57
August 27, 2025	August 26, 2025	388,223	8.55
September 25, 2025	September 24, 2025	378,020	8.45
October 29, 2025	October 28, 2025	383,524	8.35
November 26, 2025	November 25, 2025	343,590	8.31
December 31, 2025	December 30, 2025	346,364	8.27

F-70

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Distributions

The Board generally authorizes and declares monthly and/or quarterly distribution amounts per share of common stock, payable monthly and/or quarterly in arrears.

The tables below present cash distributions per share for shareholders of record during the following periods:

For the Year Ended December 31, 2025

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Dividend

Distribution Per Share(1)

Distribution Amount

November 8, 2024

January 28, 2025

January 29, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,664

February 18, 2025

February 25, 2025

February 26, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,696

February 18, 2025

March 25, 2025

March 26, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,720

February 18, 2025

March 31, 2025

May 13, 2025

Quarterly

0.0100

1,249

February 18, 2025

April 29, 2025

April 30, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,492

May 6, 2025

May 27, 2025

May 28, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,520

May 6, 2025

June 24, 2025

June 25, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,542

May 6, 2025

July 29, 2025

July 30, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,192

August 5, 2025

August 26, 2025

August 27, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,215

August 5, 2025

September 24, 2025

September 25, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

7,238

August 5, 2025

October 28, 2025

October 29, 2025

Monthly

0.0600

6,832

November 4, 2025

November 25, 2025

November 26, 2025

Monthly

0.0533

6,090

November 4, 2025

December 30, 2025

December 31, 2025

Monthly

0.0533

6,108

Total

0.7166

87,558

_______________

(1)Totals presented may not sum due to rounding.

For the Year Ended December 31, 2024

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Dividend

Distribution Per Share

Distribution Amount

December 21, 2023

January 30, 2024

January 31, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,433

December 21, 2023

February 27, 2024

February 28, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,459

December 21, 2023

March 26, 2024

March 27, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,485

February 21, 2024

March 31, 2024

May 13, 2024

Quarterly

0.03

4,054

February 21, 2024

April 30, 2024

May 1, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,106

May 7, 2024

May 28, 2024

May 29, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,145

May 7, 2024

June 25, 2024

June 26, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,171

May 7, 2024

June 30, 2024

August 13, 2024

Quarterly

0.02

2,663

May 7, 2024

July 30, 2024

July 31, 2024

Monthly

0.06

7,987

August 6, 2024

August 27, 2024

August 28, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,021

August 6, 2024

September 24, 2024

September 25, 2024

Monthly

0.06

8,046

August 6, 2024

September 30, 2024

November 12, 2024

Quarterly

0.02

2,615

August 6, 2024

October 29, 2024

October 30, 2024

Monthly

0.06

7,844

November 8, 2024

November 26, 2024

November 27, 2024

Monthly

0.06

7,876

November 8, 2024

December 24, 2024

December 26, 2024

Monthly

0.06

7,901

November 8, 2024

December 31, 2024

February 14, 2025

Quarterly

0.02

2,555

Total

0.81

109,361

F-71

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Dividend

Distribution Per Share

Distribution Amount

November 1, 2022

January 31, 2023

February 1, 2023

Monthly

0.050180

7,352

November 1, 2022

February 28, 2023

March 1, 2023

Monthly

0.050180

7,377

November 1, 2022

March 28, 2023

March 29, 2023

Monthly

0.050180

7,396

February 21, 2023

March 31, 2023

April 28, 2023

Quarterly

0.016731

2,429

February 21, 2023

April 25, 2023

April 26, 2023

Monthly

0.050180

7,285

February 21, 2023

May 30, 2023

May 31, 2023

Monthly

0.050180

7,309

February 21, 2023

June 27, 2023

June 28, 2023

Monthly

0.050180

7,329

May 9, 2023

June 30, 2023

July 31, 2023

Quarterly

0.016731

2,383

May 9, 2023

July 25, 2023

July 26, 2023

Monthly

0.050180

7,146

May 9, 2023

August 29, 2023

August 30, 2023

Monthly

0.050180

7,170

May 9, 2023

September 26, 2023

September 27, 2023

Monthly

0.050180

7,188

September 11, 2023

September 30, 2023

November 13, 2023

Quarterly

0.050000

7,025

September 11, 2023

October 31, 2023

November 1, 2023

Monthly

0.060000

8,431

September 11, 2023

November 28, 2023

November 29, 2023

Monthly

0.060000

8,478

September 11, 2023

December 26, 2023

December 27, 2023

Monthly

0.060000

8,504

November 16, 2023

December 31, 2023

January 20, 2024

Quarterly

0.030000

4,210

0.745082

107,012

With respect to distributions, the Company has adopted an “opt-in” dividend reinvestment plan for common shareholders pursuant to which shareholders that have “opted-in” may have the full amount of any cash distribution reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock based on the net offering price per share calculated as if the Company’s offering had not been terminated; however, on February 17, 2026, the Board determined to terminate the distribution reinvestment plan and as a result commencing with any distributions payable on or after March 18, 2026, all distributions will be paid in cash. With respect to distributions paid prior to March 18, 2026, each shareholder that has not “opted-in” to the dividend reinvestment plan will have their dividends or distributions automatically received in cash rather than reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock. Shareholders who receive distributions in the form of shares of common stock will be subject to the same U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences as if they received cash distributions.

The Company may fund its cash distributions to shareholders from any source of funds available to the Company, including but not limited to offering proceeds, net investment income from operations, capital gains proceeds from the sale of assets, dividends or other distributions paid to it on account of preferred and common equity investments in portfolio companies. In no event, however, will funds be advanced or borrowed for the purpose of distributions, if the amount of such distributions would exceed the Company’s accrued and received revenues for the previous four quarters, less paid and accrued operating expenses with respect to such revenues and costs.

Through November 7, 2023, the termination date of the Expense Support Agreement by the Adviser, a portion of the Company’s distributions resulted from expense support from the Adviser, which was subject to repayment by the Company within three years from the date of payment. The purpose of this arrangement was to avoid distributions being characterized as a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Shareholders should understand that any such distribution was not based on the Company’s investment performance, and can only be sustained if the Company achieves positive investment performance in future periods and/or the Adviser continued to provide expense support. Shareholders should also understand that the Company’s repayments of expense support reduced the distributions that they would have otherwise received. There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve the performance necessary to sustain these distributions, or be able to pay distributions at all.

Sources of distributions, other than net investment income and realized gains on a U.S. GAAP basis, include required adjustments to U.S. GAAP net investment income in the current period to determine taxable income available for distributions. The tables below reflect the sources of cash distributions on a U.S. GAAP basis that the Company has declared on its shares of common stock during the following periods:

F-72

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2025
Source of Distribution	Per Share		Amount		Percentage
Net investment income	$	0.61	$	73,991	84.5	%
Net realized gain on investments	—		—		—
Excess (undistributed)	0.11		13,567		15.5
Total	$	0.72	$	87,558	100.0	%


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2024
Source of Distribution	Per Share		Amount		Percentage
Net investment income	$	0.80	$	108,469	99.2	%
Net realized gain on investments	—		—		—
Excess (undistributed)	0.01		892		0.8
Total	$	0.81	$	109,361	100.0	%


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Source of Distribution	Per Share		Amount		Percentage
Net investment income	$	0.84	$	120,432	112.5	%
Net realized gain on investments	—		—		—
Excess (undistributed)	(0.09)		(13,420)		(12.5)
Total	$	0.75	$	107,012	100.0	%

Share Repurchases

Prior to the third quarter of 2025, the Company offered, on a quarterly basis, to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock on such terms as may be determined by the Board in its complete discretion. All shares purchased by the Company pursuant to the terms of each offer to repurchase were retired and are authorized and unissued shares.


Offer Date	Tender Offer Expiration	Tender Offer		Purchase Price per Share		Shares Repurchased

















February 28, 2023	March 27, 2023	$	23,099	$	8.90	2,595,339
May 26, 2023	June 26, 2023	36,020		8.96		4,020,194
August 28, 2023	September 25, 2023	28,144		9.08		3,099,549
November 27, 2023	December 22, 2023	16,397		9.03		1,815,787
February 27, 2024	March 25, 2024	60,509		9.01		6,715,753
May 24, 2024	June 24, 2024	31,358		9.00		3,484,167
August 26, 2024	September 23, 2024	33,505		8.85		3,785,909
November 25, 2024	December 23, 2024	38,391		8.80		4,362,658
February 19, 2025	March 24, 2025	36,805		8.75		4,206,258
May 16, 2025	June 27, 2025	53,838		8.61		6,252,963
August 18, 2025	September 25, 2025	60,324		8.45		7,138,809

Note 9. Earnings Per Share

The table below sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the following periods:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
		2025		2024		2023
Increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations		$	24,070	$	81,964	$	129,793
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding—basic and diluted		121,691,441		135,104,584		144,043,515
Earnings per common share-basic and diluted		$	0.20	$	0.61	$	0.90

F-73

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Note 10. Income Taxes

Taxable income generally differs from increase in net assets resulting from operations due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes net unrealized gains or losses, as unrealized gains or losses are generally not included in taxable income until they are realized.

The Company makes certain adjustments to the classification of net assets as a result of permanent book-to-tax differences, which include differences in the book and tax basis of certain assets and liabilities, and nondeductible federal taxes or losses among other items. To the extent these differences are permanent, they are charged or credited to additional paid-in-capital, or distributable earnings (losses), as appropriate.

The following table reconciles the increase in net assets resulting from operations to undistributed taxable income for the following periods:


	Year Ended December 31,
	2025(1)		2024		2023
Increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	24,070	$	81,964	$	129,793
Adjustments:
Net unrealized (gain) loss	26,181		11,758		(17,089)
Other income (loss) for tax purposes, not book	(352)		(1,866)		(12,230)
Deferred organization costs	(37)		(37)		265
Other book-tax differences	1,304		2,774		2,821
Realized gain/loss differences	(10,381)		12,259		7,957
Taxable Income	$	40,785	$	106,852	$	111,517

______________

(1)Tax information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, are estimates and are not final until the Company files its tax returns.

For the Year Ended December 31, 2025

Total distributions declared of $87.6 million resulted in a taxable dividend amount of $90.1 million that consisted of approximately $83.9 million of ordinary income and $0.3 million of long-term capital gains, and a return of capital of $5.9 million for the tax year ending December 31, 2025. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2025, on a tax basis, the Company had no undistributed income, a capital loss carryforward of $33.5 million, as well as $(31.7) million of net unrealized gains (losses) on investments and $(6.9) million of other temporary differences. For the year ended December 31, 2025, 92.5% of distributed ordinary income qualified as interest related dividend which is exempt from U.S. withholding tax applicable to non-U.S. shareholders.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company increased the total distributable earnings (losses) and decreased additional paid-in-capital. These permanent differences of $7.2 million principally related to U.S. federal income tax, including excise taxes, and a return of capital.

As of December 31, 2025, the net estimated unrealized loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $25.4 million based on a tax cost basis of $1.6 billion. As of December 31, 2025, the estimated aggregate gross unrealized loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $73.1 million and the estimated aggregate gross unrealized gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $47.7 million.

For the Year Ended December 31, 2024

Total distributions declared of $109.4 million resulted in a tax dividend amount of $106.8 million that consisted of approximately $106.3 million of ordinary income and $0.5 million of long-term capital gains for the tax year ending December 31, 2024. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2024, on a tax basis, the Company had $10.3 million of undistributed ordinary income, $0.2 million of undistributed long-term capital gains, as well as $(18.2) million of net unrealized gains (losses) on investments and $(8.1) million of other temporary differences. For the year ended December 31, 2024, 89.2% of distributed ordinary income qualified as interest related dividend which is exempt from U.S. withholding tax applicable to non-U.S. shareholders.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company increased the total distributable earnings (losses) and decreased additional paid-in-capital. These permanent differences of $2.8 million principally related to U.S. federal income tax, including excise taxes.

As of December 31, 2024, the net estimated unrealized loss of U.S. federal income tax purposes was $13.0 million based on a tax cost basis of $1.9 billion. As of December 31, 2024, the estimated aggregate gross unrealized loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $73.9 million and the estimated aggregate gross unrealized gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $60.9 million.

F-74

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023

Total distributions declared of $107.0 million resulted in a tax dividend amount of $109.5 million that consisted of approximately $107.3 million of ordinary income and $2.2 million of long-term capital gains for the year ending December 31, 2023. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2023, on a tax basis, the Company had $10.4 million of undistributed ordinary income, $0.3 million of undistributed long-term capital gains, as well as $2.2 million of net unrealized gains (losses) on investments and $(4.1) million of other temporary differences. For the year ended December 31, 2023, 89.1% of distributed ordinary income qualified as interest related dividend which is exempt from U.S. withholding tax applicable to non-U.S. shareholders.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company increased the total distributable earnings (losses) and decreased additional paid-in-capital. These permanent differences of $2.8 million principally related to U.S. federal income tax, including excise taxes.

As of December 31, 2023, the net estimated unrealized gain of U.S. federal income tax purposes was $7.6 million based on a tax cost basis of $2.0 billion. As of December 31, 2023, the estimated aggregate gross unrealized loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $43.8 million and the estimated aggregate gross unrealized gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes was $51.4 million.

Taxable Subsidiaries

Certain of the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal and state corporate-level income taxes. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded a current tax expense of approximately $1.6 million,$1.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

The Company recorded net deferred tax liabilities of $10.3 million and $10.3 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, for taxable subsidiaries, which is significantly related to U.S. GAAP to tax outside basis differences in the taxable subsidiaries' investment in certain partnership interests.

F-75

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Note 11. Financial Highlights

The below are the financial highlights for a common share outstanding during the following periods:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2025			2024			2023			2022			2021				2020			2019			2018			2017
Per share data:
Net asset value, at beginning of period	$	8.80		$	9.00		$	8.85		$	8.98		$	8.84			$	9.03		$	8.97		$	9.03		$	9.00
Results of operations:
Net investment income(1)	0.61			0.80			0.84			0.68			0.59				0.64			0.64			0.56			0.42
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)(4)	(0.41)			(0.19)			0.06			(0.18)			0.15				(0.17)			0.09			0.05			0.10
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	0.20			0.61			0.90			0.50			0.74				0.47			0.73			0.61			0.52
Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income(2)	(0.61)			(0.80)			(0.84)			(0.68)			(0.59)				(0.64)			(0.66)			(0.59)			(0.43)
Distributions from net realized gains(2)	—			—			—			—			—			(10)	—			(0.02)			(0.03)			—			(10)
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income and net realized gains(2)	(0.11)			(0.01)			0.09			0.05			(0.01)				(0.02)			—			(0.06)			(0.06)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from shareholders' distributions	(0.72)			(0.81)			(0.75)			(0.63)			(0.60)				(0.66)			(0.68)			(0.68)			(0.49)
Capital share transactions:
Issuance of common stock above net asset value	—			—			—			—			—			(10)	—			0.01			0.01			—			(10)
Net increase in net assets resulting from capital share transactions	—			—			—			—			—				—			0.01			0.01			—
Total increase (decrease) in net assets	(0.52)			(0.20)			0.15			(0.13)			0.14				(0.19)			0.06			(0.06)			0.03
Net Asset Value, at End of Period(9)	$	8.27		$	8.80		$	9.00		$	8.85		$	8.98			$	8.84		$	9.03		$	8.97		$	9.03

Total Return(5)(6)	2.1		%	7.0		%	10.4		%	5.7		%	7.9		%		5.7		%	7.1		%	6.7		%	5.9		%	(11)

Ratios:
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets(3)(7)(8)	11.8		%	12.5		%	11.9		%	8.9		%	8.0		%		5.3		%	7.6		%	7.7		%	1.5		%	(12)
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets(7)	7.2		%	9.1		%	9.4		%	7.7		%	6.7		%		7.5		%	7.1		%	6.2		%	4.0		%	(12)
Portfolio turnover rate	18.0		%	43.1		%	11.8		%	7.7		%	43.6		%		15.3		%	19.4		%	35.5		%	7.0		%	(12)

Supplemental Data:
Weighted-average shares outstanding	121,691,441			135,104,584			144,043,515			150,071,461			151,511,486				129,370,000			76,023,995			26,555,178			3,500,950
Shares outstanding, end of period	114,946,017			127,727,326			140,341,642			146,505,284			151,376,519				145,448,227			106,034,790			48,860,700			9,866,216
Net assets, end of period	$	950,390		$	1,123,549		$	1,263,487		$	1,296,261		$	1,359,691			$	1,286,304		$	957,279		$	438,210		$	89,083

_______________

(1)The per share data was derived using the weighted average shares during the period.

(2)The per share data was derived using actual shares outstanding at the date of the relevant transaction.

(3)Operating expenses may vary in the future based on unpredictable variables. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

F-76

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

(4)The amount shown at this caption is the balancing amount derived from the other figures in the schedule. The amount shown at this caption for a share outstanding throughout the year may not agree with the change in the aggregate gains and losses in portfolio securities for the year because of the timing of sales of the Company’s shares in relation to fluctuating market values for the portfolio.

(5)Total return is calculated as the change in net asset value (“NAV”) per share (assuming dividends and distributions, if any, are reinvested in accordance with the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan), if any, divided by the beginning NAV per share.

(6)Total return displayed is net of all fees, including all operating expenses such as management fees, incentive fees, general and administrative expenses, organization and amortized offering expenses, and interest expenses.

(7)The ratio reflects an annualized amount, except in the case of non-recurring expenses.

(8)Prior to any management fee waivers, the annualized total expenses to average net assets for the period ended December 31, 2025, was 11.8%.

(9)Totals presented may not sum due to rounding.

(10)The per share amounts round to less than $0.01 per share.

(11)Total return for the year ended December 31, 2017 is not annualized. An investment in the Company is subject to a maximum upfront sales load of 5% of the offering price, which will reduce the amount of capital available for investment.

(12)For 2017 figures, ratios reflect amounts from the commencement of operations, April 4, 2017, through December 31, 2017 and are not annualized.

F-77

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Note 12. Subsequent Events

In preparing these financial statements, the Company has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date of issuance. There are no subsequent events to disclose except the following:

Dividends

On February 18, 2026, the Board approved regular monthly distributions for February 2026, through March 2026. The regular monthly cash distributions, each in the gross amount of $0.0533 per share, will be payable monthly to shareholders of record as of the monthly record date.

Asset Sale

On February 18, 2026, the Company entered into six separately negotiated loan sale agreements (collectively, the “Loan Sale Agreements”) relating to the disposition of a portion of the Company’s portfolio company investments (each, a “Subject Portfolio” and collectively, the “Subject Portfolios”).

Pursuant to the Loan Sale Agreements:

The Subject Portfolios represent $600.0 million in aggregate total debt investment commitments. Excluding unfunded commitments, the aggregate fair value of the Subject Portfolios as of February 12, 2026, (the “Subject Portfolio Valuation Date”) was $538.3 million, equivalent to 99.8% of par value.

Each Loan Sale Agreement provides that each Purchaser will purchase the relevant Subject Portfolio for a purchase price equal to its fair value as of the Subject Portfolio Valuation Date adjusted for certain interest activity consistent with market standards. The fair value of each portfolio company investment included in the Subject Portfolios was determined on the Subject Portfolio Valuation Date in accordance with the Company’s standard valuation process, in accordance with Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act, which establishes requirements for determining fair value in good faith for purposes of the 1940 Act.

The Subject Portfolios represent 33.8% of the Company’s total investment commitments, including unfunded commitments, as of December 31, 2025. The Subject Portfolios consist of 92.0% first-lien investments, 4.5% second-lien investments and 3.5% unsecured investments, and include investments in 96 portfolio companies across 25 industries. The Subject Portfolios have an average investment size of $5.6 million and a weighted average spread of 5.5% and consist of partial sales, representing approximately 59% of our investments in each underlying portfolio company as of December 31, 2025.

Termination of Dividend Reinvestment Plan

On February 17, 2026, the Board also determined to terminate the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. As a result, the Regular Distribution payable in March 2026, will be payable only in cash and, subject to Board approval, all future distributions are expected to be paid in cash.

F-78

Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise noted)

Revolving Credit Facility Amendment

On February 17, 2026, the Company entered into an Omnibus Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement and Guarantee and Security Agreement in order to (i) reduce the maximum commitment of the Revolving Credit Facility from $225.0 million to $75.0 million, (ii) shorten the revolver availability period from January 2028 to October 2027, (iii) increase the unused fee from 0.375% to 0.50%-0.65%, (iv) increase the applicable margin from (a) with respect to any ABR Loan, 1.00% to 1.50% per annum, (b) with respect to any term benchmark loan, 2.00% to 2.50% per annum, and (c) with respect to any RFR Loan, 2.00% to 2.50% per annum, (v) expand the ability to make restricted payments, subject to certain conditions, and (vi) reduce the minimum shareholders’ equity test.

Return of Capital Distribution

On March 5, 2026, the Board declared a special cash return of capital distribution to shareholders of $2.50 per share, reflecting approximately 30% of the Company’s NAV as of December 31, 2025, payable on or before March 31, 2026, to shareholders of record as of March 24, 2026.

F-79

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

There are not and have not been any disagreements between the Company and its accountant on any matter of accounting principles, practices, or financial statement disclosure.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report and determined that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by the Annual Report.

(b)Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 COSO Framework). Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2025.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report related to internal controls over financial reporting of the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(c)Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

Diversified Lending Investment Committee

The Adviser’s investment team (the “Investment Team”) is led by Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz and Craig W. Packer and is supported by certain members of the Adviser’s senior executive team and the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. The Adviser’s Diversified Lending Investment Committee is comprised of Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz, Craig W. Packer, Logan Nicholson, Alexis Maged, Patrick Linnemann and Meenal Mehta and, effective November 1, 2025, Matthias Ederer.

Mr. Ederer is a Senior Managing Director at Blue Owl, a member of the Adviser’s Investment Team and a member of the Adviser’s Diversified Lending Investment Committee. Before joining Blue Owl, Mr. Ederer was a Partner at BC Partners, where he co-founded the credit business and served on the investment committee. Prior to that, Mr. Ederer was a Partner at Wingspan Investment Management. Mr. Ederer began his career at Goldman Sachs & Co., working in the Special Situations Group and the Bank Loan Distressed Investing Group in London and New York. Mr. Ederer received an M.Phil. in Economics from the University of Oxford, Nuffield College and a B.Sc. in Economics from the University of Warwick.

Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans

During the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2025, none of the Company’s directors or executive officers adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of Company securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) or any “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement.”

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.

Not Applicable.

123

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Our Board of Directors

As of December 31, 2025, our Board consisted of six members. The Board is divided into three classes, with the members of each class serving staggered, three-year terms. The terms of our Class I directors will expire at the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders; the terms of our Class II directors will expire at the 2027 annual meeting of shareholders; and the terms of our Class III directors will expire at the 2028 annual meeting of shareholders.

Biographical Information

Brief biographies of the members of the Board are set forth below. Also included below following each biography is a brief discussion of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led our Board to conclude that the applicable director should serve on our Board at this time. In addition, set forth further below is a biography of each of our executive officers who is not a director.

124

Name, Address, and Age(1)

Position(s) Held with the Company

Principal
Occupation(s)
During the Past
5 Years

Term of Office

and Length of

Time Served(2)

Number of

Companies in

Fund

Complex(3)

Overseen by

Director

Other Directorships
Held by Director or
Nominee for Director

Independent Directors:

Eric Kaye, 62

Director

Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Kayezen, LLC (formerly ARQ^EX Fitness Systems)

Class I Director since 2016; Term expires in 2026

OBDC
OCIC

OTF

OTIC

Victor Woolridge, 69

Director

Managing Director of Barings Real Estate Advisers LLC

Class I Director since 2021; Term expires in 2026

OBDC
OCIC

OTF

OTIC

Christopher M. Temple, 58

Director

President of DelTex Capital LLC

Class II Director since 2016; Term expires in 2027

OBDC
OCIC

OTF

OTIC

Melissa Weiler, 61

Director

Private Investor

Class II Director since 2021, Term expires in 2027

OBDC
OCIC
OTF
OTIC

Jefferies Financial Group Inc.

Edward D’Alelio, 73

Chairman of the Board, Director

Retired

Class III Director since 2016; Term expires in 2028

OBDC
OCIC

OTF

OTIC

Interested Directors:(4)

Craig W. Packer, 59

Chief Executive Officer and Director

Co-Founder of Owl Rock Capital Partners

Co-President of Blue Owl

Co-Chief Investment Officer of each of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers

Chief Executive Officer of the Blue Owl BDCs

Class III Director since 2016; Term expires in 2028

OBDC
OCIC
OTF
OTIC
Blue Owl Capital Inc. (“Blue Owl”)

______________

(1)The address for each director is c/o Blue Owl Capital Corporation II, 399 Park Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

(2)Directors serve for three-year terms until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

(3)The term “Fund Complex” refers to the Blue Owl BDCs. Directors and officers who oversee the funds in the Fund Complex are noted.

(4)“Interested person” of the Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). Mr. Packer is an “interested person” because of his affiliation with the Adviser.

Independent Directors

Mr. Kaye is the Chief Executive Officer and founder of Kayezen, LLC, a physical therapy and fitness equipment design company. Prior to founding Kayezen, LLC, Mr. Kaye served as a Vice Chairman and Managing Director of UBS Investment Bank, and a member of the division’s Global Operating and U.S. Executive Committees, from June 2001 to May 2012. For the majority of Mr. Kaye’s tenure with UBS, he was a Managing Director and led the firm’s Exclusive Sales and Divestitures Group, where he focused on advising middle-market companies. Prior to joining UBS, Mr. Kaye had served as Global Co-Head of Mergers & Acquisitions for Robertson Stephens, an investment banking firm, from February 1998 to June 2001. Mr. Kaye joined Robertson Stephens from PaineWebber where he served as Executive Director and head of the firm’s Technology Mergers & Acquisitions team. Since March 2016 and November 2016, he has served on the boards of directors of OBDC and the Company, respectively, since August 2018 he has served on the board of directors of OTF, since September 2020 he has served on the board of directors of OCIC, and since August 2021 he has served on the board of directors of OTIC. Mr. Kaye previously served on the board of directors of Blue Owl Capital Corporation III (“OBDE”) from February 2020 until January 2025and on the board of directors of Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. II (“OTF II”) from November 2021 until March 2025. Mr. Kaye holds a B.A. from Union College and an M.B.A. from Columbia Business School.

We believe Mr. Kaye’s management positions and experiences in the middle-market provide the Board with valuable insight.

Mr. Temple has served as President of DelTex Capital LLC (a private investment firm) since its founding in 2010. Prior to forming DelTex Capital, Mr. Temple served as President of Vulcan Capital, the investment arm of Vulcan Inc., from May 2009 until December 2009 and as Vice President of Vulcan Capital from September 2008 to May 2009. Prior to joining Vulcan in September 2008, Mr. Temple served as a managing director at Tailwind Capital, LLC from May to August 2008. Prior to joining Tailwind, Mr. Temple was a managing director at Friend Skoler & Co., Inc. from May 2005 to May 2008. From April 1996 to December 2004, Mr. Temple was a managing director at Thayer Capital Partners. Mr. Temple started his career in the audit and tax departments of KPMG’s Houston office and was a licensed CPA from 1989 to 1993. Mr. Temple served on the board of directors of Plains GP

125

Holdings, L.P., the general partner of Plains All American Pipeline Company from November 2016 through May 2024 and served as a member of the Plains GP Holdings, L.P. compensation committee from November 2020 through May 2024. Mr. Temple also served as a director of Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.’s (“PAA”) general partner from May 2009 to November 2016. He was a member of the PAA Audit Committee from 2009 to 2016. Prior public board service includes board and audit committee service for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings from April 2011 to May 2016 and on the board and audit committee of Charter Communications Inc. from November 2009 through January 2011. In addition to public boards, Mr. Temple has served on private boards including Brawler Industries, National HME, Loenbro, Inc. and HMT, LLC and as Operating Executive/Senior Advisor for Tailwind Capital, LLC, a New York-based middle-market private equity firm. Since March 2016 and November 2016 he has served on the boards of directors of OBDC and the Company, respectively, since August 2018 he has served on the board of directors of OTF, since September 2020 he has served on the board of directors of OCIC and since August 2021 he has served on the board of directors of OTIC. Mr. Temple previously served on the board of directors of OBDE from February 2020 until January 2025 and on the board of directors of OTF II from November 2021 until March 2025. Mr. Temple holds a B.B.A., magna cum laude, from the University of Texas and an M.B.A. from Harvard.

We believe Mr. Temple’s broad investment management background, together with his financial and accounting knowledge, brings important and valuable skills to the Board.

Mr. D’Alelio was formerly a Managing Director and CIO for Fixed Income at Putnam Investments, Boston, where he served from 1989 until he retired in 2002. While at Putnam, he served on the Investment Policy Committee, which was responsible for oversight of all investments. He also sat on various Committees including attribution and portfolio performance. Prior to joining Putnam, he was a portfolio manager at Keystone Investments and prior to that, he was an Investment Analyst at The Hartford Ins. Co. Since 2002, Mr. D’Alelio has served as an Executive in Residence at the University of Mass., Boston—School of Management. He is also President of the UMass Foundation. He serves on the Advisory Committees of Ceres Farms. Since September 2009, Mr. D’Alelio has served as director of Vermont Farmstead Cheese. Mr. D'Alelio served on the board of Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund from April 2010 until February 2025, Blackstone Long Short Credit Income Fund from November 2010 until February 2025 and Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund from May 2021 until February 2025. Since March 2016 and November 2016, he has served on the boards of directors of OBDC and the Company, respectively, since August 2018 he has served on the board of directors of OTF, since September 2020 he has served on the board of directors of OCIC and since August 2021 he has served on the board of directors of OTIC. Mr. D’Alelio previously served on the board of directors of OBDE from February 2020 until January 2025 and on the board of directors of OTF II from November 2021 until March 2025. Mr. D’Alelio’s previous corporate board assignments include Archibald Candy, Doane Pet Care, Trump Entertainment Resorts and UMass Memorial Hospital. Mr. D’Alelio is a graduate of the Univ. of Mass Boston and has an M.B.A. from Boston University.

We believe Mr. D’Alelio’s numerous management positions and broad experiences in the financial services sector provide him with skills and valuable insight in handling complex financial transactions and issues, all of which make him well qualified to serve on the Board.

Ms. Weiler was formerly a Managing Director and a member of the Management Committee of Crescent Capital Group, a Los Angeles-based asset management firm (“Crescent”), where she served from January 2011 until she retired in December 2020. During that time, Ms. Weiler was responsible for the oversight of Crescent’s CLO management business from July 2017 through December 2020, and managed several multi-strategy credit funds from January 2011 through June 2017. During her tenure at Crescent, she also served on the Risk Management and Diversity & Inclusion committees. From October 1995 to December 2010, Ms. Weiler was a Managing Director at Trust Company of the West, a Los Angeles-based asset management firm (“TCW”). At TCW, she managed several multi-strategy credit funds from July 2006 to December 2010, and served as lead portfolio manager for TCW’s high-yield bond strategy from October 1995 to June 2006. Ms. Weiler has served on the board of directors of Jefferies Financial Group Inc. since July 2021. She is a member of the Cedars-Sinai Board of Governors and is actively involved in 100 Women in Finance. Ms. Weiler joined the boards of directors of the Company, OBDC, OTF and OCIC in February 2021 and OTIC in August 2021. Ms. Weiler previously served on the board of directors of OBDE from February 2021 until January 2025 and on the board of directors of OTF II from November 2021 until March 2025. Ms. Weiler holds a B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.

We believe Ms. Weiler’s broad investment management background, together with her financial and accounting knowledge, brings important and valuable skills to the Board.

Mr. Woolridge was formerly a Managing Director of Barings Real Estate Advisers, LLC (“Barings”), the real estate investment unit of Barings LLC, a global asset management firm. Mr. Woolridge most recently served as Head of the U.S. Capital Markets for Equity Real Estate Funds at Barings. Mr. Woolridge previously served as Vice President and Managing Director and Head of Debt Capital Markets - Equities of Cornerstone Real Estate Advisers LLC (prior to its rebranding under the Barings name) (“Cornerstone”) from January 2013 to September 2016 and as Vice President Special Servicing from January 2010 to January 2013. Prior to joining Cornerstone, Mr. Woolridge served as a Managing Director of Babson Capital Management LLC (“Babson”) from January 2000 to January 2010. Prior to joining Babson, Mr. Woolridge served as Director of Loan Originations and Assistant Regional Director of MassMutual Financial Group from September 1982 to January 2000. Since 2009, Mr. Woolridge has served on the University of Massachusetts (UMass) Board of Trustees and has previously served as Chairman of the Board and as Chairman of the Board’s

126

Committee on Administration and Finance. Mr. Woolridge has served as trustee for University of Massachusetts Global since 2021. Since 2022, Mr. Woolridge has served as a director of Trumbull Property Income Fund and Fallon Health. Mr. Woolridge has also served on the UMass Foundation’s investment committee since 2021. Mr. Woolridge serves as Board Committee Chair and President

of Springfield Riverfront Development Corporation – Basketball Hall of Fame. Mr. Woolridge previously served on the Board of Trustees of Baystate Health from 2005 to 2016, which included service as Chairman of the Board and on the Board’s compensation, finance, governance and strategy committees. Mr. Woolridge joined the boards of directors of the Company, OBDC, OCIC, OTF and OTIC in November 2021. Mr. Woolridge previously served on the board of directors of OBDE from November 2021 until January 2025 and on the board of directors of OTF II from November 2021 until March 2025. Mr. Woolridge holds a B.S. from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and is a Certified Commercial Investment Member.

We believe Mr. Woolridge’s numerous management positions and broad experiences in the asset management and financial services sectors provide him with skills and valuable insight in handling complex financial transactions and issues, all of which makes him well qualified to serve on the Board.

Interested Director

Mr. Packer is the Chief Executive Officer of each of the Blue Owl BDCs and is a member of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee and the Technology Lending Investment Committee of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers. Additionally, Mr. Packer is a Co-President and a director of Blue Owl. Mr. Packer is also the Head of the Credit platform and serves as a Co-Chief Investment Officer for each of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers. Previously, Mr. Packer co-founded Owl Rock Capital Partners (“Owl Rock”), the predecessor firm to Blue Owl’s Credit platform. In addition, since March 2016 and November 2016 Mr. Packer has served on the boards of directors of OBDC and the Company, respectively, since August 2018 he has served on the board of directors of OTF, since September 2020 he has served on the board of directors of OCIC and since August 2021 he has served on the board of directors of OTIC. Mr. Packer previously served on the board of directors of OBDE from February 2020 until January 2025 and on the board of directors of OTF II from November 2021 until March 2025. Mr. Packer also served as President of OBDE since its inception until January 2024 and as President of the Company, OBDC, OCIC, OTF, OTF II and OTIC since each of their inceptions until August 2024. Prior to co-founding Owl Rock, Mr. Packer was a Partner and Co-Head of Leveraged Finance in the Americas at Goldman, Sachs & Co. Mr. Packer joined Goldman, Sachs & Co. as a Managing Director and Head of High Yield Capital Markets in 2006 and was named partner in 2008. Prior to joining Goldman Sachs & Co., Mr. Packer was the Global Head of High Yield Capital Markets at Credit Suisse First Boston, and before that he worked at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Mr. Packer serves as Treasurer of the Board of Trustees of Greenwich Academy, and Co-Chair of the Honorary Board of Kids in Crisis, a nonprofit organization that serves children in Connecticut. Mr. Packer is also on the Advisory Board for the Mount Sinai Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and serves as a director of Wingspire Capital LLC. In addition, Mr. Packer is on the Foundation Board of Trustees for the McIntire School of Commerce, University of Virginia and is a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Virginia Athletics Foundation. Mr. Packer earned an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a B.S. from the University of Virginia.

We believe Mr. Packer’s depth of experience in corporate finance, capital markets and financial services gives the Board valuable industry-specific knowledge and expertise on these and other matters, and his history with us and the Adviser provides an important skill set and knowledge base to the Board.

Meetings and Attendance

The Board met eighteen times during 2025 and acted on various occasions by written consent. All directors then in office attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board held during the period for which they were a director and of the respective committees on which they served during 2025.

Board Attendance at the Annual Meeting

Our policy is to encourage our directors to attend each annual meeting; however, such attendance is not required at this time. Three board members attended the 2025 Annual Meeting.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Overall responsibility for our oversight rests with the Board. We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement pursuant to which the Adviser will manage the Company on a day-to-day basis. The Board is responsible for overseeing the Adviser and our other service providers in accordance with the provisions of the 1940 Act, applicable provisions of state and other laws and our charter. The Board is composed of six members, five of whom are directors who are not “interested persons” of the Company or the Adviser as defined in the 1940 Act. The Board meets in person at regularly scheduled quarterly meetings each year. In addition, the Board may hold special in-person or telephonic meetings or informal conference calls to discuss specific matters that may arise or require action between regular meetings. As described below, the Board has established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, an Audit Committee and a Co-Investment Committee, and may establish ad hoc committees or working groups from time to time, to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. The Board has appointed Edward D’Alelio, an independent director, to serve in the role of Chairman of the Board. The Chairman’s role is to preside at all meetings of the Board and to act as a liaison with the Adviser, counsel and other directors generally between meetings. The Chairman serves as a key point person for dealings between management and the directors. The Chairman also may perform such other functions as may be delegated by the

127

Board from time to time. The Board reviews matters related to its leadership structure annually. The Board has determined that the Board’s leadership structure is appropriate because it allows the Board to exercise informed and independent judgment over the matters under its purview and it allocates areas of responsibility among committees of directors and the full Board in a manner that enhances effective oversight.

We are subject to a number of risks, including investment, compliance, operational and valuation risks, among others. Risk oversight forms part of the Board’s general oversight of the Company and is addressed as part of various Board and committee activities. Day-to-day risk management functions are subsumed within the responsibilities of the Adviser and other service providers (depending on the nature of the risk), which carry out our investment management and business affairs. The Adviser and other service providers employ a variety of processes, procedures and controls to identify various events or circumstances that give rise to risks, to lessen the probability of their occurrence and to mitigate the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur. Each of the Adviser and other service providers has their own independent interest in risk management, and their policies and methods of risk management will depend on their functions and business models. The Board recognizes that it is not possible to identify all of the risks that may affect the Company or to develop processes and controls to eliminate or mitigate their occurrence or effects. As part of its regular oversight of the Company, the Board interacts with and reviews reports from, among others, the Adviser, our chief compliance officer, our independent registered public accounting firm and counsel, as appropriate, regarding risks faced by the Company and applicable risk controls. The Board may, at any time and in its discretion, change the manner in which it conducts risk oversight.

Communications with Directors

Shareholders and other interested parties may contact any member (or all members) of the Board by mail. To communicate with the Board, any individual directors or any group or committee of directors, correspondence should be addressed to the Board or any such individual directors or group or committee of directors by either name or title. All such correspondence should be sent to Blue Owl Capital Corporation II, 399 Park Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, New York 10022, Attention: Secretary.

Committees of the Board

The Board has an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Co-Investment Committee and may form additional committees in the future. A brief description of each committee is included in this Form 10-K and the charters of the Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance can be accessed on the Company’s website at www.blueowlproducts.com.

As of December 31, 2025, the members of each of the Board’s committees were as follows (the names of the respective committee chairperson are bolded):

Audit Committee

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Co-Investment Committee

Edward D'Alelio

Christopher M. Temple

Eric Kaye

Melissa Weiler

Victor Woolridge

Audit Committee Governance, Responsibilities and Meetings

In accordance with its written charter adopted by the Board, the Audit Committee:

(a)assists the Board’s oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm;

(b)prepares an Audit Committee report, if required by the SEC, to be included in our annual proxy statement;

(c)oversees the scope of the annual audit of our financial statements, the quality and objectivity of our financial statements, accounting and financial reporting policies and internal controls;

(d)determines the selection, appointment, retention and termination of our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as approving the compensation thereof;

(e)pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided to us and certain other persons by such independent registered public accounting firm; and

(f)acts as a liaison between our independent registered public accounting firm and the Board.

The Audit Committee had nine formal meetings in 2025.

Our Board has determined that Christopher M. Temple, an independent director, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act.

128

Each member of the Audit Committee simultaneously serves on the audit committees of three or more public companies, and the Board has determined that each member’s simultaneous service on the audit committees of other public companies does not impair such member’s ability to effectively serve on the Audit Committee.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Governance, Responsibilities and Meetings

In accordance with its written charter adopted by the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:

(a)recommends to the Board persons to be nominated by the Board for election at the Company’s meetings of our shareholders, special or annual, if any, or to fill any vacancy on the Board that may arise between shareholder meetings;

(b)makes recommendations with regard to the tenure of the directors;

(c)is responsible for overseeing an annual evaluation of the Board and its committee structure to determine whether the structure is operating effectively; and

(d)recommends to the Board the compensation to be paid to the independent directors of the Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider for nomination to the Board candidates submitted by our shareholders or from other sources it deems appropriate.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee had two formal meetings in 2025.

Director Nominations

Nomination for election as a director may be made by, or at the direction of, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or by shareholders in compliance with the procedures set forth in our bylaws.

Shareholder proposals or director nominations to be presented at the annual meeting of shareholders, other than shareholder proposals submitted pursuant to the SEC’s Rule 14a-8, must be submitted in accordance with the advance notice procedures and other requirements set forth in our bylaws. These requirements are separate from the requirements discussed above to have the shareholder nomination or other proposal included in our proxy statement and form of proxy/voting instruction card pursuant to the SEC’s rules.

Our bylaws require that the proposal or recommendation for nomination must be delivered to, or mailed and received at, the principal executive offices of the Company not earlier than the 150th day prior to the one year anniversary of the date the Company’s proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting, or later than the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. If the date of the annual meeting has changed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, shareholder proposals or director nominations must be so received not earlier than the 150th day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than the 120th day prior to the date of such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.

In evaluating director nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers, among others, the following factors:

•whether the individual possesses high standards of character and integrity, relevant experience, a willingness to ask hard questions and the ability to work well with others;

•whether the individual is free of conflicts of interest that would violate applicable law or regulation or interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director;

•whether the individual is willing and able to devote sufficient time to the affairs of the Company and be diligent in fulfilling the responsibilities of a director and Board Committee member;

•whether the individual has the capacity and desire to represent the balanced, best interests of the shareholder as a whole and not a special interest group or constituency; and

•whether the individual possesses the skills, experiences (such as current business experience or other such current involvement in public service, academia or scientific communities), particular areas of expertise, particular backgrounds, and other characteristics that will help ensure the effectiveness of the Board and Board committees.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s goal is to assemble a board that brings to the Company a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high-quality business and professional experience.

Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider other factors as they may deem are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Board also believes it appropriate for certain key members of our management to participate as members of the Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are relevant to our business and who are willing to continue in service are considered for re-nomination. If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service or if

129

the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identify the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the criteria above. The members of the Board are polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the aforementioned criteria. Research may also be performed to identify qualified individuals. To date, we have not engaged third parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying potential nominees, although we reserve the right in the future to retain a third-party search firm, if necessary.

The Board has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. In determining whether to recommend a director nominee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers and discusses diversity, among other factors, with a view toward the needs of the Board as a whole. The Board generally conceptualizes diversity expansively to include, without limitation, concepts such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill and other qualities that contribute to the Board, when identifying and recommending director nominees. The Board believes that the inclusion of diversity as one of many factors considered in selecting director nominees is consistent with the Board’s goal of creating a Board that best serves the needs of the Company and the interests of its shareholders.

Co-Investment Committee Governance, Responsibilities and Meetings

The Co-Investment committee is responsible for reviewing and making certain findings in respect of co-investment transactions pursuant to the exemptive relief that has been granted by the SEC to the Adviser and its affiliates to co-invest with other funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates in a manner consistent with the our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. The Co-Investment Committee was formed on February 18, 2025, and had three formal meetings in 2025.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, the Company’s directors and executive officers, and any persons holding more than 10% of its shares, are required to report their beneficial ownership and any changes therein to the SEC and the Company. Specific due dates for those reports have been established, and the Company is required to report herein any failure to file such reports by those due dates. Based on the Company’s review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 filed by such persons and information provided by the Company’s directors and officers, the Company believes that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to such persons were timely filed.

Code of Business Conduct

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct which applies to our executive officers, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as well as every officer, director and employee of the Company. Our Code of Business Conduct can be accessed on our website at www.blueowlproducts.com.

There have been no material changes to our corporate code of ethics or material waivers of the code that apply to our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer. If we make any substantive amendment to, or grant a waiver from, a provision of our Code of Business Conduct, we will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website at www.blueowlproducts.com or file a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We have also adopted an insider trading policy which applies to our executive officers, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as well as every officer, director and employee of the Company. This policy is filed as Exhibit 19 to this Annual Report.

Information about Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors

The following sets forth certain information regarding the executive officers of the Company who are not directors of the Company:


Name	Age	Position	Officer Since
Logan Nicholson	45	President	2024
Karen Hager	53	Chief Compliance Officer	2018

Neena Reddy	48	Vice President and Secretary	2019
Jonathan Lamm	51	Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer	2021
Matthew Swatt	37	Co-Chief Accounting Officer, Co-Treasurer and Co-Controller	2021
Shari Withem	43	Co-Chief Accounting Officer, Co-Treasurer and Co-Controller	2021

The address for each of our executive officers is c/o Blue Owl Capital Corporation II, 399 Park Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

Ms. Hager is the Global Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Managing Director of Blue Owl, a member of Blue Owl’s Management Committee and Operating Committee and also serves as the Chief Compliance Officer of Blue Owl and each of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers and the Blue Owl BDCs. Prior to joining Owl Rock, the predecessor firm to Blue Owl’s Credit platform in

130

March 2018, Ms. Hager was Chief Compliance Officer at Abbott Capital Management. Previous to Abbott, Ms. Hager worked as SVP, Director of Global Compliance and Chief Compliance Officer at The Permal Group, and as Director of Compliance at Dominick & Dominick Advisors LLC. Prior to joining Dominick & Dominick Advisors LLC, Ms. Hager was a Senior Securities Compliance Examiner/Staff Accountant at the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Ms. Hager received a B.S. in Accounting from Brooklyn College of the City University of New York.

Mr. Nicholson is a Senior Managing Director at Blue Owl, a member of the Direct Lending Investment Team, and a member of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. Mr. Nicholson is also President of the Company, OBDC II and OCIC, and Portfolio Manager for certain funds in Blue Owl’s Diversified Lending strategy, including the Company, OBDC II and OCIC. Prior to joining Blue Owl in 2023, Mr. Nicholson was a Co-Founder and Partner at Brinley Partners, a startup private credit asset manager, from 2021 to 2023. Previously, Mr. Nicholson was at Goldman Sachs & Co. (“Goldman”) from 2003 to 2021, where he was most recently a Managing Director and Head of U.S. Leveraged Finance Capital Markets. During his time at Goldman, he was responsible for structuring, risk management and distribution of capital commitments for both Leveraged Loans and High Yield bonds, and he was also appointed as a member of the LSTA Board of Directors. Additionally, Mr. Nicholson spent 2021 in a leadership role at healthcare firm Humana Inc., where he was Senior Vice President of Corporate Development and responsible for all M&A activity. Mr. Nicholson received a B.S. in Systems Engineering with a double major in Economics from the University of Virginia.

Ms. Reddy is a Vice President and Secretary of each of the Blue Owl BDCs and Chief Legal Officer of each of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers. Ms. Reddy also serves as the General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Blue Owl, and as a member of Blue Owl’s Operating Committee. Prior to joining Owl Rock, the predecessor firm to Blue Owl’s Credit platform, Ms. Reddy was associate general counsel at Goldman, Sachs & Co LLC, from June 2010 to April 2019 and was dedicated to Goldman Sachs Asset Management L.P. (“GSAM”), where she was responsible for GSAM managed direct alternative products, including private credit. Prior to GSAM, Ms. Reddy practiced as a corporate attorney at Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP and at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP. Ms. Reddy joined the Board of Directors for Partnership for New York City, representing Blue Owl, in 2024. Prior to becoming an attorney, Ms. Reddy was a financial analyst in the private wealth division at Goldman, Sachs & Co. Ms. Reddy received a J.D. from New York University School of Law and a B.A. in English, magna cum laude, from Georgetown University.

Mr. Lamm is Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of each of the Blue Owl BDCs. Mr. Lamm is also a Senior Managing Director of Blue Owl. Prior to joining Owl Rock, the predecessor firm to Blue Owl’s Credit platform, in April 2021, Mr. Lamm served as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (“GSBD”), a business development company traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Lamm was responsible for building and overseeing GSBD’s finance, treasury, accounting and operations functions from April 2013 through March 2021, including during its initial public offering in March 2015. During his time at Goldman Sachs, Mr. Lamm also served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Goldman Sachs Private Middle Market Credit LLC, Goldman Sachs Private Middle Market Credit II LLC and Goldman Sachs Middle Market Lending Corp. prior to the completion of its merger with GSBD in October 2020. Throughout his twenty-two years at Goldman Sachs, Mr. Lamm held various positions. From 2013 to 2021, Mr. Lamm served as Managing Director, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer at GSAM Credit Alternatives. From 2007 to 2013, Mr. Lamm served as Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer at GSAM Credit Alternatives. From 2005 to 2007, Mr. Lamm served as Vice President in the Financial Reporting group and, from 1999 to 2005, he served as a Product Controller. Prior to joining Goldman Sachs, Mr. Lamm worked in public accounting at Deloitte & Touche.

Mr. Swatt is the Co-Chief Accounting Officer, Co-Treasurer and Co-Controller of each of the Blue Owl BDCs. Mr. Swatt is also a Managing Director of Blue Owl. Prior to joining Owl Rock, the predecessor firm to Blue Owl’s Credit platform, in May 2016, Mr. Swatt was an Assistant Controller at Guggenheim Partners in their Private Credit group, where he was responsible for the finance, accounting, and financial reporting functions. Preceding that role, Mr. Swatt worked within the Financial Services--Alternative Investments practice of PwC where he specialized in financial reporting, fair valuation of illiquid investments and structured products, internal controls and other technical accounting matters pertaining to alternative investment advisors, hedge funds, business development companies and private equity funds. Mr. Swatt received a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Maryland and is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in New York.

Ms. Withem is the Co-Chief Accounting Officer, Co-Treasurer and Co-Controller of each of the Blue Owl BDCs. Ms. Withem is also a Managing Director of Blue Owl. Prior to joining Owl Rock, the predecessor firm to Blue Owl’s Credit platform, in March 2018, Ms. Withem was Vice President of Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc., a business development company traded on the NYSE , where she was responsible for accounting, financial reporting, treasury and internal controls functions. Preceding that role, Ms. Withem worked for MCG Capital Corporation, a business development company formerly traded on the Nasdaq and Deloitte in the Audit and Assurance Practice. Ms. Withem received a B.S. in Accounting from James Madison University and is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in Virginia.

Portfolio Managers

131

four direct lending investment committees focus on a specific investment strategy (Diversified Lending, Technology Lending, First Lien Lending and Opportunistic Lending). Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz, Craig W. Packer and Alexis Maged sit on each of Blue Owl’s direct lending investment committees. In addition to Messrs. Ostrover, Lipschultz, Packer and Maged, the Diversified Lending Investment Committee is comprised of Matthias Ederer, Logan Nicholson, Meenal Mehta and Patrick Linnemann. We consider the individuals on the Diversified Lending Investment Committee to be our portfolio managers. The Investment Team, under the Diversified Lending Investment Committee’s supervision, sources investment opportunities, conducts research, performs due diligence on potential investments, structures our investments and monitors our portfolio companies on an ongoing basis. The Diversified Lending Investment Committee meets regularly to consider our investments, direct our strategic initiatives and supervise the actions taken by the Adviser on our behalf. In addition, the Diversified Lending Investment Committee reviews and determines whether to make prospective investments (including approving parameters or guidelines pursuant to which certain investments may be made or sold consistent with our investment objective) and monitors the performance of the investment portfolio. Each investment opportunity requires the approval of a majority of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. Follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies may require the Diversified Lending Investment Committee’s approval beyond that obtained when the initial investment in the portfolio company was made. In addition, temporary investments, such as those in cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less, may require approval by the Diversified Lending Investment Committee. The compensation packages of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee members from the Adviser include various combinations of discretionary bonuses and variable incentive compensation based primarily on performance for services provided and may include shares of Blue Owl.

None of the Adviser’s investment professionals receive any direct compensation from us in connection with the management of our portfolio. Certain members of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee, through their financial interests in the Adviser, are entitled to a portion of the profits earned by the Adviser, which includes any fees payable to the Adviser under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, less expenses incurred by the Adviser in performing its services under the Investment Advisory Agreement.

The Investment Team performs a similar role for OBDC and OCIC, and certain members of the Investment Team also perform a similar role for OTF and OTIC, from which the Adviser and its affiliates may receive incentive fees. See “ITEM 1. BUSINESS – Affiliated Transactions” for a description of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ allocation policy governing allocations of investments among us and other investment vehicles with similar or overlapping strategies, as well as a description of certain other relationships between us and the Adviser. See “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS — Risks Related to Our Adviser and Its Affiliates — Our Adviser and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest with respect to services performed for their respective other accounts and clients or issuers in which we may invest.” for a discussion of potential conflicts of interests.

The members of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee function as portfolio managers with the most significant responsibility for the day-to-day management of our portfolio. Information regarding the Diversified Lending Investment Committee, is as follows:


Name						Year of Birth
Douglas I. Ostrover						1962
Marc S. Lipschultz						1969
Craig W. Packer						1966
Alexis Maged						1965

Logan Nicholson						1980
Meenal Mehta						1975
Patrick Linnemann						1983
Matthias Ederer						1981

In addition to managing our investments, our portfolio managers also manage other registered investment companies and BDCs, other pooled investment vehicles and other accounts, as indicated below. The following table identifies, as of December 31, 2025: (i) the number of registered investment companies and BDCs (including us), other pooled investment vehicles and other accounts

132

managed by each portfolio manager; (ii) the total assets of such companies, vehicles and accounts; and (iii) the number and total assets of such companies, vehicles and accounts that are subject to an advisory fee based on performance.


Type of Account	Number of Accounts	Assets of Accounts (in millions)	Number of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee	Assets Subject to a Performance Fee (in millions)
Douglas I. Ostrover
Registered investment companies/Business development companies	5	$77,056	5	$77,056
Other pooled investment vehicles	40	15,115	12	9,823
Other accounts	—	—	—	—


Type of Account	Number of Accounts	Assets of Accounts (in millions)	Number of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee	Assets Subject to a Performance Fee (in millions)
Marc S. Lipschultz
Registered investment companies/Business development companies	5	$77,056	5	$77,056
Other pooled investment vehicles	44	25,889	16	20,597
Other accounts	—	—	—	—


Type of Account	Number of Accounts	Assets of Accounts (in millions)	Number of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee	Assets Subject to a Performance Fee (in millions)
Craig W. Packer
Registered investment companies/Business development companies	5	$77,056	5	$77,056
Other pooled investment vehicles	37	13,750	11	9,261
Other accounts	—	—	—	—


Type of Account	Number of Accounts	Assets of Accounts (in millions)	Number of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee	Assets Subject to a Performance Fee (in millions)
Alexis Maged
Registered investment companies/Business development companies	5	$77,056	5	$77,056
Other pooled investment vehicles	37	13,750	11	9,261
Other accounts	—	—	—	—


Type of Account	Number of Accounts	Assets of Accounts (in millions)	Number of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee	Assets Subject to a Performance Fee (in millions)
Logan Nicholson
Registered investment companies/Business development companies	3	$55,846	3	$55,846
Other pooled investment vehicles	19	9,424	6	7,913
Other accounts	—	—	—	—

133


Type of Account	Number of Accounts	Assets of Accounts (in millions)	Number of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee	Assets Subject to a Performance Fee (in millions)
Meenal Mehta
Registered investment companies/Business development companies	3	$55,846	3	$55,846
Other pooled investment vehicles	19	9,424	6	7,913
Other accounts	—	—	—	—


Type of Account	Number of Accounts	Assets of Accounts (in millions)	Number of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee	Assets Subject to a Performance Fee (in millions)
Patrick Linneman
Registered investment companies/Business development companies	3	$55,846	3	$55,846
Other pooled investment vehicles	19	9,424	6	7,913
Other accounts	—	—	—	—


Type of Account	Number of Accounts	Assets of Accounts (in millions)	Number of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee	Assets Subject to a Performance Fee (in millions)
Matthias Ederer
Registered investment companies/Business development companies	3	$55,846	3	$55,846
Other pooled investment vehicles	19	9,424	6	7,913
Other accounts	—	—	—	—

The management and incentive fees payable by the Blue Owl Credit Clients are based on the gross or net assets and performance, respectively of each Blue Owl Client.

Biographical information regarding each member of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee, who is not a director or executive officer of the Company is as follows:

Mr. Ostrover is Co-Chief Executive Officer of Blue Owl and the chairman of Blue Owl’s board of directors. Mr. Ostrover is also the Co-Chief Executive Officer and serves as a Co-Chief Investment Officer of each of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers. Mr. Ostrover is also a member of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee and the Technology Lending Investment Committee of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers. Previously, Mr. Ostrover co-founded Owl Rock, the predecessor firm to Blue Owl’s Credit platform. Mr. Ostrover served on the boards of directors of the Company and OBDC and from 2016 through 2021, on the board of directors of OTF from 2018 through 2021, and on the boards of directors of OBDE and OCIC from 2020 through 2021. Prior to co-founding Owl Rock, Mr. Ostrover was one of the founders of GSO Capital Partners (GSO), Blackstone’s alternative credit platform, and a Senior Managing Director at Blackstone until June 2015. Prior to co-founding GSO in 2005, Mr. Ostrover was a Managing Director and Chairman of the Leveraged Finance Group of Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB). Prior to his role as Chairman, Mr. Ostrover was Global Co-Head of CSFB's Leveraged Finance Group, during which time he was responsible for all of CSFB’s origination, distribution and trading activities relating to high yield securities, leveraged loans, high yield credit derivatives and distressed securities. Mr. Ostrover joined CSFB in November 2000 when CSFB acquired Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (“DLJ”), where he was a Managing Director in charge of High Yield and Distressed Sales, Trading and Research. Mr. Ostrover had been a member of DLJ’s high yield team since he joined the firm in 1992. Mr. Ostrover is actively involved in non-profit organizations including serving on the Board of Directors of the Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Mount Sinai Health System, and the Leadership Council for Memorial Sloan Kettering. Mr. Ostrover also serves on the investment committee of the Brunswick School. Mr. Ostrover received an M.B.A. from New York University Stern School of Business and a B.A. in Economics from the University of Pennsylvania.

Mr. Lipschultz is Co-Chief Executive Officer of Blue Owl and a member of Blue Owl’s board of directors. Mr. Lipschultz also serves as Co-Chief Investment Officer for each of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers. Previously, Mr. Lipschultz co-founded Owl Rock, the predecessor firm to Blue Owl’s Credit platform. Prior to co-founding Owl Rock, Mr. Lipschultz spent more than two decades at KKR, serving on the firm’s Management Committee and as the Global Head of Energy and Infrastructure. Mr. Lipschultz has a wide range of experience in alternative investments, including leadership roles in private equity, private credit and real assets. Prior to

134

joining KKR, Mr. Lipschultz was with Goldman, Sachs & Co., where he focused on mergers and acquisitions and principal investment activities. Mr. Lipschultz served on the board of the Hess Corporation until 2025 and is actively involved in a variety of nonprofit organizations, serving as a trustee or board member of the 92nd Street Y, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Michael J. Fox Foundation, Mount Sinai Health System, Riverdale Country School and the Stanford University Board of Trustees. Mr. Lipschultz received an M.B.A. with high distinction, Baker Scholar, from Harvard Business School and an A.B. with honors and distinction, Phi Beta Kappa, from Stanford University.

Mr. Maged is Chief Credit Officer of Blue Owl, a member of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee and the Technology Lending Investment Committee of each of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers and Vice President of each of the Blue Owl BDCs. Mr. Maged is also a Senior Managing Director of Blue Owl. Prior to joining Owl Rock, the predecessor firm to Blue Owl’s Credit platform, in January 2016, Mr. Maged was Chief Financial Officer of Barkbox, Inc., a New York-based provider of pet-themed products and technology from September 2014 to November 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Maged was a Managing Director with Goldman Sachs & Co. from 2007 until 2014. At Goldman Sachs & Co., Mr. Maged held several leadership positions, including Chief Operating Officer of the investment bank’s Global Credit Finance businesses, Co-Chair of the Credit Markets Capital Committee and a member of the Firmwide Capital Committee. Prior to assuming that role in 2011, Mr. Maged served as Chief Underwriting Officer for the Americas and oversaw the U.S. Bank Debt Portfolio Group and US Loan Negotiation Group. From mid-2007 to the end of 2008, Mr. Maged was Head of Bridge Finance Capital Markets in the Americas Financing Group’s Leveraged Finance Group, where he coordinated the firm’s High Yield Bridge Lending and Syndication business. Prior to joining Goldman, Sachs & Co, Mr. Maged was Head of the Bridge Finance Group at Credit Suisse and also worked in the Loan Capital Markets Group at Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette (“DLJ”). Upon DLJ’s merger with Credit Suisse in 2000, Mr. Maged joined Credit Suisse’s Syndicated Loan Group and, in 2003, founded its Bridge Finance Group. Earlier in his career, Mr. Maged was a member of the West Coast Sponsor Coverage Group at Citigroup and the Derivatives Group at Republic National Bank, as well as a founding member of the Loan Syndication Group at Swiss Bank Corporation. Mr. Maged received an M.B.A. from New York University Stern School of Business and a B.A. from Vassar College.

Ms. Mehta is a Senior Managing Director of Blue Owl, a member of the Adviser’s Investment Team and a member of the Adviser’s Diversified Lending Investment Committee. Ms. Mehta is also a Co-Head of Underwriting for the Adviser’s Investment Team. Before joining Blue Owl, Ms. Mehta was a Managing Director at Antares Capital, a direct lender to middle-market firms based in New York. Prior to that, Ms. Mehta was a Vice President at GE Capital. Ms. Mehta began her career as a Manager at L&T Finance Limited, Mumbai India in the Treasury Group. Ms. Mehta received an M.B.A. from Goizueta Business School, Emory University, an M.S. in Management Studies with a specialization in Finance from NMIMS, Mumbai University and a B.S. in Commerce and Economics from Sydenham College, Mumbai University.

Mr. Linnemann is a Senior Managing Director of Blue Owl, a member of the Adviser’s Investment Team and, a member of the Adviser’s Diversified Lending Investment Committee. Mr. Linnemann is also a Portfolio Manager for certain funds in Blue Owl’s Diversified Lending strategy, including Blue Owl Diversified Lending Fund. Before joining Owl Rock, the predecessor firm to Blue Owl’s Credit platform, Mr. Linnemann was a Vice President at Angel Island Capital, the credit investment platform of Golden Gate Capital, from 2015 to 2016, where he focused on sourcing and evaluating credit investments. Before that, Mr. Linnemann was Vice President of the Leveraged Finance Capital Markets Group at Goldman Sachs & Co. in New York from 2006 to 2015. Mr. Linnemann received a BA in Economics from the University of Pennsylvania.

Ownership of Securities

The table below shows the dollar range of shares of our common stock to be beneficially owned by the members of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee as of February 26, 2026 stated as one of the following dollar ranges: None; $1-$10,000; $10,001- $50,000; $50,001-$100,000; $100,001–$500,000; $500,001–$1,000,000; or Over $1,000,000.

135


Name						Dollar Range of Equity Securities in Blue Owl Capital Corporation II(1)(2)
Douglas I. Ostrover						None
Marc S. Lipschultz						Over $1,000,000
Craig W. Packer						$500,001–$1,000,000
Alexis Maged						None
Logan Nicholson						None
Meenal Mehta						None
Patrick Linnemann						None
Matthias Ederer						None

______________

(1)Beneficial ownership determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) promulgated under the 1934 Act.

(2)The dollar range of equity securities of the Company beneficially owned by Diversified Lending Investment Committee members, if applicable, is calculated by multiplying the current net asset value per share of the Company times the number of shares beneficially owned.

136

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

None of our executive officers will receive direct compensation from us. We will reimburse the Adviser the allocable portion of the compensation paid by the Adviser (or its affiliates) to our chief compliance officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs (based on the percentage of time such individuals devote, on an estimated basis, to our business and affairs). The members of the Diversified Lending Investment Committee, through their financial interests in the Adviser, are entitled to a portion of the profits earned by the Adviser, which includes any fees payable to the Adviser under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, less expenses incurred by the Adviser in performing its services under the Investment Advisory Agreement.

Director Compensation

No compensation is expected to be paid to our director who is an “interested person,” as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Our directors who do not also serve in an executive officer capacity for us or the Adviser are entitled to receive annual cash retainer fees, fees for participating in in-person board and committee meetings and annual fees for serving as a committee chairperson, determined based on our net assets as of the end of each fiscal quarter. As of December 31, 2025, these directors were Edward D’Alelio, Eric Kaye, Christopher M. Temple, Melissa Weiler and Victor Woolridge. We pay each independent director the following amounts for serving as a director:


			Annual Committee Chair Cash Retainer
Assets Under Management	Annual Cash Retainer		Chair of the Board		Audit		Committee Chair
$0 < $2.5 Billion	$	150,000	$	15,000	$	10,000	$	5,000
$2.5 Billion < $5 Billion	$	200,000	$	15,000	$	10,000	$	5,000
$5 Billion < $10 Billion	$	250,000	$	15,000	$	10,000	$	5,000

$10 Billion < $15 Billion	$	300,000	$	15,000	$	10,000	$	5,000
≥ $15 Billion	$	350,000	$	15,000	$	10,000	$	5,000

We also reimburse each of the directors for all reasonable and authorized business expenses in accordance with our policies as in effect from time to time, including reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board meeting and each committee meeting not held concurrently with a board meeting.

The table below sets forth the compensation received by each director from the Company and the Fund Complex for service during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025:


Name	Fees Earned and Paid in Cash by the Company		Total Compensation from the Company		Total Compensation from the Fund Complex
Edward D'Alelio	$	340,000	$	340,000	$	1,442,800
Christopher M. Temple	335,000		335,000		1,416,500
Eric Kaye	330,000		330,000		1,390,200
Melissa Weiler	325,000		325,000		1,363,900
Victor Woolridge	325,000		325,000		1,363,900

137

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. These rules generally provide that a person is the beneficial owner of securities if such person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting thereof, or to dispose or direct the disposition thereof or has the right to acquire such powers within 60 days. The following table sets forth, as of February 26, 2026, the beneficial ownership according to information furnished to us by such persons or publicly available filings. Ownership information for those persons who beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock is based upon filings by such persons with the SEC and other information obtained from such persons of each current director, the nominees for director, the Company’s executive officers, the executive officers and directors as a group, and each person known to us to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

The percentage ownership is based on shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 26, 2026. To our knowledge, except as indicated in the footnotes to the table, each of the shareholders listed below has sole voting and/or investment power with respect to shares of our common stock beneficially owned by such shareholder.


	Shares Beneficially Owned
Name and Address	Number of Shares Owned	Percentage of Class Outstanding
Interested Directors
Craig W. Packer	116,667	*
Independent Directors
Edward D'Alelio	—	—	%
Eric Kaye	—	—	%
Christopher M. Temple	—	—	%
Melissa Weiler	—	—	%
Victor Woolridge	—	—	%
Executive Officers
Karen Hager	—	—	%
Logan Nicholson	—	—	%
Jonathan Lamm	—	—	%
Matthew Swatt	—	—	%
Shari Withem	—	—	%
Neena Reddy	—	—	%
All officers and directors as a group (12 persons)(1)	116,667	*

______________

*Less than 1%.

(1)The address for each of the directors and officers is c/o Blue Owl Capital Corporation II, 399 Park Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

138

Dollar Range of Equity Securities Beneficially Owned by Directors

The table below shows the dollar range of equity securities of the Company and the aggregate dollar range of equity securities of the Fund Complex that were beneficially owned by each director as of February 26, 2026 stated as one of the following dollar ranges: None; $1-$10,000; $10,001- $50,000; $50,001-$100,000; or Over $100,000. For purposes of this Form 10-K, the term “Fund Complex” is defined to include the Company, Blue Owl Capital Corporation, Blue Owl Credit Income Corp., Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. and Blue Owl Technology Income Corp.

Name of Director

Dollar Range of Equity Securities in Blue Owl Capital

Corporation II(1)(2)

Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the

Fund Complex(1)(3)

Interested Directors

Craig W. Packer

over $100,000

Independent Directors

Edward D'Alelio

—

over $100,000

Eric Kaye

—

over $100,000

Christopher M. Temple

—

over $100,000

Melissa Weiler

—

over $100,000

Victor Woolridge

—

over $100,000

______________

(1)Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) of the 1934 Act.

(2)The dollar range of equity securities of the Company beneficially owned by directors of the Company, if applicable, is calculated by multiplying the current net asset value per share by the number of equity securities beneficially owned.

(3)The dollar range of Equity Securities in the Fund Complex beneficially owned by directors of the Company, if applicable, is the sum of: (1) the product obtained by multiplying the closing price per share of OTF’s common stock on February 26, 2026, times the number of shares of OTF’s common stock beneficially owned, (2) the product obtained by multiplying the current net offering price of OCIC, times the number of shares of OCIC beneficially owned, (3) the product obtained by multiplying the current net offering price of OTIC., times the number of shares of OTIC beneficially owned, (4) the product obtained by multiplying the closing price of OBDC common stock as of February 26, 2026, by the number of shares of OBDC beneficially owned, and (5) the total dollar range of equity securities in the Company beneficially owned by the director.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

We have entered into both the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement with the Adviser. Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, we will pay the Adviser a base management fee and an incentive fee. See “ITEM 1. BUSINESS —Investment Advisory Agreement” for a description of how the fees payable to the Adviser will be determined. Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, we will reimburse the Adviser for expenses necessary to perform services related to our administration and operations. In addition, the Adviser or its affiliates may engage in certain origination activities and receive attendant arrangement, structuring or similar fees.

Our executive officers, certain of our directors and certain other finance professionals of Blue Owl also serve as executives of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers and officers and directors of the Company and certain professionals of Blue Owl and the Adviser are officers of Blue Owl Securities LLC. In addition, our executive officers and directors and the members of the Adviser and members of its Diversified Lending Investment Committee serve or may serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same, or a related, line of business as we do (including the Blue Owl Credit Advisers) including serving on their respective investment committees and/or on the investment committees of investments funds, accounts or other investment vehicles managed by our affiliates which may have investment objectives similar to our investment objective. At times we may compete with the Blue Owl Credit Clients and other Blue Owl clients, for capital and investment opportunities. As a result, we may not be given the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by the Blue Owl Credit Clients and other Blue Owl clients. This can create a potential conflict when allocating investment opportunities among us and such other Blue Owl Credit Clients and other Blue Owl clients. An investment opportunity that is suitable for multiple clients of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers or other affiliated advisers may not be capable of being shared among some or all of such clients and affiliates due to the limited scale of the opportunity or other factors, including regulatory restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act. However, for the Adviser and its affiliates to fulfill their fiduciary duties to each of their clients, the Blue Owl Credit Advisers have put in place investment allocation policies that seek to ensure the fair and equitable allocation of investment opportunities over time and addresses the co-investment restrictions set forth under the 1940 Act. In addition, from time to time, Blue Owl Securities LLC may purchase securities in certain of our offerings.

Allocation of Investment Opportunities

The Blue Owl Credit Advisers intend to allocate investment opportunities in a manner that is fair and equitable over time and is consistent with its allocation policies, so that no client of the Adviser or its affiliates is disadvantaged in relation to any other client of

139

the Adviser or its affiliates, taking into account such factors as the relative amounts of capital available for new investments, cash on hand, existing commitments and reserves, the investment programs and portfolio positions of the participating investment accounts, the clients for which participation is appropriate, targeted leverage level, targeted asset mix and any other factors deemed appropriate. The Blue Owl Credit Advisers intend to allocate common expenses among us and other clients of the Adviser and its affiliates in a manner that is fair and equitable over time or in such other manner as may be required by applicable law or the Investment Advisory Agreement. Fees and expenses generated in connection with potential portfolio investments that are not consummated will be allocated in a manner that is fair and equitable over time and in accordance with policies adopted by the Blue Owl Credit Advisers and the Investment Advisory Agreement.

The Blue Owl Credit Advisers have put in place investment allocation policies that seek to ensure the equitable allocation of investment opportunities and addresses the co-investment restrictions set forth under the 1940 Act. When we engage in co-investments as permitted by the exemptive relief described below, we will do so in a manner consistent with the Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ allocation policies. In situations where co-investment with other entities managed by the Adviser or its affiliates is not permitted or appropriate, such as when there is an opportunity to invest in different securities of the same issuer, a committee comprised of certain executive officers of the Blue Owl Credit Advisers (including executive officers of the Adviser) along with other officers and employees, will need to decide whether we or such other entity or entities will proceed with the investment. The allocation committee will make these determinations based on the Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ allocation policies, which generally requires that such opportunities be offered to eligible accounts in a manner that will be fair and equitable over time.

The Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ allocation policies are designed to manage the potential conflicts of interest between the Adviser’s fiduciary obligations to us and its or its affiliates' similar fiduciary obligations to other Blue Owl clients, however, there can be no assurance that the Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ efforts to allocate any particular investment opportunity fairly among all clients for whom such opportunity is appropriate will result in an allocation of all or part of such opportunity to us. Not all conflicts of interest can be expected to be resolved in our favor.

The allocation of investment opportunities among us and any of the other investment funds sponsored or accounts managed by the Adviser or its affiliates may not always, and often will not, be proportional. In general, pursuant to the Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ allocation policies, the process for making an allocation determination includes an assessment as to whether a particular investment opportunity (including any follow-on investment in, or disposition from, an existing portfolio company held by the Company or another investment fund or account) is suitable for us or another investment fund or account including the Blue Owl Credit Clients. In making this assessment, the Blue Owl Credit Advisers may consider a variety of factors, including, without limitation: the investment objectives, guidelines and strategies applicable to the investment fund or account; the nature of the investment, including its risk-return profile and expected holding period; portfolio diversification and concentration concerns; the liquidity needs of the investment fund or account; the ability of the investment fund or account to accommodate structural, timing and other aspects of the investment process; the life cycle of the investment fund or account; legal, tax and regulatory requirements and restrictions, including, as applicable, compliance with the 1940 Act (including requirements and restrictions pertaining to co-investment opportunities discussed below); compliance with existing agreements of the investment fund or account; the available capital of the investment fund or account; diversification requirements for BDCs or RICs; the gross asset value and net asset value of the investment fund or account; the current and targeted leverage levels for the investment fund or account; and portfolio construction considerations. The relevance of each of these criteria will vary from investment opportunity to investment opportunity. In circumstances where the investment objectives of multiple investment funds or accounts regularly overlap, while the specific facts and circumstances of each allocation decision will be determinative, the Blue Owl Credit Advisers may afford prior decisions precedential value.

Pursuant to the Blue Owl Credit Advisers’ allocation policies, if through the foregoing analysis, it is determined that an investment opportunity is appropriate for multiple investment funds or accounts, the Blue Owl Credit Advisers generally will determine the appropriate size of the opportunity for each such investment fund or account. If an investment opportunity falls within the mandate of two or more investment funds or accounts, and there are no restrictions on such funds or accounts investing with each other, then each investment fund or account will receive the amount of the investment that it is seeking, as determined based on the criteria set forth above.

Certain allocations may be more advantageous to us relative to one or all of the other investment funds, or vice versa. While the Blue Owl Credit Advisers will seek to allocate investment opportunities in a way that it believes in good faith is fair and equitable over time, there can be no assurance that our actual allocation of an investment opportunity, if any, or terms on which the allocation is made, will be as favorable as they would be if the conflicts of interest to which the Adviser may be subject did not exist. In addition, the Adviser and its affiliates are permitted to allocate an investment to a number of products across platforms that it views as appropriate for the particular investment objectives, strategies and characteristics of such products.

140

Exemptive Relief

We rely on an order for exemptive relief (the “Order”) to co-invest with other funds managed by the Adviser or certain affiliates in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors. Pursuant to the Order, we generally are permitted to co-invest with certain of our affiliates if such co-investments are done on the same terms and at the same time, as further detailed in the Order. The Order requires that a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of our Board make certain findings (1) in most instances when we co-invest with our affiliates in an issuer where our affiliate has an existing investment in the issuer, and (2) if we dispose of an asset acquired in a transaction under the Order unless the disposition is done on a pro rata basis. Pursuant to the Order, the Board will oversee our participation in the co-investment program. As required by the Order, we have adopted, and the Board has approved, policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the Order, and the Adviser and our Chief Compliance Officer will provide reporting to the Board.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

The Audit Committee is required to review and approve any transactions with related persons (as such term is defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K).

License Agreement

We have entered into a license agreement (the “License Agreement”), pursuant to which an affiliate of Blue Owl has granted the Company a non-exclusive license to use the name “Blue Owl.” Under the License Agreement, we have a right to use the Blue Owl name for so long as the Adviser or one of its affiliates remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, we have no legal right to the “Blue Owl” name or logo.

Material Non-Public Information

Our senior management, members of the Adviser’s Diversified Lending Investment Committee and other investment professionals from the Adviser may serve as directors of, or in a similar capacity with, companies in which we invest or in which we are considering making an investment. Through these and other relationships with a company, these individuals may obtain material non-public information that might restrict our ability to buy or sell the securities of such company under the policies of the company or applicable law.

Director Independence

Pursuant to our certificate of incorporation, a majority of the Board will at all times consist of directors who are not “interested persons” of us, of the Adviser, or of any of our or its respective affiliates, as defined in the 1940 Act. Under Section 303A.00 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, a director of a business development company (“BDC”) is considered to be independent if he or she is not an “interested person” of ours, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. We refer to these directors as our “Independent Directors.”

Consistent with these considerations, after review of all relevant transactions and relationships between each director, or any of his or her family members, and the Company, the Adviser, or of any of their respective affiliates, the Board has determined that each of Messrs. Kaye, Temple, D’Alelio, Woolridge and Ms. Weiler is independent, has no material relationship with the Company, and is not an “interested person” (as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) of the Company. Mr. Packer is considered an “interested person” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Company since he is employed by the Adviser.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

KPMG LLP, New York, New York, has been appointed by the Board to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. KPMG LLP acted as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023. The Company knows of no direct financial or material indirect financial interest of KPMG LLP in the Company.

141

Fees

Set forth in the table below are audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and all other fees billed to the Company by KPMG LLP for professional services performed for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:


	For the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2025		For the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2024
Audit Fees(1)	$	596,500	$	740,000
Audit-Related Fees(2)	—		—
Tax Fees(3)	288,655		299,872
All Other Fees(4)	—		—
Total Fees	$	885,155	$	1,039,872

______________

(1)“Audit Fees” are fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of interim financial statements or services that are normally provided by KPMG LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including comfort letters and consents.

(2)“Audit-Related Fees” are fees billed for assurance and related services by KPMG LLP that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements that are not reported under “Audit Fees.”

(3)“Tax Fees” are fees billed services rendered by KPMG LLP for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance, customs and duties and international tax planning.

(4)“All Other Fees” are fees billed for services other than those stated above.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has established a pre-approval policy that describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax and other services to be provided by KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The policy requires that the Audit Committee pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of such service does not impair the auditor’s independence.

Any requests for audit, audit-related, tax and other services that have not received general pre-approval must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval, irrespective of the amount, and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally, pre-approval is provided at regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to management.

142

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report:

(1)Financial Statements – Financial statements are included in Item 8. See the Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of this Annual Report.

(2)Financial Statement Schedules – None. We have omitted financial statement schedules because they are not required or are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated statements or notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

(3)Exhibits – The following is a list of all exhibits filed as a part of this Annual Report, including those incorporated by reference.

Please note that the agreements included as exhibits to this Form 10-K are included to provide information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about us or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement that have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC:


Exhibit Number			Description of Exhibits
3.1			Articles of Amendment and Restatement, dated April 4, 2017, as amended on June 22, 2023 (incorporated by reference Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 10, 2023).
3.2			Amended and Restated Bylaws, dated July 6, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 22, 2023).
4.1			Indenture, dated as of November 26, 2019 by and between Owl Rock Capital Corporation II and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the current report on Form 8-K, filed November 26, 2019).
4.2			Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 15, 2023, relating to the 8.450% Notes due 2026, by and between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as successor to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the current report on Form 8-K, filed November 15, 2023).
4.3*			Description of Securities.
10.1			Third Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement between Owl Rock Capital Corporation II and Owl Rock Capital Advisors LLC, dated May 18, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K, filed on May 19, 2021).
10.2			Form of Custodian Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (j) to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on N-2, filed on November 23, 2016).
10.3			Amended and Restated Administration Agreement between Owl Rock Capital Corporation and Owl Rock Capital Advisors LLC, dated May 18, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K, filed on May 19, 2021).
10.4			Form of License Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (k)(2) to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on N-2, filed on November 23, 2016).
10.5			Form of Sale and Contribution Agreement between Owl Rock Capital Corporation II and ORCC II Financing LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 4, 2017).
10.6			Amended and Restated Non-Recourse Carveout Guaranty Agreement, dated as of March 11, 2019, by the Company in favor of State Street Bank and Trust Company, on behalf of certain secured parties, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 12, 2019).
10.7			Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the current report on Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2021).
10.8			Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 10, 2022).
10.9			License Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2023, between Blue Owl Capital Corporation II and Blue Owl Capital Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 6, 2023).

143


10.10			Indenture and Security Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2023, by and between Owl Rock CLO XIII, LLC, as Issuer, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 15, 2023).
10.11			Collateral Management Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2023, by and between Owl Rock CLO XIII, LLC and Blue Owl Credit Advisors LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 15, 2023).
10.12			Loan Sale Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2023, between Blue Owl Capital Corporation II, as Seller, and Owl Rock CLO XIII, LLC, as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 15, 2023).
10.13			Loan Sale Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2023, between ORCC II Financing LLC and OR Lending II LLC, as Sellers, and Owl Rock CLO XIII, LLC, as Purchaser (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 15, 2023).
10.14			Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated January 12, 2024, between Blue Owl Capital Corporation II, as Borrower, the Lenders and Issuing Banks party thereto, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 18, 2024).
10.15			Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2025, by and among ORCC II Financing LLC, as Borrower, the Lenders from time to time parties thereto, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Sole Lead Arranger, Syndication Agent and Administrative Agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company as Collateral Administrator, Collateral Agent and Collateral Custodian (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 28, 2025).
10.16			Fourth Amended and Restated Margining Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2025, between ORCC II Financing LLC, as Borrower, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Administrative Agreement under the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2025, by and among ORCC II Financing LLC, as Borrower, the Lenders from time to time parties thereto, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Sole Lead Arranger, Syndication Agent and Administrative Agent, State Street Bank and Trust Company as Collateral Administrator, Collateral Agent and Collateral Custodian (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 28, 2025).
19.1*			Insider Trading Policy
21.1*			Subsidiary List
24.1			Power of Attorney (included on signature page hereto).
31.1*			Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*			Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1**			Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2**			Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1*			Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Supplemental Information.
99.2*			Supplemental Financial Information of Blue Owl Credit SLF LLC (unaudited) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025.
99.3*			Supplemental Financial Information of Blue Owl Leasing LLC as of and for the period from June 30, 2025 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2025

*Filed herewith.

**Furnished herewith.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

Not applicable.

144

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	Blue Owl Capital Corporation II

Date: March 5, 2026	By:	/s/ Jonathan Lamm
		Jonathan Lamm
		Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Craig W. Packer and Jonathan Lamm, and each of them, such person’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and revocation, for such person and in such person’s name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign one or more Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, and any and all amendments thereto, and to file same with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as such person might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents and each of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities on March 5, 2026.

145


Name						Title

/s/ Craig W. Packer						Chief Executive Officer and Director
Craig W. Packer

/s/ Edward D’Alelio						Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Edward D’Alelio

/s/ Christopher M. Temple						Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee
Christopher M. Temple

/s/ Eric Kaye						Director and Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Eric Kaye

/s/ Melissa Weiler						Director
Melissa Weiler

/s/ Victor Woolridge						Director
Victor Woolridge

/s/ Jonathan Lamm						Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Jonathan Lamm

/s/ Matthew Swatt						Co-Chief Accounting Officer, Co-Treasurer and Co-Controller
Matthew Swatt

/s/ Shari Withem						Co-Chief Accounting Officer, Co-Treasurer and Co-Controller
Shari Withem

146